The Intrinsic α/β Ratio for Human Tumour Cells: Is It a Constant?

References

• Bentzen S.M., Thames H.D., Overgaard J. Does variation in the in vitro cellular radiosensitivity explain the shallow clinical dose-control curve for malignant melanoma. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1990; 57: 117–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. A cellular description of the repair defect in Ataxia-telangectasia. Ataxia Telangectasia—A cellular and molecular link between Cancer, Neuropathology and Immune-deficiency, B.A. Bridges, D.G. Harnden. Wiley, Chichester 1982; 141–153, In
   Google Scholar
• Fertil B., Malaise E.P. Intrinsic radiosenstivity of human cell lines is correlated with radioresponsiveness of human tumours: analysis of 101 published survival curves. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics 1986; 11: 1699–1707
   Google Scholar
• Hall E.J. Radiation dose-rate: a factor of importance in radiobiology and radiotherapy. British Journal of Radiology 1972; 45: 81–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes A., McMillan T.J., Peacock J.H., Steel G.G. The radiation dose-rate effect in two human neuroblastoma cell lines. British Journal of Cancer 1990; 62: 791–795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliakis G., Okayasu R., Seauer R. Radiosensitive xrs-5 and parental CHO cells show identical DNA neutral filter elution dose-response: implications for a relationship between cell radiosensitivity and induction of DNA double-strand breaks. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1988; 54: 55–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelland L.R., Steel G.G. Differences in radiation response among human cervix carcinoma cell lines. Radiotherapy and Oncology 1988; 13: 225–232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelland L.R., Edwards S.M., Steel G.G. Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in human cervix carcinoma cell lines of differing radiosensitivity. Radiation Research 1988; 116: 526–538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan T.J., Eady J.J., Peacock J.H., Steel G.G. Cellular recovery in two sub-lines of the L5178Y murine leukaemic lymphoblast cell line differing in their sensitivity to ionizing radiation. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1992; 61: 49–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan T.J., Cassoni A.M., Edwards S., Holmes A., Peacock J.M. The relationship of DNA double-strand break induction to radiosensitivity in human tumour cell lines. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1990; 58: 427–438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar B.C., Fielden E.M., Millar J.L. Interpretations of survival-curve data for Chinese hamster cells, line V79 using the multitarget, multitarget with initial slope and alpha, beta equations. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1978; 33: 599–603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell J.B., Bedford J.S., Bailey S.M. Dose-rate effects on the cell cycle and survival of S3 He La and V79 cells. Radiation Research 1979; 79: 520–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock J.H., Cassoni A.M., McMillan T.J. Radiosensitive human tumour cell lines may not be recovery deficient. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1988; 54: 945–953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock J.H., Eady J.J., Edwards S.M., Holmes A., McMillan T.J., Steel G.G. Initial damage or repair as the major determinant of cellular radiosensitivity?. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1989; 56: 543–547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford I.R. Evidence for a general relationship between the induced level of DNA double-strand break-age and cell killing after X-irradiation of mammalian cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1986; 49: 611–620
   Google Scholar
• Rossi H.H. A note on the effects of fractionation of high LET radiations. Radiation Research 1976; 66: 170–173
   Google Scholar
• Steel G.G., Peacock J.H. Why are some human tumours more radiosensitive than others?. Radiotherapy and Oncology 1989; 15: 63–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel G.G., Deacon J.M., Duchesne G.M., Horwich A., Kelland L.R., Peacock J.H. The dose-rate effect in human tumour cells. Radiotherapy and Oncology 1987; 9: 299–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel G.G., Down J.D., Peacock J.H., Stephens T.C. Dose-rate effects and the repair of radiation damage. Radiotherapy and Oncology 1986; 5: 321–331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel G.G., McMillan T.J., Peacock J.H. The picture has changed in the 1980s. Proc. 15th L. H. Gray Conference, April 1989. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1989; 56: 525–537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames H.D. An ‘incomplete-repair’ model for survival after fractionated and continuous irradiations. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1985; 47: 319–339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ankeren S.C., Murray D., Meyn R.E. Induction and rejoining of γ-ray-induced DNA single-and double-strand breaks in Chinese hamster AA8 cells and two radiosensitive clones. Radiation Research 1988; 116: 511–525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells R.L., Bedford J.S. Dose rate effects in mammalian cells IV: Repairable and non-repairable damage in noncycling C3H 10T½ cells. Radiation Research 1983; 94: 105–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X., Darling J.L., McMillan T.J., Peacock J.H., Steel G.G. Heterogeneity of radiosensitivity in a human glioma cell line. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics 1992; 22: 103–108
   Google Scholar
• Yang X., Darling J.L., McMillan T.J., Peacock J.H., Steel G.G. Radiosensitivity, recovery and dose-effect in three human glioma cell lines. Radiotherapy and Oncology 1990; 19: 49–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar