A method for coupling analysis of association modules in product family design

Reference

• Algeddawy, T., and H. ElMaraghy. 2013a. “Reactive Design Methodology for Product Family Platforms, Modularity and Parts Integration.” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 6 (1): 34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Algeddawy, T., and H. ElMaraghy. 2013b. “Optimum Granularity Level of Modular Product Design Architecture.” CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 62 (1): 151–154. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alizon, F., S. K. Moon, S. B. Shooter, and T. W. Simpson. 2007. “Three Dimensional Design Structure Matrix with Cross-Module and Cross-Interface Analysis.” ASME design engineering technical conferences - design automation conference, Las Vegas, NV, Sep. 4-7 ASME, Paper No. DETC2007/DAC-34510.
   Google Scholar
• Asikoglu, O., and T. W. Simpson. 2012. “A new Method for Evaluating Design Dependencies in Product Architectures.” 14th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis & optimization conference, Indianapolis, IN, AIAA, Sep. 17-19 AIAA-2012-5660.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, C. L., and R. B. Xiao. 2008. “The Method for Uncoupling Design with the Aid of Systematic Inventive Thinking.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 222 (C3): 435–445.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, C. L., R. B. Xiao, and P. A. Yang. 2010. “The Method for Analysing and Disposing of Functional Interaction in Axiomatic Design.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 224 (3): 401–409.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. L., R. J. Jiao, and M. M. Tseng. 2009. “Evolutionary Product Line Design Balancing Customer Needs and Product Commonality.” CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 58: 123–126. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., A. Macwan, and S. Li. 2007. “Model-Based Rapid Redesign Using Decomposition Patterns.” Journal of Mechanical Design 129 (3): 283–294. doi: 10.1115/1.2406099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., D. Rosen, J. K. Allen, and F. Mistree. 1994. “Modularity and the Independence of Functional Requirements in Designing Complex Systems.” Concurrent Product Design, ASME 74: 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., S. Zhang, and T. Wang. 2015. “Modelling and Analysis of System Robustness for Mechanical Product Based on Axiomatic Design and Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm.” Advances in Mechanical Engineering 7 (8): 1–14. doi: 10.1177/1687814015598694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, D., and W. Hwang. 2004. “A Suggestion and a Contribution for the Improvement of Axiomatic Design.” Proceedings of ICAD2004, Seoul, Korea, Jun. 21-24 ICAD-2004-23.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, S., A. Messac, and R. A. Khire. 2011. “Comprehensive Product Platform Planning (CP3) Framework.” Journal of Mechanical Design 133 (4): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P. J., C. Simons, and C. Eckert. 2004. “Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design.” Journal of Mechanical Design 126 (5): 788–797. doi: 10.1115/1.1765117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deo, H. V., and N. P. Suh. 2004. “Mathematical Transforms in Design: Case Study on Feedback Control of a Customizable Automotive Suspension.” CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 53 (1): 125–128. doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60660-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duflou, J. R., and W. Dewulf. 2006. “On the Complementarity of TRIZ and Axiomatic Design: From Decoupling Objective to Contradiction Identification.” Proceedings of the ETRIA TRIZ future conference, Kortrijk, Belgium, 9–11 October.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, C., P. J. Clarkson, and W. Zanker. 2004. “Change and Customisation in Complex Engineering Domains.” Research in Engineering Design 15 (1): 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s00163-003-0031-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giffin, M., O. de Weck, G. Bounova, R. Keller, C. Eckert, and P. J. Clarkson. 2009. “Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems.” Journal of Mechanical Design 131 (8): 1–14. doi: 10.1115/1.3149847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenov, M. D., and S. G. Barker. 2005. “Application of Axiomatic Design and Design Structure Matrix to the Decomposition of Engineering Systems.” Systems Engineering 8 (1): 29–40. doi: 10.1002/sys.20015
   Google Scholar
• Hölttä-Otto, K., N. Chiriac, D. Lysy, and E. Suk Suh. 2012. “Comparative Analysis of Coupling Modularity Metrics.” Journal of Engineering Design 23 (10-11): 790–806. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2012.701728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jose, A., and M. Tollenaere. 2005. “Modular and Platform Methods for Product Family Design: Literature Analysis.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 16: 371–390. doi: 10.1007/s10845-005-7030-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, S., and T. W. Simpson. 2016. “An Integrated Approach to Product Family Redesign Using Commonality and Variety Metrics.” Research in Engineering Design 27 (4): 391–412. doi: 10.1007/s00163-016-0224-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Y. J. 2004. “The Method for Uncoupling Design by Contradiction Matrix of TRIZ and Case Study.” Proceedings of the ICAD2004, Seoul, 21–24 June, ICAD-2004-11.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, E. C. Y., N. H. M. Caldwell, and P. J. Clarkson. 2012. “A Method to Assess the Effects of Engineering Change Propagation.” Research in Engineering Design 23 (4): 329–351. doi: 10.1007/s00163-012-0131-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, X., and J. K. Gershenson. 2008. “DSM-Based Product Representation for Design Process and Modularity.” ASME design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference, Brooklyn, NY, Aug. 3-8 Paper No. DET2008-49963.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. 2006. “Optimal Strategy for Eliminating Coupling Terms from a Design Matrix.” Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 10 (2): 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, E., and S. W. Hsiao. 2014. “A Decision Support System for Product Family Design.” Information Sciences 281: 113–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.04.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luh, D. B., Y. T. Ko, and C. H. Ma. 2011. “A Structural Matrix-Based Modelling for Designing Product Variety.” Journal of Engineering Design 22 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1080/09544820902877591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J. F., D. C. Wynn, Wieland Biedermann, U. Lindemann, and P. J. Clarkson. 2014. “Simulating Progressive Iteration, Rework and Change Propagation to Prioritise Design Tasks.” Research in Engineering Design 25 (4): 283–307. doi: 10.1007/s00163-014-0174-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. H., and A. P. Lehnerd. 1997. The Power of Product Platforms-Building Value and Cost Leadership. New York, USA: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasqual, M. C., and O. L. de Weck. 2012. “Multilayer Network Model for Analysis and Management of Change Propagation.” Research in Engineering Design 23 (4): 305–328. doi: 10.1007/s00163-011-0125-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Y. Z., Y. Liu, J. R. Tang, and Wanghui Bu. 2013. “Multivariable Correlative Model Decomposition for Complex Product Design Based on Clustering with Multiple Couplings.” Journal of Mechanical Engineering 49 (3): 111–121. doi: 10.3901/JME.2013.03.111
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, T. W. 2004. “Product Platform Design and Customization: Status and Promise.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 18 (1): 3–20. doi: 10.1017/S0890060404040028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, T. W., A. L. Bobuk, A. Slingerland, S. Brennan, D. Logan, and K. Reichard. 2012. “From User Requirements to Commonality Specifications: An Integrated Approach to Product Family Design.” Research in Engineering Design 23: 141–153. doi: 10.1007/s00163-011-0119-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steva, E. D., E. N. Rice, T. J. Marion, T. W. Simpson, and R. B. Stone. 2006. “Two Methodologies for Identifying Product Platform Elements Within an Existing Set of Products.” ASME design engineering technical conferences - design automation conference, Philadelphia, PA, Sep. 10-13 ASME, Paper No. DETC2006/DAC-99234.
   Google Scholar
• Steward, D. V. 1981. “The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-28: 71–74. doi: 10.1109/TEM.1981.6448589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, R. B., K. L. Wood, and R. H. Crawford. 2000. “A Heuristic Method for Identifying Modules for Product Architectures.” Design Studies 21 (1): 5–31. doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00003-4
   Google Scholar
• Su, J. C. Y., S. J. Chen, and L. Lin. 2003. “A Structured Approach to Measuring Functional Dependency and Sequencing of Coupled Tasks in Engineering Design.” Computers and Industrial Engineering 45: 195–214. doi: 10.1016/S0360-8352(03)00031-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 1995. “Axiomatic Design of Mechanical Systems.” Journal of Mechanical Design 117B (2): 2–10. doi: 10.1115/1.2836467
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 2001. Axiomatic design: Advances and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, E. S., M. R. Furst, K. J. Mihalyov, and Olivier de Weck. 2010. “Technology Infusion for Complex Systems: A Framework and Case Study.” Systems Engineering 13 (2): 186–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, W., A. Liu, S. C. Y. Lu, and T. Wuest. 2015. “A Multi-Principle Module Identification Method for Product Platform Design.” Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A (Applied Physics & Engineering) 16 (1): 1–10. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A1400263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y. W., Y. M. Deng, W. F. Lu, and A. Y. C. Nee. 2015. “Analysis of Mechanical Systems with Adaptable Functions for the Evaluation of Functional Coupling and Component Importance.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 76: 1449–1458. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6358-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, T. L., A. A. Yassine, and D. E. Goldberg. 2007. “An Information Theoretic Method for Developing Modular Architectures Using Genetic Algorithms.” Research in Engineering Design 18: 91–109. doi: 10.1007/s00163-007-0030-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharias, N. A., and A. A. Yassine. 2008. “Optimal Platform Investment for Product Family Design.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19 (2): 131–148. doi: 10.1007/s10845-007-0069-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar