Effects of product personalisation degree on user perception in car front design

References

• Baig, M. Z., and M. Kavakli. 2019. “A Survey on Psycho-Physiological Analysis & Measurement Methods in Multimodal Systems.” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 3 (2): 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3020037.
   Google Scholar
• Bekele, E., and N. Sarkar. 2014. “Psychophysiological Feedback for Adaptive Human–Robot Interaction (HRI).” In Advances in Physiological Computing, edited by Fairclough S. and Gilleade K., 141–167. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6392-3_7.
   Google Scholar
• Benaissa, B., and M. Kobayashi. 2023. “The Consumers’ Response to Product Design: A Narrative Review.” Ergonomics 66 (6): 791–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2127919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom, J. 2000. “Personalization: a taxonomy.” In CHI'00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 313–314. https://doi.org/10.1145/633292.633483.
   Google Scholar
• Blom, J. O., and A. F. Monk. 2003. “Theory of Personalization of Appearance: Why Users Personalize Their PCs and Mobile Phones.” Human-computer Interaction 18 (3): 193–228. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1803_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bynion, T. M., and M. T. Feldner. 2020. Self-Assessment Manikin. Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, 4654-4656. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_77.
   Google Scholar
• Cantamessa, M., F. Montagna, S. Altavilla, and A. Casagrande-Seretti. 2020. “Data-Driven Design: The New Challenges of Digitalization on Product Design and Development.” Design Science 6: e27. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., Y. Zhang, Y. Ding, V. G. Duffy, and X. Zhang. 2021. “Is an Anthropomorphic app Icon More Attractive? Evidence from Neuroergonomomics.” Applied Ergonomics 97: 103545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. C., J. H. Huang, S. Gupta, and G. Akman. 2021. “Developing a Personalized Recommendation System in a Smart Product Service System Based on Unsupervised Learning Model.” Computers in Industry 128: 103421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N., D. Good, D. Matravers, and P. J. Clarkson. 2008. “Design as Communication: Exploring the Validity and Utility of Relating Intention to Interpretation.” Design Studies 29 (5): 425–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, P., and P. Hekkert. 2007. “Framework of Product Experience.” International Journal of Design 1 (1), https://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/66/15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. M., J. C. O. Nicolas, and J. P. Schoormans. 2008. “Product Personality in Physical Interaction.” Design Studies 29 (5): 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, H., and M. S. Poole. 2006. “What is Personalization? Perspectives on the Design and Implementation of Personalization in Information Systems.” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 16 (3-4): 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2006.9681199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, N., and M. Schreier. 2010. “Why Customers Value Self-Designed Products: The Importance of Process Effort and Enjoyment.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 27 (7): 1020–1031. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00768.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs-Frothnhofen, P., E. A. Hartmann, D. Brandt, and D. Weydandt. 1996. “Designing Human-Machine Interfaces to Match the User's Mental Models.” Control Engineering Practice 4 (1): 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0661(95)00201-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, Y., Y. Ji, S. Jiang, X. Liu, Z. Feng, Y. Li, and Y. Liu. 2021. “Integrating Aesthetic and Emotional Preferences in Social Robot Design: An Affective Design Approach with Kansei Engineering and Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 83: 103128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govers, P. C. M. 2004. Product Personality. PhD. Delft University of Technology, Delft, NL.
   Google Scholar
• Govers, P., P. Hekkert, and J. P. Schoormans. 2003. Happy, Cute and Tough: Can Designers Create a Product Personality that Consumers Understand. In Design and Emotion (pp. 345-349). https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai:surfsharekit.nl:771893fa-f065-4a29-a204-27d1bb580c33.
   Google Scholar
• Govers, P. C., and J. P. Schoormans. 2005. “Product personality and its influence on consumer preference.” Journal of Consumer Marketing, https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760510605308.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., A. A. Pepe, and L. L. Murphy. 2005. “Hedonomics: The Power of Positive and Pleasurable Ergonomics.” Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications 13 (1): 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/106480460501300104.
   Google Scholar
• Hashmi, H. B. A., C. Shu, S. W. Haider, A. Khalid, and Y. Munir. 2021. “Bridging the gap Between Product Design and Customer Engagement: Role of Self-Determined Needs Satisfaction.” Sage Open 11 (4): 215824402110565. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211056598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helander, M. G., and H. M. Khalid. 2006. “Affective and Pleasurable Design.” Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics 3: 543–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470048204.ch21.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. L., Y. C. Chen, T. N. Yang, W. K. Lin, and Y. H. Liu. 2018. “Does Product Design Matter? Exploring its Influences in Consumers’ Psychological Responses and Brand Loyalty.” Information Technology & People 31 (3): 886–907. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2017-0206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneko, K., Y. Kishita, and Y. Umeda. 2018. “Toward Developing a Design Method of Personalization: Proposal of a Personalization Procedure.” Procedia CIRP 69: 740–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.134.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid, H. M., and M. G. Helander. 2004. “A Framework for Affective Customer Needs in Product Design.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5 (1): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922031000086744.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. Y., and Y. Lee. 2020. “The Effect of Online Customization on Consumers’ Happiness and Purchase Intention and the Mediating Roles of Autonomy, Competence, and Pride of Authorship.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 36 (5): 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1658375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatt, W. K., A. Chesham, and J. S. Lobmaier. 2016. “Putting up a big Front: Car Design and Size Affect Road-Crossing Behaviour.” PLoS One 11 (7): e0159455. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, J. Y., C. H. Chen, S. Koyama, and D. Chang. 2021. “Investigating the Relationship Between Users’ eye Movements and Perceived Product Attributes in Design Concept Evaluation.” Applied Ergonomics 94: 103393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauff, C. A., D. Knight, D. Kotys-Schwartz, and M. E. Rentschler. 2020. “The Role of Prototypes in Communication Between Stakeholders.” Design Studies 66: 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., R. Tan, and X. Gong. 2023. “How Omnichannel Integration Promotes Customer Word-of-Mouth Behaviors: The Mediating Roles of Perceived Personal Preference fit and Perceived Social Relatedness.” Information Technology & People 36 (4): 1726–1753. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2021-0440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, S., Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, and J. Xu. 2020. “A User Biology Preference Prediction Model Based on the Perceptual Evaluations of Designers for Biologically Inspired Design.” Symmetry 12 (11): 1860. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12111860.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C., and A. Uemura. 1983. “Stylistic Evolution in European Music.” Leonardo, 225–228. https://doi.org/10.2307/1574920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, G., P. A. Hancock, J. Lin, A. R. Panganiban, L. E. Reinerman-Jones, J. L. Szalma, and R. W. Wohleber. 2021. “Evolution and Revolution: Personality Research for the Coming World of Robots, Artificial Intelligence, and Autonomous Systems.” Personality and Individual Differences 169: 109969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, J. P., J. Cagan, and C. M. Vogel. 2004. “Speaking the Buick Language: Capturing, Understanding, and Exploring Brand Identity with Shape Grammars.” Design Studies 25 (1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00023-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill, A. L., and P. Anand. 1989. “The Effect of Imagery on Information Processing Strategy in a Multiattribute Choice Task.” Marketing Letters 1 (1): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436144.
   Google Scholar
• Mehra, B. 2021. “Chatbot Personality Preferences in Global South Urban English Speakers.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 3 (1): 100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100131.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. 1997. “Comparison of the PAD and PANAS as Models for Describing Emotions and for Differentiating Anxiety from Depression.” Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 19 (4): 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02229025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugge, R. 2011. “The Effect of a Business-Like Personality on the Perceived Performance Quality of Products.” International Journal of Design 5 (3): 67–76. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:571599ca-4d89-4d90-be59-0aa3e0bcd520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugge, R., P. C. Govers, and J. P. Schoormans. 2009a. “The Development and Testing of a Product Personality Scale.” Design Studies 30 (3): 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugge, R., J. P. Schoormans, and H. N. Schifferstein. 2009b. “Emotional Bonding with Personalised Products.” Journal of Engineering Design 20 (5): 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820802698550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagamachi, M. 2002. “Kansei Engineering as a Powerful Consumer-Oriented Technology for Product Development.” Applied Ergonomics 33 (3): 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00019-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, C. H., and M. Kumar. 2008. “Using Product Design Strategically to Create Deeper Consumer Connections.” Business Horizons 51 (5): 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2008.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. 2007. Emotional Design: Why we Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. UK: Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. E., and K. B. Schloss. 2010. “An Ecological Valence Theory of Human Color Preference.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (19): 8877–8882. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906172107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazhoohi, Farid, and Alan Kingstone. 2022. “Larger vehicles are perceived as more aggressive, angry, dominant, and masculine.” Current Psychology 41 (7): 4195–4199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00936-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, A. T. 1986. “Environmental Perception and Affect: A Schema Discrepancy Model.” Environment and Behavior 18 (1): 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916586181001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safavi, F., P. Olikkal, D. Pei, S. Kamal, H. Meyerson, V. Penumalee, and R. Vinjamuri. 2024. “Emerging Frontiers in Human–Robot Interaction.” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 110 (2): 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-024-02074-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, S., and O. S. Kingo. 2019. “How is Physiological Arousal Related to Self-Reported Measures of Emotional Intensity and Valence of Events and Their Autobiographical Memories?” Consciousness and Cognition 75: 102811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seva, R. R., H. B. L. Duh, and M. G. Helander. 2007. “The Marketing Implications of Affective Product Design.” Applied Ergonomics 38 (6): 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seva, R. R., and M. G. Helander. 2009. “The Influence of Cellular Phone Attributes on Users’ Affective Experiences: A Cultural Comparison.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39 (2): 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikhwal, R. K., and P. R. Childs. 2021. “Towards Mass Individualisation: Setting the Scope and Industrial Implication.” Design Science 7, https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirgy, M. J. 1982. “Self-concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review.” Journal of Consumer Research 9 (3): 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snelders, D., and P. Hekkert. 1999. “Association Measures as Predictors of Product Originality.” Advances in Consumer Research 26 (1): 588–592. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=83144387&lang=zh-cn&site=eds-live.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, X., J. Li, P. Tang, S. Zhou, X. Peng, H. N. Li, and Q. Wang. 2020. “Exploring Personalised Autonomous Vehicles to Influence User Trust.” Cognitive Computation 12 (6): 1170–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09757-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X., A. May, and Q. Wang. 2016. “The Impact of User- and System-Initiated Personalization on the User Experience at Large Sports Events.” Applied Ergonomics 54: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C., H. Chung, K. Barton, S. J. Hu, and T. Freiheit. 2020. “Incorporating Customer Personalization Preferences in Open Product Architecture Design.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 56: 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C., S. J. Hu, H. Chung, K. Barton, C. Piya, K. Ramani, and M. Banu. 2017. “Product Personalization Enabled by Assembly Architecture and Cyber Physical Systems.” CIRP Annals 66 (1): 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirumalai, S., and K. K. Sinha. 2009. “Customization Strategies in Electronic Retailing: Implications of Customer Purchase Behavior.” Decision Sciences 40 (1): 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00222.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N., and D. Zmiri. 2006. “Exploring Attributes of Skins as Potential Antecedents of Emotion in HCI.” Aesthetic Computing, 405–422. http://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262562379/.
   Google Scholar
• Windhager, S., F. L. Bookstein, K. Grammer, E. Oberzaucher, H. Said, D. E. Slice, T. Thorstensen, and K. Schaefer. 2012. ““Cars Have Their own Faces”: Cross-Cultural Ratings of car Shapes in Biological (Stereotypical) Terms.” Evolution and Human Behavior 33 (2): 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D. 2022. “Brand Image Innovation Design Based on the era of 5G Internet of Things.” Journal of Intelligent Systems 31 (1): 1262–1273. https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2022-0135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, H. C., R. Jain, S. Shukla, S. Avikal, and P. K. Mishra. 2013. “Prioritization of Aesthetic Attributes of car Profile.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 43 (4): 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2013.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar