Differential response of two cell lines sequentially irradiated with low X-ray doses

References

• Azzam E, De Toledo S, Gooding T, Little J. 1998. Intercellular communication is involved in the bystander regulation of gene expression in human cells exposed to very low fluences of alpha particles. Radiation Research 152: 552–557.
   Google Scholar
• Balaknishman S, Rao SB. 1999. Cytogenetic analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes of occupational workers exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research 442: 37–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballarini F, Biaggi M, Ottolenghi A, Sapora 0. 2002. Cellular communication and bystander effects: a critical review for modeling low-dose radiation action. Mutation Research 501: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Barquinero J, Barrios L, Caballin M, Miro R, Ribas M, Subias A, Egozcue J. 1993. Cytogenetic analysis of lymphocytes from hospital workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research 286: 275–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso R, Takahashi-Hyodo S, Peitl P Jr, Ghilardi-Neto T, Sakamoto-Hojo E. 2001. Evaluation of chromosomal aberra-tions, micronuclei and sister chromatid exchanges in hospital workers chronically exposed to ionizing radiation. Teratogen-esis, Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis 21: 431–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo D, Marinaccio A, Perniconi B, Settini A, Palmi S, Iavicoli S. 2002. Chromosomal aberration in long-haul air crew members. Mutation Research 513: 11–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giierci A, Dulout F, Seoane A. 2003. Cytogenetic analysis in Chinese hamster cells chronically exposed to low doses of X-rays. International Journal of Radiation Biology 79: 793–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giierci AM. Dulout FN, Seoane Al. 2004. DNA damage in Chinese hamster cells repeatedly exposed to low doses of X-rays. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 104: 173–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimers A. 2000. Chromosome aberration analysis in Concorde pilots. Mutation Research 467: 169–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner M, Lambin P, Marples B. 1999. Adaptive response and induced radioresistance. Comptes Rendus de L'Academie des Sciences Serie III - Sciences de la Vie-Life 322: 167–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner M, Lambin P, Malaise E, Robson T, Arrand J, Skov K, Marples B. 1996. Hypersensitivity to very-low single radiation doses: its relationship with adaptive response and induced radioresistance. Mutation Research 358: 171–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little J, Azzam E, De Toledo S, Nagasawa H. 2002. Bystander effects: intercellular transmission of radiation damage signals. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 99: 159–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan W:. 2003. Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I. Radiation induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitro. Radiation Research 159: 567–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2003. Radiation-induced bystander effects, carcinogenesis and models. Oncogene 22: 7028–7033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive PL:. 1996. DNA damage and repair in individual cells: applications of the comet assay in radiobiology. International Journal of Radiation Biology 75: 395–405.
   Google Scholar
• Olive PL, Johnston P, Banath J, Durand R 1998. The comet assay: a new method to examine heterogeneity associated with solid tumors. Nature Medical 4: 103–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz-Y-Mifio C, Leone P, Chavez M, Bustamante G, Córdoba A, Gutierrez S, Penaherrera MS, Sanchez M. 1995. Follow up study of chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes in hospital workers occupationally exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Mutation Research 335: 245–251.
   Google Scholar
• Prise K, Belyakov 0, Newman H, Patel S, Schettino G, Folkard M, Michael B. 2002. Non-targeted effects of radiation: bystander responses in cell and tissue models. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 99: 223–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romney C, Paulauskis J, Nagasawa H, Little J. 2001. Multiple manifestations of X-ray-induced genomic instability in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Molecular Carcinogenesis 32: 118–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawant S, Randers-Pehrson G, Metting N, Hall E. 2001. Adaptive response and the bystander effect induced by radiation in C3H 10T(1/2) cells in culture. Radiation Research 156: 177–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider LL. 1988. A simple technique for quantization of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Experimental Cell Research 175: 184–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tice RR, Strauss GH. 1995. The single cell gel electrophoresis/ comet assay: a potential tool for detecting radiation-induced DNA damage in humans. Stem Cells 13: 207–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upton AC. 2002. Carcinogenic effects of low-level ionizing radiation: problems an prospects. In Vivo 16: 527–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkat S, Apte S, Chaubey R, Chauhan P. 2001. Radioadaptive response in human lympholcytes in vitro. Journal of Environ-mental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology 20: 165–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward TH, Marples B. 2000. Technical report SYBR Green I and the improved sensitivity of the single-cell electrophoresis assay. International Journal of Radiation 76: 61–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojewodzka M, Kruszweski M, Iwanenko T, Collins A, Szumiel I. 1998. Application of the comet assay for monitoring DNA damage in workers exposed to chronic low-dose-irradiation. I. Strand breakage. Mutation Research 416: 21–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar