References
- Abe, Shinzo (2013) ‘The bounty of the open seas: five new principles for Japanese diplomacy’, January 18 <https://japan.kantei.go.jp/96_abe/statement/201301/18speech_e.html>, accessed 15 February 2019.
- Abe, Shinzo (2015) ‘Statement by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’, August 14, <https://japan.kantei.go.jp/97_abe/statement/201508/0814statement.html>, accessed 15 December 2018.
- Boym, Svetlana (2001) The future of nostalgia (New York: Basic Books).
- Browning, Christopher S, and Pertti Joenniemi (2017) ‘Ontological security, self-articulation and the securitization of identity’, Cooperation and Conflict, 52:1, 31–47.
- Central Archives of China, et al. (2014a) ‘Nomination form, international memory of the world register, Documents of Nanjing Massacre’, <http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/mow/nomination_forms/china_nanjing_en.pdf>, accessed 15 December 2018.
- Central Archives of China, et al. (2014b) ‘Nomination form, international memory of the world register, Archives about “Comfort Women” for Japanese Troops’, <http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/mow/nomination _forms/china_comfort_women_eng.pdf>, accessed 1 December 2016.
- Committee of Foreign Policy and Defense, House of Councillors of Japan (2016) ‘Minutes of the meeting, No. 2’, October 20, <http://kokkai.ndl.go.jp/SENTAKU/sangiin/192/0059/19210200059002a.html>, accessed 28 February 2019.
- Dobson, Hugo (2017) ‘Is Japan really back? The “Abe Doctrine” and global governance’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47:2, 199–224.
- Dower, John W (1999) Embracing defeat: Japan in the wake of world war II (New York: W.W. Norton and Co.).
- Edmondson, Ray (2020a) ‘Memory of the World: an introduction’, in Ray Edmondson, Lothar Jordan, Anca Claudia Prodan (eds) The UNESCO memory of the world programme: key aspects and recent developments (Switzerland: Springer), 19–40.
- Edmondson, Ray (2020b) ‘Reviewing the MoW general guidelines: reflections on the experience of 2015–2017’, in Ray Edmondson, Lothar Jordan and Anca Claudia Prodan (eds) The UNESCO memory of the world programme: key aspects and recent developments (Switzerland: Springer), 59–89.
- Giddens, Anthony (1991) Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
- Gustafsson, Karl (2014) ‘Memory politics and ontological security in Sino-Japanese relations’, Asian Studies Review, 38:1, 71–86.
- Gustafsson, Karl (2015) ‘Identity and recognition: remembering and forgetting the post-war in Sino-Japanese relations’, The Pacific Review, 28:1, 117–38.
- Gustafsson, Karl (2016) ‘Routinised recognition and anxiety: understanding the deterioration in Sino-Japanese relations’, Review of International Studies, 42:4, 613–633.
- Gustafsson, Karl, Linus Hagström, and Ulv Hanssen (2018) ‘Japan’s pacifism is dead’, Survival, 60:6, 137–158.
- Hagström, Linus (2015) ‘The Sino-Japanese battle for soft power: pitfalls and promises’, Global Affairs, 1:2, 129–137.
- Hagström, Linus, and Karl Gustafsson (2015) ‘Japan and identity change: why it matters in International Relations’, The Pacific Review, 28:1, 1–22.
- Hagström, Linus, and Ulv Hanssen (2016) ‘War is peace: the rearticulation of “peace” in Japan’s China discourse’, Review of International Studies, 42:2, 266–286.
- Hase, Hiroshi (2015) ‘Speech at the 38th session of the General Conference of UNESCO’ <https://www.unesco.emb-japan.go.jp/pdf/SpeechHase_Eng38GC2015.pdf>, accessed 15 December 2018.
- Hashimoto, Akiko (2015) The long defeat: cultural trauma, memory, and identity in Japan (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- Hosoya, Yuichi (2015) ‘Historical memories and security legislation: Japan’s security policy under the Abe administration’, Asia-Pacific Review, 22:2, 44–52.
- Innes, Alexandria, and Brent J Steele (2013) ‘Memory, trauma, and ontological security’ in Doville Budryte and Erica Resende (eds) Memory and trauma in international relations (New York: Routledge), 15–29.
- Kim, Mikyoung (2014) ‘Memorializing comfort women: memory and human rights in Korea-Japan relations’, Asian Politics & Policy, 6:1, 83–96.
- Kingston, Jeff (2019) ‘Japanese revisionists’ meddling backfires’, Critical Asian Studies, 51:3, 437–450.
- Kinnvall, Catarina (2006) Globalization and religious nationalism in India: the search for ontological security (New York: Routledge).
- Kisha Kurabu, Nippon (2012) ‘Debate and press conference with 11 leaders of political parties’, <https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/jnpc-prd-public-oregon/files/2012/11/7eba6ba77c605322983a133a5b95bf46.pdf>, accessed 15 May 2019.
- Kolmaš Michal (2019) National identity and Japanese revisionism: Abe shinzo’s vision of a beautiful Japan and its limits (New York: Routledge).
- Kumagai, Naoko (2015) ‘Ontological security and Japan’s ideological debate over compensating wartime “comfort women’, Social Science Japan Journal, 18:2, 146–161.
- Langenbacher, Eric (2010) ‘Collective memory as a factor in political culture and international relations’ in Eric Langenbacher and Yossi Shain (eds), Power and the past: collective memory and international relations (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press), 13–49.
- Lawson, Stephanie, and Seiko Tannaka (2011) ‘War memories and Japan’s “normalization” as an international actor: A critical analysis’, European Journal of International Relations, 17:3, 405–428.
- LDP (2015) ‘Chugoku ga shinseishita nankin jiken shiryo no yunesuko kiroku isan toroku ni kansuru ketsugi’ [LDP’s Resolution on the inscription of China’s nominated the documents of Nanjing incident], 14 October, <https://jimin.jp-east-2.storage.api.nifcloud.com/pdf/news/policy/130702_1.pdf?_ga=2.46948591.996171913.1582093735-1565895995.1582093735>, accessed 3 March 2019.
- Mainichi, Shimbun (2015) ‘Nihon nankin hiteiha wo in’yo’ [Japan cited a ‘Nanjing’ denier], November 16, 1.
- Mälksoo, Maria (2015) ‘Memory must be defended’: beyond the politics of mnemonical security’, Security Dialogue, 46:3, 221–237.
- Mälksoo, Maria (2019) ‘The transitional justice and foreign policy nexus: the inefficient causation of state ontological security-seeking’, International Studies Review, 21:3, 373–397.
- Mitzen, Jennifer (2006) ‘Ontological security in world politics: state identity and the security dilemma’, European Journal of International Relations, 12:3, 341–370.
- Mitzen, Jennifer, and Kyle Larson (2017) ‘Ontological security and foreign policy’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- MOFA (2013–2019), Diplomatic Bluebook, <https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/other/bluebook>, accessed 15 February 2020.
- Muryama, Tomi’ichi (1995) ‘Statement by Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the war’s end’ <https://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/press/pm/murayama/9508.html>, accessed 27 February 2019.
- Nakano, Ryoko (2018) ‘A failure of global documentary heritage? UNESCO’s “Memory of the World” and heritage dissonance in East Asia’, Contemporary Politics, 24:4, 481–496.
- National Federation of UNESCO Association in Japan (2015) ‘Jigyo hokokusho’ [Annual report] <https://www.unesco.or.jp/pdf/bussinessPlan/plan_pdf_2015.pdf>, accessed 25 October 2019.
- Nishino, Rumiko, Kim Pu-Ja, and Akane Onozawa (2018) Denying comfort women: the Japanese state’s assault on historical truth (New York: Routledge).
- Olick, Jeffrey K (1999) ‘Collective memory: the two cultures’, Sociological Theory, 17:3, 333–348.
- Oros, Andrew L (2008) Normalizing Japan: politics, identity, and the evolution of security practice (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
- Oros, Andrew L (2015) ‘International and domestic challenges to Japan’s postwar security identity: “norm constructivism” and Japan’s new “proactive pacifism’, The Pacific Review, 28:1, 139–160.
- Rumelili, Bahar (2018) ‘Breaking with Europe’s pasts: memory, reconciliation, and ontological (In)security’, European Security, 27:3, 280–295.
- Rumelili, Bahar, and Ayşe Betül Çelik (2017) ‘Ontological insecurity in asymmetric conflicts: reflections on agonistic peace in Turkey’s Kurdish issue’, Security Dialogue, 48:4, 279–296.
- Rumelili, Bahar, and Jennifer Todd (2018) ‘Paradoxes of identity change: integrating macro, meso, and micro research on identity in conflict processes’, Politics, 38:1, 3–8.
- Saikawa, Takashi (2016) ‘Returning to the international community: UNESCO and post-war Japan, 1945–1951’ in Poul Duedahl (ed), A history of UNESCO: global actions and impacts (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan), 116–130.
- Sankei (2015) ‘Yunesuko shinsa bumon no nihonjin kiyo wa kako hitori nomi’ [Only one Japanese has worked for UNESCO’s assessment committees], 18 October, <https://www.sankei.com/life/news/151018/lif1510180016-n2.html>, accessed 3 March 2019.
- Sankei (2016a) ‘Kakyo gyakusatsu wo kioku isan, ajia taiheiyo chiikiban ni shinsei’ [Nomination of the Sook Ching Massacre for the Register of the Memory of the World in the Asia-Pacific], 24 May, <http://www.sankei.com/life/news/160524/lif1605240002-n1.html>, accessed 15 December 2018.
- Sankei (2016b) ‘Yunesuko kioku isan, shinsa tomeika e seifukan iinkai secchi wo yobo’ [UNESCO documentary heritage, Japan’s demand for the creation of inter-state committee], 1 November, <https://www.sankei.com/life/news/161101/lif1611010010-n1.html>, accessed 3 March 2019.
- Sankei (2019) ‘Sekai no kioku, minaoshi yosei’ [Memory of the World Japan’s demand on reforms], February 19, <https://www.sankei.com/politics/news/190219/plt1902190044-n1.html>, accessed 3 March 2019.
- Schuolze, Kai (2015) ‘Risks of sameness, the “rise of China” and Japan’s ontolgocial security’, in Sebastian Maslow, Ra Mason and Paul O’shea (eds) Risk state: Japan’s foreign policy in an age of uncertainty (Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate), 101–116.
- Seiron (2015) ‘Nankin to ochita yunesuko, kokuren’ [UNESCO and the UN falling with Nanjing], Seiron, December.
- Sekai (2016) ‘Yunesuko sekai kioku isan wo kangaeru’ [On UNESCO’s world documentary heritage], Feburuay, 225–236.
- Smith, Sheila A (2013) ‘Abe’s Yasukuni visit: the consequences?’ Council on Foreign Relations, December 30, <https://www.cfr.org/blog/abes-yasukuni-visit-consequences>, accessed 3 March 2019.
- Steele, Brent J (2008) Ontological security in international relations: self-identity and the IR state (London: Routledge).
- Subotic, Jelena (2018) ‘Political memory, ontological security, and Holocaust remembrance in post-communist Europe’, European Security, 27:3, 296–313.
- Subotic, Jelena (2019) ‘Political memory after state death: the abandoned Yugoslav national pavilion at Auschwitz’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:3, 245–262.
- Suga, Yoshihide (2014) ‘Press conference’, Prime Minister of Japan and his cabinet, <https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/tyoukanpress/201401/15_p.html>.
- Suga, Yoshihide (2015a) ‘Press conference’, Prime Minister of Japan and his cabinet, 2 October, <http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/tyoukanpress/201510/2_p.html>, accessed 15 December 2018.
- Suga, Yoshihide (2015b) ‘Press conference’, Prime Minister of Japan and his cabinet, 13 October, <http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/tyoukanpress/201510/13_p.html>, accessed 15 December 2018.
- Suga, Yoshihide (2016) ‘Press conference by the Chief Cabinet Secretary’, Prime Minister of Japan and his cabinet, 12 May, <https://japan.kantei.go.jp/tyoukanpress/201605/12_a.html>, accessed 15 December 2018.
- Suga, Yoshihide (2017) ‘Press conference by the Chief Cabinet Secretary’, Prime Minister of Japan and his cabinet, 31 October, <https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/tyoukanpress/201710/31_a.html>, accessed 15 February 2019.
- Suzuki, Shogo (2019) ‘Japanese revisionists and the “Korea threat”: insights from ontological security’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32:3, 303–321.
- Takahashi, Masashi (2015a) ‘Chugoku no nankin jiken yunesuko kioku isan toroku ni taisuru seifu no torikumi’ [The Japanese government’s response to UNESCO’s inscription of China’s Nanjing incident], Japan Institute for National Fundamentals, 6 November, <https://jinf.jp/news/archives/17573>, accessed 15 February 2019.
- Takahashi, Shiro (2015b) ‘Daigyakusatsu toroku’ [The inscription of great massacre], Seiron, December, 118–123.
- Takahashi, Shiro (2016) ‘Sekai kioku isan: “ianfu” kyodo shinsei shiryo no giman’ [Memory of the World: deception of the jointly nominated ‘comfort women’ documents], Seiron, August, 214–223.
- Takahashi, Shiro (2019) WGIP to rekishisen [WGIP and history wars] (Chiba: Moralogy Kenkyujo).
- UNESCO (1945) ‘UNESCO Constitution’, <http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=15244&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html>, accessed 15 December 2018.
- UNESCO (2017) ‘Executive board, 202 EX/PX/DR.15.8, 24 March’, <http://unesdoc.unesco.org/ulis/cgi-bin/ExtractPDF.pl?catno=247706&lang=e&from=141&to=149&display=2&ts=1499006266>, accessed 15 May 2019.
- Yamaguchi, Tomomi, Motokazu Nogawa, Tessa-Morris Suzuki andEmi Koyama (2016) Umi wo wataru “ianfu” mondai [‘Comfort women’ issue goes overseas] (Tokyo: Iwanami).
- Yennie Lindgren, Wrenn, and Petter Y Lindgren (2017) ‘Identity politics and the East China Sea: China as Japan’s “other’, Asian Politics & Policy, 9:3, 378–401.
- Zarakol, Ayşe (2010) ‘Ontological (in)security and state denial of historical crimes: Turkey and Japan’, International Relations, 24:1, 3–23.
- Zarakol, Ayse (2011) After defeat: how the east learned to live with the west (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).