Product emotional design method based on image metaphor: a technical note

References

• Acar, S., and M. A. Runco. 2014. “Assessing Associative Distance Among Ideas Elicited by Tests of Divergent Thinking.” Creativity Research Journal 26 (2): 229–238. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.901095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaniz, T., and S. Biazzo. 2019. “Emotional Design: The Development of a Process to Envision Emotion-Centric New Product Ideas.” Procedia Computer Science, 474–484. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.078.
   Google Scholar
• Alcántara, E., Artacho, M. A., González, J. C., and Garcia, A. C. 2005. “Application of Product Semantics to Footwear Design. Part I – Identification of Footwear Semantic Space Applying Differential Semantics.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (8): 713–725. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2005.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Álvarez, A., and T. Ritchey. 2015. “Applications of General Morphological Analysis: From Engineering Design to Policy Analysis.” Acta Morphologica Generalis 4 (1): 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Buker, T., Schmitt, T., Miehling, J., and Wartzack, S. 2022. “What’s More Important for Product Design – Usability or Emotionality? An Examination of Influencing Factors.” Journal of Engineering Design 33 (8-9): 635–669. doi:10.1080/09544828.2022.2142902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casakin, H. P. 2007. “Metaphors in Design Problem Solving: Implications for Creativity.” International Journal of Design 1 (2): 21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. M., and C. W. Chen. 2016. “Kansei Assessment of the Constituent Elements and the Overall Interrelations in car Steering Wheel Design.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 56: 97–105. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2016.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., and Y. Gao. 2005. Semantic Communication. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. C., and K. Z. Lin. 2018. “Utilizing Text Mining and Kansei Engineering to Support Data-Driven Design Automation at Conceptual Design Stage.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 38: 826–839. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2018.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. E. 2007. Metaphor. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, R. A., Zaltman, G., and Coulter, K. S. 2001. “Interpreting Consumer Perceptions of Advertising: An Application of the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique.” Journal of Advertising 30 (4): 1–21. doi:10.1080/00913367.2001.10673648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., and Clarkson, P. J. 2004. “Seeing Things: Consumer Response to the Visual Domain in Product Design.” Design Studies 25 (6): 547–577. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbilek, O., and B. Sener. 2010. “Product Design, Semantics and Emotional Response.” Ergonomics 46 (13-14): 1346–1360. doi:10.1080/00140130310001610874.
   Google Scholar
• Demirtas, E. A., Anagun, A. S., and Koksal, G. 2009. “Determination of Optimal Product Styles by Ordinal Logistic Regression Versus Conjoint Analysis for Kitchen Faucets.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39 (5): 866–875. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2009.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derboven, J., De Roeck, D., and Verstraete, M. 2012. “Semiotic Analysis of Multi-Touch Interface Design: The MuTable Case Study.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70 (10): 714–728. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. 2002. Designing Emotions. Delft: Delft University of Technology. Department of Industrial Design.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. 2018. “Measuring Emotion: Development and Application of an Instrument to Measure Emotional Responses to Products.” Funology 2: 391–404. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68213-6_25.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, M., Zhao, L., Sun, M., and Qin, H. 2022. “An ISM-BN-GA Based Methodology for Product Emotional Design.” Displays 74: 102279, doi:10.1016/j.displa.2022.102279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endrissat, N., Islam, G., and Noppeney, C. 2016. “Visual Organizing: Balancing Coordination and Creative Freedom via Mood Boards.” Journal of Business Research 69 (7): 2353–2362. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, C. 2011. “Using Scenarios to Explore Employee Attitudes in Retailing.” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 39 (3): 218–228. doi:10.1108/09590551111115042.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., and Badke-Schaub, P. 2014. “What Inspires Designers? Preferences on Inspirational Approaches During Idea Generation.” Design Studies 35 (1): 29–53. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2013.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, F., Cao, Y., Ding, Y., Liu, W., and Zhang, X. 2015. “A Multimodal Measurement Method of Users’ Emotional Experiences Shopping Online.” Human Factors & Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 25 (5): 585–598. doi:10.1002/hfm.20577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, F., Qu, Q. X., Nagamachi, M., and Duffy, V. G. 2020. “A Proposal of the Event-Related Potential Method to Effectively Identify Kansei Words for Assessing Product Design Features in Kansei Engineering Research.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 76: 102940. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, C., and C. Foster. 2019. “Exploring the ZMET Methodology in Services Marketing.” Journal of Services Marketing 34 (1), doi:10.1108/JSM-11-2018-0344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanington, B., and B. Martin. 2019. Universal Methods of Design. Rockport: Rockport Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Honda, S., Yanagisawa, H., and Kato, T. 2022. “Aesthetic Shape Generation System Based on Novelty and Complexity.” Journal of Engineering Design 33 (12): 1016–1035. doi:10.1080/09544828.2022.2155343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, M., and B. King. 2018. “Explaining the Embodied Hospitality Experience with ZMET.” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 30 (11): 3442–3461. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-10-2017-0709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao, J. R., Zhang, Y., and Helander, M. 2006. “A Kansei Mining System for Affective Design.” Expert Systems with Applications 30 (4): 658–673. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.07.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. 2006. How We Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, J. Y., Chen, C. H., Koyama, S., and Chang, D. 2021. “Investigating the Relationship Between Users’ Eye Movements and Perceived Product Attributes in Design Concept Evaluation.” Applied Ergonomics 94. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, G., and J. Kapferer. 1985. “Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles.” Journal of Marketing Research 22 (1): 41–53. doi:10.2307/3151549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q. Y. 2006. Sparse Coding Theory of Visual Perception and its Application. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Mingqing, Y., Chao, Z., and Lingling, L. 2013. “The Product Emotion and Key Technologies for Emotional Measurement.” Journal of Graphic 34 (1): 122–127. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-302X.2013.01.023.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., Su, J., Zhang, Z., and Bai, R. 2021. “Product Innovation Concept Generation Based on Deep Learning and Kansei Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Design 32 (10): 559–589. doi:10.1080/09544828.2021.1928023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., and S. X. Yang. 2022. “Study on Product Form Design via Kansei Engineering and Virtual Reality.” Journal of Engineering Design 33 (6): 412–440. doi:10.1080/09544828.2022.2078660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Z. L., and F. Frenkler. 2017. “Modeling Design of New Energy Vehicles Based on Semantic Analysis.” Journal of Machine Design 34 (03): 111–116. doi:10.13841/j.cnki.jxsj.2017.03.021.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, L. X., and L. Hong. 2015. Kansei Engineering Design. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonagh, D., Bruseberg, A., and Haslam, C. 2002. “Visual Product Evaluation: Exploring Users’ Emotional Relationships with Products.” Applied Ergonomics 33 (3): 231–240. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00008-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, D. P., Blessing, L. T., Yang, M. C., Hernández, A. A., and Wood, K. L 2016. “Overcoming Design Fixation: Design by Analogy Studies and Nonintuitive Findings.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 30 (2): 185–199. doi:10.1017/S0890060416000068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvey, M. S., and B. E. Kavalam. 2010. “Mining Deeper Meaning in Consumer Decision Maps.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 13 (4): 372–388. doi:10.1108/13522751011078809.
   Google Scholar
• Nagamachi, M. 2002. “Kansei Engineering as a Powerful Consumer-Oriented Technology for Product Development.” Applied Ergonomics 33 (3): 289–294. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00019-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 2002. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 2005. Emotional Design: Why We Love Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, C. E. 1967. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1991. Peirce on Signs. Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petiot, J., and B. Yannou. 2004. “Measuring Consumer Perceptions for a Better Comprehension, Specification and Assessment of Product Semantics.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 33 (6): 507–525. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2003.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poyatos, F. 1993. Paralanguage a Linguistic and Interdisciplinary Approach to Interactive Speech and Sound. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Quan, H., Li, S., Wei, H., and Hu, J. 2019. “Personalized Product Evaluation Based on GRA-TOPSIS and Kansei Engineering.” Symmetry 11 (7): 867. doi:10.3390/sym11070867.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolf, A. 2008. Art and Visual Perception. Hunan: Hunan Fine Arts Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. 1990. Tell Me a Story: A New Look at Real and Artificial Memory. New York: Charles Scribners Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Song, M. Y., Xiao, H. J., Qi, L. Y., and Yu, L. L. 2014. “Relationship Between Brand Experience and Purchasing Intention: Smart-Phone Market Based on the Moderating Effect of Brand Involvement.” Journal of Dalian University of Technology 35 (03): 62–68. doi:10.19525/j.issn1008-407x.2014.03.012.
   Google Scholar
• Tasse, D., A. Ankolekar, and Hailpern, J. 2016. “Getting Users Attention in web Apps in Likable Minimally Annoying Ways.” In Proceedings of 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3324–3334. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858174.
   Google Scholar
• Treur, J. 2021. “Mental Models in the Brain: On Context-Dependent Neural Correlates of Mental Models.” Cognitive Systems Research 69: 83–90. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira, J., Osório, J. M. A., Mouta, S., Delgado, P., Portinha, A., Meireles, J. F., and Santos, J. A. 2017. “Kansei Engineering as a Tool for the Design of In-Vehicle Rubber Keypads.” Applied Ergonomics 61 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.016.12.019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei, Z., and J. H. Nie. 2021. “Research on Interface Design Based on User’s Mental Model Driven by Interactive Genetic Algorithm.” International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation 17 (1): 42–51. doi:10.1504/IJBIC.2021.113364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside, A. G. 2008. “Using the Forced Metaphor-Elicitation Technique (FMET) to Meet Animal Companions Within Self.” Journal of Business Research 61 (5): 480–487. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, Y., and Y. Li. 2011. “An Image Quantization of Product Form Design Method Based on Form Feature Lines.” Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition) 43 (3): 233–238. doi:10.15961/j.jsuese.2011.03.031.
   Google Scholar
• Yakin, H., and A. Totu. 2014. “The Semiotic Perspectives of Peirce and Saussure: A Brief Comparative Study.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 155: 4–8. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.247.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. C. 2011. “A Classification-Based Kansei Engineering System for Modeling Consumers’ Affective Responses and Analyzing Product Form Features.” Expert Systems with Applications 38 (9): 11382–11393. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, P., Y. Xiong, Y. Li, L. Liu, and M. Li. 2017. “An Exploration into the Influence of Stimulation Distance of Stimulus Information on Design Thinking Based on EEG Alpha Activity.” Journal of Mechanical Engineering 53: 15. doi:10.3901/JME.2017.15.040.
   Google Scholar
• Zabotto, C. N., D. C. Amaral, C. J. M. Hornos, and B. G. Benze. 2019. “Automatic Digital Mood Boards to Connect Users and Designers with Kansei Engineering.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 74: 341. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, J. L. 1985. “Measuring the Involvement Construct.” The Journal of Consumer Research 12 (3). doi:10.1086/208520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaltman, G., and R. H. Coulter. 1995. “Seeing the Voice of the Customer: Metaphor-Based Advertising Research.” Journal of Advertising Research 35 (4): 35–51. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)00377-H.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, L. Y., L. P. Khoo, Zhao-Wei Zhong 2009. “A Rough Set Based Decision Support Approach to Improving Consumer Affective Satisfaction in Product Design.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39 (2): 295–302. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. L. 2006. Product Semantics. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. 2009. “The Characters and Levels of Product Semantics of Chinese Traditional Culture.” Journal of Hebei University 34 (1): 121–124. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6378.2009.01.025.
   Google Scholar
• Zwicky, F. 1969. Discovery, Invention, Research – Through the Morphological Approach. Toronto: The Macmillian Company.
   Google Scholar