The design platform – a coherent platform description of heterogeneous design assets for suppliers of highly customised systems

References

• André, Samuel, Roland Stolt, and Fredrik Elgh. 2016. “A Platform Model for Suppliers of Customized Systems: Creating an Ability to Master Fluctuating Requirements.” Paper presented at the IDETC/CIE 2016 international design engineering technical conferences & computers & information in engineering conference, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, August 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, D., J. Gao, K. Case, J. Harding, B. Young, S. Cochrane, and S. Dani. 2007. “An Engineering Design Knowledge Reuse Methodology Using Process Modelling.” Research in Engineering Design 18 (1): 37–48. doi: 10.1007/s00163-007-0028-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blessing, Lucienne T. M., and Amaresh Chakrabarti. 2009. DRM, A Design Research Methodology. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brière-Côté, Antoine, Louis Rivest, and Alain Desrochers. 2010. “Adaptive Generic Product Structure Modelling for Design Reuse in Engineer-to-order Products.” Computers in Industry 61 (1): 53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2009.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederfeldt, Mikael. 2005. Planning Design Automation Systems-Criteria and Guidelines. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Claesson, Anders, Björn Rosvall, and Hans Johannesson. 2005. “Capturing Design Knowledge of Robust Designs Using Configurable Components.” Paper presented at the ASME 2005 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Long Beach, California, USA, September 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. 2006. “Managing Technology Development Projects.” Research Technology Management 49 (6): 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgh, Fredrik, and Mikael Cederfeldt. 2008. “Cost-Based Producibility Assessment: Analysis and Synthesis Approaches Through Design Automation.” Journal of Engineering Design 19 (2): 113–130. doi: 10.1080/09544820701802923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, João, Elsa Henriques, Arlindo Silva, and Michael A. Moss. 2015. “Requirements Change in Complex Technical Systems: An Empirical Study of Root Causes.” Research in Engineering Design 26 (1): 37–55. doi: 10.1007/s00163-014-0183-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesberts, Paul M. J., and Laurens Van Der Tang. 1992. “Dynamics of the Customer Order Decoupling Point: Impact on Information Systems for Production Control.” Production Planning & Control 3 (3): 300–313. doi: 10.1080/09537289208919402
   Google Scholar
• Halman, J. I. M., A. P. Hofer, and W. V. Vuuren. 2003. “Platform-driven Development of Product Families: Linking Theory with Practice.” Journal of Productive Innovation Management 20 (2): 149–162. doi: 10.1111/1540-5885.2002007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Benjamin Loer. 2003. Development of Industrial Variant Specification Systems. Technical University of Denmark [Danmarks Tekniske Universitet], Department of Management Engineering [Institut for Planlægning, Innovation og Ledelse]. Vedbæk: IKON Tekst & Tryk A/S.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, Tim, Joel Johansson, and Fredrik Elgh. 2016. “Assessment of Simulation Ready CAD Models in a Set Based Concurrent Engineering Context.” Paper presented at the DESIGN 2016, 14th international design conference, Dubrovnik, May 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Högman, Ulf, Dag Bergsjö, Marcus Anemo, and Henrik Persson. 2009. “Exploring the Potential of Applying a Platform Formulation at Supplier Level - The Case of Volvo Aero Corporation.” Paper presented at the DS 58-4: proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th international conference on engineering design, Vol. 4, product and systems design, Palo Alto, CA, USA, August 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hvam, Lars, Simon Pape, and Michael K. Nielsen. 2006. “Improving the Quotation Process with Product Configuration.” Computers in Industry 57 (7): 607–621. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, Jianxin Roger, and Chun-Hsien Chen. 2006. “Customer Requirement Management in Product Development: A Review of Research Issues.” Concurrent Engineering 14 (3): 173–185. doi: 10.1177/1063293X06068357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesson, H. 2014. “Emphasizing Reuse of Generic Assets Through Integrated Product and Production System Development Platforms.” In Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design: Methods & Application, edited by Timothy W. Simpson, Jianxin (Roger) Jiao, Zahed Siddique, and Katja Hölttö-Otto, 119–146. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kristianto, Yohanes, Petri Helo, and Roger Jianxin Jiao. 2015. “A System Level Product Configurator for Engineer-to-order Supply Chains.” Computers in Industry 72: 82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levandowski, Christoffer Erik, Jianxin Roger Jiao, and Hans Johannesson. 2015. “A Two-stage Model of Adaptable Product Platform for Engineering-to-order Configuration Design.” Journal of Engineering Design 26 (7–9): 220–235. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2015.1021305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Zhongkai, Zhihong Cheng, Yixiong Feng, and Jinyong Yang. 2013. “An Integrated Method for Flexible Platform Modular Architecture Design.” Journal of Engineering Design 24 (1): 25–44. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2012.668614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankins, John C. 1995. “Technology Readiness Levels.” White Paper, April 6. NASA, Office of Space Access and Technology, Advanced Concepts Office.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. H., and A. P. Lehnerd. 1997. The Power of Product Platforms - Building Value and Cost Leadership. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, Kevin, Katja Hölttä-Otto, Timothy W Simpson, Dieter Krause, Sebastian Ripperda, and Seung Ki Moon. 2016. “Global Views on Modular Design Research: Linking Alternative Methods to Support Modular Product Family Concept Development.” Journal of Mechanical Design 138 (7): 71–101. doi: 10.1115/1.4033654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Jaeil, Dongmin Shin, Park Insun, and Hyun Hyemi. 2008. “A Product Platform Concept Development Method.” Journal of Engineering Design 19 (6): 515–532. doi: 10.1080/09544820802043583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudberget, Dag, Christoffer Levandowski, Ola Isaksson, Timoleon Kipouros, Hans Johannesson, and John Clarkson. 2015. “Modelling and Assessing Platform Architectures in Pre-embodiment Phases Through Set-based Evaluation and Change Propagation.” Journal of Aerospace Operations 3 (3,4): 203–221. doi: 10.3233/AOP-150052
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, D., and K. Ulrich. 1998. “Planning for Product Platform.” Sloan Management Review 39 (4): 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Siddique, Zahed, and Karunakar Reddy Boddu. 2004. “A Mass Customization Information Framework for Integration of Customer in the Configuration/Design of a Customized Product.” AI EDAM 18 (1): 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, Melody. 2001. Managing Engineering Knowledge: MOKA: Methodology for Knowledge Based Engineering Applications. London: Professional Engineering Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stolt, Roland, Joel Johansson, Samuel André, Tim Heikkinen, and Fredrik Elgh. 2016. “How to Challenge Fluctuating Requirements: Results from Three Companies.” Paper presented at the proceedings of the 23rd ISPE Inc. international conference on transdisciplinary engineering, Parana, Curitiba, October 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Tuli, Prashant, and Ravi Shankar. 2015. “Collaborative and Lean New Product Development Approach: A Case Study in the Automotive Product Design.” International Journal of Production Research 53 (8): 2457–2471. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.974849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhagen, Wim J. C., Pablo Bermell-Garcia, Reinier E. C. van Dijk, and Richard Curran. 2012. “A Critical Review of Knowledge-Based Engineering: An Identification of Research Challenges.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 26 (1): 5–15. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2011.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmar, Jan, and Michael Gepp. 2015. “Framework for Standardization Programs in the Engineer-To-order Industry.” Paper presented at the 2015 Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology (PICMET), Portland, OR, USA, August 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Wikner, Joakim, and Martin Rudberg. 2005. “Integrating Production and Engineering Perspectives on the Customer Order Decoupling Point.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25 (7): 623–641. doi: 10.1108/01443570510605072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar