Keeping discourses separate: explaining the non-alignment of climate politics and human rights norms by small island states in United Nations climate negotiations

References

• Anderson, Jason, MalcolmFergusson and CarolinaValsecchi (2008) An overview of greenhouse gas emissions and emissions reduction scenarios for the future (Brussels: European Parliament, Policy Department Economic and Scientific Department)
   Google Scholar
• Arosema, Gustavo (2013) ‘Conflicts of rights in international human rights: a meta-rule analysis’, Global Constitutionlism, 1:1, 6–36.
   Google Scholar
• Aubert, Vilhelm (1972) ‘Interessenkonflikt und Wertekonflikt: Zwei Typen des Konflikts und der Konfliktlösung’ in Walter LBühl (ed) Konflict und Konflikt strategie: Ansätze zu einer soziologischen Konflikttheorie (Munich: Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung), 178–205.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Barry (2005) ‘Practice as collective action’ in Theodore RSchatzki, Karin KnorrCetina and Eikevon Savigny (eds) The practice turn in contemporary theory (New York: Routledge), 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, Robert and DavidSnow (2000) ‘Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betzold, Carola (2010) ‘“Borrowing” power to influence international negotiations: AOSIS in the climate change regime, 1990–1997’, Politics, 30:3, 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Betzold, Carola, PaulaCastro and FlorianWeiler (2012) ‘AOSIS in the UNFCCC negotiations: from unity to fragmentation?’, Climate Policy, 12:5, 591–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Charli (2007) ‘Studying issue (non)-adoption in transnational advocacy networks’, International Organization, 61:3, 643–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carraro, Carlo and CarmenMarchiori (2004) ‘Endogenous strategic issue linkage in international negotiations’ in CarloCarraro and VitoFragnelli (eds) Game practice and the environment (Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar), 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Coley, Jonathan (2013) ‘Theorizing issue selection in advocacy organizations: an analysis of human rights activism around Darfur and the Congo, 1998–2010’, Sociological Perspectives, 56:2, 191–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Christina (2004) ‘International institutions and issue linkage: building support for agricultural trade liberalization’, American Political Science Review, 98:1, 153–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, Nicole and LindaWallbott (2012) ‘Beyond soft balancing. Small states and coalition building in the ICC and climate negotiations’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25:3, 345–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitelhoff, Nicole and LisbethZimmermann (2013) Things we lost in the fire: how different types of contestation affect the validity of international norms (Frankfurt: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt)
   Google Scholar
• Depledge, Joanna and PamelaChasek (2012) ‘Raising the tempo. The escalating pace and intensity of environmental negotiations’ in PamelaChasek and LynnWagner (eds) The roads from Rio. Lessons learned from twenty years of multilateral environmental negotiations (New York: Routledge), 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, Christophe (1996) ‘Negotiation as coalition building’, International Negotiation, 1, 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, Martha and KatherineSikkink (1998) ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization, 52:4, 887–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, Ian (2005) ‘Small island developing states: becalmed in a sea of soft law’, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 14:2, 89–99.
   Google Scholar
• Glazebrook, Susan (2009) ‘Human rights in the Pacific: human rights and the environment’, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 40:1, 293–350.
   Google Scholar
• Grist, Natasha (2008) ‘Positioning climate change in sustainable development discourse’, Journal of International Development, 20:6, 783–803.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, Michael and JoyeetaGupta (2000) ‘Leadership: theory and methodology’ in JoyeetaGupta and MichaelGrubb (eds) Climate change and European leadership: a sustainable role for Europe? (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic), 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, Joyeeta and LasseRingius (2001) ‘The EU's climate leadership: reconciling ambition and reality’, International Environmental Agreements, 1:2, 281–299.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, Ernst B (1980) ‘Why collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes’, World Politics, 32:3, 357–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen (1992) Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp)
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, Maarten A (1995) The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Hampson, Fen Osler and MichaelHart (1995) Multilateral negotiations: lessons from arms control, trade and the environment (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, Betsy (2010) ‘Rethinking climate refugees and climate conflict. Rhetoric, reality and the politics of policy discourse’, Journal of International Development, 22:2, 233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschmann, Albert (1994) ‘Wie viel Gemeinsinn braucht die liberale Gesellschaft?’, Leviathan, 22:2, 293–304.
   Google Scholar
• Huq, Saleemul, Hannah Reid and Laurel Murray (2006) ‘Climate change and development links’, IIED Gatekeeper Series, London, < http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/5956/14857IIED.pdf?…>.
   Google Scholar
• Kasa, Sjur, AnneGullberg and GørildHeggelund (2008) ‘The group of G77 in the international climate negotiations: recent developments and future directions’, International Environmental Agreements, 8, 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz, Audie (1995) Norms in international relations (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Leguey-Feilleux, Jean-Robert (2009) The dynamics of diplomacy (Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Riener)
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, Jane (2012) Climate change, forced migration, and international law (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Ronald B (2006) ‘Problem structure, institutional design, and the relative effectiveness of international environmental agreements’, Global Environmental Politics, 6:3, 72–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narlikar, Amrita (2012) ‘Bargaining coalitions in the WTO’ in AmritaNarlikar, MartinDaunton and RobertStern (eds) The Oxford handbook of the World Trade Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 184–209.
   Google Scholar
• Narlikar, Amrita and DianaTussie (2004) ‘The G20 at the Cancún Ministerial: developing countries and their evolving coalitions in the WTO’, World Economy, 27:7, 947–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narlikar, Amrita and Ngaire Woods (2001) ‘International trade and the emergence of new inter-state coalitions’,  < http://www.globaleconomicgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/International%20Trade%20and%20the%20Emergence.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver (2002) ‘Returning practice to the linguistic turn: the case of diplomacy’, Millennium, 31:3, 627–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, Simon and DanielChong (2011) ‘Jumping on the human rights bandwagon: how rights-based linkages can refocus climate politics’, Global Environmental Politics, 11:3, 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nollkaemper, André (2009) ‘Sovereignty and environmental justice in international law’ in JonasEbbesson and PhoebeOkowa (eds) Environmental law and justice in context (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press), 253–269.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha (2008) ‘Menschenrechte und Fähigkeiten über Grenzen hinweg’ in IngoRichter (ed) Transnationale Menschenrechte. Schritte zu einer weltweiten Verwirklichung der Menschenrechte (Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich), 61–83.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, Sebastian and ThomasGehring (2011) ‘Institutional interaction: ten years of scholarly development’ in SebastianOberthür and Olav SchramStokke (eds) Managing institutional complexity: regime interplay and global environmental change (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press), 25–58.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, Sebastian and Olav SchramStokke (2011) ‘Conclusions: decentralized interplay management in an evolving interinstitutional order’ in SebastianOberthür and Olav SchramStokke (eds) Managing institutional complexity. regime interplay and global environmental change (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press), 313–341.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Pache, Anne-Claire and FelipeSantos (2013) ‘Embedded in hybrid contexts: how individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics’ in MichaelLounsbury and EvaBoxenbaum (eds) Institutional logics in action, part B (Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald), 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Panke, Diana (2012) ‘Dwarfs in international negotiations. how small states make their voices heard’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25:3, 313–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poast, Paul (2012) ‘Does issue linkage work? Evidence from European alliance negotiations, 1860 to 1945’, International Organization, 66:2, 277–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PSIDS (2009) Views on the possible security implications of climate change to be included in the report of the Secretary-General to the 64th Session of the United Nations General Assembly (New York: Permanent Mission of the Republic of Nauru to the United Nations)
   Google Scholar
• Sebenius, James (1983) ‘Negotiation arithmetic: adding and subtracting issues and parties’, International Organization, 37:2, 281–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shue, Henry (2003) ‘Global accountability: transnational duties towards economic rights’ in Jean-MarcCoicaud, MichaelDoyle and Anne-MarieGardner (eds) The globalization of human rights (New York: United Nations University Press), 160–177.
   Google Scholar
• Shue, Henry (2012) ‘Climate hope: implementing the exit strategy’, unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, David and RobertBenford (1988) ‘Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization’, International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, David, BurkeRochford, StevenWorden and RobertBenford (1986) ‘Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation’, American Sociological Review, 51:4, 464–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swidler, Ann (2005) ‘What anchors cultural practices’ in TheodoreSchatzki, Karin KnorrCetina and Eikevon Savigny (eds) The practice turn in contemporary theory (New York: Routledge), 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, Patricia, WilliamOcasio and MichaelLounsbury (2012) The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure, and process (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Verheyen, Roda (2005) Climate change damage and international law. Prevention duties and state responsibility (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff)
   Google Scholar
• Wallbott, Linda (2014) ‘Indigenous peoples in UN REDD+ negotiations: “importing power” and lobbying for rights through discursive interplay management’, Ecology and Society, 19:1, 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen (1987) The origins of alliances (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander (1994) ‘Collective identity formation and the international state’, American Political Science Review, 88:2, 384–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Angela (2008) ‘Turning the tide: recognizing climate change refugees in international law’, Law & Policy, 30:4, 502–529.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Franziska, ChristianSchleyer and BasArts (nd) ‘The discourse and politics of market-based instruments for ecosystem services: introduction’, unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC (2011a) ‘List of participants’,  < http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/misc02p01.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC (2011b) ‘List of participants’,  < http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/misc02p02.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC (2012) ‘List of participants’, FCCC/CP/2012/INF.2, < http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2012/cop18/eng/inf02.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• UN-OHRLLS (2013) Small Island Developing States in numbers (New York: United Nations)
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, Dvora (1992) ‘Silences in public policy discourse: organizational and policy myths’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2, 399–423.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, Michael (2005) ‘Introduction: Law and compliance at different levels’ in MichaelZürn and ChristianJoerges (eds) Law and governance in postnational Europe. Compliance beyond the nation-state (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press), 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, Michael, Klaus DieterWolf and ManfredEfinger (1990) ‘Problemfelder und Situationsstrukturen in der Analyse internationaler Politik. Eine Brücke zwischen den Polen?’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft21, 151–174.
   Google Scholar