From ‘Westlessness’ to renewal of the liberal international order: whose vision for the ‘good life’ will matter?

References

• Adler, Emanuel. 2019. World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, Emanuel and Vincent Pouliot. 2011. International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albright, Madeleine. 2018. Fascism—A Warning. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Michael and Martha Finnemore. 1999. “The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization 53(4): 699–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, Felix. 2011. “Reclaiming the Vision Thing: Constructivists as Students of the Future.” International Studies Quarterly. 55(3): 647–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björkdahl, Annika. 2002. “Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 15(1): 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Brännmark, Mikael and Suzann Benn. 2012. “A Proposed Model for Evaluating the Sustainability of Continuous Change Programmes.” Journal of Change Management 12(2): 231–245.
   Google Scholar
• Bueger, Christian and Frank Gadinger. 2017. International Practice Theory. Houndsmills: Palgrave
   Google Scholar
• Bull, Hedley. 1977/1995. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Houndsmills: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, Hedley and Adam Watson, eds. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunde, Tobias, Randolf Carr, Sophie Eisentraut, Christoph Erber, Julia Hammelehle, Laura Hartmann, Juliane Kabus, Franziska Stärk, and Julian Voje. February 2020. Munich Security Report 2020: Westlessness. Munich Security Conference, Munich. https://doi.org/10.47342/IAQX5691.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, Barry and George Lawson. 2015. The Global Transformation—History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. 2014. “Beyond Neo-liberalism: Resilience, the New Art of Governing Complexity.” Resilience. 2(1): 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, David. 2021. “Becoming Resilient: The ‘Right to Opacity’ as the Foundation of ‘Relations of Community”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Ciutâ, Felix. 2007. “Narratives of Security: Strategy and identity in the European Context”. In Discursive Constructions of Identity in European Politics, edited by Richard C.M. Mole, 190–207. Houndsmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, Alexander and Daniel Nexon. 2020. Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling of the American Global Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, John M. 1985. Aristotle on the Goods of Fortune. The Philosophical Review. 94(2): 173–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, Tim. 1995. “The Social Construction of International Society.” European Journal of International Relation. 1(3):367–389.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, Tim and Trine Flockhart. eds. 2013. Liberal World Orders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, Tim and Christian Reus-Smit, eds. 2017. The Globalization of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ezzy, D. 1998. “Theorizing Narrative Identity: Symbolic Interactionism and Hermeneutics.” The Sociological Quarterly 39(2): 239–252.
   Google Scholar
• Flockhart, Trine. 2012. “Towards a Strong NATO Narrative: From a ‘Practice of Talking’ to a ‘Practice of Doing’.” International Politics 49(1):78–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flockhart, Trine. 2016. “The Problem of Change in Constructivist Theory: Ontological Security Seeking and Agent Motivation.” Review of International Studies 42(5): 799–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flockhart, Trine. 2020. “Is This the End? Resilience, Ontological Security, and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order.” Contemporary Security Policy. 41(2): 215–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsby, Andreas. 2015. “The Logic of Social Identity in IR: China’s Identity and Grand Strategy in the 21st Century.” PhD Thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Friedner-Parrat, Charlotta. 2017. “On the Evolution of the Primary Institutions of International Society.” International Studies Quarterly 61(3): 623–630. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galison, Peter. 1997. Image & Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, John M. 2002. “What’s at Stake in “Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations?” Transcending “Chronofetishism” and “Tempocentrism” in international relations.” In Historical Sociology of International Relations, edited by Stephen Hobden and John M. Hobson, 3–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, Michael and Dominic Abrams. 1988. Social Identifications: A Social Phycology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. 1973. “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4(1): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, Kimberly. 2013. “Liberal Quotidian Practices of World Ordering.” In Liberal World Orders, edited by Tim Dunne and Trine Flockhart, 157–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, Emma. 2018. “Emotions, Bodies, and the Un/Making of International Relations.” Millennium 47(2): 284–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, John G. 2001. After Victory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, John G. and Annemarie Slaughter. 2006. “Forging a World of Liberty Under Law: US National Security in the 21st Century.” Final Report of the Princeton Project. Princeton NJ: The Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, Ash and Matthew Kroening. 2019. Present at the Creation: A Global Strategy for Revitalizing, Adapting and Defending a Rules-Based International System. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council of The United States.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, Robert. 2016. “This is how fascism comes to America.” Washington Post, 18 May. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-is-how-fascism-comes-to-america/2016/05/17/c4e32c58-1c47-11e6-8c7b-6931e66333e7_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Peter. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korosteleva, Elena A. 2020. “Reclaiming Resilience Back: A Local Turn in EU External Governance.” Contemporary Security Policy 41(2): 241–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korosteleva, Elena A. and Trine Flockhart. 2020. “Resilience in EU and International Institutions: Redefining Local Ownership in a New Global Governance Agenda.” Contemporary Security Policy 41(2): 153–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korosteleva, Elena A. and Irina Petrova. 2021. “From ‘the Local’ to ‘the Global’: What Makes Communities Resilient in Times of Complexity and Change?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing, Robert D. 1969/1990. The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lebow, Richard N. 2008. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lebow, Richard N. 2018. The Rise and Fall of Political Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzen J. 2006. Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Relations 12(3): 341–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nexon, Daniel. 2009. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Andrew. 2011. War, Religion and Empire: Transformation of International Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puchala, Donald, J. 2003. Theory and History in International Relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, Heather and Christian Reus-Smit. 2013. “Chapter 4: Grand Days, Dark Palaces: The Contradictions of Liberal Ordering Practices. Ordering.” In Liberal World Orders, edited by Tim Dunne and Trine Flockhart, 87–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, Christian. 1997. “The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions.” International Organization 51(4): 555–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, Christian. 2013. “The Liberal Order Reconsidered.” In After Liberalism?: The Future of Liberalism in International Relations, edited by R. Friedman, K. Oskanian and R. P. Pardo, 167–186. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, Christian. 2017. “Cultural Diversity and International Order.” International Organization 71(4): 851–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, M. and M. Hewstone. 1998. “Social Identity Theory's Self-Esteem Hypothesis: A Review and Some Suggestions for Clarification.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 2(1): 40–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rutazibwa, O.U. 2014. “Studying Agaciro: Moving Beyond Wilsonian Interventionist Knowledge Production on Rwanda.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 8(4): 291–302.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, Theodore. 2002. The Site of the Social—A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Philadelphia: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Jessica. 2015. “Intuitively Neoliberal? Towards a Critical Understanding of Resilience Governance.” European Journal of International Relations 21(2):402–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spandler, Killian. 2015. “The Political International Society: Change in Primary and Secondary Institutions.” Review of International Studies 41(3): 601–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stele, Brent. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations Self-Identity and the IR State. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suganami, Hidemi. 2017. “Chapter 2: The Argument of The Anarchical Society.” In The Anarchical Society at 40, edited by Hidemi Suganami, Madeline Carr and Adam Humphreys, 23–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvest, Casper. 2013. “Chapter 9: Theoretical Foundations of Liberal Order.” In Liberal World Orders, edited by Tim Dunne and Trine Flockhart, 173–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Antje. 2017. A Theory of Contestation. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wight, Martin. 1966. “Why is there No International Theory?” In Diplomatic Investigations, edited by Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight. 33. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, John. 2011. “Structure, Norms and Normative Theory in a Re-defined English School: Accepting Buzan’s Challenge.” Review of International Studies. 37(3): 1235–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarakol, Ayse. 2017. “Theorising Hierarchies”. In Hierarchies in World Politics edited by Ayse Zarakol, 1–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar