Analogical stimuli retrieval approach based on R-SBF ontology model

References

• Ahmed, S., and B. T. Christensen. 2009. “An In Situ Study of Analogical Reasoning in Novice and Experienced Design Engineers.” Journal of Mechanical Design 131 (11): 111004. doi:10.1115/1.3184693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altshuller, G. 1984. Creativity as an Exact Science. Luxembourg: Gordon and Branch Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bearman, C. R., L. J. Ball, and T. C. Ormerod. 2002. “An Exploration of Real-World Analogical Problem Solving in Novices.” The 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Virginia, August 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Becattini, N. 2013. “Product and Process Modeling – State of the Art Update.” FORMAT, January 31. http://www.format-project.eu/deliverables/public-reports-and-white-papers/deliverable-2.2/view.
   Google Scholar
• Becattini, N., and G. Cascini. 2013. “Mapping Causal Relationships and Conflicts among Design Parameters and System Requirements.” Computer-Aided Design and Applications 10 (4): 643–662. doi:10.3722/cadaps.2013.643-662.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnardel, N., and E. Marmèche. 2004. “Evocation Processes by Novice and Expert Designers: Towards Stimulating Analogical Thinking.” Creativity and Innovation Management 13 (3): 176–186. doi:10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00307.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, G. Z. 2006. “Study on Theory and Method of Function-Oriented Design.” [In Chinese.] PhD diss., Hebei University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Casakin, H. 2004. “Visual Analogy as a Cognitive Strategy in the Design Process: Expert Versus Novice Performance.” Journal of Design Research 4 (2): 1–18. doi:10.1504/JDR.2004.009846.
   Google Scholar
• Cascini, G. 2012. “TRIZ-Based Anticipatory Design of Future Products and Processes.” Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 16 (3): 29–63.
   Google Scholar
• Cascini, G., G. Fantoni, and F. Montagna. 2013. “Situating Needs and Requirements in the FBS Framework.” Design Studies 34 (5): 636–662. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2012.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascini, G., F. Rotini, and D. Russo. 2009. “Functional Modeling for TRIZ-Based Evolutionary Analyses.” ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on engineering design, California, August 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallucci, D., and N. Khomenko. 2007. “From TRIZ to OTSM-TRIZ: Addressing Complexity Challenges in Inventive Design.” International Journal of Product Development 4 (1–2): 4–21. doi:10.1504/IJPD.2007.011530.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, A., P. Sarkar, B. Leelavathamma, and B. S. Nataraju. 2005. “A Behavioral Model for Representing Biological and Artificial Systems for Inspiring Novel Designs.” The International Conference on Engineering Design, Bristol, August, 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, A., S. Venkataraman, B. S. C. Ranjan, and U. Lindemann. 2013. “A Case for Multiple Views of Function in Design Based on a Common Definition.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 27 (3): 271–279. doi:10.1017/S0890060413000279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J., S. P. Dow, and C. D. Schunn. 2015. “Do the Best Design Ideas (Really) Come from Conceptually Distant Sources of Inspiration?” Design Studies 36: 31–58. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2014.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J., K. Fu, C. D. Schunn, J. Cagan, K. L. Wood, and K. Kotovsky. 2011. “On the Benefits and Pitfalls of Analogies for Innovative Design: Ideation Performance Based on Analogical Distance, Commonness, and Modality of Examples.” Journal of Mechanical Design 133 (8): 081004. doi:10.1115/1.4004396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J., and C. Schunn. 2015. “The Impact of Analogies on Creative Concept Generation: Lessons From an in Vivo Study in Engineering Design.” Cognitive Science 39 (1): 126–155. doi:10.1111/cogs.12127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Z. N. Zhang, Y. B. Xie, and M. Zhao. 2015. “A New Model of Conceptual Design Based on Scientific Ontology and Intentionality Theory. Part I: The Conceptual Foundation.” Design Studies 37: 12–36. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2014.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., M. Zhao, Y. B. Xie, and Z. N. Zhang. 2015. “A New Model of Conceptual Design Based on Scientific Ontology and Intentionality Theory. Part II: The Process Model.” Design Studies 38: 139–160. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, I., and L. H. Shu. 2012. “Investigating Effects of Oppositely Related Semantic Stimuli on Design Concept Creativity.” Journal of Engineering Design 23 (4): 271–296. doi:10.1080/09544828.2011.603298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, S. C. 2013. "Using Similarity Measures to Identify TRIZ Model of Solutions: Examples of Relevant Trends Identification." [In Chinese.] MS diss., National Tsing Hua University.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, B. T., and C. D. Schunn. 2007. “The Relationship of Analogical Distance to Analogical Function and Preinventive Structure: The Case of Engineering Design.” Memory & Cognition 35 (1): 29–38. doi:10.3758/BF03195939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J., B. T. Hagan, and H. M. Bratt. 1976. “The Failure-Experience Matrix - a Useful Design Tool.” Journal of Engineering for Industry 98 (3): 1074–1079. doi:10.1115/1.3439009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong, H., and L. H. Tong. 2006. “Grouping of TRIZ Inventive Principles to Facilitate Automatic Patent Classification.” Expert Systems with Applications 34 (1): 788–795. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, D. W., and P. Moreau. 2002. “The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking During New Product Ideation.” Journal of Marketing Research 39 (1): 47–60. doi:10.1509/jmkr.39.1.47.18930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K. 1997. “How Scientists Think: On-Line Creativity and Conceptual Change in Science.” In Conceptual Structures and Processes: Emergence, Discovery and Change, edited by T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, and S. Vaid, 461–493. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association press.
   Google Scholar
• Erden, M. S., H. Komoto, T. J. van Beek, V. D’Amelio, E. Echavarria, and E. E. T. Tomiyama. 2008. “A Review of Function Modeling: Approaches and Applications.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22 (02): 147–169. doi:10.1017/S0890060408000103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Z. Y., W. J. Li, and X. H. Li. 2007. Ontology Engineering and Its Application. [In Chinese]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forbus, K. D., D. Gentner, and K. Law. 1995. “MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-Based Retrieval.” Cognitive Science 19 (2): 141–205. doi:10.1016/0364-0213(95)90016-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, K., J. Chan, J. Cagan, K. Kotovsky, C. Schunn, and K. Wood. 2013. “The Meaning of “Near” and “far”: the Impact of Structuring Design Databases and the Effect of Distance of Analogy on Design Output.” Journal of Mechanical Design 135 (2): 021007. doi:10.1115/1.4023158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. 1983. “Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy.” Cognitive Science 7 (2): 155–170. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. 1990. “Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22 (4): 26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., and U. Kannengiesser. 2004. “The Situated Function–Behavior–Structure Framework.” Design Studies 25 (4): 373–391. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., and K. J. Holyoak. 1980. “Analogical Problem Solving.” Cognitive Psychology 12 (3): 306–355. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girault, C., and R. Valk. 2003. Petri Nets for Systems Engineering. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Goel, A. K., S. Rugaber, and S. Vattam. 2009. “Structure, Behavior, and Function of Complex Systems: The Structure, Behavior, and Function Modeling Language.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 23 (01): 23–35. doi:10.1017/S0890060409000080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden, I. J. 2005. “Function Based Archival and Retrieval: Developing a Repository of Biologically Inspired Product Concepts.” MS diss., University of Maryland, College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., and A. L. Sever. 2011. “Inspiring Design Ideas with Texts.” Design Studies 32 (2): 139–155. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Q. W. 2010. “Collaboration-oriented Research on Ontology Modeling of Mechanical Product Design Knowledge.” [In Chinese.]. MS diss., Hefei University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Hirtz, J., R. B. Stone, D. A. McAdams, S. Szykman, and K. L. Wood. 2002. “A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts.” Research in Engineering Design 13 (2): 65–82. doi:10.1007/s00163-001-0008-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, L. Z., W. Liu, R. H. Tan, and G. Z. Cao. 2015. "Research on Product Conceptual Design Based on Biological-Technological Characteristic Analogy." [In Chinese.] Chinese Journal of Engineering Design 22(4): 301–308. doi:10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2015.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Kalogerakis, K., C. Lüthje, and C. Herstatt. 2010. “Developing Innovations Based on Analogies:Experience from Design and Engineering Consultants.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 27 (3): 418–436. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00725.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, C. Y. 2014. “Exploring the Relationships Between Analogical, Analytical, and Creative Thinking.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 13: 80–88. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2014.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Y. H., R. H. Tan, and J. H. Ma. 2013. “Study on Patent Text Classification for Product Innovative Design.” Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 19 (2): 382–390.
   Google Scholar
• Linsey, J. S. 2007. “Design-by-analogy and Representation in Innovative Engineering Concept Generation.” PhD diss., The University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Linsey, J., I. Tseng, K. Fu, J. Cagan, K. L. Wood, and C. D. Schunn. 2010. “A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty.” Journal of Mechanical Design 132 (4): 041003. doi:10.1115/1.4001110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. Y. 2009. “Research on Construction and Semantic Retrieval of Multiple Majors Domain Ontology.” [In Chinese.]. PhD diss., Beijing Jiaotong University.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. Q., S. P. Ma, T. Hong, and Z. Z. Liu. 2010. Search Engine Technology Foundation. [In Chinese.]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z. G. 2014. "Study on Conceptual Design Based on Function and Physical Laws." [In Chinese.] PhD diss., Hebei University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, D. 2002. Hands on Systematic Innovation. Belgium: Creax press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. A., and K. L. Wood. 2002. “A Quantitative Similarity Metric for Design by Analogy.” Journal of Mechanical Design 124 (2): 173–182. doi:10.1115/1.1475317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, J., K. Kotovsky, and J. Cagan. 2007. “The Influence of Open Goals on the Acquisition of Problem-Relevant Information.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33 (5): 876–891. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. T. 2011. “Patent-based Analogy Search Tool for Innovative Concept Generation.” PhD diss., The University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., K. Fu, K. N. Otto, M. C. Yang, D. Jensen, and K. L. Wood. 2014. “Function Based Design-by-Analogy: a Functional Vector Approach to Analogical Search.” Journal of Mechanical Design 136 (10): 101102. doi:10.1115/1.4028093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., and W. Beitz. 2000. Engineering Design – A Systematic Approach. 2nd Ed., 3rd Print. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, L., and J. S. Gero. 1992. “A Design Support System Using Analogy.” In Artificial Intelligence in Design’ 92, edited by J. S. Gero and F. Sudweeks, 795–813. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, L., and J. S. Gero. 1996. “Function–Behavior–Structure Paths and Their Role in Analogy-Based Design.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10 (4): 289–312. doi:10.1017/S0890060400001633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. F. 1970. “Analogy and the Resolution of Some Cognitivity Problems.” The Journal of Philosophy 67 (20): 725–746. doi:10.2307/2024008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. 1977. “Component Processes in Analogical Reasoning.” Psychological Review 84 (4): 353–378. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studer, R., V. R. Benjamins, and D. Fensel. 1998. “Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods.” Data & Knowledge Engineering 25 (1): 161–197. doi:10.1016/S0169-023X(97)00056-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 2001. Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, R. H. 2006. “Process of Two Stages Analogy-Based Design Employing TRIZ.” International Journal of Product Development 4 (1–2): 109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, R. H. 2010. TRIZ and Applications: The Process and Methods of Technological Innovation. [In Chinese.]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, S. L. 2016. “Research on Ontology-Based Semantic Retrieval Model for Cloud Services.” [In Chinese.] PhD diss., Jinlin University.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, I., J. Moss, J. Cagan, and K. Kotovsky. 2008. “The Role of Timing and Analogical Similarity in the Stimulation of Idea Generation in Design.” Design Studies 29 (3): 203–221. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umeda, Y., and T. Tomiyama. 2016. “Development of Function Modeling and Its Application to Self-Maintenance Machine.” In Impact of Design Research on Industrial Practice, edited by C. Amaresh and U. Lindemann, 311–320. Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Umeda, Y., T. Tomiyama, and H. Yoshikawa. 1995. “FBS Modeling: Modeling Scheme of Function for Conceptual Design.” In proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, edited by B. Bredeweg, 271–278. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Vattam, S., B. Wiltgen, M. Helms, A. K. Goel, and Y. J. 2011. “DANE: Fostering Creativity in and Through Biologically Inspired Design.” The 1st International Conference on Design Creativity, Kobe, Japan, Nov 29–Dec 1.
   Google Scholar
• Verhaegen, P. A., J. D’hondt, D. Vandevenne, S. Dewulf, and J. Duflou. 2011. “Identifying Candidates for Design – by – Analogy.” Computers in Industry 62 (4): 446–459. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2010.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. 2006. “Research on Ontology-Based Semantic Information Retrieval.” [In Chinese.]. PhD diss., University of Science and Technology of China.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. 2011. “Semantic Retrieval Technology and Applications for Ancient Murals.” [In Chinese.]. PhD diss., Zhejiang University.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. B. 1998. “Analogical Distance and Purpose in Creative Thought: Mental Leaps Versus Mental Hops.” In Advances in Analogy Research: Integration of Theory and Data From the Cognitive, Computational, and Neural Sciences, edited by K. J. Holyoak, D. Gentner, and B. N. Kokinov, 221–230. Sofia: New Bulgarian University.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Y. Y. 2011. “Research of Ontology-Based Agricultural Knowledge Modeling and Reasoning.” [In Chinese.]. PhD diss., University of Science and Technology of China.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. O., D. Rosen, B. A. Nelson, and J. Yen. 2010. “The Effects of Biological Examples in Idea Generation.” Design Studies 31 (2): 169–186. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2009.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, W. 2014. “(Meta) Knowledge Modeling for Inventive Design.” PhD diss., Université de Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. H. 2013. “Research on Emergency Intelligent Information Retrieval System Based on Domain Knowledge Model.” [In Chinese.]. PhD diss., Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications.
   Google Scholar
• Yasushi, U., I. Masaki, Y. Masaharu, S. Yoshiki, and T. Tetsuo. 1996. “Supporting Conceptual Design Based on the Function-Behavior-State Modeler.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10 (4): 275–288. doi:10.1017/S0890060400001621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, C. Y. 2013. Petri net and Application. [In Chinese]. Beijing: Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, Y. 2008. “Recursive Object Model (ROM) – Modelling of Linguistic Information in Engineering Design.” Computers in Industry 59 (6): 612–625. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2008.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar