Radiation protection biology then and now

References

• Advisory committee on human radiation experiments. 1995. Final report. Washington: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty J. 1993. Scientific collaboration, internationalism, and diplomacy: the case of the atomic bomb casualty commission. J Hist Biol. 26:205–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck U. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bedford JS, Dewey WC. 2002. Radiation Research Society. 1952-2002. Historical and current highlights in radiation biology: has anything important been learned by irradiating cells? Radiat Res. 158:251–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belli M, Salomaa S, Ottolenghi A. 2011. MELODI: the ‘Multidisciplinary European Low-Dose Initiative’. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 143:330–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belli M, Tabocchini MA, Jourdain JR, Salomaa S, Repussard J. 2015. The European initiative on low-dose risk research: from the HLEG to MELODI. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 166:178–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss MK, Bristow R, Dewhirst MW. 2014. Linking the history of radiation biology to the hallmarks of cancer. Radiat Res. 181:561–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks AL. 2018. Low dose radiation: the history of the U.S. Department of Energy research program. Washington: Washington State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caufield C. 1989. Multiple exposures: chronicles of the radiation age. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cho K, Imaoka T, Klokov D, Paunesku T, Salomaa S, Birschwilks M, Bouffler S, Brooks AL, Hei TK, Iwasaki T, et al. 2019. Funding for radiation research: past, present and future. Int J Radiat Biol. 2:1–25. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1558303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark C. 1997. Radium girls: women and industrial health reform, 1910-1935. Chapel Hill (NC): The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke RH, Valentin J. 2009. The history of ICRP and the evolution of its policies. Ann ICRP. 109:75–110.
   Google Scholar
• Codman EA. 1902. A study of the cases of accidental X-ray burns hitherto recorded. Reprinted from Philadelphia Medical Journal. March 8.
   Google Scholar
• Farmelo G. 1995. The discovery of X-rays. Scient Am. 273:68–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukunaga H, Yokoya A, Taki Y, Prise KM. 2017. Radiobiological implications of Fukushima nuclear accident for personalized medical approach. Tohoku J Exp Med. 242:77–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley B, Wang Q, Wanzer B, Vogt S, Finney L, Yang PL, Paunesku T, Woloschak G. 2011. Past and future work on radiobiology mega-studies: a case study at Argonne National Laboratory. Health Phys. 100:613–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamblin JD. 2007. ‘A dispassionate and objective effort’: negotiating the first study on the biological effects of atomic radiation. J Hist Biol. 40:147–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harremoes P. 2001. Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.
   Google Scholar
• [HLEG] High Level and Expert Group. 2009. Report of high level expert group on European low dose risk research. http://www.hleg.de/fr.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hulse EV, Path FRC, Mole RH. 1982. Reflections on the terms stochastic and non-stochastic as currently used in radiological protection. Br J Radiol. 55:321–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter GK. 2000. Vital forces: the discovery of the molecular basis of life. San Diego (CA): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• ICRP. 1951. International recommendations on radiological protection. Revised by the International Commission on Radiological Protection at the Sixth International Congress of Radiology, London, July 1950. Br J Radiol. 56:431–439.
   Google Scholar
• ICRP. 1965. The evaluation of risks from radiation. ICRP Publications 8. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• International X-Ray and Radium Protection Committee. 1928. International recommendations for X-ray and radium protection on the proposal of the Radio-Physics Section adopted by the Second International Congress of Radiology in Stockholm, July 27th, 1928.
   Google Scholar
• International X-Ray and Radium Protection Commission. 1934. International recommendations for X-ray and radium protection, revised by the International X-ray and Radium Protection Commission at the fourth International Congress of Radiology, Zürich, July 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Knight N, Wilson JF. 1996. Chapter 1, The early years of radiation therapy. In: Gagliardi R, Wilson FJ, editors. A history of radiological sciences: oncology. Reston: Radiology Centennial; p. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kulka U, Abend M, Ainsbury E, Badie C, Barquinero J, Barrios L, Beinke C, et al. 2017. RENEB – Running the European Network of biological dosimetry and physical retrospective dosimetry. Int J Radiat Biol. 93:2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert B. 2001. Radiation: early warnings; late effects. In: Harremoes P, Gee D, MacGavin M, Stirling A, Keys J, Wynne B, Guedes Vaz S, editors. Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Luckey TD. 1980. Hormesis with ionizing radiation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luckey TD, Lawrence KS. 2006. Radiation hormesis: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Dose Resp. 4:169–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macklis RM. 1993. The great radium scandal. Sci Am. 8:94–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macklis RM. 1996. Chapter 11, Radiomedical fraud and popular perceptions of radiation. In: Gagliardi R, Wilson FJ, editors. A history of radiological sciences: oncology. Reston: Radiology Centennial; p. 277–292.
   Google Scholar
• Martland HS. 1929. Radium poisoning. Monthly Labor Rev. 28:20–95.
   Google Scholar
• Martland HS, Humphries RE. 1929. Osteogenic sarcoma in dial painters using luminous paint. Arch Pathol. 7:406–417.
   Google Scholar
• Mole RH. 1957. Shortening of life by chronic irradiation: the experimental facts. Nature. 180:456–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller HJ. 1927. Artificial transmutation of the gene. Science. 66:87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakamura N. 2019. History of radiation genetics: light and darkness. Int J Radiat Biol. 24:1–16. doi:10.1080/09553002.2019.1572251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin JT. 1904. Dangers to the X-ray operator. Am X-Ray J. 14:9.
   Google Scholar
• Pravaile R. 2014. Nuclear weapons tests and environmental consequences: a global perspective. AMBIO. 43:729–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston RJ. 2004. Radiation biology: concepts for radiation protection. Health Phys. 87:3–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston RJ. 2017. International organizations, risk assessment and research-why, what and how. Mutat Res. 806:75–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repussard J. 2018. Understanding low dose radiation exposure effects: MELODI’s views on developing international cooperation. Int J Radiat Biol. 29:1–9. doi:10.1080/09553002.2018.1547439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts H. 1897. The American X-Ray Journal. Am X-Ray J. 1:1.
   Google Scholar
• Röntgen WC. 1895. Über eine neue Art von Strahlen. Sitzungsberichte der Physikalisch-Medizinischen Gesellschaft zu Würzburg Jahrgang. 132–149.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland S. 1896. Preface. Arch Clin Skiagr. 1:3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhm W, Friedl AA, Wojcik A. 2018. Coordinated radiation protection research in Europe: is it the beginning of a new era? Radiat Environ Biophys. 57:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhm W, Woloschak GE, Shore RE, Azizova TV, Grosche B, Niwa O, Akiba S, Ono T, Suzuki K, Iwasaki T, et al. 2015. Dose and dose-rate effects of ionizing radiation: a discussion in the light of radiological protection. Radiat Environ Biophy. 54:379–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhm W, Fantuzzi E, Harrison R, Schuhmacher H, Vanhavere F, Alves J, Bottollier-Depois JF, Fattibene P, Knezevic Z, Lopez MA, et al. 2016. EURADOS strategic research agenda: vision for dosimetry of ionising radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 168(2):223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Russ S. 1922. The measurement of X-ray intensity and the necessity for an international method. Proc Phys Soc London. 35:5D.
   Google Scholar
• Salomaa S, Jourdain JR, Kreuzer M, Jung T, Repussard J. 2017. Multidisciplinary European low dose initiative: an update of the MELODI program. Int J Radiat Biol. 93:1035–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan K. 1993. Ionizing radiation, genetic risk estimation and molecular biology: impact and inferences. Trends Genet. 9:79–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan K, Chakraborty R. 2000. Ionizing radiation and genetic risks. XII. The concept of ‘potential recoverability correction factor’ (PRCF) and its use for predicting the risk of radiation-inducible genetic disease in human live births. Mutat Res. 453:129–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrödinger E. 1946. What is life? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan PR, Fogel B. 2011a. Creating a physical biology. The threee-man paper and early molecular biology. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan PR, Fogel B. 2011b. Introduction. In: Sloan PR, Fogel B, editors. Creating a physical biology. The three-man paper and early molecular biology. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spear FG. 1953. Radiations and living cells. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Streffer C. 2015. An update on the mechanisms and pathophysiological consequences of genomic instability with focus on ionizing radiation. Res Rep Biol. 6:225–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers WC. 2011. Physics and genes. In: Sloan PR, Fogel B, editors. Creating a physical biology. The three-man paper and early molecular biology. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor LS. 1958. History of the international commission on radiological units and measurements (ICRU). Health Phys. 1:306–314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thames HD. 1988. Early fractionation methods and the origins of the NSD concept. Acta Oncol. 27:89–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames HD, Hendry JH. 1987. Fractonation in radiotherapy. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Timofeeff-Ressovsky NW, Zimmer KG, Delbrück M. 1935. Über die Natur der Genmutation und der Genstruktur. Nachrichten Von Der Gesellschaft Der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen Biologie. 13:189–245.
   Google Scholar
• Vogin G, Foray N. 2013. The law of Bergonie and Tribondeau: a nice formula for a first approximation. Int J Radiat Biol. 89:2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker JS. 2000. Permissible dose: a history of radiation protection in the twentieth century. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Bannister LA, Sebastian S, Le Y, Ismail Y, Didychuk C, Richardson RB, Flegal F, Paterson L, Causey P, et al. 2018. Low-dose radiobiology program at Canadian nuclear laboratories: past, present and future. Int J Radiat Biol. 24:1–11. doi:10.1080/09553002.2018.1562252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcik A, Hamza K, Lundegård I, Enghag M, Haglund K, Arvanitis L, Schenk L. 2018. Educating about radiation risks in high schools: towards improved public understanding of the complexity of low-dose radiation health effects. Radiat Environ Biophy. 58:13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar