Effect of changing the radiation dose range on the in vitro cytogenetic dose response to gamma-rays

References

• Abe Y, Yoshida MA, Fujioka K, Kurosu Y, Ujiie R, Yanagi A, Tsuyama N, Miura T, Inaba T, Kamiya K, et al. 2018. Dose-response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals. J Radiat Res. 59(1):35–42. doi:10.1093/jrr/rrx052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsbury EA, Lloyd DC. 2010. Dose estimation software for radiation biodosimetry. Health Phys. 98(2):290–295. doi:10.1097/01.HP.0000346305.84577.b4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alok A, Agrawala PK. 2020. Repurposing sodium diclofenac as a radiation countermeasure agent: A cytogenetic study in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 856–857:503220. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2020.503220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asaad CO, Caraos GL, Robles GJ, Asa AD, Cobar ML, Asaad AA. 2016. Enhancing cytogenetic biological dosimetry capabilities of the Philippines for nuclear incident preparedness. Genome Integr. 7:4. doi:10.4103/2041-9414.197163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balakrishnan S, Shirsath K, Bhat N, Anjaria K. 2010. Biodosimetry for high dose accidental exposures by drug induced premature chromosome condensation (PCC) assay. Mutat Res. 699(1–2):11–16. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Caballín MR, Miró R, Ribas M, Subias A, Egozcue J. 1995. Establishment and validation of a dose-effect curve for gamma-rays by cytogenetic analysis. Mutat Res. 326(1):65–69. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)00150-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barquinero JF, Puig P. 2017. Biological dosimetry, statistical challenges: Biological dosimetry after high-dose exposures to ionizing radiation. In: Ainsbury E, Calle M, Cardis E, Einbeck J, Gómez G, Puig P., editors. Extended abstracts fall 2015. Trends in mathematics. 7. Cham: Birkhäuser; p. 67–70. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55639-0_11
   Google Scholar
• Bauchinger M, Schmid E, Dresp J. 1979. Calculation of the dose-rate dependence of the decentric yield after Co gamma-irradiation of human lymphocytes. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 35(3):229–233. doi:10.1080/09553007914550261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauchinger M, Schmid E, Streng S, Dresp J. 1983. Quantitative analysis of the chromosome damage at first division of human lymphocytes after 60Co γ-Irradiation. Radiat Environ Biophys. 22(3):225–229. doi:10.1007/bf01323712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beinke C, Oestreicher U, Riecke A, Kulka U, Meineke V, Romm H. 2011. Inter-laboratory comparison to validate the dicentric assay as a cytogenetic triage tool for medical management of radiation accidents. Radiat Meas. 46(9):929–935. doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.05.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beinke C, Port M, Riecke A, Ruf CG, Abend M. 2016. Adaption of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay for improved triage biodosimetry. Radiat Res. 185(5):461–472. doi:10.1667/RR14294.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkhaled L, Barrios L, Mestres M, Caballin MR, Ribas M, Barquinero JF. 2006. Analysis of gamma-rays induced chromosome aberrations: a fingerprint evaluation with a combination of pan-centromeric and pan-telomeric probes. Int J Radiat Biol. 82(12):869–875. doi:10.1080/09553000600979092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benković V, Kopjar N, Horvat Knezevic A, Dikić D, Basić I, Ramić S, Viculin T, Knezević F, Orolić N. 2008. Evaluation of radioprotective effects of propolis and quercetin on human white blood cells in vitro. Biol Pharm Bull. 31(9):1778–1785. doi:10.1248/bpb.31.1778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhavani M, Tamizh Selvan G, Kaur H, Adhikari JS, Vijayalakshmi J, Venkatachalam P, Chaudhury NK. 2014. Dicentric chromosome aberration analysis using giemsa and centromere specific fluorescence in-situ hybridization for biological dosimetry: an inter- and intra-laboratory comparison in Indian laboratories. Appl Radiat Isot. 92:85–90. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewen JG, Preston RJ, Littlefield LG. 1972. Radiation-induced human chromosome aberration yields following an accidental whole-body exposure to 60Co γ-rays. Radiat Res. 49(3):647–656. doi:10.2307/3573421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Yan XK, Du J, Wang ZD, Zhang XQ, Zeng FG, Zhou PK. 2011. Biological dose estimation for accidental supra-high dose gamma-ray exposure. Radiat Meas. 46(9):837–841. doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deperas J, Szluinska M, Deperas-Kaminska M, Edwards A, Lloyd D, Lindholm C, Romm H, Roy L, Moss R, Morand J, et al. 2007. CABAS: a freely available PC program for fitting calibration curves in chromosome aberration dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 124(2):115–123. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncm137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giorgio M, Barquinero JF, Vallerga MB, Radl A, Taja MR, Seoane A, De Luca J, Oliveira MS, Valdivia P, Lima OG, et al. 2011. Biological dosimetry intercomparison exercise: an evaluation of triage and routine mode results by robust methods. Radiat Res. 175(5):638–649. doi:10.1667/RR2425.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doggett NA, McKenzie WH. 1983. An analysis of the distribution and dose response of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes after in vitro exposure to 137Cesium gamma radiation. Radiat Environ Biophys. 22(1):33–51. doi:10.1007/BF01323759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Gupta ML. 2014. Alleviation of radiation-induced genomic damage in human peripheral blood lymphocytes by active principles of Podophyllum hexandrum: an in vitro study using chromosomal and CBMN assay. Mutagenesis. 29(2):139–147. doi:10.1093/mutage/get071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards AA, Lloyd DC, Purrott RJ. 1979. Radiation induced chromosome aberrations and the Poisson distribution. Radiat Environ Biophys. 16(2):89–100. doi:10.1007/bf01323216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabry L. 1986. Cytogenetic damage induced in human lymphocytes by low doses of 60Co gamma rays delivered at high and low dose rates. Acta Radiol Oncol. 25(2):143–146. doi:10.3109/02841868609136393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabry L, Leonard A, Wambersie A. 1985. Induction of chromosome aberrations in G0 human lymphocytes by low doses of ionizing radiations of different quality. Radiat Res. 103(1):122–134. doi:10.2307/3576677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filushkin I, Nugis V, Chistopolsky A. 1999. Comparative cytogenetic analysis of cultures of irradiated lymphocytes and mixed cultures of irradiated and non irradiated cells. Meditsinskaya Radiologia. 44(3):19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Finnon P, Moquet JE, Edwards AA, Lloyd DC. 1999. The 60Co gamma ray dose-response for chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes analysed by FISH; applicability to biological dosimetry. Int J Radiat Biol. 75(10):1215–1222. doi:10.1080/095530099139368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornalski KW. 2014. Alternative statistical methods for cytogenetic radiation biological dosimetry. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Library. arXiv. org/abs/1412.2048.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia OF, Ramalho AT, Di Giorgio M, Mir SS, Espinoza ME, Manzano J, Nasazzi N, López I. 1995. Intercomparison in cytogenetic dosimetry among five laboratories from Latin America. Mutat Res. 327(1–2):33–39. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)00066-e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh VST, Fujishima Y, Abe Y, Sakai A, Yoshida MA, Ariyoshi K, Kasai K, Wilkins RC, Blakely WF, Miura T. 2019. Construction of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) translocation dose-response calibration curve with multiple donor data sets using R, based on ISO 20046:2019 recommendations. Int J Radiat Biol. 95(12):1668–1684. doi:10.1080/09553002.2019.1664788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guedeney G, Harou-Kouka M, Doloy MT, Masse R. 1986. Modifications of individual chromosomal radiosensitivity after total-body irradiation in man and monkey. Br J Cancer Suppl. 7:167–168.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjidekova V, Hristova R, Ainsbury EA, Atanasova P, Popova L, Staynova A. 2010. The use of the dicentric assay for biological dosimetry for radiation accidents in Bulgaria. Health Phys. 98(2):252–257. doi:10.1097/HP.0b013e3181ab3ccf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeri SA, Mozdarani H, Foroghizadeh M, Mahmoudzadeh A. 2004. Determination of dose response relationship in cultured human lymphocytes for biological dosimetry. Iran J Radiat Res. 2:85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzi VI, Terzoudi GI, Makropoulos V, Maravelias C, Pantelias GE. 2008. Pre-irradiation exposure of peripheral blood lymphocytes to glutaraldehyde induces radiosensitization by increasing the initial yield of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations. Mutagenesis. 23(2):101–109. doi:10.1093/mutage/gem049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayata I, Kanda R, Minamihisamatsu M, Furukawa M, Sasaki MS. 2001. Cytogenetical dose estimation for 3 severely exposed patients in the JCO criticality accident in Tokai-mura. J Radiat Res. 42(Suppl):S149–S155. doi:10.1269/jrr.42.s149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Health Protection Agency (HPA). 2009. High dose radiation effects and tissue injury. Report of the independent Advisory Group on Ionizing Radiation. Documents of the Health Protection Agency. RCE-10. Chilton: HPA; [accessed 2012 Jun 30]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/335105/RCE-10_for_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández A, Endesfelder D, Einbeck J, Puig P, Benadjaoud MA, Higueras M, Ainsbury E, Gruel G, Oestreicher U, Barrios L, et al. 2023. Biodose Tools: an R shiny application for biological dosimetry. Int J Radiat Biol. 99(9):1378–1390. doi:10.1080/09553002.2023.2176564
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hone PA, Edwards AA, Lloyd DC, Moquet JE. 2005. The yield of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in first division human lymphocytes depends on the culture time. Int J Radiat Biol. 81(7):523–529. doi:10.1080/09553000500303591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Radiation Cytogenetics Archives (HRCA). 2017. Radiation Biology Center, Kyoto University; [accessed 2023 Nov 14]. http://www.rbc.kyoto-u.ac.jp/db/radchrom.html.
   Google Scholar
• Iijima K, Morimoto K. 1991. Quantitative analyses of the induction of chromosome aberrations and sister-chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes exposed to gamma-rays and mitomycin-C in combination. Mutat Res. 263(4):263–268. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(91)90011-r.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2011. Cytogenetic dosimetry: Applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• Iwasaki T, Takashima Y, Suzuki T, Yoshida MA, Hayata I. 2011. The dose response of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes induced in vitro by very low-dose γ rays. Radiat Res. 175(2):208–213. doi:10.1667/rr2097.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacprzak J, Kuszewski T, Lankoff A, Müller WU, Wojcik A, Lisowska H. 2013. Individual variations in the micronucleus assay for biological dosimetry after high dose exposure. Mutat Res. 756(1-2):196–200. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaddour A, Colicchio B, Buron D, El Maalouf E, Laplagne E, Borie C, Ricoul M, Lenain A, Hempel WM, Morat L, et al. 2017. Transmission of induced chromosomal aberrations through successive mitotic divisions in human lymphocytes after in vitro and in vivo radiation. Sci Rep. 7(1):3291. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03198-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanda R, Hayata I, Lloyd DC. 1999. Easy biodosimetry for high-dose radiation exposures using drug-induced, prematurely condensed chromosomes. Int J Radiat Biol. 75(4):441–446. doi:10.1080/095530099140366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karachristou I, Karakosta M, Pantelias A, Hatzi VI, Karaiskos P, Dimitriou P, Pantelias G, Terzoudi GI. 2015. Triage biodosimetry using centromeric/telomeric PNA probes and Giemsa staining to score dicentrics or excess fragments in non-stimulated lymphocyte prematurely condensed chromosomes. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 793:107–114. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karachristou I, Karakosta M, Pantelias A, Hatzi V, Pantelias G, Thanassoulas A, Karaiskos P, Dimitriou P, Terzoudi GI. 2016. Biodosimetry for high-dose exposures based on dicentric analysis in lymphocytes released from the G2-block by caffeine. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 172(1–3):230–237. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncw151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karthikeya-Prabhu B, Venkatachalam P, Paul SF, Muthuvelu K, Balu-David M, Mohankumar MN, Jeevanram RK. 2003. Comparison of inter- and intra-chromosomal aberrations in blood samples exposed to different dose rates of gamma radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 103(2):103–109. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur H, Paul SFD, Jayanth VR, Thayalan K, David BM, Venkatachalam P. 2007. In-vitro dicentric and micronucleus dose response curves for cobalt-60 gamma radiation for biological dosimetry. Indian J. Rad. Res. 4(1):10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Köksal G, Pala FS, Dalci DO. 1995. In vitro dose-response curve for chromosome aberrations induced in human lymphocytes by 60Co gamma-radiation. Mutat Res. 329(1):57–61. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(95)00019-f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnaja AP, Sharma NK. 1994. Heterogeneity of chromosome damage in beta-thalassaemia traits. An evaluation of spontaneous and gamma-ray-induced micronuclei and chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes in vitro after G0 and G2 phase irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 66(1):29–39. doi:10.1080/09553009414550921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnaja AP, Sharma NK. 2004. Transmission of gamma-ray-induced unstable chromosomal aberrations through successive mitotic divisions in human lymphocytes in vitro. Mutagenesis. 19(4):299–305. doi:10.1093/mutage/geh031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnaja AP, Sharma NK. 2006. Differential radiation effects in smokers – culture time dependence of the yield of gamma ray-induced chromosome damage in first division metaphases. Int J Radiat Biol. 82(5):363–377. doi:10.1080/09553000600774097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar AAA, Bakkiam D, Sonwani S, Seenisamy R, Sivasubramanian K, Venkatraman B. 2017. Comparison of dicentric dose response curves of 6MV LINAC X-rays and 60Co γ-rays for biodosimetry application. Appl Radiat Isot. 129:124–129. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurochkina VA, Bezdrobna LK, Tsyganok TV, Khomych IA, Institute for Nuclear Research, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. 2021. “Dose – effect” calibration dependence by frequency of unstable chromosomic exhanges in human lymphocytes in acute gamma irradiation by 137Cs in low doses for biological dosimetry. Nucl Phys At Energy. 22(2):167–173. (Ukrainian). doi:10.15407/jnpae2021.02.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwabara Y, Matsubara S, Yoshimatsu S, Suzuki S. 1986. Combined effects of ultrasound and ionizing radiation on lymphocyte chromosomes. Acta Radiol Oncol. 25(4–6):291–294. doi:10.3109/02841868609136421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lefrançois D, Al Achkar W, Aurias A, Couturier J, Dutrillaux AM, Dutrillaux B, Flüry-Herard A, Gerbault-Seureau M, Hoffschir F, Lamoliatte E. 1989. Chromosomal aberrations induced by low-dose gamma-irradiation. Study of R-banded chromosomes of human lymphocytes. Mutat Res. 212(2):167–172. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(89)90068-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin WC, Chang KW, Liao TZ, Ou Yang FY, Chang TJ, Yuan MC, Wilkins RC, Chang CH. 2021. Intercomparison of conventional and QuickScan dicentric scoring for the validation of individual biodosimetry analysis in Taiwan. Int J Radiat Biol. 97(7):916–925. doi:10.1080/09553002.2021.1928789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm C, Luomahaara S, Koivistoinen A, Ilus T, Edwards AA, Salomaa S. 1998. Comparison of dose-response curves for chromosomal aberrations established by chromosome painting and conventional analysis. Int J Radiat Biol. 74(1):27–34. doi:10.1080/095530098141690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm C, Stricklin D, Jaworska A, Koivistoinen A, Paile W, Arvidsson E, Deperas-Standylo J, Wojcik A. 2010. Premature chromosome condensation (PCC) assay for dose assessment in mass casualty accidents. Radiat Res. 173(1):71–78. doi:10.1667/RR1843.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm C, Wojcik A, Jaworska A. 2011. Biological dosimetry following exposure to neutrons in a criticality accident. NKS-233. Nordic Nuclear Safety Research; [accessed 2023 Jul 23]. https://www.nks.org/download/nks233_e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Littlefield LG, Joiner EE, Colyer SP, Frome EL. 1987. Effects of cryopreservation on the recovery of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 18(1):25–29. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a079880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G. 2022. Revision of cytogenetic dosimetry in the IAEA manual 2011 based on data about radio-sensitivity and dose-rate findings contributing. FASEB J. 36(11):e22621. doi:10.1096/fj.202200769RR
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu JX, Pan Y, Ruan JL, Piao C, Su X. 2016. Intercomparison in cytogenetic dosimetry among 22 laboratories in China. Genome Integr. 7:6. doi:10.4103/2041-9414.197164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lloyd DC, Edwards AA. 1983. Chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes: effect of radiation quality, dose, and dose rate. In: Ishihara T, Sasaki M, editors. Radiation-induced chromosome damage in man. New York: AR Liss, Inc.; p. 23–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd DC, Edwards AA, Prosser JS. 1986. Chromosome aberrations induced in human lymphocytes by in vitro acute X and gamma radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 15(2):83–88. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a079681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd DC, Edwards AA, Prosser JS, Barjaktarovic N, Brown JK, Horvat D, Ismail SR, Köteles GJ, Almassy Z, Krepinsky A. 1987. A colla­borative exercise on cytogenic dosimetry for simulated whole and partial body accidental irradiation. Mutat Res. 179(2):197–208. doi:10.1016/0027-5107(87)90310-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lloyd DC, Purrott RJ, Dolphin GW, Bolton D, Edwards AA, Corp MJ. 1975. The relationship between chromosome aberrations and low LET radiation dose to human lymphocytes. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 28(1):75–90. doi:10.1080/09553007514550781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd DC, Sevan’kaev AV. 1996. EUR 16532 – biological dosimetry for persons irradiated by the Chernobyl accident. Final report on experimental collaboration project no 6. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. European Commission; [accessed 2023 Nov 19]. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/b86fbe08-14a9-4a49-959d-dbe7e1c6f644/language-en.
   Google Scholar
• Luchnik NV, Sevankaev AV. 1976. Radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes. I. Dependence on the dose of gamma-rays and an anomaly at low doses. Mutat Res. 36(3):363–378. doi:10.1016/0027-5107(76)90246-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lusiyanti Y, Alatas Z, Lubis M, Suvifan V, Ramadhani D, Purnami S. 2014. Dose-response curve of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes induced by gamma-rays. Atom Indo. 39(3):124–128. doi:10.17146/aij.2013.254
   Google Scholar
• Martins V, Antunes AC, Cardoso J, Santos L, Monteiro Gil O. 2011. Influence of age and gender in response to γ-radiation in Portuguese individuals using chromosomal aberration assay – Preliminary findings. Radiat Meas. 46(9):1000–1003. doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins V, Antunes AC, Monteiro Gil O. 2013. Implementation of a dose–response curve for γ-radiation in the Portuguese population by use of the chromosomal aberration assay. Mutat Res. 750(1–2):50–54. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maznyk N, Vinnikov V. 2004. Calibration dose-response relationships for cytogenetic biodosimetry of recent and past exposure to low dose gamma-radiation. Ukrainian J Radiol. 12(4):415–425. http://medradiologia.org.ua/assets/files/arch/2004/4/p415_425.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes ME, Mendonça JCG, Hwang S, Giorgio MD, Lima FF, Santos N. 2020. Calibration curves by 60Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation – a comparative study. Genet Mol Biol. 43(1):e20180370. doi:10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messal-Djelti A-N, Louhibi L, Boujemaa A, Saidi-Mehtar N, Barrios L, Caballín MR, Barquinero JF. 2016. Comparison of the dicentric yield observed in metaphase cells obtained using only Colcemid or Colcemid and Calyculin-A. J Appl Biol Sci. 10(1):64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Montoro A, Almonacid M, Serrano J, Saiz M, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Verdú G, Pérez J, Villaescusa JI. 2005. Assessment by cytogenetic analysis of the radioprotection properties of propolis extract. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 115(1–4):461–464. doi:10.1093/rpd/nci026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoro A, Barquinero JF, Almonacid M, Montoro A, Sebastià N, Verdú G, Sahuquillo V, Serrano J, Saiz M, Villaescusa JI, et al. 2011. Concentration-dependent protection by ethanol extract of propolis against γ-ray-induced chromosome damage in human blood lymphocytes. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011:174853–174857. doi:10.1155/2011/174853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller WU, Rode A. 2002. The micronucleus assay in human lymphocytes after high radiation doses (5-15 Gy). Mutat Res. 502(1–2):47–51. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(02)00022-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman A, Sasaki MS. 1966. Chromosome-exchange aberrations in human lymphocytes. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 11(4):321–328. doi:10.1080/09553006714550021
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pacyniak I, Kowalska M. 2015. Zastosowanie statystyki bayesowskiej w dozymetrii biologicznej promieniowania mieszanego n + g. In: Bartłomiejczyk A., editor. Metody matematyczne w zastosowaniach. Gdańsk (Poland): Gdańsk University of Technology. Chapter 9, Centrum Zastosowań Matematyki, Politechnika Gdańska. Polish; p. 157–185.
   Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Ruan J, Gao G, Wu L, Piao C, Liu J. 2019. Laboratory intercomparison of cytogenetic dosimetry among 38 laboratories in China. Dose Response. 17(1):1559325819833473. doi:10.1177/1559325819833473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CS, Kim EJ, Jeong KS, Park SJ, Kwak DM, Kwon OD, Rhee MH, Park SC, Kim SH, Ryu SY, et al. 2014. Assessment of cytogenetic damages on human peripheral lymphocytes following gamma rays local cutaneous exposures. Pak Vet J. 34(1):68–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul SF, Venkatachalam P, Jeevanram RK. 1997. A comparative study of synchronised and conventional culture methods on the micronucleus dose-response curve. Mutat Res. 391(1–2):91–98. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1218(97)00038-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham ND, Nguyen MH, Tran Q, Che QT, Nguyen VH, Phan VT, Pham VD, Ern Lee S, Vo TL. 2019. Determination of spontaneous dicentric frequencies and establishment of dose-response curves after expose of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to low- and high-dose rate 60Co gamma rays – the basis for cytogenetic biodosimetry in Vietnam. Int J Radiat Biol. 95(3):307–313. doi:10.1080/09553002.2019.1549754
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piatkin EK, VIu N. 1986. Relation between the yield of chromosome aberrations and the dose during irradiation of human lymphocytes in vitro and in vivo. Med Radiol (Mosk). 31(9):30–35. Russian.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prasanna PGS, Loats H, Gerstenberg HM, Torres BN, Shehata CW, Duffy KL. 2002. AFRRI’s Gamma-ray, X-ray, and fission-neutron calibration curves for the lymphocyte dicentric assay: application of a Metaphase Finder System. Bethesda: Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute. Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute special publication 02-1.
   Google Scholar
• Prasanna PG, Moroni M, Pellmar TC. 2010. Triage dose assessment for partial-body exposure: dicentric analysis. Health Phys. 98(2):244–251. doi:10.1097/01.HP.0000348020.14969.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preethi D, Kaur H, Paul SFD, Thayalan K, Balu David M, Venkatachalam P. 2009. Effect of dose rate and energy on the yield of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes exposed to low LET ionizing radiation. Brachytherapy News. 1(2):13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser JS, Edwards AA, Lloyd DC. 1990. The Relationship between colony-forming ability and chromosomal aberrations induced in human T-lymphocytes after γ-irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 58(2):293–301. doi:10.1080/09553009014551631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig R, Barrios L, Pujol M, Caballín MR, Barquinero JF. 2013. Suitability of scoring PCC rings and fragments for dose assessment after high-dose exposures to ionizing radiation. Mutat Res. 757(1):1–7. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujol M, Barquinero JF, Puig P, Puig R, Caballín MR, Barrios L. 2014. A new model of biodosimetry to integrate low and high doses. PLoS One. 9(12):e114137. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114137 Erratum in: PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujol M, Barrios L, Puig P, Caballín MR, Barquinero JF. 2016. A new model for biological dose assessment in cases of heterogeneous exposures to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res. 185(2):151–162. doi:10.1667/RR14145.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujol-Canadell M, Perrier JR, Cunha L, Shuryak I, Harken A, Garty G, Brenner DJ. 2020. Cytogenetically-based biodosimetry after high doses of radiation. PLoS One. 15(4):e0228350. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujol M, Puig R, Caballín MR, Barrios L, Barquinero JF. 2012. The use of caffeine to assess high dose exposures to ionising radiation by dicentric analysis. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 149(4):392–398. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncr326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadhani D, Tetriana D, Purnami S, Suvifan VA, Kurnia Hasan Basri I, Kisnanto T, Oktariyani TA, Syafira D, Yunus MY, Miura T, et al. 2023. γ-H2AX and phospho-ATM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays as biodosimetry methods for radiation exposure assessment: a pilot study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 199(19):2383–2390. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncad253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigaud O, Guedeney G, Duranton I, Leroy A, Doloy MT, Magdelenat H. 1990. Genotoxic effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on the circulating lymphocytes of breast cancer patients. II. Alteration of DNA repair and chromosome radiosensitivity. Mutat Res. 242(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(90)90096-k.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romm H, Wilkins RC, Coleman CN, Lillis-Hearne PK, Pellmar TC, Livingston GK, Awa AA, Jenkins MS, Yoshida MA, Oestreicher U, et al. 2011. Biological dosimetry by the triage dicentric chromosome assay: potential implications for treatment of acute radiation syndrome in radiological mass casualties. Radiat Res. 175(3):397–404. doi:10.1667/RR2321.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy L, Grégoire E, Gruel G, Roch-Lefevre S, Voisin P, Busset A, Martin C, Voisin P. 2012. Effect of lymphocytes culture variations on the mitotic index and on the dicentric yield following gamma radiation exposure. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 151(1):135–143. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncr460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy L, Sorokine-Durm I, Voisin P. 1996. Comparison between fluorescence in situ hybridization and conventional cytogenetics for dicentric scoring: a first-step validation for the use of FISH in biological dosimetry. Int J Radiat Biol. 70(6):665–669. doi:10.1080/095530096144545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rungsimaphorn B, Rerkamnuaychoke B, Sudprasert W. 2016. Establishment of dose-response curves for dicentrics and premature chromosome condensation for radiological emergency preparedness in Thailand. Genome Integr. 7:8. doi:10.4103/2041-9414.197165
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan TL, Pantelias AG, Terzoudi GI, Pantelias GE, Balajee AS. 2019. Use of human lymphocyte G0 PCCs to detect intra- and inter-chromosomal aberrations for early radiation biodosimetry and retrospective assessment of radiation-induced effects. PLoS One. 14(5):e0216081. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu TH, Kim JH, Kim JK. 2016. Chromosomal aberrations in human peripheral blood lymphocytes after exposure to ionizing radiation. Genome Integr. 7:5. doi:10.4103/2041-9414.197172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Samarth RM, Gandhi P, Chaudhury NK. 2023. Linear dose response of acrocentric chromosome associations to gamma irradiation in human lymphocytes. Strahlenther Onkol. 199(2):182–191. doi:10.1007/s00066-022-01978-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki MS. 2003. Chromosomal biodosimetry by unfolding a mixed Poisson distribution: a generalized model. Int J Radiat Biol. 79(2):83–97. doi:10.1080/0955300021000045655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage JRK. 1970. Sites of radiation induced chromosome exchanges. Curr Top Rad Res. 6:129–194.
   Google Scholar
• Savage JR, Papworth DG. 1969. Distortion hypothesis: an alternative to a limited number of sites for radiation-induced chromosome exchange. J Theor Biol. 22(3):493–514. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(69)90017-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid E, Bauchinge M, Bunde E, Ferbert HF, Lieven H. 1974. Comparison of the chromosome damage and its dose response after medical whole-body exposure to Co-60 gamma-rays and irradiation of blood in vitro. Int J Radiat Biol Stud Phys Chem Med. 26(1):31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid E, Braselmann H, Nahrstedt U. 1995. Comparison of gamma-ray induced dicentric yields in human lymphocytes measured by conventional analysis and FISH. Mutat Res. 348(3):125–130. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(95)00056-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmid E, Hieber L, Heinzmann U, Roos H, Kellerer AM. 1996. Analysis of chromosome aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes induced by in vitro alpha-particle irradiation. Radiat Environ Biophys. 35(3):179–184. doi:10.1007/s004110050028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid E, Regulla D, Guldbakke S, Schlegel D, Roos M. 2002. Relative biological effectiveness of 144 keV neutrons in producing dicentric chromosomes in human lymphocytes compared with 60Co gamma rays under head-to-head conditions. Radiat Res. 157(4):453–460.[0453:rbeokn]2.0.co;2. doi:10.1667/0033-7587(2002)157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid E, Roos H, Kramer HM. 2008. The depth-dependence of the biological effectiveness of 60Co gamma rays in a large absorber determined by dicentric chromosomes in human lymphocytes. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 130(4):442–446. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn069 bf01323712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid E, Schlegel D, Guldbakke S, Kapsch RP, Regulla D. 2003. RBE of nearly monoenergetic neutrons at energies of 36 keV-14.6 MeV for induction of dicentrics in human lymphocytes. Radiat Environ Biophys. 42(2):87–94. doi:10.1007/s00411-003-0200-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastià N, Almonacid M, Villaescusa JI, Cervera J, Such E, Silla MA, Soriano JM, Montoro A. 2013. Radioprotective activity and cytogenetic effect of resveratrol in human lymphocytes: an in vitro evaluation. Food Chem Toxicol. 51:391–395. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2012.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastià N, Montoro A, Montoro A, Almonacid M, Villaescusa JI, Cervera J, Such E, Silla MA, Soriano JM. 2011. Assessment in vitro of radioprotective efficacy of curcumin and resveratrol. Radiat Meas. 46(9):962–966. doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthamizhchelvan S, Pant GS, Rath GK, Julka PK, Nair O, Joshi RC, Malhotra A, Pandey RM. 2007. Biodosimetry using chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 123(2):241–245. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncl109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthamizhchelvan S, Pant GS, Rath GK, Julka PK, Nair O, Prabhakar R, Malhotra A. 2008. Biological estimation of dose in hemi-body irradiation of cancer patients by cytogenetic analysis. Health Phys. 94(2):112–117. doi:10.1097/01.HP.0000284893.98079.ae
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma NK. 2013. Modulation of radiation-induced and mitomycin C-induced chromosome damage by apigenin in human lymphocytes in vitro. J Radiat Res. 54(5):789–797. doi:10.1093/jrr/rrs117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L, Fujioka K, Sun J, Kinomura A, Inaba T, Ikura T, Ohtaki M, Yoshida M, Kodama Y, Livingston GK, et al. 2012. A modified system for analyzing ionizing radiation-induced chromosome abnormalities. Radiat Res. 177(5):533–538. doi:10.1667/rr2849.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stricklin D, Arvidsson E, Ulvsand T. 2005. Establishment of biodosimetry at FOI: dicentric assay protocol development and 137Cs dose response curve. Umeå: FOI-R-1570-SE, Swedish Defence Research Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Stricklin D, Wilkinson D, Arvidsson E, Prud’homme-Lalonde L, Thorleifson E, Mullins D, Lachapelle S. 2007. An initial limited biodosimetry inter-comparison exercise: FOI and DRDC Ottawa. Radiat Meas. 42(6–7):1133–1137. doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.05.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stricklin D, Lindholm C, Jaworska A. 2008. Development and application of the PCC biodosimetry method in emergency preparedness. NKS-173. Nordic Nuclear Safety Research; [accessed 2023 Nov 19]. https://www.nks.org/en/nks_reports/view_document.htm?id=111010111120095.
   Google Scholar
• Suto Y, Hirai M, Akiyama M, Kobashi G, Itokawa M, Akashi M, Sugiura N. 2013. Biodosimetry of restoration workers for the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station accident. Health Phys. 105(4):366–373. doi:10.1097/HP.0b013e3182995e42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suto Y, Hirai M, Akiyama M, Suzuki T, Sugiura N. 2012. Sensitive and rapid detection of centromeric alphoid DNA in human metaphase chromosomes by PNA fluorescence in situ hybridization and its application to biological radiation dosimetry. cytologia. 77(2):261–267. doi:10.1508/cytologia.77.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suto Y, Hirai M, Akiyama M, Yuki M, Nakagawa T, Tominaga T, Nakayama F, Suzuki T, Sugiura N. 2012. Induction and persistence of multicentric chromosomes in cultured human peripheral blood lymphocytes following high-dose gamma irradiation. cytologia. 77(3):347–358. doi:10.1508/cytologia.77.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suto Y. 2010. Dicentric chromosome assay data collection, version 1. Chromosome aberration data of the Biodosimetry Group of the Department of Radiation Measurement and Dose Assessment of the National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology; [accessed 2023 Nov 14]. https://www.qst.go.jp/site/nirs-english/1369.html. Available at: https://www.qst.go.jp/uploaded/attachment/1369.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Szłuińska M, Edwards A, Lloyd D. 2005. Statistical methods for biological dosimetry. HPA-RPD-011. Health Protection Agency; [accessed 2009 Nov 1]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7d59d740f0b60aaa293e99/HpaRpd011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tobi SE, Moquet JE, Edwards AA, Lloyd DC, Itzhaki RF. 1990. Chromosomal radiosensitivity of lymphocytes from Alzheimer’s disease patients. J Med Genet. 27(7):437–440. doi:10.1136/jmg.27.7.437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Top A, Coşkun M, Orta T. 2000. Biological Dosimetry of Co-60 Gamma Irradiation. Turk J Haematol. 17(4):189–196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Venkatachalam P, Solomon FD, Prabhu BK, Mohankumar MN, Gajendiran N, Jeevanram RK. 1999. Estimation of dose in cancer patients treated with fractionated radiotherapy using translocation, dicentrics and micronuclei frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Mutat Res. 429(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(99)00096-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnikov VA, Ainsbury EA, Maznyk NA, Lloyd DC, Rothkamm K. 2010. Limitations associated with analysis of cytogenetic data for biological dosimetry. Radiat Res. 174(4):403–414. doi:10.1667/RR2228.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnikov VA, Maznyk NA. 2013. Cytogenetic dose-response in vitro for biological dosimetry after exposure to high doses of gamma-rays. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 154(2):186–197. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voisin P, Benderitter M, Claraz M, Chambrette V, Sorokine-Durm I, Delbos M, Durand V, Leroy A, Paillole N. 2001. The cytogenetic dosimetry of recent accidental overexposure. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-Grand.). 47(3):557–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorobtsova I, Darroudi F, Semyonov A, Kanayeva A, Timofeyeva N, Yakovleva T, Zharinov G, Natarajan AT. 2001. Analysis of chromosome aberrations by FISH and Giemsa assays in lymphocytes of cancer patients undergoing whole-body irradiation: comparison of in vivo and in vitro irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 77(11):1123–1131. doi:10.1080/09553000110075527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Liu Q, Wan D, Xiang J, Du L, Wang Y, Cao J, Fu Y, Fan F, Hecker M. 2012. BioDoser: improved dose-estimation software for biological radiation dosimetry. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 108(1):402–406. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZZ, Li WJ, Zhi DJ, Jing XG, Wei W, Gao QX, Liu B. 2007. Biodosimetry estimate for high-LET irradiation. Radiat Environ Biophys. 46(3):229–235. doi:10.1007/s00411-007-0110-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins RC, Romm H, Kao TC, Awa AA, Yoshida MA, Livingston GK, Jenkins MS, Oestreicher U, Pellmar TC, Prasanna PG. 2008. Interlaboratory comparison of the dicentric chromosome assay for radiation biodosimetry in mass casualty events. Radiat Res. 169(5):551–560. doi:10.1667/RR1272.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong KF, Siu LL, Ainsbury E, Moquet J. 2013. Cytogenetic biodosimetry: what it is and how we do it. Hong Kong Med J. 19:168–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao B, Jiang BR, Ai HS, Li YF, Liu GX, Man QH, Qiu LJ. 2010. Biological dose estimation for two severely exposed patients in a radiation accident in Shandong Jining, China, in 2004. Int J Radiat Biol. 86(9):800–808. doi:10.3109/09553002.2010.481320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida MA, Hayata I, Tateno H, Tanaka K, Sonta S, Kodama S, Kodama Y, Sasaki MS. 2007. The Chromosome Network for biodosimetry in Japan. Radiat Meas. 42(6–7):1125–1127. doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.05.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar