One of what kind? Comparative perspectives on the substance of EU democracy promotion

References

• AyersAlison J (2008) ‘“We all know a democracy when we see one”: (neo)liberal orthodoxy in the “democratisation” and “good governance” project’, Policy and Society, 27:1, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ban Ki-moon (2011) ‘Opening comments at press conference’, Tunis, 22 March, < http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocus/sgspeeches/statments_full.asp?statID = 1121#.Ut8CK7S1KUk>, accessed 22 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• BarryJack J (2012) ‘Democracy promotion and ODA: a comparative analysis’, Contemporary Politics, 18:3, 303–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoonstraJos (2007) ‘OSCE democracy promotion: grinding to a halt?’, Working Paper 44, FRIDE, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• BörzelTanja A, YaseminPamuk and AndreasStahn (2008) ‘The European Union and the promotion of good governance in its near abroad. One size fits all?’, Working Paper 18, SFB-Governance, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• BörzelTanja A and ThomasRisse (2004) ‘One size fits all! EU policies for the promotion of human rights, democracy and the rule of law’, paper presented at Workshop on Democracy Promotion, Stanford University, 4–5 October, < http://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/polwiss/forschung/international/atasp/publikationen/4_artikel_papiere/18/tandt_stanford_final.pdf?1367709623>, accessed 22 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• BörzelTanja A and ThomasRisse (2009) ‘Venus approaching Mars? The European Union's approaches to democracy promotion in comparative perspective’ in AmichaiMagen, ThomasRisse and MichaelMcFaul (eds) Promoting democracy and the rule of law: American and European strategies (Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan), 34–60.
   Google Scholar
• BradleyMatthew T (2005) ‘“The other”: precursory African conceptions of democracy’, International Studies Review, 7:3, 407–431.
   Google Scholar
• BurnellPeter (2000) ‘Democracy assistance: the state of the art’ in PeterBurnell (ed) Democracy assistance. International co-operation for democratization (London: Frank Cass), 339–360.
   Google Scholar
• BurnellPeter (2005) ‘Political strategies of external support for democratization’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 1:3, 361–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurnellPeter (2008) ‘From evaluating democracy assistance to appraising democracy promotion’, Political Studies, 56:2, 414–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurnellPeter (2010) ‘Is there a new autocracy promotion?’, Working Paper 96, FRIDE, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• BurnellPeter and OliverSchlumberger (2010) ‘Promoting democracy—promoting autocracy? International politics and national political regimes’, Contemporary Politics, 16:1, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarothersThomas (1997) ‘Democracy assistance: the question of strategy’, Democratization, 4:3, 109–132.
   Google Scholar
• CarothersThomas (1999) Aiding democracy abroad. The learning curve (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace)
   Google Scholar
• CarothersThomas (2002) ‘The end of the transition paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, 13:1, 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarothersThomas (2009) ‘Democracy assistance: political vs. developmental?’, Journal of Democracy, 20:1, 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarothersThomas (2010) ‘The elusive synthesis’, Journal of Democracy, 21:4, 12–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the EU (2011a) ‘Council conclusions on counter-terrorism’, 3109th General Affairs Council meeting, Brussels, 12 September.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU (2011b) ‘Council conclusions on the European Endowment for Democracy’, 3130th Foreign Affairs Council meeting, Brussels, 1 December.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU (2012) ‘EU strategic framework and action plan on human rights and democracy’, 11855/12, 25 June.
   Google Scholar
• CrawfordGordon (2000a) ‘European Union development co-operation and the promotion of democracy’ in PeterBurnell (ed) Democracy assistance: international cooperation for democratization (London: Frank Cass), 90–127.
   Google Scholar
• CrawfordGordon (2000b) ‘Promoting democratic governance in the South’, European Journal of Development Research, 12:1, 23–57.
   Google Scholar
• CremonaMarise (2004) ‘Values in the EU constitution: the external dimension’, Working Paper 24, Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• De RidderEline and DimitryKochenov (2011) ‘Democratic conditionality in the eastern enlargement: ambitious window dressing’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 16:5, 589–605.
   Google Scholar
• EpsteinDavid L, RobertBates, JackGoldstone, IdaKristensen and SharynO'Halloran (2006) ‘Democratic transitions’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:3, 551–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2004) ‘European Neighbourhood Policy’, strategy paper, COM(2004) 373 final, 12 May.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010) ‘EU development policy in support of inclusive growth and sustainable development’, Green Paper, COM(2010) 629, 10 November.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011a) ‘The future approach to EU budget support to third countries’, COM(2011) 638, 13 October.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2011b) ‘Increasing the impact of EU development policy: an Agenda for Change’, COM(2011) 637, 13 October.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2011a) ‘Human rights and democracy at the heart of EU external action—towards a more effective approach’, COM(2011) 886 final, 12 December.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2011b) ‘A new response to a changing neighbourhood’, COM (2011) 303 final, 25 May.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament OPPD (2010) Getting acquainted: setting the stage for democracy assistance (Brussels:
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council of the EU (2006) ‘Regulation on establishing a financing instrument for the promotion of democracy and human rights worldwide’, 1889/2006, 20 December, Official Journal of the European Union, L 386(29.12.2006), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• FollesdalAndreas and SimonHix (2006) ‘Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44:3, 533–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FreyburgTina, SandraLavenex, FrankSchimmelfennig, TatianaSkripka and AnneWetzel (2009) ‘EU promotion of democratic governance in the neighbourhood’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16:6, 916–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FuchsDieter and Hans-DieterKlingemann (1995) Citizens and the state (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• GrugelJean B (2004) ‘New regionalism and modes of governance—comparing US and EU strategies in Latin America’, European Journal of International Relations, 10, 603–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HerreroSonia (2009) ‘A decade of democracy promotion through the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights’, Working Paper 1/2009, European Partnership for Democracy, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• HobsonChristopher and MiljaKurki (2012) The conceptual politics of democracy promotion (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• HoutWil (2010) ‘Governance and development: changing EU policies’, Third World Quarterly, 31:1, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuberDaniela (2008) ‘Democracy assistance in the Middle East and North Africa: a comparison of US and EU policies’, Mediterranean Politics, 13:1, 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IngelhartRonald and ChristianWelzel (2009) ‘How development leads to democracy’, Foreign Affairs, 88:2, 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JacksonNicole J (2010) ‘The role of external factors in advancing non-liberal democratic forms of political rule: a case study of Russia's influence on Central Asian regimes’, Contemporary Politics, 16:1, 101–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JünemannAnnette and MichèleKnodt (2007) Externe Demokratieförderung durch die Europäische Union (Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos)
   Google Scholar
• KopsteinJeffrey (2006) ‘The transatlantic divide over democracy promotion’, Washington Quarterly, 29:2, 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KühnhardtLudger (2000) ‘Die Zukunft der Demokratisierung’ in KarlKaiser and Hans-PeterSchwarz (eds) Weltpolitik im neuen Jahrhundert (Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos), 233–242.
   Google Scholar
• KurkiMilja (2010) ‘Democracy and conceptual contestability: reconsidering conceptions of democracy in democracy promotion’, International Studies Review, 12:3, 362–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KurkiMilja (2011) ‘Governmentality and EU democracy promotion: the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights and the construction of democratic civil societies’, International Political Sociology, 1:5, 349–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LavenexSandra and FrankSchimmelfennig (2011) ‘EU democracy promotion in the neighbourhood: from leverage to governance?’, Democratization, 18:4, 885–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeonardMark (2005) Why Europe will run the 21st century (London: Fourth Estate)
   Google Scholar
• LeviMargaret and LauraStoker (2000) ‘Political trust and trustworthiness’, Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LipsetSeymour M (1959) ‘Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy’, American Political Science Review, 53:1, 69–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MagenAmichai and MichaelMcFaul (2009) ‘Introduction: American and European strategies to promote democracy—shared values, common challenges, divergent tools?’ in AmichaiMagen, ThomasRisse and MichaelMcFaul (eds) Promoting democracy and the rule of law: American and European strategies (Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• MagenAmichai and LeonardoMorlino (2008) International actors, democratization and the rule of law. Anchoring democracy (Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• MagenAmichai, ThomasRisse and MichaelMcFaul (2009) Promoting democracy and the rule of law: American and European strategies (Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave)
   Google Scholar
• MajoneGiandomenico (1998) ‘Europe's “democratic deficit”: the question of standards’, European Law Journal, 4:1, 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• MandavilleAlicia P and Peter PMandaville (2007) ‘Introduction. Rethinking democratization and democracy assistance’, Development, 50:1, 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• MannersIan (2008) ‘The normative ethics of the European Union’, International Affairs, 84:1, 45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MerkelWolfgang (2010) ‘Strategien der Demokratieförderung: Konzept und Kritik’ in JoachimRaschke and RalfTils (eds) Strategie in der Politikwissenschaft. Konturen eines neuen Forschungsfelds (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften), 151–179.
   Google Scholar
• MoravcsikAndrew (2002) ‘In defence of the democratic deficit: reassessing legitimacy in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40:4, 603–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NewmanEdward and RolandRich (2004) The UN role in promoting democracy: between ideals and reality (Tokyo: UNU Press)
   Google Scholar
• ObamaBarack (2011), Remarks by the President on the Middle East and North Africa, Washington, 19 May, < http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/19/remarks-president-middle-east-and-north-africa>, accessed 22 January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• O'DonnellGuillermo A and Philippe CSchmitter (1986) Transitions from authoritarian rule: tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press)
   Google Scholar
• PaceMichelle (2011) ‘Liberal or social democracy? Aspect dawning in the EU's democracy promotion agenda in the Middle East’, International Journal of Human Rights, 15:6, 801–812.
   Google Scholar
• PrzeworskiAdam, Jose ACheibub, Michael EAlvarez and FernandoLimongi (2000) Democracy and development: political institutions and material well-being in the world, 1950–1990 (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• ReynaertVicky (2011) ‘Preoccupied with the market: the EU as a promoter of “shallow” democracy in the Mediterranean’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 16:5, 623–637.
   Google Scholar
• RisseThomas (2009) ‘Conclusions: towards transatlantic democracy promotion?’ in AmichaiMagen, ThomasRisse and MichaelMcFaul (eds) Promoting democracy and the rule of law: American and European strategies (Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave), 244–271.
   Google Scholar
• RutazibwaOlivia (2013) ‘A democratic critique of contemporary Western ethical foreign policy’, Ethical Perspectives, 20:1, 81–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SasseGwendolyn (2011) ‘The Council of Europe as a norm entrepreneur: the political strengths of a weak international institution’ in NeilWalker, JoShaw and StephenTierney (eds) Europe's constitutional mosaic (Oxford: Hart), 171–204.
   Google Scholar
• SchimmelfennigFrank and HannoScholtz (2008) ‘EU democracy promotion in the European neighborhood. Political conditionality, economic development and transnational exchange’, European Union Politics, 9:2, 187–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchraederPeter J (2002) ‘Promoting an international community of democracies’ in Peter JSchraeder (ed) Exporting democracy: rhetoric vs. reality (Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• SchraederPeter J (2003) ‘The state of the art in international democracy promotion: results of a joint European–North American research network’, Democratization, 10:2, 21–44.
   Google Scholar
• SmithKaren E (2008) European Union foreign policy in a changing world (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity)
   Google Scholar
• StewartSusan (2009) ‘Democracy promotion before and after the “colour revolutions”’, Democratization, 16:4, 645–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WarkotschAlexander (2007) ‘International socialization in difficult environments: the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe in Central Asia’, Democratization, 14:3, 491–508.
   Google Scholar
• WetzelAnne and JanOrbie (2011a) ‘With map and compass on narrow paths and through shallow waters: discovering the substance of EU democracy promotion’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 16:5, 705–725.
   Google Scholar
• WetzelAnne and JanOrbie (2011b) ‘The substance of EU democracy promotion’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 16:5, (special issue).
   Google Scholar
• WetzelAnne and JanOrbie (2015) The substance of EU democracy promotion: concepts and cases (Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave)
   Google Scholar
• WhitmanRichard G (2011) Normative Power Europe: empirical and theoretical perspectives (Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave)
   Google Scholar
• YoungsRichard (2003) ‘European approaches to democracy assistance: learning the right lesson?’, Third World Quarterly, 24:1, 127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngs, Richard (ed) (2006) Survey of European democracy promotion policies 2000–2006 (Madrid: FRIDE)
   Google Scholar
• YoungsRichard (2008) ‘Trends in democracy assistance. What has Europe been doing?’, Journal of Democracy, 19:2, 160–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoungsRichard (2011) ‘Misunderstanding the maladies of liberal democracy promotion’, Working Paper 106, FRIDE, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• ZielonkaJan and AlexPravda (2001) Democratic consolidation in Eastern Europe. Volume 2. International and transnational factors (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar