Comparing novelty of designs from biological-inspiration with those from brainstorming

References

• Ahmed-Kristensen, Saeema, Bo Thomas Christensen, and Torben Anker Lenau. 2014. “Naturally Original: Stimulating Creative Design Through Biological-Analogies and Random Images.” Proceedings of the 13th International Design Conference, Design Society, 427–436, Croatia, May 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Al-khatib, Bilal Adel. 2012. “The Effect of Using Brainstorming Strategy in Developing Creative Problem Solving Skills among Female Students in Princess Alia University College.” American International Journal of Contemporary Research 2 (10): 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Appio, Francesco Paolo, Antonella Martini SofianeAchiche, and Catherine Beaudry. 2016. “On Designers’ Use of Biomimicry Tools During the New Product Development Process: An Empirical Investigation.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2016.1236190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldussu, Alessandro, and Gaetano Cascini. 2015. “About Integration Opportunities Between TRIZ and Biomimetics for Inventive Design.” Procedia Engineering 131: 3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.342
   Google Scholar
• Bhushan, Bharat. 2016. Biomimetics: Bioinspired Hierarchical-Structured Surfaces for Green Science and Technology. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blessing, Lucienne T.M., and Amaresh Chakrabarti. 2009. DRM, A Design Research Methodology. Verlag: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnardel, Nathalie. 2000. “Towards Understanding and Supporting Creativity in Design: Analogies In A Constrained Cognitive Environment.” Knowledge-Based Systems 13 (7): 505–513. doi: 10.1016/S0950-7051(00)00067-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, R.J., and D. Fitt. 2003. “To Minimise Shear Stress and to Avoid Solid to Solid Contact Between the Eyelid and the Eye Surface, the Latter is Covered by a Thin Tear Film.” Mathematical Medicine and Biology 20: 1–28. doi: 10.1093/imammb/20.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, Amaresh, Prabir Sarkar, B. Leelavathamma, and B.S. Nataraju. 2005. “A Functional Representation for Aiding Biomimetic and Artificial Inspiration of New Ideas.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19 (02): 113–132. doi: 10.1017/S0890060405050109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, Hyunmin, Chiu Ivey, Shu Lee, Robert B. Stone, and Daniel A. McAdams. 2011. “Biologically Meaningful Keywords for Functional Terms of the Functional Basis.” Journal of Mechanism Design 133 (2): 021007. doi: 10.1115/1.4003249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, Hyunmin, and Lee Shu. 2012. “Automatic Extraction of Causally Related Functions From Natural-Language Text for Biomimetic Design.” Proceedings of the ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 373–382, August 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Chulvi, Vicente, Elena Mulet, Amaresh Chakrabarti, Belinda López-Mesa, and Carmen González-Cruz. 2012. “Comparison of the Degree of Creativity in the Design Outcomes Using Different Design Methods.” Journal of Engineering Design, 23 (4): 241–269. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2011.624501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coskun, Hamit, Paul B. Paulus, Vincent Brown, and Jeffrey J. Sherwood. 2000. “Cognitive Stimulation and Problem Presentation in Idea-Generating Groups.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 4 (4): 307–329. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.4.4.307
   Google Scholar
• Craig, Salmaan, David Harrison, Andrew Cripps, and Daniel Knott. 2008. “Biotriz Suggests Radiative Cooling of Buildings can be Done Passively by Changing the Structure of Roof Insulation to let Longwave Infrared Pass.” Journal of Bionic Engineering 5 (1): 55–66. doi: 10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60007-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Darren W., and Page Moreau. 2002. “The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking During New Product Ideation.” Journal of Marketing Research 39 (1): 47–60. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.39.1.47.18930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deldin, Jon-Michael, and Megan Schuknecht. 2014. “The Asknature Database: Enabling Solutions in Biomimetic Design.” In Chap 2 in Biologically Inspired Design, 17–27. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dugosh, Karen Leggett, Paul B. Paulus, Evelyn J. Roland, and Huei-Chuan Yang. 2000. “Cognitive Stimulation in Brainstorming.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 79 (5): 722–735. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etoundi, Appolinaire C., Stuart C. Burgess, and Ravi Vaidyanathan. 2013. “A Bio-Inspired Condylar Hinge for Robotic Limbs.” Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics 5 (3): 031011. doi: 10.1115/1.4024471
   Google Scholar
• Fernald, Lloyd W., and Pam Nickolenko. 1993. “The Creative Process: Its Use and Extent of Formalization by Corporations.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 27 (3): 214–220. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1993.tb00708.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, Michael E., and Ashok K. Goel. 2012. “Analogical Problem Evolution In Biologically Inspired Design.” Design Computing and Cognition ‘12. Springer, Dordrecht, June 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Helms, Michael, Swaroop S. Vattam, and Ashok K. Goel. 2009. “Biologically Inspired Design: Process and Products.” Design Studies 30 (5): 606–622. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2009.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, Scarlett R., Brett R. Jones, and Brian P. Bailey. 2009. “Idea Generation Techniques among Creative Professionals.” System Sciences, 2009. HICSS'09. Hawaii International Conference. IEEE, January 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, Scott G. 1998. A Review of Brainstorming Research: Six Critical Issues for Inquiry. New York: Creative Research Unit, Creative Problem Solving Group-Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, David G., and Steven M. Smith. 1991. “Design Fixation.” Design Studies 12 (1): 3–11. doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M.K., H. Hashemi Farzaneh, and Udo Lindemann. 2012. “An Approach to Support Searching for Biomimetic Solutions Based on System Characteristics and its Environmental Interactions.” Proceedings of the 12th International Design Conference, Design Society, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Brook, K.S. Jacquelyn, and Nagel James. 2015. “Integrating Biology, Design, and Engineering for Sustainable Innovation.” Proceedings of the Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), IEEE, 88–93, March 7.
   Google Scholar
• Keshwani, Sonal, Torben Anker Lenau, Saeema Ahmed-Kristensen, and Amaresh Chakrabarti. 2013. “Benchmarking Bio-Inspired Designs with Brainstorming in Terms of Novelty of Design Outcomes.” Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design, Seoul Korea, August 19-22.
   Google Scholar
• Lenau, T., Andy Dentel, þ Ingvarsdóttir, and T. Gud̄laugsson. 2010. “Engineering Design of an Adaptive Leg Prosthesis Using Biological Principles.” Proceedings of the 11th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Lepora, Nathan F., Paul Verschure, and Tony J. Prescott. 2013. “The State of the Art in Biomimetics.” Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 8 (1): 013001. doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/8/1/013001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Mesa, Belinda, Elena Mulet, Rosario Vidal, and Graham Thompson. 2011. “Effects of Additional Stimuli on Idea-Finding in Design Teams.” Journal of Engineering Design 22 (1): 31–54. doi: 10.1080/09544820902911366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, Arnold M. 1992. “Culture and Creativity.” American Journal of Psychotherapy 46 (3): 454–469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moalosi, Richie. 2007. “The Impact of Socio-Cultural Factors Upon Human-Centred Design In Botswana.” PhD diss., Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Molina, Arturo, Ahmed H. Al-Ashaab, Timothy I.A. Ellis, Robert I.M. Young, and Robert Bell. 1995. “A Review of Computer-Aided Simultaneous Engineering Systems.” Research in Engineering Design 7 (1): 38–63. doi: 10.1007/BF01681911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss Jr, Jerome. 1966. “Measuring Creative Abilities in Junior High School Industrial Arts.” Monograph 2.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Jeremy, Katherine Fu, Kevin Otto, Maria Yang, Dan Jensen, and Kristin Wood. 2014. “Function Based Design-By-Analogy: A Functional Vector Approach to Analogical Search.” Journal of Mechanical Design 136 (10): 101102. doi: 10.1115/1.4028093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, Jacquelyn K.S., Robert L. Nagel, Robert B. Stone, and Daniel A. McAdams. 2010. “Function-Based, Biologically Inspired Concept Generation.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24 (04): 521–535. doi: 10.1017/S0890060410000375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Brent, Jamal Wilson, and Jeannette Yen. 2009. “A Study of Biologically-Inspired Design as a Context for Enhancing Student Innovation.” Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, Julia M., and Carolyn C. Seepersad. 2015. “Toward a Methodology for Systematically Generating Energy-and Materials-Efficient Concepts Using Biological Analogies.” Journal of Mechanical Design 137 (9): 091101. doi: 10.1115/1.4030877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, A.F., G. Rona, P. Dupont, and L. Armand. 1971. “The Constructive Imagination: How to Take Advantage of its Ideas, Principles and Process of the Creative Thought and Brainstorming.” Dunod, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Ottosson, Stig. 1995. “Boosting Creativity in Technical Development.” Workshop in Engineering Design and Creativity, 35–39, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkan, Ozgu, and Fehmi Dogan. 2013. “Cognitive Strategies of Analogical Reasoning in Design: Differences Between Expert and Novice Designers.” Design Studies 34 (2): 161–192. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl, Gerhard, and Wolfgang Beitz. 2007. Engineering Design A Systematic Approach. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Perttula, MattiKalevi. 2006. “Idea Generation in Engineering Design: Application of a Memory Search Perspective and Some Experimental Studies.” PhD diss., Helsinki University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ranjan, B.S.C., Venkataraman Srinivasan, and Amaresh Chakrabarti. 2012. “The Extended, Integrated Model of Designing.” Proceedings of the Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering, Karlsruhe, Germany, May 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, Mel. 1961. “An Analysis of Creativity.” The Phi Delta Kappan 42 (7): 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgueiredo, Camila Freitas, and Armand Hatchuel. 2016. “Beyond Analogy: A Model of Bioinspiration for Creative Design.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 30 (02): 159–170. doi: 10.1017/S0890060416000044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sara, Khelil, and Zemmouri Noureddine. 2015. “A Bio Problem-Solver for Supporting the Design, Towards the Optimization of the Energy Efficiency.” Modeling, Simulation, and Applied Optimization (ICMSAO), 2015, 1–6. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, Prabir, and Amaresh Chakrabarti. 2008. “Studying Engineering Design Creativity-Developing A Common Definition and Associated Measures.” In Studying Design Creativity, edited by John Gero. Verlag: Springer. http://cpdm.iisc.ac.in/cpdm/ideaslab/paper_scans/UID_17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, Prabir, and Amaresh Chakrabarti. 2011. “Assessing Design Creativity.” Design Studies 32 (4): 348–383. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, Julian, Ujjwal Pal, and Amaresh Chakrabarti. 2010. “A Methodology For Supporting “Transfer” in Biomimetic Design.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24 (04): 483–506. doi: 10.1017/S0890060410000351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, V., and Amaresh Chakrabarti. 2010. “Investigating Novelty–Outcome Relationships in Engineering Design.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24 (02): 161–178. doi: 10.1017/S089006041000003X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, Robert J., and Todd I. Lubart. 1999. “The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms.” In Handbook of Creativity Chap 1, edited by Robert J. Sternberg, 3–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, Ahmed, Hassan Hamza, and Eman Wefky. 2013. “The Effect of Using Brainstorming Strategy on Developing Creative Thinking Skills for Sixth Grade Students in Science Teaching.” Proceedings of International Conference on e-Learning “Best Practices in Management, Design and Development of e-Courses: Standards of Excellence and Creativity” IEEE, May 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Tsenn, Joanna, Julie S. Linsey, and Daniel A. McAdams. 2016. “Bioinspired Materials Design: An Assessment of Methods to Improve a Text Mining Algorithm for Identifying Biological Material Structural Design Principles.” Proceedings of ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, North Carolina, USA, August 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Vattam, Swaroop, Bryan Wiltgen, Michael Helms, Ashok K. Goel, and Jeannette Yen. 2011. “DANE: Fostering Creativity in and Through Biologically Inspired Design.” In Design Creativity 2010, edited by Toshiharu Taura, 115–122. Kobe: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, Julian F.V., Olga A. Bogatyreva, Nikolaj R. Bogatyrev, Adrian Bowyer, and Anja-Karina Pahl. 2006. “Biomimetics: Its Practice and Theory.” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 3 (9): 471–482. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, Gordon Lynn. 1942. The Vertebrate Eye and its Adaptive Radiation. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Cranbrook Institute of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Thomas B. 1998. “Analogical Distance and Purpose in Creative Thought: Mental Leaps Versus Mental Hops.” In Advances in Analogy Research: Integration of Theory and Data From the Cognitive, Computational, and Neural Sciences, 221–230. Sofia: New Bulgarian University.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, Donna M., Linda Richter, and Arie W. Kruglanski. 1996. “On Leaping to Conclusions When Feeling Tired: Mental Fatigue Effects on Impressional Primacy.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32 (2): 181–195. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1996.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, Rene, Michael Diehl, and Gavin Zijlstra. 2000. “Idea Production in Nominal and Virtual Groups: Does Computer-Mediated Communication Improve Group Brainstorming?” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 3 (2): 141–158. doi: 10.1177/1368430200032003
   Google Scholar