Sustainable product family configuration based on a platform strategy

Reference

• Allen, David T., and David R. Shonnard. 2011. Sustainable Engineering: Concepts, Design, and Case Studies. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Atasu, Atalay, V. Daniel R. Guide, and Luk N. Van Wassenhove. 2010. “So What if Remanufacturing Cannibalizes My New Product Sales?” California Management Review 52 (2): 56–76. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2010.52.2.56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, R., C. K. Kwong, and P. Ji. 2015. “A Novel Methodology for Simultaneous Consideration of Remanufactured and New Products in Product Line Design.” International Journal of Production Economics 169: 127–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, R., C. K. Kwong, and P. Ji. 2016. “Coordination of the Closed-Loop Supply Chain for Product Line Design with Consideration of Remanufactured Products.” Journal of Cleaner Production 114: 286–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, Harry. 2000. Eco-indicator 99 Manual for Designers. Hague, the Netherlands: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment. https://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/EI99_Manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canavos, G. C. 1973. “An Empirical Bayes Approach for the Poisson Life Distribution.” IEEE Transactions on Reliability R-22 (2): 91–96. doi: 10.1109/TR.1973.5216041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, Souma, Achille Messac, and Ritesh A Khire. 2011. “Comprehensive Product Platform Planning (CP3) Framework.” Journal of Mechanical Design 133 (10): 101004. doi: 10.1115/1.4004969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silveira, G., D. Borenstein, and F. S. Fogliatto. 2001. “Mass Customization: Literature Review and Research Directions.” International Journal of Production Economics 72 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00079-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Weck, Olivier L, Eun Suk Suh, and David Chang. 2003. “Product Family and Platform Portfolio Optimization.” ASME international design engineering technical conference, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, Kalyanmoy. 2001. Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, Wiley-Interscience Series in Systems and Optimization. Chichester, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, Kalyanmoy. 2008. Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, Wiley Paperback Series. Chichester, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Devanathan, Srikanth, Devarajan Ramanujan, William Z. Bernstein, Fu Zhao, and Karthik Ramani. 2010. “Integration of Sustainability Into Early Design Through the Function Impact Matrix.” Journal of Mechanical Design 132 (8): 081004. doi: 10.1115/1.4001890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, A. H. F., and J. A. de Vasconcelos. 2002. “Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms Applied to Solve Optimization Problems.” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 38 (2): 1133–1136. doi: 10.1109/20.996290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Xuehong, Jianxin Jiao, and Mitchell M. Tseng. 2001. “Architecture of Product Family: Fundamentals and Methodology.” Concurrent Engineering 9 (4): 309–325. doi: 10.1177/1063293X0100900407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiksel, J. 2009. Design for Environment: A Guide to Sustainable Product Development. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Frischknecht, Bart, and Panos Papalambros. 2008. “A Pareto Approach to Aligning Public and Private Objectives in Vehicle Design.” ASME 2008 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, DETC2008-49143, Brooklyn, NY, USA, August 3-6.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, Kikuo, and Hiroko Yoshida. 2004. “Product Variety Optimization Simultaneously Designing Module Combination and Module Attributes.” Concurrent Engineering 12 (2): 105–118. doi: 10.1177/1063293x04044758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Zugasti, Javier P, and Kevin N Otto. 2000. “Modular Platform-Based Product Family Design.” ASME design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, September 10-13.
   Google Scholar
• He, Bin, Jun Wang, Shan Huang, and Yan Wang. 2015. “Low-carbon Product Design for Product Life Cycle.” Journal of Engineering Design 26 (10-12): 321–339. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2015.1053437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ijomah, Winifred L. 2009. “Addressing Decision Making for Remanufacturing Operations and Design-for-Remanufacture.” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 2 (2): 91–102. doi:10.1080/19397030902953080.
   Google Scholar
• Jeswiet, J., and M. Hauschild. 2005. “EcoDesign and Future Environmental Impacts.” Materials & Design 26 (7): 629–634. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, Yangjian, Roger J. Jiao, Liang Chen, and Chunlong Wu. 2013. “Green Modular Design for Material Efficiency: a Leader–Follower Joint Optimization Model.” Journal of Cleaner Production 41: 187–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Lan, and Venkat Allada. 2005. “Robust Modular Product Family Design Using a Modified Taguchi Method.” Journal of Engineering Design 16 (5): 443–458. doi: 10.1080/09544820500287359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, Jianxin. 2012. “Product Platform Flexibility Planning by Hybrid Real Options Analysis.” IIE Transactions 44 (6): 431–445. doi: 10.1080/0740817x.2011.609874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, Jianxin, and Yiyang Zhang. 2005. “Product Portfolio Planning with Customer-Engineering Interaction.” IIE Transactions 37 (9): 801–814. doi: 10.1080/07408170590917011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, Jianxin, Yiyang Zhang, and Yi Wang. 2007. “A Generic Genetic Algorithm for Product Family Design.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18 (2): 233–247. doi: 10.1007/s10845-007-0019-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Samyeon, and Seung Ki Moon. 2015. “Assessing and Generating Modules for Product Recovery.” Proceedings of the ASME 2015 international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference, DETC2015-47130, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2-5 August.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Samyeon, and Seung Ki Moon. 2016. “Eco-modular Product Architecture Identification and Assessment for Product Recovery.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 136: 1–21. doi:10.1007/s10845-016-1253-7.
   Google Scholar
• Koppelman, Frank S., and Chandra Bhat. 2006. A Self Instructing Course in Mode Choice Modeling: Multinomial and Nested Logit Models. USA: Prepared for U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration. http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/bhat/COURSES/LM_Draft_060131Final-060630.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, Min Jung, Yoo Suk Hong, and Nam Wook Cho. 2009. “Eco-architecture Analysis for end-of-Life Decision Making.” International Journal of Production Research 47 (22): 6233–6259. doi: 10.1080/00207540802175329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, Minjung, and Harrison M. Kim. 2011. “Assessing Product Family Design From an end-of-Life Perspective.” Engineering Optimization 43 (3): 233–255. doi: 10.1080/0305215x.2010.482990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, Minjung, and Harrison Kim. 2017. “Green Profit Maximization Through Integrated Pricing and Production Planning for a Line of new and Remanufactured Products.” Journal of Cleaner Production 142 (Part 4): 3454–3470. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.121.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, Ningrong, and Seung Ki Moon. 2015. “A Decision Support System for Market-Driven Product Positioning and Design.” Decision Support Systems 69: 82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2014.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, Vicky. 2006. “Ecodesign Tools for Designers: Defining the Requirements.” Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (15–16): 1386–1395. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, B., J. Zhang, D. Xue, and P. Gu. 2011. “Systematic Lifecycle Design for Sustainable Product Development.” Concurrent Engineering 19 (4): 307–324. doi: 10.1177/1063293x11424513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X. G., and C. K. Kvvong. 2010. “A Multiobjective Approach for Optimal Design of Product Line.” International conference on advanced technology of design and manufacture (ATDM 2010), Beijing, China, 23-25 November 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Jungmok, and HarrisonM Kim. 2015. “Product Family Architecture Design with Predictive, Data-Driven Product Family Design Method.” Research in Engineering Design 27: 5–21. doi: 10.1007/s00163-015-0201-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Jungmok, Minjung Kwak, and Harrison M. Kim. 2014. “Demand Trend Mining for Predictive Life Cycle Design.” Journal of Cleaner Production 68: 189–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Marc H., and Alvin P. Lehnerd. 1997. The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michalek, Jeremy J., Oben Ceryan, Panos Y. Papalambros, and Yoram Koren. 2005. “Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design.” Journal of Mechanical Design 128 (6): 1196–1204. doi: 10.1115/1.2336252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalek, Jeremy J., Panos Y. Papalambros, and Steven J. Skerlos. 2004. “A Study of Fuel Efficiency and Emission Policy Impact on Optimal Vehicle Design Decisions.” Journal of Mechanical Design 126 (6): 1062–1070. doi: 10.1115/1.1804195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, Seung Ki, and Daniel A. McAdams. 2012. “A Market-Based Design Strategy for a Universal Product Family.” Journal of Mechanical Design 134 (11): 111007. doi: 10.1115/1.4007395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, Seung Ki, Kyoung Jong Park, and Timothy W. Simpson. 2014. “Platform Design variable Identification for a Product Family Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization.” Research in Engineering Design 25 (2): 95–108. doi: 10.1007/s00163-013-0166-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, Kevin, Katja Hölttä-Otto, Timothy W. Simpson, Dieter Krause, Sebastian Ripperda, and Seung Ki Moon. 2016. “Global Views on Modular Design Research: Linking Alternative Methods to Support Modular Product Family Concept Development.” Journal of Mechanical Design 138 (7): 071101–071101. doi: 10.1115/1.4033654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirmoradi, Zhila, Kambiz Haji Hajikolaei, and G. Gary Wang. 2014. “Designing Scalable Product Families by the Radial Basis Function–High-Dimensional Model Representation Metamodelling Technique.” Engineering Optimization 47: 1423–1439. doi: 10.1080/0305215x.2014.971776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani, Karthik, Devarajan Ramanujan, William Z. Bernstein, Fu Zhao, John Sutherland, Carol Handwerker, Jun-Ki Choi, Harrison Kim, and Deborah Thurston. 2010. “Integrated Sustainable Life Cycle Design: A Review.” Journal of Mechanical Design 132 (9): 091004. doi: 10.1115/1.4002308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, Tahira N., Bart D. Frischknecht, and Panos Y. Papalambros. 2012. “Perceptual Attributes in Product Design: Fuel Economy and Silhouette-Based Perceived Environmental Friendliness Tradeoffs in Automotive Vehicle Design.” Journal of Mechanical Design 134 (4): 041006–041006. doi: 10.1115/1.4006146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, Timothy W. 2004. “Product Platform Design and Customization: Status and Promise.” AI EDAM 18 (1): 93–20. doi: 10.1017/S0890060404040028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, Timothy W., and Brayan S. D’Souza. 2004. “Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality Within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm.” Concurrent Engineering 12 (2): 119–129. doi: 10.1177/1063293X04044383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, T. W., J. R. A. Maier, and F. Mistree. 2001. “Product Platform Design: Method and Application.” Research in Engineering Design 13 (1): 2–22. doi: 10.1007/s001630100002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, Timothy W, Zahed Siddique, and Roger Jianxin Jiao. 2006. Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications. New York, NY, USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, Eun Suk, Olivier L. Weck, and David Chang. 2007. “Flexible Product Platforms: Framework and Case Study.” Research in Engineering Design 18 (2): 67–89. doi: 10.1007/s00163-007-0032-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sy, Mamadou, and Christian Mascle. 2011. “Product Design Analysis Based on Life Cycle Features.” Journal of Engineering Design 22 (6): 387–406. doi: 10.1080/09544820903409899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, Kenneth E. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, Hwai-En, Chien-Chen Chang, and Jia-Diann Li. 2008. “Modular Design to Support Green Life-Cycle Engineering.” Expert Systems with Applications 34 (4): 2524–2537. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Qi, Dunbing Tang, Leilei Yin, Miguel A. Salido, Adriana Giret, and Yuchun Xu. 2016. “Bi-objective Optimization for low-Carbon Product Family Design.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 41: 53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2016.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, C., E. Stewart, T. Howes, and B. Adams. 2008. “Aligned for Sustainable Design: An ABCD Approach to Making Better Products.” Business for Social Responsibility and IDEO, https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR_Sustainable_Design_Report_0508.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Zhiqiao, C. K. Kwong, C. K. M. Lee, and Jiafu Tang. 2015. “Joint Decision of Product Configuration and Remanufacturing for Product Family Design.” International Journal of Production Research 54: 4689–4702. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1109154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Qingyan, Suiran Yu, and Dan Jiang. 2014. “A Modular Method of Developing an eco-Product Family Considering the Reusability and Recyclability of Customer Products.” Journal of Cleaner Production 64: 254–265. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Qingyan, Suiran Yu, and Aicha Sekhari. 2011. “A Modular eco-Design Method for Life Cycle Engineering Based on Redesign Risk Control.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 56 (9): 1215–1233. doi: 10.1007/s00170-011-3246-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Suiran, Qingyan Yang, Jing Tao, and Xun Xu. 2015. “Incorporating Quality Function Deployment with Modularity for the end-of-Life of a Product Family.” Journal of Cleaner Production 87: 423–430. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and J. K. Gershenson. 2002. “Questioning the Direct Relationship Between Product Modularity and Retirement Cost.” The Journal of Sustainable Product Design 2 (1): 53–68. doi: 10.1023/b:jspd.0000016449.63718.43.
   Google Scholar
• Zwolinski, Peggy, and Daniel Brissaud. 2008. “Remanufacturing Strategies to Support Product Design and Redesign.” Journal of Engineering Design 19 (4): 321–335. doi: 10.1080/09544820701435799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar