Effects of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field on different developmental stages of Drosophila melanogaster

References

• Abdelrahim A, Hassanein HR, Dahaba M. 2011. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on healing of mandibular fracture: a preliminary clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 69(6):1708–1717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adie S, Harris IA, Naylor JM, Rae H, Dao A, Yong S, Ying V. 2011. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation for acute tibial shaft fractures: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial. JBJS. 93(17):1569–1576.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anand AS, Prasad DN, Singh SB, Kohli E. 2017. Chronic exposure of zinc oxide nanoparticles causes deviant phenotype in Drosophila melanogaster. J Hazard Mat. 327:180–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossing T, Technau GM. 1994. The fate of the CNS midline progenitors in Drosophila as revealed by a new method for single cell labelling. Development. 120(7):1895–1906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron IL, Hardman WE, Winters WD, Zimmerman S, Zimmerman AM. 1993. Environmental magnetic fields: influences on early embryogenesis. J Cell Biochem. 51(4):417–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron IL, Hunter KE, Winters WD. 1985. Retardation of embryogenesis by extremely low frequency 60 Hz electromagnetic fields. Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR. 17(1):135–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos‐Ortega JA, Knust E. 1990. Molecular analysis of a cellular decision during embryonic development of Drosophila melanogaster: epidermogenesis or neurogenesis. Eur J Biochem. 190(1):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dallari D, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Del Piccolo N, Stagni C, Amendola L, Rani N, Gnudi S, Giardino R. 2009. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic stimulation on patients undergoing hip revision prostheses: a randomized prospective double‐blind study. Bioelectromagnetics. 30(6):423–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado JMR, Leal J, Monteagudo JL, Gracia MG. 1982. Embryological changes induced by weak, extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. J Anat. 134(Pt 3):533–551.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Denno ME, Privman E, Venton BJ. 2015. Analysis of neurotransmitter tissue content of Drosophila melanogaster in different life stages. ACS Chem Neurosci. 6(1):117–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijević D, Savić T, Anđelković M, Prolić Z, Janać B. 2014. Extremely low frequency magnetic field (50 Hz, 0.5 mT) modifies fitness components and locomotor activity of Drosophila subobscura. Int J Radiat Biol. 90(5):337–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duttaroy A, Paul A, Kundu M, Belton A. 2003. A Sod2 null mutation confers severely reduced adult life span in Drosophila. Genetics. 165(4):2295–2299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edison A, Hall R, Junot C, Karp P, Kurland I, Mistrik R, Reed L, Saito K, Salek R, Steinbeck C, et al. 2016. The time is right to focus on model organism metabolomes. Metabolites. 6(1):8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito M, Lucariello A, Riccio I, Riccio V, Esposito V, Riccardi G. 2012. Differentiation of human osteoprogenitor cells increases after treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields. In Vivo. 26(2):299–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faldini C, Cadossi M, Luciani D, Betti E, Chiarello E, Giannini S. 2010. Electromagnetic bone growth stimulation in patients with femoral neck fractures treated with screws: prospective randomized double-blind study. Curr Orthop Pract. 21(3):282–287.
   Google Scholar
• Gasch AP, Payseur BA, Pool JE. 2016. The power of natural variation for model organism biology. Trends Genet. 32(3):147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonet B, Kosik‐Bogacka DI, Kuźna‐Grygiel W. 2009. Effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields on the oviposition of Drosophila melanogaster over three generations. Bioelectromagnetics. 30(8):687–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham JH, Fletcher D, Tigue J, McDonald M. 2000. Growth and developmental stability of Drosophila melanogaster in low frequency magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 21(6):465–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannemann PFW, Göttgens KWA, van Wely BJ, Kolkman KA, Werre AJ, Poeze M, Brink PRG. 2012. The clinical and radiological outcome of pulsed electromagnetic field treatment for acute scaphoid fractures: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre trial. Bone Joint J. 94:1403–1408.
   Google Scholar
• Hannemann PFW, Van Wezenbeek MR, Kolkman KA, Twiss ELL, Berghmans CHJ, Dirven PAMGM, Brink PRG, Poeze M. 2014. CT scan-evaluated outcome of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of acute scaphoid fractures: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 96:1070–1076.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang KS, Hong JM, Kang JA, Rhie JW, Jeong YH, Cho DW. 2013. Regulation of osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by controlling electromagnetic field conditions. Exp Mol Med. 45(1):e6–e6.
   Google Scholar
• Kikuchi T, Ogawa M, Otaka Y, Furuta M. 1998. Multigeneration exposure test of Drosophila melanogaster to ELF magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 19(6):335–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CS, Seong KM, Lee BS, Lee IK, Yang KH, Kim JY, Nam SY. 2015. Chronic low-dose γ-irradiation of Drosophila melanogaster larvae induces gene expression changes and enhances locomotive behavior. J Radiat Res. 56(3):475–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura KI, Truman JW. 1990. Postmetamorphic cell death in the nervous and muscular systems of Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurosci. 10(2):403–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli H, Sharma SK, Srivastava S, Chouhan S, Oza M, Singh SB. 2015. Programmable electro magnetic field system for biomedical applications. In: 2015 IEEE Applied Electromagnetics Conference (AEMC); Dec 18–21; Guwahati, India, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli H, Srivastava S, Oza M, Chouhan S, Verma S, Bansal A, Kumar B, Sharma SK. 2020. Design and study of novel tunable ELF-PEMF system for therapeutic applications. IETE J Res. 1–13. DOI:10.1080/03772063.2020.1725661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai H. 2019. Exposure to static and extremely-low frequency electromagnetic fields and cellular free radicals. Electromagn Biol Med. 38(4):231–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SS, Zhang ZY, Yang CJ, Lian HY, Cai P. 2013. Gene expression and reproductive abilities of male Drosophila melanogaster subjected to ELF–EMF exposure. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 758(1-2):95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Campo EM, Bossing T. 2014. Drosophila embryos as model to assess cellular and developmental toxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) in living organisms. PLoS One. 9(2):e88681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magwire MM, Yamamoto A, Carbone MA, Roshina NV, Symonenko AV, Pasyukova EG, Morozova TV, Mackay TF. 2010. Quantitative and molecular genetic analyses of mutations increasing Drosophila life span. PLoS Genet. 6(7):e1001037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin CA, Krantz DE. 2014. Drosophila melanogaster as a genetic model system to study neurotransmitter transporters. Neurochem Int. 73:71–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Rondanelli A, Martinez JP, Moncada ME, Manzi E, Pinedo CR, Cadavid H. 2014. Electromagnetic stimulation as coadjuvant in the healing of diaphyseal femoral fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Colomb Med. 45(2):67–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirabolghasemi G, Azarnia M. 2002. Developmental changes in Drosophila melanogaster following exposure to alternating electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 23(6):416–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourikis P, Hurlbut GD, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. 2006. Enigma, a mitochondrial protein affecting lifespan and oxidative stress response in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103(5):1307–1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols CD, Becnel J, Pandey UB. 2012. Methods to assay Drosophila behavior. J Vis Exp. 61:e3795.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nichols CD, Ronesi J, Pratt W, Sanders-Bush E. 2002. Hallucinogens and Drosophila: linking serotonin receptor activation to behavior. Neuroscience. 115(3):979–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen P, Bournias‐Vardiabasis N, Haggren W, Adey WR, Phillips JL. 1995. Exposure of Drosophila melanogaster embryonic cell cultures to 60-Hz sinusoidal magnetic fields: assessment of potential teratogenic effects. Teratology. 51(4):273–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nogueira V, Hay N. 2013. Molecular pathways: reactive oxygen species homeostasis in cancer cells and implications for cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 19(16):4309–4314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E. 1980. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature. 287(5785):795–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong C, Yung LYL, Cai Y, Bay BH, Baeg GH. 2015. Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism to study nanotoxicity. Nanotoxicology. 9(3):396–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A, Lioliousis C. 2013. ELF alternating magnetic field decreases reproduction by DNA damage induction. Cell Biochem Biophys. 67(2):703–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkes TL, Elia AJ, Dickinson D, Hilliker AJ, Phillips JP, Boulianne GL. 1998. Extension of Drosophila lifespan by overexpression of human SOD1 in motorneurons. Nat Genet. 19(2):171–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons PA. 1961. Fly size, emergence time and sternopleural chaeta number in Drosophila. Heredity. 16(4):455–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patruno A, Tabrez S, Pesce M, Shakil S, Kamal MA, Reale M. 2015. Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) on catalase, cytochrome P450 and nitric oxide synthase in erythro-leukemic cells. Life Sci. 121:117–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez E, Monteagudo JL, Garcia‐Gracia M, Delgado JM. 1983. Oviposition and development of Drosophila modified by magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 4(4):315–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlarski G, Lewczuk B, Żak A, Koncicki A, Krawczuk M, Piechocki J, Jakubiuk K, Tojza P, Jaworski J, Ambroziak D, et al. 2015. The influence of electromagnetic pollution on living organisms: historical trends and forecasting changes. Bio Med Res Int. 2015:1–18.,
   Google Scholar
• Röösli M, Lörtscher M, Egger M, Pfluger D, Schreier N, Lörtscher E, Locher P, Spoerri A, Minder C. 2007. Mortality from neurodegenerative disease and exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields: 31 years of observations on Swiss railway employees. Neuroepidemiology. 28(4):197–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabat D, Patnaik A, Ekka B, Dash P, Mishra M. 2016. Investigation of titania nanoparticles on behaviour and mechanosensory organ of Drosophila melanogaster. Physiol Behav. 167:76–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santini SJ, Cordone V, Falone S, Mijit M, Tatone C, Amicarelli F, Di Emidio G. 2018. Role of mitochondria in the oxidative stress induced by electromagnetic fields: focus on reproductive systems. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018:5076271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar S, Roy A, Roy S. 2018. Flubendiamide affects visual and locomotory activities of Drosophila melanogaster for three successive generations (P, F 1 and F 2). Invert Neurosci. 18(2):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz Z, Fisher M, Lohmann CH, Simon BJ, Boyan BD. 2009. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) production by cells in the osteoblast lineage is regulated by pulsed electromagnetic fields in cultures grown on calcium phosphate substrates. Ann Biomed Eng. 37(3):437–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seada MA, Elkholy SE, Meshrif WS. 2016. Does the cellphone radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation during ringing or talking modes induce locomotor disturbance in Drosophila melanogaster. Afr Zool. 51(1):53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrard RM, Morellini N, Jourdan N, El-Esawi M, Arthaut L-D, Niessner C, Rouyer F, Klarsfeld A, Doulazmi M, Witczak J, et al. 2018. Low-intensity electromagnetic fields induce human cryptochrome to modulate intracellular reactive oxygen species. PLoS Biol. 16(10):e2006229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanojević V, Prolić Z, Savić T, Todorović D, Janać B. 2005. Effects of extremely low frequency (50 Hz) magnetic field on development dynamics of the housefly (Musca domestica L.). Electromagn Biol Med. 24(2):99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudmeier LJ, Howard SP, Ganetzky B. 2015. A Drosophila model to investigate the neurotoxic side effects of radiation exposure. Dis Model Mech. 8(7):669–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun LY, Hsieh DK, Lin PC, Chiu HT, Chiou TW. 2010. Pulsed electromagnetic fields accelerate proliferation and osteogenic gene expression in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells during osteogenic differentiation. Bioelectromagnetics. 31(3):209–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun LY, Hsieh DK, Yu TC, Chiu HT, Lu SF, Luo GH, Kuo TK, Lee OK, Chiou TW. 2009. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on the proliferation and differentiation potential of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 30(4):251–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tissot M, Stocker RF. 2000. Metamorphosis in Drosophila and other insects: the fate of neurons throughout the stages. Prog Neurobiol. 62(1):89–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Zhang X. 2017. Magnetic fields and reactive oxygen species. IJMS. 18(10):2175.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang ZY, Zhang J, Yang CJ, Lian HY, Yu H, Huang XM, Cai P. 2016. Coupling mechanism of electromagnetic field and thermal stress on Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 11(9):e0162675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao G, Lin X, Zhou M, Zhao J. 2014. Relationship between exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 35(3):264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman S, Zimmerman AM, Winters WD, Cameron IL. 1990. Influence of 60-Hz magnetic fields on sea urchin development. Bioelectromagnetics. 11(1):37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar