Development and psychometric evaluation of the self-assessment of psoriasis symptoms (SAPS) – clinical trial and the SAPS – real world patient-reported outcomes

References

• American Academy of Dermatology. Psoriasis Shaumburg, IL: American Academy of Dermatology; 2015. Available from: https://www.aad.org/public/diseases/scaly-skin/psoriasis. Accessed October 11, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rachakonda TD, Schupp CW, Armstrong AW. Psoriasis prevalence among adults in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:512–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Psoriasis Foundation. About Psoriasis Portland, OR: National Psoriasis Foundation; 2015. Available from: https://www.psoriasis.org/about-psoriasis. Accessed June 12, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis-oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica. 1978;157:238–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langley RG, Ellis CN. Evaluating psoriasis with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Psoriasis Global Assessment, and Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51:563–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeshita J, Duffin KC, Shin DB, et al. Patient-reported outcomes for psoriasis patients with clear versus almost clear skin in the clinical setting. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:633–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen H, Cordingley L, Young H, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in psoriasis: the good, the bad and the missing!. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172:1210–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strober BE, Nyirady J, Mallya UG, et al. Item-level psychometric properties for a new patient-reported psoriasis symptom diary. Value Health. 2013;16:1014–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naegeli AN, Flood E, Tucker J, et al. The Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis. Int J Dermatol. 2015;54:715–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revicki DA, Jin Y, Wilson HD, et al. Reliability and validity of the psoriasis symptom inventory in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2014;25:8–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilet H, Roborel de Climens A, Arnould B, et al. Development and psychometric validation of the REFlective evaLuation of psoriasis Efficacy of Treatment and Severity (REFLETS) questionnaire: a common measure of plaque-type psoriasis severity and treatment efficacy for patients and clinicians. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:498–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for Industry: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley M, Atkinson P, Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman EA, Miles MB, Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, et al. Content validity-establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1-eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health. 2011;14:967–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman M, Burke L, Erickson P, et al. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR good research practices for evaluating and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PRO task force report. Value Health. 2009;12:1075–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss A, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Transaction, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Shields AL, Shiffman S, Stone A, Recall bias: understanding and reducing bias in PRO data collection. In: Tiplady B, Byrom B, eds. ePRO: electronic solutions for patient-reported data. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2010. p 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA, Simon HA, Protocol Analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Willis GB, Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)-a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994;19:210–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) 2016. Available from: http://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/dermatology/quality-of-life/dermatology-quality-of-life-index-dlqi/. Accessed March 29, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, The assessment of reliability. In: Bernstein I, ed. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill, 1994. p 248–92.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally J, Bernstein I, Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder CF, Aaronson NK. Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. The Lancet. 2009;374:369–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson EC, Hvitfeldt H, Reid R, et al. Using Patient-Reported Information to Improve Health Outcomes and Health Care Value: Case Studies from Dartmouth, Karolinska and Group Health. Lebanon, NH: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, et al. Content validity-establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 2-assessing respondent understanding. Value Health. 2011;14:978–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande PR, Rajan S, Sudeepthi BL, Abdul Nazir CP. Patient-reported outcomes: a new era in clinical research. Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2:137–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8:94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar