References
- Banken R, Agboola F, Fazioli K et al. Targeted immunomodulators for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: effectiveness and value – condition update. Boston, MA: Institute for Clinical and Economic Review; 2018.
- Owens DK. Interpretation of cost-effectiveness analyses. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:716–717.
- Feldman SR, Burudpakdee C, Gala S, et al. The economic burden of psoriasis: a systematic literature review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14:685–703.
- James SM, Hill DE, Feldman SR. Costs of common psoriasis medications, 2010–2014. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15:305–308.
- Levin AA, Gottlieb AB, Au SC. A comparison of psoriasis drug failure rates and reasons for discontinuation in biologics vs conventional systemic therapies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13: 848–853.
- Mauskopf J, Samuel M, McBride D, et al. Treatment sequencing after failure of the first biologic in cost-effectiveness models of psoriasis: a systematic review of published models and clinical practice guidelines. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32:395–409.
- Abdelnabi M, Patel A, Rengifo-Pardo M, et al. Insurance coverage of biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a retrospective, observational 5-year chart review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016;17:421–424.
- Dolgin E. First eczema biologic debuts but price could restrict use. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:391–392.
- Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. Dupilumab and crisaborole for Atopic dermatitis: effectiveness and value. Evidence Report. May 12, 2017. https://icer-review.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/MWCEPAC_ATOPIC_EVIDENCE_REPORT_051217.pdf Accessed 1 Nov 2018.
- Kuznik A, Bego-Le-Baggouse G, Eckert L, et al. Economic evaluation of dupilumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2017;7:493–505.