Challenges of cultural industry knowledge exchange in live performance audience research

References

• Allmer, T. (2018). Precarious, always-on and flexible: A case study of academics as information workers. European Journal of Communication, 33(4), 381–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts Council Wales. (2016). Artists in Schools Toolkit. Retrieved from www.artists-schools.com
   Google Scholar
• Barker, M., & Mathijs, E. (Eds.). (2008). Watching The Lord of the Rings: Tolkein’s World Audiences. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, M., & Mathijs, E. (2016). Introduction: The world hobbit project. Participations, 13(2), 158–174.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2008). The Social Impact of the Arts: An Intellectual History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, J., Watermeyer, R., & Wakeling, P. (2017). Fear and loathing in the academy? The role of emotion in response to an impact agenda in the UK and Australia. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(3), 555–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppieters, F. (1981). Performance and perception. Poetics Today, 2(3), 35–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossick, G., & Kaszynska, P. (2016). Understanding the Value of Arts & Culture: The AHRC Cultural Value Project. Arts and Humanities Research Council. Retrieved from https://ahrc.ukri.org/documents/publications/cultural-value-project-final-report
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, J., Moreton, S., Sparke, S., & Sharpe, B. (2016). The practice of cultural ecology: Network connectivity in the creative economy. Cultural Trends, 25(2), 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freshwater, H. (2009). Theatre & Audience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, A., & Comunian, R. (2016). Beyond the campus: Higher education, cultural policy and the creative economy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22(1), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauge, E. S., Pinheiro, R. M., & Zyzak, B. (2018). Knowledge bases and regional development: Collaborations between higher education and cultural creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 24(4), 485–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C., & Ryan, L.-A. (2013). Festival spaces as third places. Journal of Place Management and Development, 6(3), 192–202.
   Google Scholar
• Heim, C. (2012). “Argue with us!”: Audience co-creation through post-performance discussions. New Theatre Quarterly, 28, 189–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermes, J. (2009). Audience studies 2.0: On the theory, politics and method of qualitative audience research. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 1(1), 111–127.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, K., & Glow, H. (2015). A virtuous circle: The positive evaluation phenomenon in arts audience research. Participations, 12(1), 254–270.
   Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. W., & Champion, K. (2015). Shaping screen talent: Conceptualising and developing the film and TV workforce in Scotland. Cultural Trends, 24(2), 165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa, F., & Lightowler, C. (2013). Knowledge exchange: A comparison of policies, strategies, and funding incentives in English and Scottish higher education. Research Evaluation, 22(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindelof, A. M., & Hansen, L. E. (2015). Talking about theatre: Audience development through dialogue. Participations, 12(1), 234–253.
   Google Scholar
• McCowan, T. (2018). Five perils of the impact agenda in higher education. London Review of Education, 16(2), 279–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (2016). Preface. In K. Sedgman (Ed.), Locating the Audience: How People Found Value in National Theatre Wales (pp. xi–xvi). Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Moeran, B. (2009). From participant observation to observant participation. In S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels, & F. Kamsteeg (Eds.), Organizational Ethnography: Studying the Complexity of Everyday Life (pp. 139–155). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Moreton, S. (2016). Rethinking 'knowledge exchange': New approaches to collaborative work in the arts and humanities. Cultural Trends, 22(1), 100–115.
   Google Scholar
• Moreton, S. (2018). Contributing to the creative economy imaginary: Universities and the creative sector. Cultural Trends, 27(5), 327–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R. (2016). Higher Education Worldviews Competition Annual Lecture. Retrieved from www.bath.ac.uk/management/news_events/news/2016/25-04-rajani-naidoohigher-education-competition-worldviews-annual-lecture.htm
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998). Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 257–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oriel Wrecsam. (2016). One Year Off-Site. Retrieved from www.ow1516.com
   Google Scholar
• Pain, R., Kesby, M., & Askins, K. (2011). Geographies of impact: Power, participation and potential. Area, 43(2), 183–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette, J., & Redaelli, E. (2015). Arts Management and Cultural Policy Research. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Phiddian, R., Meyrick, J., Barnett, T., & Maltby, R. (2017). Counting culture to death. Cultural Trends, 26(2), 174–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, S. (2005). What makes an audience? Investigating the roles and experiences of listeners at a chamber music festival. Music and Letters, 86(2), 257–269.
   Google Scholar
• Radbourne, J., Glow, H., & Johanson, K. (2010). Measuring the intrinsic benefits of arts attendance. Cultural Trends, 19(4), 307–324.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, M. (2010a). Asking the audience: Audience research and the experience of theatre. About Performance, 10, 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, M. (2010b). The Young Audience: Exploring and Enhancing Children’s Experiences of Theatre. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reinelt, J. (2014). What UK spectators know: Understanding how we come to value theatre. Theatre Journal, 66(3), 337–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauter, W. (1986). Theatre talks: Or how to find out what the spectator thinks. Nordic Theatre Studies, 5, 136–145.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, P. (2013). Expertise, the academy and the governance of cultural policy. Media, Culture & Society, 35(1), 27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenmakers, H. (1990). The spectator in the leading role. In W. Sauter (Ed.), New Directions in Theatre Research: Proceedings of the XIth FIRT/IFTR Congress (Nordic Theatre Studies - special international issue), pp. 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Scollen, R. (2007). Theatre talks evolve into talking theatre. In Y. Feiler, R. Hoogland, & K. Westerling (Eds.), Willmar in the World: Young Scholars Exploring the Theatrical Event  (pp. 46–58). Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scollen, R. (2008). Regional voices talk theatre: Audience development for the performing arts. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(1), 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgman, K. (2016). Locating the Audience: How People Found Value in National Theatre Wales. Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgman, K. (2017). Audience experience in an anti-expert age. Theatre Research International, 42(3), 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgman, K. (2018). The Reasonable Audience: Theatre Etiquette, Behaviour Policing, and the Live Performance Audience Experience. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgman, K. (in press). On rigour in theatre audience research. Contemporary Theatre Review.
   Google Scholar
• Stainforth, E., & Borchi, A. (2015). The nature and value of cultural policy research for early career researchers. Cultural Trends, 24(2), 109–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulloch, J. (2000). Approaching theatre audiences: Active school students and commoditised high culture. Contemporary Theatre Review, 10(2), 85–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmsley, B. (2013). “A big part of my life”: A qualitative study of the impact of theatre. Arts Marketing: An International Journal, 3(1), 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J., Cloonan, M., & Frith, S. (2011). Having an impact? Academics, the music industries and the problem of knowledge. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 17(5), 459–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.praxisauril.org.uk/sites/praxisunico.org.uk/files/Wilson-review-business-university-collaboration_2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar