Response of aquatic protists to electric field exposure

References

• Ahmed I, Istivan T, Cosic I, Pirogova E. 2013. Evaluation of the effects of extremely low frequency (ELF) pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) on survival of the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus. EPJ Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 1:5.
   Google Scholar
• Aldini G, Yeum KJ, Niki E, Russell RM. 2010. Biomarkers for antioxidant defense and oxidative damage: Principles and applications. Ames, USA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Amaroli A, Trielli F, Bianco B, Giordano S, Moggia E, Corrado MU. 2006. Effects of a 50 Hz magnetic field on Dictyostelium discoideum (Protista). Bioelectromagnetics. 27:528–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaroli A, Chessa MG, Bavestrello G, Bianco B. 2013. Effects of an extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field on stress factors: a study in Dictyostelium discoideum cells. Eur J Protistol. 49:400–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank M, Soo L, Lin H, Henderson AS, Goodman R. 1992. Changes in transcription in HL-60 cells following exposure to AC electric fields. Bioeletrochem Bioenerg. 28:301–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank M, Goodman R. 2009. Electromagnetic fields stress living cells. Pathophysiology. 16:71–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burlaka A, Selyuk M, Gafurov M, Lukin S, Potaskalova V, Sidorik E. 2014. Changes in mitochondrial functioning with electromagnetic radiation of ultra high frequency as revealed by electron paramagnetic resonance methods. Int J Radiat Biol. 90:357–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzović-Šarić V, Landeka I, Šarić B, Barberić M, Andrijašević L, Cerovski B, Oršolić N, Đikić D. 2015. Levels of selected oxidative stress markers in the vitreous and serum of diabetic retinopathy patients. Mol Vis 12:649–664.
   Google Scholar
• Cellini L, Grande R, Di Campli E, Di Bartolomeo S, Di Giulio M, Robuffo I, Trubiani O, Mariggio MA. 2008. Bacterial response to the exposure of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 29:302–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson N, Davies MS, Dixey R. 1999. Diatom motility: the search for independent replication of biological effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol. 75:387–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daggett PM, Nerad TA. 1992a. Cultivation of photosynthetic Euglenids. In: Lee JJ, Soldo AT, editors. Protocols in protozoology. Lawrence, USA: Society of Protozoologists. pp. A-10.1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Daggett PM, Nerad TA. 1992b. Cultivation of Paramecium. In: Lee JJ, Soldo AT, editors. Protocols in protozoology. Lawrence, USA: Society of Protozoologists. pp. A-46.1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Davies MS, Norris WT. 2004. Vibration as a possible explanation for putative electromagnetic field effects: a case study on marine diatoms. Int J Radiat Biol. 80:709–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSOE). 2015. Statistical Factsheet 2014. Brussels: ENTSO-E aisbl.
   Google Scholar
• Falone S, Marchesi N, Osera C, Fassina L, Comincini S, Amadio M, Pascale A. 2016. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) prevents pro-oxidant effects of H2O2 in SK-N-BE(2) human neuroblastoma cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 92:281–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flohé L, Ötting F. 1971. Superoxide dismutase assays. Method Enzymol. 105:70–76.
   Google Scholar
• Guler G, Turkozer Z, Tomruk A, Seyhan N. 2008. The protective effects of N-acetyl-L-cysteine and epigallocatechin-3-gallate on electric field-induced hepatic oxidative stress. Int J Radiat Biol. 84:669–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjeresen DL, Kaune WD, Decker JR, Phillips RD. 1980. Effects of 60-Hz electric fields on avoidance behavior and activity of rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 1:299–312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). 2002. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. vol. 80. Lyon: IARC Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). 2010. ICNIRP guidelines for limiting exposure to time‐varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz – 100 kHz). Health Phys. 99:818–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen EC. 2013. Quantitative analysis of histological staining and fluorescence using ImageJ. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 296:378–381.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krylov VV. 2010. Effects of electromagnetic fields on parthenogenic eggs of Daphnia magna Straus. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 73:62–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicka M, Henrykowska GA, Pacholski K, Śmigielski J, Rutkowski M, Dziedziczak-Buczyńska M, Buczyński A. 2015. The effect of electromagnetic radiation emitted by display screens on cell oxygen metabolism – in vitro studies. Arch Med Sci. 11:1330–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Xiong DF, Liu JW, Li ZX, Zeng GC, Li HL. 2015. A cross-sectional study on oxidative stress in workers exposed to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol. 91:420–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long NC, Vander AJ, Kluger MJ. 1990. Stress-induced rise of body temperature in rats is the same in warm and cool environments. Physiol Behav. 47:773–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry DH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 193:265–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu W, Wu K, Hu X, Xie X, Ning J, Wang C, Zhou H, Yang G. 2017. Theoretical analysis of transmembrane potential of cells exposed to nanosecond pulsed electric field. Int J Radiat Biol. 93:231–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malagoli D, Lusvardi M, Gobba F, Ottavini E. 2004. 50 Hz magnetic fields activate mussel immunocyte p38 MAP kinase and induce HSP70 and 90. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 137:75–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Sámano J, Torres-Durán PV, Juárez-Oropeza MA, Elías-Viñas D, Verdugo-Díaz L. 2010. Effects of acute electromagnetic field exposure and movement restraint on antioxidant system in liver, heart, kidney and plasma of Wistar rats: a preliminary report. Int J Radiat Biol. 86:1088–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakaoka Y, Takeda R, Shimizu K. 2002. Orientation of Paramecium swimming in a DC magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics. 23:607–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oršolić N, Goluža E, Dikić D, Lisičić D, Sašilo K, Rođak E, Jeleč Z, Lazarus MV, Orct T. 2014a. Role of flavonoids on oxidative stress and mineral contents in the retinoic acid-induced bone loss model of rat. Eur J Nutr. 53:1217–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oršolić N, Skurić J, Dikić D, Stanić G. 2014b. Inhibitory effect of a propolis on di-n-propyl disulfide or n-hexyl salycilate-induced skin irritation, oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in mice. Fitoterapia. 93:18–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owusu-Ansah E, Yavari A, Banerjee U. 2008. A protocol for in vivo detection of reactive oxygen species. Protocol Exchange, online publication [Internet]. Available from: http://www.nature.com/protocolexchange/protocols/414, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.23
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Johansson O, Carlo GL. 2015. Polarization: a key difference between man-made and natural electromagnetic fields, in regard to biological activity. Sci Rep. 5:14914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ. 2016. Pulsed electric field increases reproduction. Int J Radiat Biol. 92:94–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefidbakht Y, Moosavi-Movahedi AA, Hosseinkhani S, Khodagholi F, Torkzadeh-Mahani M, Foolad F, Faraji-Dana R. 2014. Effects of 940 MHz EMF on bioluminescence and oxidative response of stable luciferase producing HEK cells. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 13:1082–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarapultseva EI, Igolkina JV, Tikhonov VN, Dubrova Y. 2014. The in vivo effects of low-intensity radiofrequency fields on the motor activity of protozoa. Int J Radiat Biol. 90:262–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp DJ, McDonald KL, Brown HM, Matthies HJ, Walczak C, Vale RD, Mitchison TJ, Scholey JM. 1999. The bipolar kinesin, KLP61F, cross-links microtubules within interpolar microtubule bundles of Drosophila embryonic mitotic spindles. J Cell Biol. 144:125–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skurić J, Oršolić N, Kolarić D, Đikić D, Benković V, Lisičić D, Horvat-Knežević A, Maldini B. 2011. Thermography in assessing the inflammatory skin changes and effectivity of flavonoids on animal model psoriasis//Proceedings of the 53rd International Symposium ELMAR-2011/(ed.) Božek, Jelena; Grgić, Mislav Zadar: Croatian Society Electronics in Marine-ELMAR 2011. 313–316.
   Google Scholar
• Stern S, Laties VG. 1985. 60-Hz electric fields: detection by female rats . Bioelectromagnetics. 6:99–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türközer Z, Güler G, Seyhan N. 2008. Effects of exposure to 50 Hz electric field at different strengths on oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme activities in the brain tissue of guinea pigs. Int J Radiat Biol. 84:581–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojisavljevic V, Pirogova E, Cosic I. 2007. The effect of electromagnetic radiation (550–850 nm) on 1-lactate dehydrogenase kinetics. Int J Radiat Biol. 83:221–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2007. Electromagnetic fields and public health. Exposure to extremely low frequency fields. Fact sheet No. 322. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesmann V, Franz D, Held C, Münzenmayer C, Palmisano R, Wittenberg T. 2015. Review of free software tools for image analysis of fluorescence cell micrographs. J Microsc. 257:39–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar