Synergies resulting from a systems biology approach: integrating radiation epidemiology and radiobiology to optimize protection of the public after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation

References

• Albanese J, Dainiak N. 2000. Ionizing radiation alters Fas ligand at the cell surface and on exfoliated plasma membrane-derived vesicles: implications for apoptosis and intercellularsignaling in vitro. Radiat Res. 153:49–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albanese J, Dainiak N. 2003. Modulation of intercellular communication medicated at the cell surface and on extracellular, plasma membrane-derived vesicles by ionizing radiation. Exp Hematol. 31:455–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arscott WT, Tandle AT, Shuping Z, Shabason JE, Gordon IK, Schlaff CD, Zhang G, Tofilon PJ, Camphausen KA. 2013. Ionizing radiation and glioblastoma exosomes: implications in tumor biology and cell migration. Transl Oncol. 6:638–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aypar U, Morgan WF, Baulch JE. 2011. Radiation-induced genomic instability: are epigenetic mechanisms the missing link? Int J Radiat Biol. 87:179–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boice JD. Jr. 2017. The linear-nonthreshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update. Int J Radiat Biol. 93:1079–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner DJ, Little JB, Sachs RK. 2001. The bystander effect in radiation oncogenesis: II. A quantitative model. Radiat Res. 155:402–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner DJ, Shuryak I, Sachs RK. 2014. Radiotherapy-induced carcinogenesis and leukemogenesis: mechanisms and quantitative modeling. In: Rubin P, Constine LS, Marks LB, editors. ALERT: adverse late effects of cancer treatment, medical radiology, radiation oncology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 205–226.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks AL, Hoel DG, Preston RJ. 2016. The role of dose rate in radiation cancer risk: evaluation the effect of dose rate at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels using key events critical pathways following exposure to low LET radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 92:405–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacao E, Hada M, Saganti PB, George KA, Cuinotta FA. 2016. Relative biological effectiveness of HZE particles for chromosomal aberrations and other surrogate cancer risk endpoints. PLoS One. 11:e0153998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang PY, Cucinotta FA, Bjornstad KA, Bakke J, Rosen CJ, Du N, David G, Fairchild DC, Cacao E, Blakely EA. 2016. Harderian gland tumorigenesis: low-dose-and let-reponse. Radiat Res. 185:448–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa NL, Vasconcellos de Sa L, Ramalho de Mello RC. 2017. Estimation of second primary cancer risk after treatment with radioactive iodine for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid Radiol Nuc Med. 27:261–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucinotta FA. 2016. Systems biology model of interactions between tissue growth factors and DNA damage pathway: low dose response and cross-talk in TGFsz and ATM signaling. [accessed 2017 Jun 12]. http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/1335567-systems-biology-model-interactions-between-tissue-growth-factors-dna-damage-pathways-low-dose-response-cross-talk-tgf-atm-signaling#
   Google Scholar
• Dainiak N. 1991. Surface membrane-associated regulation of cell assembly, differentiation, and growth. Blood 78:264–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dainiak N. 2016. Inferences, risk modeling, and prediction of health effects of ionizing radiation. Health Phys. 110:271–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dainiak N, Cohen CM. 1982. Surface membrane vesicles from mononuclear cells stimulate erythroid stem cells to proliferate in culture. Blood. 60:583–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasu A, Toma-Dasu I. 2017. Models for the risk of secondary cancers from radiation therapy. Phys Med. 42:232–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauer LT, Brooks AL, Hoel DG, Morgan WF, Stram D, Tran P. 2010. Review and evaluation of updated research on the health effects associated with low-dose ionizing radiation. Protection Dosimetry. 140:103–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCamilli P. 2014. Neurodegeneration and repair, Yale Medicine, Winter, 2014. Available from: http://yalemedicine.yale.edu/winter2014/fearures/feature/176804
   Google Scholar
• de Toledo SM, Buonanno M, Harris AL, Azzam EI. 2017. Genomic instability induced in distant progeny of bystander cells depends on the connexins expressed in the irradiated cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 93:1182–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrzynski L, Fornalski KW, Socol Y, Reszczynska JM. 2016. Modeling of irradiated cell transformation: dose- and time-dependent effects. Radiat Res. 186:396–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidemuller M, Jacob P, Lane RSD, Frost SE, Zablotska LB. 2012. Lung cancer mortality (1950–1999) among Eldorado uranium workers: a comparison of models of carcinogenesis and empirical excess risk models. PLOS ONE. 7:e41431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidemuller M, Holmberg E, Jacob P, Lundell M, Karlsson P. 2015. Breast cancer risk and possible mechanisms of radiation-induced genomic instability in the Swedish hemangioma cohort after reanalyzed dosimetry. Mutation Res. 775:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flamant S, Tamarat R. 2016. Extracellular vesicles and vascular injury: new insights for radiation exposure. Radiat Res. 186:203–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinendegen LE. 2016. Quantification of adaptive protection following low-dose irradiation. Health Phys. 110:276–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinendegen LE, Paretzke H, Neumann RD. 2008. Damage propagation in complex biological systems following exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation. Asia J Exp Sci. 22:7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Herr L, Shuryak I, Friedrich T, Scholz M, Durante M, Brenner DJ. 2015. New insight into quantitative modeling of DNA double-strand break rejoining. Radiat Res. 184:280–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jella KK, Rani S, O’Driscoll L, McClean B, Byrne HJ, Lung FM. 2014. Exosomes are involved in dediation radiation induced bystander signaling in human keratinocyte cells. Radiat Res. 181:138–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser JC, Meckbach R, Jacob P. 2014. Genomic instability and radiation risk in molecular pathways to colon cancer. PLos One. 9:e111024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser JC, Meckbach R, Eidemuller M, Selmansberger M, Unger K, Shpak V, Blettner M, Zitzelsberger H, Jacob P. 2016. Integration of radiation biomarker into modeling of thyroid carcinogenesis and post-Chernobyl risk assessment. Carcinogenesis 37:1152–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klammer H, Mladenov E, Li FL, Iliakis G. 2013. Bystander effects as manifestation of intercellular communication of DNA damage and of the cellular oxidative status. Cancer Lett. 356:58–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitano H. 2002. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science. 295:1662–1664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson MC, Hillery CA, Hogg N. 2014. Circulating membrane-derived microvesicles in redox biology. Free Radic Biol Med. 73:214–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little MP, Hendry JH. 2017. Mathematical models of tissue stem and transit target cell divisions and the risk of radiation-or smoking-associated cancer. PLoS Computat Biol. 13:e1005391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke PA. 2009. Incorporating information from the U.S. department of energy low-dose program into regulatory decision-making: three policy integration challenges. Health Phys. 97:510–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michor F, Iwasa Y, Nowak MA. 2006. The age incidence of chronic myeloid leukemia can be explained by a one-mutation model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:14931–14934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawaz M, Fatima F, Vallabhaneni KC, Penfornis P, Valadi H, Ekstrom K, Kholia S, Whitt JD, Fernandes JD, Pochampally R, et al. 2016. Extracellular vesicles: evolving factors in stem cell biology. Stem Cells Int. 2016:1073140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council for Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) 2015. Health Effects of Low doses of radiation: perspectives on integrating radiation biology and epidemiology. NCRP Commentary No. 24; Bethesda, MD: NCRP.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). 2012. Uncertainties in the estimation of radiation risks and probability of disease causation. NCRP Report No. 171; Bethesda, MD.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2014. Exposome and esposomics: Overview. Atlanta, GA. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/exposome/
   Google Scholar
• Rühm W, Eidemuller M, Kaiser JC. 2017. Biologically-based mechanistic models of radiation-related carcinogenesis applied to epidemiological data. Int J Radiat Biol. 93:1093–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpless NE, DePinho RA. 2007. How stem cells age and why this makes us grow old. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 8:703–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuryak I. 2017. Quantitative modeling of responses o chronic ionizing radiation exposure using targeted and non-targeted effects. PLoS One. 12:e0176476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuryak I, Fornance AJ Jr, Datta K, Suman S, Kumar S, Sachs RK, Brenner DJ. 2017. Scaling human cancer risks from low LET to high LET when dose-effect relationships are complex. Radiat Res. 187:486–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sies H, Berndt C, Jones DP. 2017. Oxidative stress. Annu Rev Bio Chem. 11:613–619.
   Google Scholar
• Sies H, Feinendegen LE. 2017. Radiation hormesis: the link to nanomolar hydrogen peroxide. Antioxid Redox Signal. 27:596–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Till JE, Grogan HA, Caffrey EA. 2017. A review of dosimetry used in epidemiological studies considered to evaluate the linear no-threshold (LNT) dose-response model for radiation protection. Int J Radiat Biol. 93:1128–1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck D, Cerretti DP, Hand A, Guha A, Sorba S, Dainiak N. 1994. Human macrophage colony-stimulating factor is expressed at and shed from the cell surface. Blood. 84:2182–2188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNSCEAR 2012. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Biological Mechanisms of Radiation Actions at Low Doses. A White Paper to Guide the Scientific Committee’s Future Program of Work, Report V.12-57831 (United Nations Publications, New York).
   Google Scholar
• Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N, Velculescu VE, Zhou S, Diaz LA, Jr, Kinzler W. 2013. Cancer genome landscapes. Science. 339:1546–1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YL, Wang J-Y, Wang EI, Meng X, Xu W-Q. 2017. Synthesis and characterization of a rosmarinic and derivative that targets mitochodria and protects against radiation-induced damage in vitro. BioOne 188:264–275.
   Google Scholar
• Zyla J, Fiinnon P, Bulman R, Bouffler S, Badie C, Polanska J. 2014. Seeking genetic signature of radiosensitivity: a novel method for data analysis in case of small sample sizes. Theor Biol Med Model. 11(Suppl 1):S2. Available from: http://www.tbiomed.com/content/11/S1/S2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar