Connolly and the never-ending critiques of liberal peace: from the privilege of difference to vorarephilia

References

• Abrahamsen, Rita (2000) Disciplining democracy. Development discourse and good governance in Africa (London: Zed Books)
   Google Scholar
• Autesserre, Séverine (2014) Peaceland. Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)10.1017/CBO9781107280366
   Google Scholar
• Barbara, Julien (2008) ‘Rethinking neo-liberal state building: building post-conflict development states’, Development in Practice, 18, 307–318
   Google Scholar
• Bargués-Pedreny, Pol (2015) ‘Realising the post-modern dream: strengthening post-conlict resilience and the promise of peace’, Resilience, 3:2, 113–132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargués-Pedreny, Pol, Jessica Schmidt, Mario Schmidt, and Kai Jonas Koddenbrock (2015) ‘Introduction’ in Pol Bargués-Pedreny, Jessica Schmidt, Mario Schmidt, and Kai Jonas Koddenbrock (eds) Ends of critique Global Dialogue 10 (Duisburg: Centre for Global Cooperation Research), 6–10
   Google Scholar
• Belloni, Roberto (2012) ‘Hybrid peace governance: its emergence and significance’, Global Governance, 18:1, 21–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhabha, Homi K (1994) The location of culture (London; New York: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Björkdahl, Annika and Kristine Höglund (2013) ‘Precarious peacebuilding: friction in global–local encounters’, Peacebuilding, 1:3, 289–299
   Google Scholar
• Boege, Volker, Anne Brown, Kevin Clements and Anna Nolan (2009) ‘Building peace and political community in hybrid political orders’, International Peacekeeping, 16:5, 599–615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski (2011) On critique. A sociology of emancipation (Cambridge: Polity Press)
   Google Scholar
• Brigg, Morgan (2010) ‘Culture: challenges and possibilities’ in Oliver P Richmond (eds) Palgrave advances in peacebuilding: critical developments and approaches (London: Palgrave), 329–34610.1057/9780230282681
   Google Scholar
• Brigg, Morgan (2013) ‘Relational sensibility in peacebuilding: emancipation, tyranny, or transformation?’ in Wren Chadwick, Tobias Debiel and Frank Gadinger (eds) Relational sensibility and the ‘turn to the local’: prospects for the future of peacebuilding (Duisburg: Käte Hamburger Kolleg/Centre for Global Cooperation Research), 12–18
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, David (1998) National deconstruction: violence, identity, and justice in Bosnia (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press)
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David (2010a) International statebuilding: the rise of post-liberal governance (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David (2010b) ‘The uncritical critique of “liberal peace”’, Review of International Studies, 36:S1, 137–155
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David (2016) ‘How the world learned to stop worrying and love failure: big data, resilience and emergent causality’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 44:3, 391–410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, Bruno (2012) ‘War and peace in Côte d’Ivoire: violence, agency, and the local/international line’, International Peacekeeping, 19:4, 508–524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Coning, Cedric (2016) ‘From peacebuilding to sustaining peace: implications of complexity for resilience and sustainability’, Resilience, 4:3, 166–181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, William E (1969) The bias of pluralism (New York, NY: Atherton Press)
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, William E (1995) The ethos of pluralization (Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press)
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, William E (2002) Identity/difference: democratic negotiations of political paradox Expanded ed (Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press)
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, William E (2005) Pluralism (Durham; London: Duke University Press)10.1215/9780822387084
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, William E (2011) A world of becoming (Durham; London: Duke University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, William E (2013) ‘The “new materialism” and the fragility of things’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 41:3, 399–412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, William E (2014) The fragility of things: self-organizing processes, neoliberal fantasies, and democratic activism (Durham and London: Duke University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Neil, Michael Pugh and Mandy Turner (2008) Whose peace? critical perspectives on the political economy of peacebuilding (Basingstoke: Palgrave)
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques (1992) ‘Force of law: the mystical foundations of authority’ in Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld and David G Carlson (eds) Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (New York, NY: Routledge), 3–67
   Google Scholar
• Drichel, Simone (2008) ‘The time of hybridity’, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 34:6, 587–615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffield, Mark (2001) Global governance and the new wars: the merging of development and security (London and New York: Zed Books)
   Google Scholar
• Dumm, Thomas L. and Morton Schoolman (2008) The new pluralism: William Connolly and the contemporary global condition (Durham; London: Duke University Press)10.1215/9780822389149
   Google Scholar
• Dumm, Thomas L. (2008) ‘A pluralist mind: agonistic respect and the problem of violence towards difference’ in David Campbell and Morton Schoolman (eds) The new pluralism: William Connolly and the contemporary global condition (Durham; London: Duke University Press), 17–6110.1215/9780822389149
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Brad and Julian Reid (2014) Resilient life. The art of living dangerously (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, Madeleine (2013) Ethics and politics after poststructuralism: Levinas, Derrida and Nancy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press)10.3366/edinburgh/9780748685134.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Graef, Julian (2015) Practicing post-liberal peacebuilding: legal empowerment and emergent hybridity in liberia (London: Macmillan)10.1057/9781137491046
   Google Scholar
• Harman, Graham (2005) Guerrilla metaphysics: phenomenology and the carpentry of things (Chicago, IL: Open Court)
   Google Scholar
• Heathershaw, John (2013) ‘Towards better theories of peacebuilding: beyond the liberal peace debate’, Peacebuilding, 1:2, 275–282
   Google Scholar
• Hehir, Aidan (2006) ‘Autonomous province building: identification theory and the failure of UNMIK’, International Peacekeeping, 13:2, 200–213
   Google Scholar
• Honig, Bonnie (2007) ‘Between decision and deliberation: political paradox in democratic theory’, American Political Science Review, 101:01, 1–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inayatullah, Naeem and David L Blaney (2004) International relations and the problem of difference (New York; London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Jabri, Vivienne (2007) War and the transformation of world politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan)10.1057/9780230626393
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, Tim (2007) ‘Hegemony, modernisation and post-war reconstruction’, Global Society, 21:4, 521–537
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, Jonathan (2016) ‘Governing through failure and denial: the new resilience agenda’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44:3, 370–390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koddenbrock, Kai Jonas (2014) ‘Strategies of critique in international relations: from foucault and Latour towards Marx’, European Journal of International Relations, 21:2, 243–266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraidi, Marwan M (2005) Hybridity, or the cultural logic of globalization (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno (2004) ‘Why has critique run out of steam? from matters of fact to matters of concern’, Critical Inquiry, 30:2, 225–248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno (2011) ‘Love your monsters’, Breakthrough Journal, 2:11, 21–28
   Google Scholar
• Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas and Stefanie Kappler (2016) ‘What attachment to peace? exploring the normative and material dimensions of local ownership in peacebuilding’, Review of International Studies, 42:5, 895–914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinas, Emmanuel (1991) Otherwise then being or beyond essence Translated by Alphonso Lingis (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers)10.1007/978-94-015-7906-3
   Google Scholar
• van der Lijn, Jaïr (2013) ‘Imagi-nation building in illusionstan: Afghanistan, where dilemmas become dogmas, and models are perceived to be reality’, International Peacekeeping, 20:2, 173–188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger (2008) ‘Indigenous peace-making versus the liberal peace’, Conflict and Cooperation, 43:2, 139–163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger (2010) ‘Hybrid peace: the interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace’, Security Dialogue, 41:4, 391–412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger (2011) International peacebuilding and local resistance. Hybrid forms of peace (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan)10.1057/9780230307032
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger (2013) ‘Introduction: the transcripts of peace: public, hidden or non-obvious?’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 7:4, 423–430
   Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger and Oliver P Richmond (2013) ‘The local turn in peace building: a critical agenda for peace’, Third World Quarterly, 34:5, 763–783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, Roger and Oliver P Richmond (2016) ‘The fallacy of constructing hybrid political orders: a reappraisal of the hybrid turn in peacebuilding’, International Peacekeeping, 23:2, 219–239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, Gearoid (2013) ‘Expectations and experiences of peacebuilding in Sierra Leone: parallel peacebuilding processes and compound friction’, International Peacekeeping, 20:2, 189–203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, Gearoid (2014) ‘Disaggregating hybridity: why hybrid institutions do not produce predictable experiences of peace’, Journal of Peace Research, 51:4, 501–514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, Gearoid, Jaïr van der Lijn and Willemijn Verkoren (2013) ‘Peacebuilding plans and local reconfigurations: frictions between imported processes and indigenous practices’, International Peacekeeping, 20:2, 137–143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, Timothy (2013) Hyperobjects: philosophy and ecology after the end of the world (London and Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press)
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal (1999) ‘Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?’, Social Research, 66:3, 745–758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, Suthaharan and David Rampton (2014) ‘The limits of hybridity and the crisis of liberal peace’, Review of International Studies, 41:1, 49–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak, Meghana and Eric Selbin (2010) Decentering international relations (London: Zed Books)
   Google Scholar
• Paffenholz, Thania (2014) ‘International peacebuilding goes local: analysing Lederach's conflict transformation theory and its ambivalent encounter with 20 years of practice’, Peacebuilding, 2:1, 11–27
   Google Scholar
• Paipais, Vassilios (2010) ‘Self and other in critical international theory: assimilation, incommensurability and the paradox of critique’, Review of International Studies, 37:1, 121–140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, Jenny H (2012) ‘A conceptual unpacking of hybridity: accounting for notions of power, politics and progress in analyses of aid-driven interfaces’, Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 7:2, 9–22
   Google Scholar
• Pia, Emily (2013) ‘Narrative therapy and peacebuilding’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 7:4, 476–491
   Google Scholar
• Pieterse, Jan Nederveen (2001) ‘Hybridity, so what?: the anti-hybridity backlash and the riddles of recognition’, Theory, Culture & Society, 18:2-3, 219–245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouligny, Béatrice (2005) ‘Civil society and post-conflict peacebuilding. ambiguities of international programmes aimed at building “new” societies’, Security Dialogue, 36:4, 495–510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouligny, Béatrice (2006) Peace operations seen from below. UN missions and local people (London: Hurst)
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, Michael (2004) ‘Peacekeeping and critical theory’, International Peacekeeping, 11:1, 39–58
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, Michael (2005) ‘The political economy of peacebuilding: a critical theory perspective’, International Journal of Peace Studies, 10:2, 23–42
   Google Scholar
• Pupavac, Vanessa (2001) ‘Therapeutic governance: psycho-social intervention and trauma risk management’, Disasters, 25:4, 358–372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampton, David and Suthaharan Nadarajah (2017) ‘A long view of liberal peace and its crisis’, European Journal of International Relations, 23:2), 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116649029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randazzo, Elisa (2016) ‘The paradoxes of the “everyday”: scrutinising the local turn in peace building’, Third World Quarterly, 37:8, 1351–1370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P (2009) ‘A post-liberal peace: eirenism and the everyday’, Review of International Studies, 35:03, 557–580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P (2010) ‘Resistance and the post-liberal peace’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 38:3, 665–692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P (2011) A post-liberal peace (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P (2012) ‘A pedagogy of peacebuilding: infrapolitics, resistance, and liberation’, International Political Sociology, 6:2, 115–131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P (2014a) Failed statebuilding: intervention, the state, and the dynamics of peace formation (New Haven and London: Yale University Press)10.12987/yale/9780300175318.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P (2014b) ‘Jekyll or Hyde: what is statebuilding creating? evidence from the “field”’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27:1, 1–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P (2015) ‘The dilemmas of a hybrid peace: negative or positive?’, Cooperation and Conflict, 50:1, 50–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P and Roger Mac Mac Ginty (2015) ‘Where now for the critique of the liberal peace?’, Cooperation and Conflict, 50:2, 171–189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P, and Audra Mitchell (2012) ‘Introduction—towards a post-liberal peace’ in Oliver P. Richmond and Audra Mitchell (eds) Hybrid forms of peace: from everyday agency to post-liberalism (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 1–38
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Oliver P, Annika Björkdahl and Stefanie Kappler (2011) ‘The emerging EU peacebuilding framework: confirming or transcending liberal peacebuilding?’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 24:3, 449–469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, David (2012) ‘Saving liberal peacebuilding from itself’, Peace Review, 24:3, 366–373
   Google Scholar
• Sabaratnam, Meera (2011) ‘IR in dialogue … but can we change the subjects? a typology of decolonising strategies for the study of world politics’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 39:3, 781–803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabaratnam, Meera (2013) ‘Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace’, Security Dialogue, 44:3, 259–278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Jessica (2013) ‘The empirical falsity of the human subject: new materialism, climate change and the shared critique of artifice’, Resilience, 1:3, 174–192
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, Christopher (1995) ‘A world made safe for differences: Ruth Benedict’s “the chrysanthemum and the sword”’, American Quarterly, 47:4, 659–680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadjbakhsh, Shahrbanou (ed) (2011) Rethinking the liberal peace. external models and local alternatives (Abingdon: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Jonas and Lisbeth Zimmermann (2016) ‘Between Banyans and battle scenes: liberal norms, contestation, and the limits of critique’, Review of International Studies, 42:03, 513–534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar