An integrated ISM-MICMAC approach for modelling and analysing dependencies among engineering parameters in the early design phase

References

• Agarwal, A., R. Shankar, and M. Tiwari. 2007. “Modelling Agility of Supply Chain.” Industrial Marketing Management 36 (4): 443–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, N., D. Wynn, and P. J. Clarkson. 2013. “Change Impact on a Product and its Redesign Process: a Tool for Knowledge Capture and Reuse.” Research in Engineering Design 24 (3): 219–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzebdeh, K., H. Bashir, and S. K. Al Siyabi. 2015. “Applying Interpretive Structural Modeling to Cost Overruns in Construction Projects in the Sultanate of Oman.” Journal of Engineering Research 12 (1): 53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Bashir, H., U. Ojiako, and C. Mota. 2020. “Modeling and Analyzing Factors Affecting Project Delays Using an Integrated Social Network-Fuzzy MICMAC Approach.” Engineering Management Journal 32 (1): 26:36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendoly, E. 2014. “System Dynamics Understanding in Projects: Information Sharing, Psychological Safety, and Performance Effects.” Production and Operations Management 23 (8): 1352–1369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhosale, V., and R. Kant. 2016. “An Integrated ISM Fuzzy MICMAC AApproach for Modelling the Supply Chain Knowledge Flow Enablers.” International Journal of Production Research 54: 7374–7399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan, N., and V. Thomson. 2010. “A Framework for NPD Processes Under Uncertainty.” Engineering Management Journal 22 (2): 27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischof, A., and L. Blessing. 2008. “Guidelines for the Development of Flexible Products.” Paper presented at the International Design Conference - Design 2008 Dubrovnik - Croatia, May 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, T. 2001. “Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48 (3): 292–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, T. 2016. “Design Structure Matrix Extensions and Innovations: A Survey and New Opportunities.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 63 (1): 27–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, R., R. Leite, and A. de Aquino. 2016. “A Graph is Worth a Thousand Words: How Overconfidence and Graphical Disclosure of Numerical Information Influence Financial Analysts Accuracy on Decision Making.” PLOS ONE 11 (8): e0160443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chander, M., S. Jain, and R. Shankar. 2013. “Modelling of Information Security Management Parameters in Indian Organizations Using ISM and MICMAC Approach.” Journal of Modelling in Management 8 (2): 171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P., C. Simons, and C. Eckert. 2004. “Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design.” Journal of Mechanical Design 126 (5): 788–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desanctis, G. 1984. “Computer Graphics as Decision Aids: Directions for Research.” Decision Sciences 15: 463–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, G., G. Desanctis, and D. McBride. 1986. “Understanding the Effectiveness of Computer Graphics for Decision Support: A Cumulative Experimental Approach.” Communications of the ACM 29 (1): 40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPrima, M. 1982. “Engineering Change Control and Implementation Considerations.” Production and Inventory Management 23 (1): 81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Duperrin, J., and M. Godet. 1973. Méthode De Hiérarchisation Des Éléments D'un Système: Essai De Prospective Du Système De L'énergie Nucléaire Dans Son Contexte Sociétal [Method of Hierarchization of Elements of a System: Prospective Testing of the Nuclear Energy System in its Societal Context]. Paris, France: Commissariat à l'énergie Atomique.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, C. M., and P. Clarkson. 2002. “Connectivity as a Key to Supporting Design: A State-Action Approach to Planning.” In Artificial Intelligence in Design 02, edited by John S Gero, 479–502. Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, C., P. Clarkson, and W. Zanker. 2004. “Change and Customisation in Complex Engineering Domains.” Research in Engineering Design 15 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, C. M., R. Keller, C. Earl, and P. J. Clarkson. 2006. “Supporting Change Processes in Design: Complexity, Prediction and Reliability.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 91 (12): 1521–1534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisa, H., A. Garstenauer, and T. Blackburn. 2018. “Causes of Engineering Change Propagation: An Analysis During Product Lifecycle.” Engineering Management Journal 30 (1): 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei, G., J. Gao, O. Owodunni, and X. Tang. 2011. “A Method for Engineering Design Change Analysis Using System Modelling and Knowledge Management Techniques.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 24 (6): 535–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fey, V., and E. Rivin. 2005. Innovation on Demand: New Product Development Using TRIZ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke, E., B. Gebhard, H. Negele, and E. Igenbergs. 2000. “Coping with Changes: Causes Findings and Strategies.” Systems Engineering 3 (4): 169–179.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke, E., and A. Schulz. 2005. “Design for Changeability (DFC): Principles to Enable Changes in Systems Throughout Their Entire Lifecycle.” Systems Engineering 8 (4): 342–359.
   Google Scholar
• Giffin, M., O. Weck, G. Bounova, R. Keller, C. Eckert, and P. J. Clarkson. 2009. “Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems.” Journal of Mechanical Design 131 (8): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Größler, A., J. Thun, and P. Milling. 2008. “System Dynamics as a Structural Theory in Operations Management.” Production and Operations Management 17 (3): 373–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamraz, B., N. Caldwell, T. Ridgman, and P. Clarkson. 2014. “FBS Linkage Ontology and Technique to Support Engineering Change Management.” Research in Engineering Design 26 (1): 3–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, J., and D. Clausing. 1988. “The House of Quality.” Harvard Business Review 66 (3): 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, PJ, TC Earle, and P Slovic. 1981. “Multi-Dimensional Functional Learning (MFL) and Some New Conceptions of Feedback.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 27 (1): 75–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, S., and E. Liu. 2005. “A Structural Component-Based Approach for Designing Product Family.” Computers in Industry 56: 13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, G., W. Yee, and K. Mak. 2003. “Current Practice of Engineering Change Management in Hong Kong Manufacturing Industries.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 139 (1-3): 481–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, D., Y. Dwivedi, N. Rana, and A. Simintiras. 2016. “Information Systems Project Failure – Analysis of Causal Links Using Interpretive Structural Modelling.” Production Planning & Control 27 (16): 1313–1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, D., N. Rana, and Y. Dwivedi. 2019. “Elucidation of IS Project Success Factors: An Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach.” Annals of Operations Research 285: 35–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, C., and M. Lin. 1987. Group Decision Making Under Multiple Criteria Methods and Applications. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jarratt, T., C. Eckert, R. Weeks, and P. Clarkson. 2003. “Environmental Legislation as a Driver of Design.” In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, Sweden, edited by A. Folkeson, K. Gralen, M. Norell, and U. Sellgren, 19–21. Accessed May 20, 2018. http://oro.open.ac.uk/13233/1/13233.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jawad, A., and H. Bashir. 2015. “Hierarchical Structuring of Organizational Performance Using Interpretive Structural Modelling.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 3-5 March doi: 10.1109/IEOM.2015.7093829.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldate, P., D. Thurston, H. Emamipour, and M. Rood. 2006. “Engineering Parameter Selection for Design Optimization During Preliminary Design.” Journal of Engineering Design 17 (4): 291–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamat, J., T. Shurong, N. Ahmad, A. Waheed, and S. Khan, 2018. “Barriers to Knowledge Management in the Health Sector of Pakistan.” Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal 10 (11): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, R., C. Eckert, and P. Clarkson. 2009. “Using an Engineering Change Methodology to Support Conceptual Design.” Journal of Engineering Design 20 (6): 571–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanam, S., J. Siddiqui, and F. Talib. 2015. “Modelling the TQM Enablers and IT Resources in the ICT Industry: an ISM-MICMAC Approach.” International Journal of Information Systems and Management 1 (3): 195–218.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, E. C. Y., N. H. M. Caldwell, and P. J. Clarkson. 2012. “A Method to Assess the Effects of Engineering Change Propagation.” Research in Engineering Design 23 (4): 329–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, C., J. Conrad, S. Wanke, and C. Weber. 2008. “A Matrix Representation of the CPM/PDD Approach as a Means for Change Impact Analysis.” In Proceedings of the 10th International Design Conference on Engineering Design, edited by D. Marjanovic, M. Storga, N. Pavkovic, and N. Bojcetic, 167–174. Dubrovnik, Croatia: The Design Society, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., V. Singh, and A. Haleem. 2015. “Critical Success Factors of Knowledge Management: Modelling and Comparison Using Various Techniques.” International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering 21 (2): 180–206.
   Google Scholar
• Kunrath, K., P. Cash, and M. Kleinsmann. 2020. “Designers’ Professional Identity: Personal Attributes and Design Skills.” Journal of Engineering Design 31 (6): 297–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, S., A. Maier, J. Wilberg, T. Munch, and U. Lindemann. 2012. “Exploring Differences between Average and Critical Engineering Changes: Survey Results from Denmark.” Paper presented at the 12th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Laslo, Z. 2010. “Project Portfolio Management: An Integrated Method for Resource Planning and Scheduling to Minimize Planning/Scheduling - Dependent Expenses.” International Journal of Project Management 28 (6): 609–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. 2008. “Design Participation Tactics: the Challenges and new Roles for Designers in the co-Design Process.” Co-design 4 (1): 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, D., and B. Turner. 1985. Engineering Design for Profit. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., and Y. Moon. 2012. “Modelling and Managing Engineering Changes in a Complex Product Development Process.” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 63 (9-12): 863–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Z. Wei, and Y. Ma. 2016. “A Shortest Path Method for Sequential Change Propagations in Complex Engineering Design Processes.” Artificial Intelligence Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 30 (1): 107–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and W. Zhao. 2014. “An Integrated Change Propagation Scheduling Approach for Product Design.” Concurrent Engineering 22 (4): 347–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, M., M. Tseng, K. Tan, and T. Bui. 2017. “Knowledge Management in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Improving Performance Through an Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach.” Journal of Cleaner Production 162: 806–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, S., J. Zhaoliang, and L. Wenping. 2016. “Evaluation of a Design Property Network-Based Change Propagation Routing Approach for Mechanical Product Development.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 30 (2016): 633–642.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M., and K. Ishii. 2002. “Design for Variety: Developing Standardized and Modularized Product Platform Architectures.” Research in Engineering Design 13 (4): 213–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, K. 1995. Engineering Data Management: A Guide to Successful Implementation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, N., A. Singh, N. P. Rana, and Y. K. Dwivedi. 2017. “Interpretive Structural Modelling and Fuzzy MICMAC Approaches for Customer Centric Beef Supply Chain: Application of a big Data Technique.” Production Planning & Control 28 (11-12): 945–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morkos, B., P. Shankar, and J. D. Summers. 2012. “Predicting Requirement Change Propagation, Using Higher Order Design Structure Matrices: An Industry Case Study.” Journal of Engineering Design 23 (12): 905–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, A., M. Halpern, R. Setchi, and P. Prickett. 2016. “Assessing the Challenges of Managing Product Design Change Through-Life.” Journal of Engineering Design 27 (1-3): 25–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A., M. Gregory, and K. Platts. 1995. “Performance Measurement System Design: a Literature Review and Research Agenda.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15 (4): 80–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pektas, S., and M. Pultar. 2006. “Modelling Detailed Information Flows in Building Design with the Parameter-Based Design Structure Matrix.” Design Studies 2 (1): 99–122.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, P., V. Palani, C. Michael, I. Matthew, K. Wood, and K. Otto. 2005. “An Empirical Foundation for Product Flexibility.” Design Studies 26 (4): 405–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddi, K. R., and Y. B. Moon. 2011. “System Dynamics Modelling of Engineering Change Management in a Collaborative Environment.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 55 (9–12): 1225–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage, A. P. 1979. Methodology for Large-Scale Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Samantra, C., S. Datta, S. Mahapatra, and B. Ranjan. 2016. “Interpretive Structural Modelling of Critical Risk Factors in Software Engineering Project.” Benchmarking: An International Journal 23 (1): 2–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saoud, L., J. Omran, B. Hassan, T. Vilutienė, and A. Kiaulakis. 2017. “A Method to Predict Change Propagation Within Building Information Model.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 23 (6): 836–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar, P., B. Morkos, and J. D. Summers. 2012. “Reasons for Change Propagation: A Case Study in an Automotive OEM.” Research in Engineering Design 23 (4): 291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindhwani, R., and V. Malhotra. 2017. “Modelling and Analysis of Agile Manufacturing System by ISM and MICMAC Analysis.” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 8 (2): 253–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, E. S., O. de Weck, and D. Chang. 2007. “Flexible Product Platform: Framework and Case Study.” Research on Engineering Design 18: 67–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C., and C. Loch. 1999. “Managing the Process of Engineering Change Orders: The Case of the Climate Control System in Automobile Development.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 (2): 160–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thamsatitdej, P., S. Boon-itt, P. Samaranayake, M. Wannakarn, and T. Laosirihongthong. 2017. “Eco-design Practices Towards Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) Approach.” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 10 (6): 326–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah, I., D. Tang, Q. Wang, L. Yin, and I. Hussain. 2018. “Managing Engineering Change Requirements During the Product Development Process.” Concurrent Engineering 26 (2): 171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah, I., D. Tang, and L. Yin. 2015. “Engineering Change Implications on Product Design: A Review of the Literature.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Education, Management and Computing Technology (ICEMCT2015), Tianjin, China.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K., and D. Eppinger. 2012. Product Design and Development. Singapore: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Vianello, G., and S. Ahmed-Kristensen. 2012. “A Comparative Study of Changes Across the Lifecycle of Complex Products in a Variant and a Customised Industry.” Journal of Engineering Design 23 (2): 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warfield, J. 1974. “Developing Interconnected Matrices in Structural Modelling.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 4 (1): 51–81.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar