Follow-up of stable chromosomal aberrations in gamma-ray irradiated non-human primates

References

• Bauchinger M. Retrospective dose reconstruction of human radiation exposure by FISH/chromosome painting. Mutation Research 1998; 404: 89–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauchinger M, Schmid E, Braselmann H. Time-course of translocation and dicentric frequencies in a radiation accident case. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2001; 77: 553–557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender M A, Preston R J, Leonard R C, Pyatt B E, Gooch P C, Shelby M D. Chromosomal aberration and sister-chromatid exchange frequencies in peripheral blood lymphocytes of a large human population sample. Mutation Research 1988; 204: 421–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertho J M, Demarquay C, Frick J, Joubert C, Arenales S, Jacquet N, Sorokine-Durm I, Chau Q, Lopez M, Aigueperse J, Gorin N C, Gourmelon P. Level of Flt3-ligand in plasma: A possible new bio-indicator for radiation-induced aplasia. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2001; 77: 703–712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakey D H, Bayley J M, Huang K C. Suitability of human chromosome-specific DNA libraries for mutagenicity studies in Macaca fascicularis. Mutagenesis 1993; 8: 189–192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camparoto M L, Ramalho A T, Natarajan A T, Curado M P, Sakamoto-Hojo E T. Translocation analysis by the FISH-painting method for retrospective dose reconstruction in individuals exposed to ionizing radiation 10 years after exposure. Mutation Research 2003; 530: 1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CETAMA. Modélisation et estimation des erreurs de mesure. 1998
   Google Scholar
• Darroudi F. Use of FISH translocations analyses for retrospective biological dosimetry: how stable are stable chromosome aberrations?. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2000; 88: 101–109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran A, Barquinero J F, Caballin M R, Ribas M, Puig P, Egozcue J, Barrios L. Suitability of FISH painting techniques for the detection of partial-body irradiations for biological dosimetry. Radiation Research 2002; 157: 461–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards A A, Lindholm C, Darroudi F, Stephan G, Romm H, Barquinero J, Barrios L, Caballin M R, Roy L, Whitehouse C A, Tawn E J, Moquet J, Lloyd D C, Voisin P. Review of translocations detected by FISH for retrospective biological dosimetry applications. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005; 113: 396–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Carbajal Y C, Moquet J E, Edwards A A, Lloyd D C. The persistence of fish translocations for retrospective biological dosimetry after simulated whole or partial body irradiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 1998; 76: 159–168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hande M P, Natarajan A T. Induction and persistence of cytogenetic damage in mouse splenocytes following whole-body X-irradiation analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.IV. Dose response. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1998; 74: 441–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hone P A, Edwards A A, Lloyd D C, Moquet J E. The yield of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in first division human lymphocytes depends on the culture time. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2005; 81: 523–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm C, Edwards A. Long-term persistence of translocations in stable lymphocytes from victims of a radiological accident. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2004; 80: 559–566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm C, Romm H, Stephan G, Schmid E, Moquet J, Edwards A A. Intercomparison of translocation and dicentric frequencies between laboratories in a follow-up of the radiological accident in Estonia. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2002; 78: 883–890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm C, Luomahaara S, Koivistoinen A, Ilus T, Edwards A A, Salomaa S. Comparison of dose-response curves for chromosomal aberrations established by chromosome painting and conventional analysis. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1998; 74: 27–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas J N, Awa A A, Straume T, Poggensee M, Kodama Y, Nakano M, Ohtaki K, Weiers H U, Pinkels D, Gray J, Littlefield L G. Rapid translocation frequency analysis in humans decades after exposure to ionizing radiation. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1992; 62: 53–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas J N, Cox A B, McLean J RN. Human chromosome painting probes used to measure chromosome translocations in non-human primates: Extrapolations from monkey to man. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 1993; 46: 253–256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas J N, Hill F S, Burk C E, Cox A B, Straume T. Stability of the translocation frequency following whole-body irradiation measured in rhesus monkeys. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1996; 70: 309–318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pala F S, Moquet J E, Edwards A A, Lloyd D C. In vitro transmission of chromosomal aberrations through mitosis in human lymphocytes. Mutation Research 2001; 474: 139–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez P, Montoro A, Barquinero J F, Caballin M R, Villaescusa I, Barrios L. Analysis of translocations in stable cells and their implications in retrospective biological dosimetry. Radiation Research 2004; 162: 31–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small M F, Stanyon R, Smith D G, Sineo L. High-resolution chromosomes of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). American Journal of Primatology 1985; 9: 63–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorokine-Durm I, Durand V, Delbos M, Le Baron L, Roy L. A French view on FISH painting as a biodosimeter. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2000; 88: 35–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorokine-Durm I, Durand V, Le Roy A, Paillole N, Roy L, Voisin P. Is FISH painting an appropriate biological marker for dose estimates of suspected accidental radiation overexposure? A review of cases investigated in France from 1995 to 1996. Environmental Health Perspectives 1997; 105(Suppl. 6)1427–1432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spruill M D, Nelson D O, Ramsey M J, Nath J, Tucker J D. Lifetime persistence and clonality of chromosome aberrations in the peripheral blood of mice acutely exposed to ionizing radiation. Radiation Research 2000; 153: 110–121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straume T, Lucas J N. A comparison of the yields of translocations and dicentrics measured using fluorescence in situ hybridization. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1993; 64: 185–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsumi M, Yabe M. Monkey interleukin 2/optimal conditions for production and partial characterization. International Archives of Allergy and applied Immunology 1986; 81: 118–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tucker J D, Breneman J W, Briner J F, Eveleth G G, Langlois R G, Moore D H. The persistence of radiation-induced translocations in rat peripheral blood determined by chromosome painting. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 1997; 30: 264–272
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voisin P, Assaei R G, Heidary A, Varzegar R, Zakeri F, Durand V, Sorokine-Durm I. Mathematical methods in biological dosimetry: the 1996 Iranian accident. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2000; 76: 1545–1554
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voisin P, Benderitter M, Claraz M, Chambrette V, Sorokine-Durm I, Delbos M, Durand V, Leroy A, Paillole N. The cytogenetic dosimetry of recent accidental overexposure. Cellular and Molecular Biology (Noisy-le-grand) 2001; 47: 557–564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward D C, Miller R L, Johnson E H, Lucas J N, Meyne J. Identification of trisomy in Macaca fascicularis by fluorescence in situ hybridization with a human chromosome 13 DNA library. Human Genetics 1994; 94: 247–251
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wienberg J, Stanyon R, Jauch A, Cremer T. Homologies in human and Macaca fuscata chromosomes revealed by in situ suppression hybridization with human chromosome specific DNA libraries. Chromosoma 1992; 101: 265–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar