Contextualizing change in Turkish foreign policy: the promise of the ‘two-good’ theory

References

• Agence France-Presse (2006) ‘Ankara and Kabul sign cooperation accord’, 5 January.
   Google Scholar
• Altunı¸ık, MB (2009) ‘Worldviews and Turkish foreign policy in the Middle East’, New Perspectives on Turkey, 40:1, 169–192.
   Google Scholar
• Atlı, A (2011) ‘Turkey's foreign economic policy’, Insight Turkey, 13:1, 109–128.
   Google Scholar
• Aydın, M (2003) ‘The determinants of Turkish foreign policy, and Turkey's European vocation’, The Review of International Affairs, 3:2, 306–331.
   Google Scholar
• Aydın, M and S Açıkme¸e (2007) ‘Europeanization through EU conditionality: understanding the new era in Turkish foreign policy’, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 9:3, 263–274.
   Google Scholar
• Balcı, A and N Mi¸ (2008) ‘Turkey's role in the alliance of civilizations: a new perspective in Turkish foreign policy?’, Turkish Studies, 9:3, 387–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, R and EF Keyman (2012) ‘Turkey: an emerging hub of globalization and internationalist humanitarian actor?’, Globalizations, 9:1, 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC Worldwide Monitoring (2007) ‘Al-Sharqiyah carries conflicting reports on Turkish sanctions on Iraqi Kurds’, 1 November, accessed 12 August 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, DS (2008) ‘Governments, civilians, and the evolution of insurgency: modelling the early dynamics of insurgencies’, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilefsky, D and A Shadid (2011) ‘Turkey moves to intensify sanctions against Syria’, New York Times, 30 November.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin, P (2007) ‘Only strong states can survive in Turkey's geography: the uses of “geopolitical truths” in Turkey’, Political Geography, 26:7, 740–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, P and A Bilgiç (2011) ‘Turkey's “new” foreign policy towards Eurasia’, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 52:2, 173–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camyar, I and HM Tağma (2010) ‘Why does Turkey seek European Union membership? A historical institutional approach’, Turkish Studies, 11:3, 371–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciftci, S (2013) ‘Social identity and attitudes toward foreign policy: evidence from a youth survey in Turkey’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 45:1, 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cizre, U (2003) ‘Demythologising the national security concept: the case of Turkey’, Middle East Journal, 57:2, 213–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNN Turk (2007) ‘Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan's foreign policy advisor, Egemen Bagı¸, calls to impose sanctions on Armenia’, 18 September, accessed 12 October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, SB (2011) ‘Turkey's emergence as a geopolitical power broker’, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 52:2, 217–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danforth, N (2009) ‘Ideology and pragmatism in Turkish foreign policy: from Atatürk to the AKP’, Turkish Policy Quarterly, 7:3, 75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Denizhan, E (2010) ‘Turkey's Caucasian and Central Asia policy and TİKA [Türkiye'nin Kafkasya ve Orta Asya politikasi ve TİKA]’, Sosyal ve Be¸eri Bilimler Dergisi, 2:1, 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Deringil, S (2004) Turkish foreign policy during the Second World War: an active neutrality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, RE and TN Dupuy (1977) The encyclopedia of military history (New York: Harper and Row)
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, N (2003) Empire: how Britain made the modern world (London: Allen Lane)
   Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, KS and MD Ward (1999) ‘A revised list of independent states since the Congress of Vienna’, International Interactions, 25:4, 393–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülmez, SB (2013) ‘Rising euroscepticism in Turkish politics: the case of the AKP and the CHP’, Acta Politica, 48:3, 326–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güner, SS (2012) ‘Religion and preferences: a decision-theoretic explanation of Turkey's new foreign policy’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 8:3, 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güney, A (2005) ‘An anatomy of the transformation of the US–Turkish alliance: from “Cold War” to “War on Iraq”’, Turkish Studies, 6:3, 341–359.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, W (2002) Turkish foreign policy, 1774–2000 (Portland, Oregon: Frank Cass)
   Google Scholar
• Hatipoglu, E, TC Morgan and G Palmer (2009) ‘Economic sanctions and foreign policy substitutability: an application of the two-good theory’, Annual International Studies Association Convention, Chicago, USA, February.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, F and O Taspinar (2006) ‘Turkey and Russia: axis of the excluded?’, Survival, 48:1, 81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadera, KM and GL Sorokin (2004) ‘Measuring national power’, International Interactions, 30:2, 211–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaosmanoglu, AL (2000) ‘The evolution of the national security culture and the military in Turkey’, Journal of International Affairs, 54:1, 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, Y (2011) ‘Turkey's turn to the east” and the intra-class contradictions in Turkey’, Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought, 2:2, 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R and M Dickenson (2013) ‘Turkish foreign policy and public opinion in the AKP era’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 9:2, 171–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibris, A and M Müftüler-Baç (2011) ‘The accession games: a comparison of three limited-information negotiation designs’, International Studies Perspectives, 12:4, 405–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiri¸çi, K (2006) ‘Turkey's foreign policy in turbulent times’, Chaillot Papers, 92.
   Google Scholar
• Kiri¸çi, K (2009) ‘The transformation of Turkish foreign policy: the rise of the trading state’, New Perspectives on Turkey, 40:1, 29–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitaoka, S (1990) ‘Diplomacy and the military and Showa Japan’, Daedalus, 119:3, 155–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubicek, P (2008) ‘Turkey's inclusion in the Atlantic Community: looking back, looking forward’, Turkish Studies, 9:1, 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutlay, M (2011) ‘Economy as the “practical hand” of “new Turkish foreign policy”: a political economy explanation’, Insight Turkey, 13:1, 67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Larrabee, FS (2010) ‘Turkey's new geopolitics’, Survival, 52:2, 157–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, FS and IO Lesser (2003) Turkish foreign policy in an age of uncertainty (Washington, DC: RAND Corporation)
   Google Scholar
• Menon, R and E Wimbush (2007) ‘The US and Turkey: end of an alliance?’, Survival, 49:2, 129–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, TC and T Heinrich (no date) ‘Wealth and the use of economic sanctions’, mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, TC and G Palmer (1997) ‘A two-good theory of foreign policy: an application to dispute initiation and reciprocation’, International Interactions, 22:3, 225–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, TC and G Palmer (1999) ‘Chinese foreign policy in the twenty-first century: insights from the “two-good” theory’, Issues and Studies, 35:3, 35–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, TC and G Palmer (2000) ‘A model of foreign policy substitutability: selecting the right tools for the job(s)’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44:1, 11–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, TC and G Palmer (2003) ‘To protect and to serve: alliances and foreign policy portfolios’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47:2, 180–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Most, BA and H Starr (1984) ‘International relations theory, foreign policy substitutability, and “nice” laws’, World Politics, 36:3, 383–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mufti, M (2002) ‘Swamp to backyard: the Middle East in Turkish foreign policy’ in RO Freedman (ed) The Middle East enters the twenty-first century (Gainesville: University Press of Florida), 80–110.
   Google Scholar
• Müftüler-Baç, M (2011) ‘Turkish foreign policy, its domestic determinants and the role of the European Union’, South European Society and Politics, 16:2, 279–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müftüler-Baç, M and Y Gürsoy (2010) ‘Is there an Europeanization of Turkish foreign policy? An addendum to the literature on EU candidates’, Turkish Studies, 11:3, 405–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdie, A and D Peksen (2013) ‘The impact of human rights INGO shaming on sanctions’, The Review of International Organizations, 8:1, 33–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oguzlu, T (2008) ‘Middle Easternization of Turkey's foreign policy: does Turkey dissociate from the West?’, Turkish Studies, 9:1, 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öni¸, Z (2011) ‘Multiple faces of the “new” Turkish foreign policy: underlying dynamics and a critique’, Insight Turkey, 13:1, 47–65.
   Google Scholar
• Öni¸, Z (2012) ‘Turkey and the Arab spring: between ethics and self-interest’, Insight Turkey, 14:1, 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• Öni¸, Z and S Yılmaz (2009) ‘Between Europeanization and Euro-Asianism: foreign policy activism in Turkey during the AKP era’, Turkish Studies, 10:1, 7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, G and TC Morgan (2006) Two good theory of foreign policy (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, G and TC Morgan (2007) ‘Power transition, the two-good theory, and neorealism: a comparison with comments on recent US foreign policy’, International Interactions, 33:3, 329–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, G, SB Wohlander and TC Morgan (2002) ‘Give or take: foreign aid and foreign policy substitutability’, Journal of Peace Research, 39:1, 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pipes, D (1983) In the path of God: Islam and political power (New York: Basic Books)
   Google Scholar
• Powers, KL (2006) ‘Dispute initiation and alliance obligations in regional economic institutions’, Journal of Peace Research, 43:4, 453–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, AF (2010) ‘Security and the effects of budgetary constraints’, NATO Review, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters, 2011, ‘Israeli–Greek–Turkish air sea forces on guard for first Cypriot gas drilling’, 17 September, accessed 29 January 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, P (2013) ‘Turkey's “double gravity” predicament: the foreign policy of a newly activist power’, International Affairs, 89:2, 381–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, O (1998) Türkiye'nin dı¸ politikası [Turkey's foreign policy] (Ankara: İmge Yayıncılık)
   Google Scholar
• Sayarı, S (2000) ‘Turkish foreign policy in the post-Cold War era: the challenges of multi-regionalism’, Journal of International Affairs, 54:1, 169–198.
   Google Scholar
• Sayarı, S (2013) ‘New directions in Turkey–USA relations’, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 15:2, 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, JD (1987) ‘Reconstructing the correlates of war dataset on material capabilities of states, 1816–1985’, International Interactions, 14:1, 115–132.
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2011) Yearbook 2011: armaments, disarmaments and international security (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Sözen, A (2010) ‘A paradigm shift in Turkish foreign policy: transition and challenges’, Turkish Studies, 11:1, 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayfur, MF and K Goymen (2002) ‘Decision making in Turkish foreign policy: the Caspian oil pipeline issue’, Middle Eastern Studies, 38:2, 101–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepedelen, K(2008) ‘The Turkish Ambassador's Address at the UN Special Event on Making Globalization Work for the LDCs’,  < www.un.int/turkey/page247.html>, accessed 5 April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tugal, C (2012) ‘Democratic janissaries? Turkey's role in the Arab spring’, New Left Review, 76:4, 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Türkmen, F (2009) ‘Turkish–American relations: a challenging transition’, Turkish Studies, 10:1, 109–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulman, H and O Sander (1972) ‘Türk dı¸ politikasına yön veren etkenler' [Factors that shape Turkish foreign policy]’, Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27:1, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Yalvaç, F (2012) ‘Strategic depth or hegemonic depth? A critical realist analysis of Turkey's position in the world system’, International Relations, 26:2, 165–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, H (1998) ‘Turkic identity and foreign policy flux: the rise of neo-Ottomanism’, Critique, 7:12, 19–42.
   Google Scholar
• Zenelaj, R, N Beriker and E Hatipoglu (2012) ‘EU/US and Turkey as mediators in Bosnia: a comparative study’, Paper presented at 25th annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 11–14 July.
   Google Scholar