Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles enhances radiosensitivity in cervical cancer

References

• Al-Mahrouki AA, Karshafian R, Giles A, Czarnota GJ. 2012. Bioeffects of ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles on endothelial cells: gene expression changes associated with radiation enhancement in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol. 38(11):1958–1969. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mahrouki AA, Wong E, Czarnota GJ. 2015. Ultrasound-stimulated microbubble enhancement of radiation treatments: endothelial cell function and mechanism. Oncoscience. 2(12):944–957. doi:10.18632/oncoscience.277
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barker HE, Paget JT, Khan AA, Harrington KJ. 2015. The tumour microenvironment after radiotherapy: mechanisms of resistance and recurrence. Nat Rev Cancer. 15(7):409–425. doi:10.1038/nrc3958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calliada F, Campani R, Bottinelli O, Bozzini A, Sommaruga MG. 1998. Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles. Eur J Radiol. 27(Suppl 2):S157–S160. doi:10.1016/s0720-048x(98)00057-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H. 2016. Inhibiting CD146 by its monoclonal antibody aa98 improves radiosensitivity of cervical cancer cells. Med Sci Monit. 22:3328–3333. doi:10.12659/msm.896731
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L. 2019. Cervical cancer. Lancet. 393(10167):169–182. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32470-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnota GJ, Karshafian R, Burns PN, Wong S, Al Mahrouki A, Lee JW, Caissie A, Tran W, Kim C, Furukawa M, et al. 2012. Tumor radiation response enhancement by acoustical stimulation of the vasculature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109(30):E2033–2041. doi:10.1073/pnas.1200053109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng H, Cai Y, Feng Q, Wang X, Tian W, Qiu S, Wang Y, Li Z, Wu J. 2018. Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles enhance radiosensitization of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem. 48(4):1530–1542. doi:10.1159/000492263
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El Kaffas A, Al-Mahrouki A, Hashim A, Law N, Giles A, Czarnota GJ. 2018. Role of acid sphingomyelinase and ceramide in mechano-acoustic enhancement of tumor radiation responses. J Natl Cancer Inst. 110(9):1009–1018. doi:10.1093/jnci/djy011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El Kaffas A, Czarnota GJ. 2015. Biomechanical effects of microbubbles: from radiosensitization to cell death. Future Oncol. 11(7):1093–1108. doi:10.2217/fon.15.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feril LB, Jr., Kondo T, Zhao QL, Ogawa R, Tachibana K, Kudo N, Fujimoto S, Nakamura S. 2003. Enhancement of ultrasound-induced apoptosis and cell lysis by echo-contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol. 29(2):331–337. doi:10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00700-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkman J. 2002. Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis. Semin Oncol. 29(6 Suppl 16):15–18. doi:10.1016/S0093-7754(02)70065-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Barros M, Paris F, Cordon-Cardo C, Lyden D, Rafii S, Haimovitz-Friedman A, Fuks Z, Kolesnick R. 2003. Tumor response to radiotherapy regulated by endothelial cell apoptosis. Science. 300(5622):1155–1159. doi:10.1126/science.1082504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbins E, Kolesnick R. 2003. Raft ceramide in molecular medicine. Oncogene. 22(45):7070–7077. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YJ, Wang TC, Fan CH, Yeh CK. 2017. Current progress in antivascular tumor therapy. Drug Discov Today. 22(10):1503–1515. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2017.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Z, Ma D. 2018. The precision prevention and therapy of HPV-related cervical cancer: new concepts and clinical implications. Cancer Med. 7(10):5217–5236. doi:10.1002/cam4.1501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang P, You X, Pan M, Li S, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Wang M, Hong Y, Pu Z, Chen L, et al. 2013. A novel therapeutic strategy using ultrasound mediated microbubbles destruction to treat colon cancer in a mouse model. Cancer Lett. 335(1):183–190. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2013.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibsen S, Schutt CE, Esener S. 2013. Microbubble-mediated ultrasound therapy: a review of its potential in cancer treatment. Drug Des Devel Ther. 7:375–388. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S31564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolesnick R, Fuks Z. 2003. Radiation and ceramide-induced apoptosis. Oncogene. 22(37):5897–5906. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozin SV, Duda DG, Munn LL, Jain RK. 2012. Neovascularization after irradiation: what is the source of newly formed vessels in recurring tumors? J Natl Cancer Inst. 104(12):899–905. doi:10.1093/jnci/djs239
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lo L, Uchenunu O, Botelho RJ, Antonescu CN, Karshafian R. 2023. AMPK is required for recovery from metabolic stress induced by ultrasound microbubble treatment. iScience. 26(2):105883. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105883
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNabb E, Al-Mahrouki A, Law N, McKay S, Tarapacki C, Hussein F, Czarnota GJ. 2020. Ultrasound-stimulated microbubble radiation enhancement of tumors: Single-dose and fractionated treatment evaluation. PLoS One. 15(9):e0239456. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng H, Miao S, Teng P. 2022. Cardiac metastasis of cervical cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Heart Surg Forum. 25(2):E326–e329. doi:10.1532/hsf.4549
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orbegoso C, Murali K, Banerjee S. 2018. The current status of immunotherapy for cervical cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 23(6):580–588. doi:10.1016/j.rpor.2018.05.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potiron VA, Abderrahmani R, Clément-Colmou K, Marionneau-Lambot S, Oullier T, Paris F, Supiot S. 2013. Improved functionality of the vasculature during conventionally fractionated radiation therapy of prostate cancer. PLoS One. 8(12):e84076. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084076
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramasamy T, Ruttala HB, Gupta B, Poudel BK, Choi HG, Yong CS, Kim JO. 2017. Smart chemistry-based nanosized drug delivery systems for systemic applications: A comprehensive review. J Control Release. 258:226–253. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.04.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruttala HB, Ramasamy T, Poudel BK, Ruttala RRT, Jin SG, Choi HG, Ku SK, Yong CS, Kim JO. 2020. Multi-responsive albumin-lonidamine conjugated hybridized gold nanoparticle as a combined photothermal-chemotherapy for synergistic tumor ablation. Acta Biomater. 101:531–543. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma D, Leong KX, Czarnota GJ. 2022. Application of ultrasound combined with microbubbles for cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 23(8):4393. doi:10.3390/ijms23084393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma D, Xuan Leong K, Palhares D, Czarnota GJ. 2023. Radiation combined with ultrasound and microbubbles: A potential novel strategy for cancer treatment. Z Med Phys. 33(3):407–426. doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.04.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi J, Fu C, Su X, Feng S, Wang S. 2021. Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles inhibit aggressive phenotypes and promotes radiosensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Bioengineered. 12(1):3000–3013. doi:10.1080/21655979.2021.1931641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimura T, Noma N, Oikawa T, Ochiai Y, Kakuda S, Kuwahara Y, Takai Y, Takahashi A, Fukumoto M. 2012. Activation of the AKT/cyclin D1/Cdk4 survival signaling pathway in radioresistant cancer stem cells. Oncogenesis. 1(6):e12–e12. doi:10.1038/oncsis.2012.12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stapleton S, Jaffray D, Milosevic M. 2017. Radiation effects on the tumor microenvironment: Implications for nanomedicine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 109:119–130. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.05.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran WT, Iradji S, Sofroni E, Giles A, Eddy D, Czarnota GJ. 2012. Microbubble and ultrasound radioenhancement of bladder cancer. Br J Cancer. 107(3):469–476. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergadi E, Ieronymaki E, Lyroni K, Vaporidi K, Tsatsanis C. 2017. Akt signaling pathway in macrophage activation and M1/M2 polarization. J Immunol. 198(3):1006–1014. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1601515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vordermark D. 2016. Radiotherapy of cervical cancer. Oncol Res Treat. 39(9):516–520. doi:10.1159/000448902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl DR, Lawrence TS. 2017. Integrating chemoradiation and molecularly targeted therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 109:74–83. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wieringa HW, van der Zee AG, de Vries EG, van Vugt MA. 2016. Breaking the DNA damage response to improve cervical cancer treatment. Cancer Treat Rev. 42:30–40. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu Z, Zhao X, Shu H, Luo W, Dong Y, Xu L, Zhu H, Zhao Q, Lv Y. 2022. Endostar synergizes with radiotherapy to inhibit angiogenesis of cervical cancer in a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 27(8):238. doi:10.31083/j.fbl2708238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhong G, Zhao Q, Chen Z, Yao T. 2023. TGF-β signaling promotes cervical cancer metastasis via CDR1as. Mol Cancer. 22(1):66. doi:10.1186/s12943-023-01743-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou J, Lei N, Tian W, Guo R, Chen M, Qiu L, Wu F, Li Y, Chang L. 2022. Recent progress of the tumor microenvironmental metabolism in cervical cancer radioresistance. Front Oncol. 12:999643. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.999643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar