Morality and progress: IR narratives on international revisionism and the status quo

References

• Acharya, Amitav (2014) Global international relations (IR) and regional worlds: a new agenda for international Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58:4, 647–659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, Amitav and Barry Buzan (2007) ‘Why is there no non-western international relations theory? An introduction’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7:3, 287–312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, Graham (2015) ‘The Thucydides trap: are the U.S. and China headed for war?’ The Atlantic, September 24, <http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/09/united-states-china-war-thucydides-trap/406756/>, accessed 12 March 2019
   Google Scholar
• Autesserre, Séverine (2012) ‘Dangerous Tales: dominant narratives on the Congo and their unintended consequences’, African Affairs, 111:443, 202–222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behravesh, Maysam (2018) ‘State revisionism and ontological (in)security in international politics: the complicated case of Iran and its nuclear behavior’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 21:4, 836–857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, Brett and Leonard Seabrooke (eds) (2006) Global standards of market civilization (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Breuer, Adam and Alastair Iain Johnston (2019) ‘Memes, narratives, and the emergent US–China security dilemma’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:4, 429–455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukovansky, Mlada (2016) ‘The responsibility to accomodate. Ideas and change’, in TV Paul (ed.) Accommodating rising powers: past, present, and future (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 87–107
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry (2010) ‘China in international society: Is peaceful rise possible?’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3:1, 5–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry and George Lawson (2015) The global transformation: history, modernity and the making of international relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, William (2008) ‘Chinese visions of world order: post-hegemonic or a new hegemony?’, International Studies Review, 10:4, 749–761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, EH (1939a) Britain: a study of foreign policy from the versailles treaty to the outbreak of war (London: Longman Green)
   Google Scholar
• Carr, EH (1939) The twenty years’ crisis, 1919–1939: an introduction to the study of international relations (London: Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Steve (2015) ‘On states’ status quo and revisionist dispositions: discerning power, popularity and satisfaction from Security Council vetoes’, Issues and Studies, 51:3, 1–28
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Steve, Hu, Weixing and He Kai (2018) ‘Discerning states’ revisionist and status quo orientations: Comparing China and the US’, European Journal of International Relations, 25:2, 613–640
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Ching-Chang and Kosuke Shimizu (2019) ‘International relations from the margins: the Westphalian meta-narratives and counter-narratives in Okinawa-Taiwan relations’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:4, 521–540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Michael (ed.) (2000) E.H. Carr: a critical appraisal (London: Palgrave Macmilan)
   Google Scholar
• Damro, Chad (2012) ‘Market power Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19:5, 682–699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, Jason (2006) The origins of revisionist and status quo states (London: Palgrave)
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense (2018), Summary of the 2018 national defense strategy of The United States of America, <https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf>, accessed 1 June 2018
   Google Scholar
• Deudney, Daniel, and G. John Ikenberry (1993) ‘The logic of the west’, World Policy Journal, 10:4, 17–25
   Google Scholar
• Deudney, Daniel, and G. John Ikenberry (2012) ‘Democratic internationalism. An American grand strategy for a post-exceptionalist era’, Working Paper 11, Council on Foreign Relations
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Sheng (2010), ‘Analyzing rising power from the perspective of soft power: a new look at China’s rise to the status quo power’, Journal of Contemporary China, 19:64, 255–272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economist (2018) ‘A full blown trade war between America and China looks likely’, 21 July, <https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2018/06/21/a-full-blown-trade-war-between-america-and-china-looks-likely>, accessed 2 November 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Eun, Yong-Soo (2018) What is at stake in building ‘non-western’ international relations theory? (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Huiyin (2009) ‘Is China a revisionist power?’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2:3, 313–334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg, Aaron (2018) ‘Competing with China’, Survival, 60:3, 7–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin, Robert (1987) The political economy of international relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, Stacie E. (2018) ‘Embedded revisionism: networks, institutions, and challenges to world order’, International Organization, 72:4, 1–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Avery (2007) ‘Power transitions, institutions, and China’s rise in East Asia: theoretical expectations and evidence’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 30:4/5, 639–682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gries, Peter and Yiming Jing (2019) ‘Are the US and China fated to fight? How narratives of ‘power transition’ may shape great power war or peace’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:4, 456–482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Karl, Linus Hagström and Ulv Hanssen (2019) ‘Long live pacifism! Narrative power and Japan’s pacifist model’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:4, 502–520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagström, Linus and Karl Gustafsson (2019) ‘Narrative power: how storytelling shapes East Asian international politics’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:4, 387–406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, John (2004) The eastern origins of western civilisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, John (2012) The eurocentric conception of world politics: western international theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, Andrew (2005), ‘Pax Americana or the empire of insecurity?’, International Relations of the Asia Pacific, 5:2, 153–176
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, Ian (2007) ‘Breaking and making norms: American revisionism and crises of legitimacy’, International Politics, 44:2–3, 194–213
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G John (2008) ‘The rise of China and the future of the West: can the liberal system survive?’, Foreign Affairs, 87:1, 23–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G John (2011) Liberal leviathan: the origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world order (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry G John (2017) The plot against American foreign policy’, Foreign Affairs, 17 April, <https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2017-04-17/plot-against-american-foreign-policy>, accessed 25 March 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Jaschob, Lena, et al. (2017) ‘Was frustriert die Gewinner? revisionismus in der internationalen Politik und das Rätsel revisionistischer Aufsteiger‘, Zeitschrift für Außen-und Sicherheitspolitik, 10:1, 1–24
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Alistair Iain (2003), ‘Is China a status quo power?’, International Security, 27:4, 5–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastner, Scott L and Philip C Saunders (2012) ‘Is China a status quo or revisionist state? Leadership travel as an empirical indicator of foreign policy priorities’, International Studies Quarterly, 56:1, 163–177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavalski, Emilian (2018) ‘Guanxi or what is the Chinese for relational theory of world politics’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 18:3, 397–420
   Google Scholar
• Kissinger, Henry (1957) Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy (New York: Harper and Brothers)
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, Douglas (1997) ‘The continuation of history: power transition theory and the end of the cold war’, Journal of Peace Research, 34:1, 24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Yves-Heng (2015) ‘How (dis)satisfied is China? A power transition theory perspective,’ Journal of Contemporary China, 24:92, 280–297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Kheng Swe, Hailong Ju and Mingjiang Li (2017), ‘China’s revisionist aspirations in Southeast Asia and the curse of the South China Sea disputes’, China: An International Journal, 15:1, 187–213.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, Jennifer (2017) ‘Asia’s other revisionist power’, Foreign Affairs, March/April, <https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2017-02-13/asias-other-revisionist-power>, accessed 5 June 2018
   Google Scholar
• Ling, LHM (2018) ‘Heart and soul for world politics: Advaita Monism and Daoist Trialectics in IR’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 18:3, 313–337
   Google Scholar
• Ling, LHM and Mari Nakamura (2019) ‘Popular culture and politics: re-narrating the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands dispute’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:4, 541–558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, Michael (1997) ’Westernizing Russia and China’, Foreign Affairs, 76:3, 93–97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, Ian (2002) ‘Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40:2, 235–258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of External Affairs (2017) ‘Joint statement—United States and India: prosperity through partnership’, June, <http://mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/28560/United_States_and_India_Prosperity_Through_Partnership>, accessed 30 May 2018
   Google Scholar
• Merlingen, Michael (2007) ‘Everything is dangerous: a critique of “normative power Europe”’, Security Dialogue 38:4, 435–453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew (2014) The quiet superpower (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, Hans (1962 (1948)) Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf)
   Google Scholar
• Myre, Greg (2018) ‘How the Pentagon plans to spend that extra $61 billion’, NPR, March 26, <https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2018/03/26/596129462/how-the-pentagon-plans-to-spend-that-extra-61-billion>, accessed 30 May 2018
   Google Scholar
• Nymalm, Nicola (2013) ‘The end of the “liberal theory of history”? dissecting the US congress’ discourse on China’s currency policy’, International Political Sociology, 7:4, 388–405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nymalm, Nicola (2017) ‘The economics of identity: is China the new “Japan problem” for the United States?’, Journal of International Relations and Development, <DOI: 10.1057/s41268-017-0126-9>
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organski, AFK and Jacek Kugler (1980) The war ledger (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Chengxin (2018) ‘Toward a new relational ontology in global politics: China’s rise as holographic transition’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 18:3, 339–367
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Chengxin (2004) ‘The ‘China Threat’ in American Self-Imagination: The Discursive Construction of Other as Power Politics’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 29:3, 305–331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, Molly and Kristen Monroe (1998) ‘Narrative in political science’, Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 315–331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piening, Christopher (1997) Global Europe: the European Union in world affairs (London: Lynne Rienner)
   Google Scholar
• Pieterse, Jan Nederveen (2008) ‘Rethinking modernity and capitalism: add context and stir’, Convergence, <http://nebula.wsimg.com/8f6447fddcdd06192452c93b37aa2559?AccessKeyId=FF8C6D6A9193E63EE295&disposition=0&alloworigin=1>, accessed 6 November 2017
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, Jennifer (2009) A turn to empire, the rise of imperial liberalism in Britain and France. (Boston: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Rosecrance, Richard (1998) ‘The European Union: a new type of international actor’ in Jan Zielonka (ed) Paradoxes of European Foreign Policy (The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International), 15–24
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, David (2006) Identifying threats and threatening identities: the social construction of realism and liberalism (Stanford: Stanford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Gerald (1996) ‘East Asia and the constrainment of China’, International Security, 20:4, 107–135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweller, Randall (1999) ‘Managing the rise of great powers: history and theory’ in Alastair Iain Johnston and Robert S. Ross (eds) Engaging China: the management of an emerging power (London: Routledge), 1–32
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, Randall (2015) ‘Rising powers and revisionism in emerging international orders’, Valdai Papers #16, May, <http://valdaiclub.com/files/11391/>
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, Randall (2018) ‘Opposite but compatible nationalisms: a neoclassical realist approach to the future of US–China relations’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11:1, 23–48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman, Frederick L. (1948) International politics: the destiny of the western state system (New York: MacGraw-Hill)
   Google Scholar
• Shambaugh, David (2001) ‘China or America: which is the revisionist power?’, Survival, 43:3, 25–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Steve (1999) ‘Is the truth out there? Eight questions about international order’ in TV Paul and John A Hall (eds) International order and the future of world politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 99–119
   Google Scholar
• Somers, Margaret R and Gloria D Gibson (1994) Reclaiming the Epistemological Other: Narrative and the Social Constitution of Identity, in: Craig J. Calhoun (ed) Social theory and the politics of identity (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Blackwell), 37–99
   Google Scholar
• Stuenkel, Oliver (2016) Post-western world: how emerging powers are remaking global order. (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity)
   Google Scholar
• Subotić, Jelena (2016) ‘Narrative, ontological security, and foreign policy change’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 12, 610–627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, Shogo, et al. (2013) International orders in the early modern world: before the rise of the west (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Terhalle, Maximilian (2015) The transition of global order: legitimacy and contestation (Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave)
   Google Scholar
• Thies, Cameron G and Mark D Nieman (2017) Rising powers and foreign policy revisionism: understanding BRICS identity and behavior through time (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press)
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Oliver (2013) ‘Threatening’ China and US security: the international politics of identity’, Review of International Studies, 39:4, 903–924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, Oliver (2014) American images of China: identity, power, policy (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Oliver (2016) ‘China, India and the US rebalance to the Asia Pacific: the geopolitics of rising identities’, Geopolitics 21:4, 922–944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadura, Katharine (2015) ‘The EU as ‘norm entrepreneur’ in the Asian region: exploring the digital diplomacy aspect of the human rights toolbox’, Asia Europe Journal, 13:3, 349–360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walt, Stephen M (2018) ‘America’s IR schools are broken’, Foreign Policy, <https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/02/20/americans-ir-schools-are-broken-international-relations-foreign-policy/>, accessed 27 February 2018
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Steven (2017) Status and the challenge of rising powers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• White House (2017a) ‘National security strategy of the United States of America’, <https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905-2.pdf>, accessed 25 March 2018
   Google Scholar
• White House (2017b) ‘Press briefing on President Trump’s upcoming visit to Poland and Germany’, 29 June, <https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/press-briefing-president-trumps-upcoming-visit-poland-germany-062917/>, accessed 31 October 2018
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Jeffrey (2017) ‘The evolution of China’s Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: from a revisionist to status-seeking agenda’, International Relations of the Asia Pacific, 19:1, 147–176
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, Stephanie C. (2019) ‘“Soft power is such a benign animal”: narrative power and the reification of concepts in Japan’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:4, 483–501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfers, Arnold (1962) Discord and collaboration: essays on international politics (Baltimore, Maryland: The John Hopkins Press)
   Google Scholar
• Womack, Brantly (2015) ‘China and the future status quo’, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 8:2, 115–137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Thomas (2017) All measures short of war: the contest for the twenty-first century and the future of American power (New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Xiang, Lanxin (2001) ‘Washington’s misguided China policy’, Survival, 43:3, 7–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Ren (2015) ‘A reform-minded status quo power? China, the G20, and reform of the international financial system’, Third World Quarterly, 36:11, 2023–2043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Suisheng (2018) ‘A revisionist stakeholder: China and the post-world war II world order’, Journal of Contemporary China, 27:113, 643–658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar