Managing great powers in the post-Cold War world: old rules new game? The case of the global war on terror

References

• Bellamy, AJ and M McDonald (2004) ‘Securing international society: towards an English School discourse of security’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 39:2, 307–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, Tony (2001) ‘Prime Minister's address to the Labour Party Conference’, Brighton, 2 October, < www.labour.org.uk>, accessed February 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, K (2007) Theory of world security (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Boutros-Ghali, Boutros (1992) An agenda for peace (New York: United Nations Press)
   Google Scholar
• Boutros-Ghali, Boutros (1995) Supplement to An agenda for peace (New York: United Nations Press)
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, SG and WC Wohlforth (2005) ‘Hard times for soft balancing’, International Security, 30:1, 72–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, H (1977) The anarchical society. A study of order in world politics (London: Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Burbach, R and J Tarbell (2004) Imperial overstretch: George W. Bush and the hubris of empire (New York: Zed Books)
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, H (1966) ‘The balance of power’ in H Butterfield and M Wight (eds) Diplomatic investigations (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press), 132–148.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, GHW (1990) Address before a Joint Session of the Congress on the Persian Gulf Crisis and the Federal Budget Deficit, 11 September 1990 (Washington: Congress of the United States)
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B (2004a) From international to world society? English School theory and the social structure of globalisation (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B (2004b) The United States and the great powers (Bodmin, United Kingdom: Polity)
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry and Ole Wæver (2009) ‘Macrosecuritisation and security constellations: reconsidering scale in securitization theory’, Review of International Studies, 35, 253–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, B, O Wæver and JD Wilde (1998) Security: a new framework for analysis (Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner)
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N (1999) The new military humanism (Monroe, USA: Common Coverage Press)
   Google Scholar
• Colás, A and R Saull (eds) (2006) The War on Terror and the American ‘empire’ after the Cold War (New York: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M (2005) ‘From the Cold War to the War on Terror’ in J Baylis and S Smith (eds) The globalization of world politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 131–157.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, T (2003) ‘Society and hierarchy in international relations’, International Relations, 17:3, 303–320.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, Emile (1990) Suicide: a study in sociology (London: Free Press)
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M and K Sikkink (1998) ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization, 52:4, 887–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, RM (2005) Nuclear terrorism after 9/11 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies)
   Google Scholar
• Grunberg, I (1990) ‘Exploring the “myth” of hegemonic stability’, International Organization, 44:4, 431–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurtov, M (2006) Superpower on crusade: the Bush Doctrine in US foreign policy (Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner)
   Google Scholar
• Halper, S and J Clarke (2004) America alone: the neo-conservatives and the global order (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, KJ (2004) Taming the sovereigns: institutional change in international politics (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• ICISS (2001) The responsibility to protect (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre)
   Google Scholar
• Ignatieff, M (2003) ‘Empire lite’, Prospects, 83, 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, RJB (1981) ‘Concepts and models of change in international relations’ in B Buzan and RJB Jones (eds) Change and the study of international relations: the evaded dimension (London: Frances Pinter), 11–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kawaguchi, KH (2003) A social theory of international law: international relations as a complex system (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff)
   Google Scholar
• Kelstrup, M (2004) ‘Globalisation and societal insecurity: the securitisation of terrorism and competing strategies for global governance’ in S Guzzini and D Jung (eds) Contemporary security analysis and Copenhagen peace research (London: Routledge), 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Krauthammer, C (1991) ‘The unipolar moment’, Foreign Affairs, 70:1, 23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Q and W Xiangsui (1999) Unrestricted warfare (Beijing: PLA Literature and Arts)
   Google Scholar
• Little, R (2007) The balance of power in international relations: metaphors, myths and models (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• McKewon, TJ (1983) ‘Hegemonic stability theory and 19th century tariff levels in Europe’, International Organization, 37:1, 73–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, H and J Snyder (1988) ‘Lost hegemony?’, International Organization, 42:4, 749–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OSCE (1990) Charter of Paris for a New Europe (Paris: OSCE Summit)
   Google Scholar
• Pape, RA (2005) ‘Soft balancing against the United States’, International Security, 30:1, 7–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, TV (2005) ‘Soft balancing in the age of US primacy’, International Security, 30:1, 47–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press-Barnathan, G (2004) ‘The war against Iraq and international order: from Bull to Bush’, International Studies Review, 6, 195–212.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, MV (2006) The risk society at war: terror, technology and strategy in the twenty–first century (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Rees, W and R Aldrich (2005) ‘Contending cultures of counterterrorism: transatlantic divergence or convergence?’, International Affairs, 81:5, 905–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, C (2004) American power and world order (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity)
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, TC (1956) ‘An essay on bargaining’, American Economic Review, 46:3, 281–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, TC (1960) The strategy of conflict (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, TC (1966) Arms and influence (New Haven: Yale University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Snidal, D (1985) ‘The limits of hegemonic stability theory’, International Organization, 39:4, 579–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, S (1987) ‘The persistent myth of lost hegemony’, International Organization, 41:4, 551–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, S (1988) ‘The persistent myth of lost hegemony: reply to Milner and Snyder’, International Organization, 42:4, 751–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USNDS (2005) National defense strategy (Washington: Department of Defense)
   Google Scholar
• USNDS (2008) National defense strategy (Washington: Department of Defense)
   Google Scholar
• USNIC (2008) Global trends 2025: a transformed world (Washington:
   Google Scholar
• USNSCT (2006) National strategy for combating terrorism (Washington: The White House)
   Google Scholar
• USNSS (2002) The national security strategy (Washington: The White House)
   Google Scholar
• USNSS (2006) National security strategy (Washington: White House)
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A (1992) The evolution of international society (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A (1995) ‘Constructing international politics’, International Security, 20:1, 71–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A (1999) Social theory of international politics (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, NJ and AJ Bellamy (2005) ‘Humanitarian intervention in world politics’ in J Baylis and S Smith (eds) The globalization of world poitics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 555–578.
   Google Scholar
• Wight, M (1966) ‘The balance of power’ in H Butterfield and M Wight (eds) Diplomatic investigations (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press), 149–180.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlforth, WC (1999) ‘The stability of a unipolar world’, International Security, 24:1, 5–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar