Epistemic security and the redemptive hegemony of magical realism

References

• Adler, Emanuel. 2019. World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution. Vol. 150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, Emanuel, and Alena Drieschova. 2021. “The Epistemological Challenge of Truth Subversion to the Liberal International Order.” International Organization 75 (2): 359–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Alexei Tsinovoi. 2019. “International Misrecognition: The Politics of Humour and National Identity in Israel’s Public Diplomacy.” European Journal of International Relations 25 (1): 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117745365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, John. 2015. “The Geopolitics of Knowledge about World Politics: A Case Study in U.S. Hegemony.” In Geographies of Knowledge and Power, edited by Peter Meusburger, Derek Gregory and Laura Suarsana, 235–246. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006. “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance between Ritual and Strategy.” In Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, edited by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Bernard Giesen and Jason L. Mast, 29–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amoureux, Jack L. 2015. A Practice of Ethics for Global Politics: Ethical Reflexivity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amoureux, Jack L, and Brent J Steele, eds. 2015. Reflexivity and International Relations: Positionality, Critique, and Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arfi, Badredine. 2020. “Security Qua Existential Surviving (While Becoming Otherwise) through Performative Leaps of Faith.” International Theory 12 (2): 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, Richard K. 1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism.” International Organization 38 (2): 225–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Catherine. 2009 [1992]. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berenskötter, Felix. 2014. “Parameters of a National Biography.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (1): 262–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, Stephen. 2014. “Lt. Kizhe Rides Again: Magical Realism and Russian National Security Perspectives.” The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 27 (2): 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13518046.2014.906783
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, Derek. 2023. “The Unbearable Lightness of Being? Reconfiguring the Moral Underpinnings and Sources of Ontological Security.” International Theory 15 (2): 234–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971922000173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology. Translated by Matthew Adamson. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Edited by Richard Nice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, and Jean-Claude Passeron. 1977. Education, Society and Culture. Translated by Richard Nice. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brosius, Christiane, and Ute Hüsken. 2010. “Change and Stability of Rituals.” In Ritual Matters. Dynamic Dimensions in Practice, edited by Christiane Brosius and Ute Hüsken, 1–25. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, Christopher. 2016. “Ethics and Ontological Security.” In Ethical Security Studies, 160–173. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, Christopher S. 2019. “Brexit Populism and Fantasies of Fulfilment.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1567461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, Christopher S., and Pertti Joenniemi. 2017. “Ontological Security, Self-Articulation and the Securitization of Identity.” Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1): 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716653161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappel, Andrew J. 2002. “Bringing Cultural Practice into Law: Ritual and Social Norms Jurisprudence.” Santa Clara Law Review 43 (2): 389.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, John. 2020. “Psychoanalysis, Cultures of Anarchy, and Ontological Insecurity.” International Theory 12 (2): 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciplijauskaitè, Birutè. 1979. “Socialist and Magic Realism: Veiling or Unveiling?” Journal of Baltic Studies 10 (3): 218–227.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Katerina. 1981. The Soviet Novel: History as Ritual. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cossu, Andrea. 2010. “Durkheim’s Argument on Ritual, Commemoration and Aesthetic Life: A Classical Legacy for Contemporary Performance Theory?” Journal of Classical Sociology 10 (1): 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X09352558
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, Nick. 2004. “Ritual, Body Technique, and (Inter) Subjectivity.” In Thinking through Rituals, edited by Kevin Schilbrack, 41–61. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Curanović, Alicja. 2021. The Sense of Mission in Russian Foreign Policy: Destined for Greatness! London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• D’Anieri, Paul. 2019. “Magical Realism: Assumptions, Evidence and Prescriptions in the Ukraine Conflict.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 60 (1): 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2019.1627231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, Faye, and Brent J. Steele. 2019. “Critical Security History: (De)Securitisation, Ontological Security, and Insecure Memories.” European Journal of International Security 4 (2): 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2019.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, Mary. 1965. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge. Book.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, Émile. 1995 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Translated by K Fields. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutkiewicz, Jan, and Jan Smoleński. 2023. “Epistemic Superimposition: The War in Ukraine and the Poverty of Expertise in International Relations Theory.” Journal of International Relations and Development forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Charlotte, Thomas Lindemann, and Ole Jacob Sending. 2018. “Frustrated Sovereigns: The Agency That Makes the World Go around.” Review of International Studies 44 (5): 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210518000402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fomin, Ivan, Konstantin Kokarev, Boris Ananyev, Nikita Neklyudov, Anzhelika Bondik, Pavel Glushkov, Aliya Safina, et al. 2021. “International Studies in an Unpredictable World: still Avoiding the Difficult Problems?” European Journal of International Relations 27 (1): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120948124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 2007. “Re-Framing Justice in a Globalizing World.” In (Mis)Recognition, Social Inequality and Social Justice: Nancy Fraser and Pierre Bourdieu, edited by Terry Lovell, 17–35. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Galván-Álvarez, Enrique. 2010. “Epistemic Violence and Retaliation: The Issue of Knowledges in "Mother India.” Atlantis 32 (2): 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler, Brie. 2017. “Self-Knowledge.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward Zalta. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/self-knowledge/.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony. 1994. “Living in a Post-Traditional Society.” In Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Traditions and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, edited by Ulrich Beck, Anthony Giddens and Scott Lash, 56–109. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Giesen, Bernard. 2006. “Performing the Sacred: A Durkheimian Perspective on the Performative Turn in the Social Sciences.” In Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, edited by Jeffrey C Alexander, Bernard Giesen and Jason L. Mast, 325–367. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Girard, René. 2013. Violence and the Sacred. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzini, Stefano. 1998. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hagström, Linus. 2021. “Great Power Narcissism and Ontological (in) Security: The Narrative Mediation of Greatness and Weakness in International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 65 (2): 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath-Kelly, Charlotte. 2012. “Can we Laugh yet? Reading Post-9/11 Counterterrorism Policy as Magical Realism and Opening a Third-Space of Resistance.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 18 (4): 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-012-9180-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hom, Andrew R., and Brent J. Steele. 2020. “Anxiety, Time, and Ontological Security’s Third-Image Potential.” International Theory 12 (2): 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hom, Andrew R., and Luke Campbell. 2022. “The Liturgy of Triumph: victory Culture, Popular Rituals, and the US Way of Wartiming.” International Relations 36 (4): 591–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178221135097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, Caroline. 1994. The Archetypal Actions of Ritual/Caroline Humphrey and James Laidlaw, edited by James Laidlaw. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, Jef. 1998. “Security! What Do You Mean?:from Concept to Thick Signifier.” European Journal of International Relations 4 (2): 226–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans, Jef. 2002. “Defining Social Constructivism in Security Studies: The Normative Dilemma of Writing Security.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27 (1_suppl): 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754020270S104
   Google Scholar
• Kazharski, Aliaksei. 2020. “Civilizations as Ontological Security? Stories of the Russian Trauma.” Problems of Post-Communism 67 (1): 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1591925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, Catarina. 2004. “Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security.” Political Psychology 25 (5): 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, Catarina. 2019. “Populism, Ontological Insecurity and Hindutva: Modi and the Masculinization of Indian Politics.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1588851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, Catarina, and Jennifer Mitzen. 2020. “Anxiety, Fear, and Ontological Security in World Politics.” International Theory 12 (2): 238–239. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, Catarina, and Ted Svensson. 2018. “Misrecognition and the Indian State: The Desire for Sovereign Agency.” Review of International Studies 44 (5): 902–921. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210518000311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2018. Praxis: On Acting and Knowing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, R. D. 1969. Self and Others, 2nd ed. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1991. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Book.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leone, Massimo. 2011. “Rituals and Routines: A Semiotic Inquiry.” Chinese Semiotic Studies 5 (1): 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2011-0109
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, Bronisław. 1992 [1925]. “Magic, Science and Religion.” In Magic, Science and Religion and Other Articles, 17–92. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
   Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, Maria. 2015. “Memory Must Be Defended’: Beyond the Politics of Mnemonical Security.” Security Dialogue 46 (3): 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614552549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, Maria. 2021. “A Ritual Approach to Deterrence: I Am, Therefore I Deter.” European Journal of International Relations 27 (1): 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120966039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martill, Benjamin, and Sebastian Schindler, eds. 2020. Theory as Ideology in International Relations: The Politics of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, John. 2014. “Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin.” Foreign Affairs 93 (5): 77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitzen, Jennifer. 2018. “Anxious Community: EU as (in)Security Community.” European Security 27 (3): 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1497985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motyl, Alexander J. 2014. “The Surrealism of Realism: Misreading the War in Ukraine.” World Affs 177: 75.
   Google Scholar
• Moulioukova, Dina, and Roger E. Kanet. 2021. “Ontological Security: A Framework for the Analysis of Russia’s View of the World.” Global Affairs 7 (5): 831–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2021.2000173
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Martin. 2011. “Education and the Formation of Geopolitical Subjects.” International Political Sociology 5 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Martin. 2013. “Lack and Jouissance in Hegemonic Discourse of Identification with the State.” Organization 20 (2): 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412445041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Martin. 2009. Making Great Power Identities in Russia. An Ethnographic Discourse Analysis of Education at a Russian Elite University. Zürich: LIT.
   Google Scholar
• Narozhna, Tanya. 2022. “Misrecognition, Ontological Security and State Foreign Policy: The Case of post-Soviet Russia.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 76 (1): 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2021.1985963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver. 2006. “Pop Goes Religion: Harry Potter Meets Clifford Geertz.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 9 (1): 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549406060809
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver. 2015. “I Remember When Russia Was a Great Power.” Journal of Regional Security 10 (1): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.11643/issn.2217-995X151SPN56
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, Iver. 2016. “Russia’s Europe, 1991–2016: Inferiority to Superiority.” International Affairs 92 (6): 1381–1399. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omelicheva, Mariya Y., and Lidiya Zubytska. 2016. “An Unending Quest for Russia’s Place in the World. The Discursive Co-Evolution of the Study and Practice of International Relations in Russia.” New Perspectives 24 (1): 19–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X1602400102
   Google Scholar
• Oren, Ido. 2003. Our Enemies and US: America’s Rivalries and the Making of Political Science: Cornell: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oren, Ido, and Ty Solomon. 2015. “WMD, WMD, WMD: Securitisation through Ritualised Incantation of Ambiguous Phrases.” Review of International Studies 41 (2): 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poupeau, Franck. 2000. “Reasons for Domination, Bourdieu versus Habermas.” In Reading Bourdieu on Society and Culture, edited by Bridget Fowler, 69–87. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport, Roy A. 1999. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reshetnikov, Anatoly. 2023. Chasing Greatness: On Russia’s Discursive Interaction with the West over the past Millennium. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Justin. 1990. “What’s the Matter with Realism?” Review of International Studies 16 (4): 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112379
   Google Scholar
• Rossdale, Chris. 2015. “Enclosing Critique: The Limits of Ontological Security.” International Political Sociology 9 (4): 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelili, Bahar. 2020. “Integrating Anxiety into International Relations Theory: Hobbes, Existentialism, and Ontological Security.” International Theory 12 (2): 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilbrack, Kevin. 2004. “Ritual Metaphysics.” In Thinking through Rituals, edited by Kevin Schilbrack. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, Adam B., and Robert P. Weller. 2012. Rethinking Pluralism: ritual, Experience, and Ambiguity. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Jonathan Z. 1987. To Take Place: Toward Theory in Ritual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stausberg, Michael. 2006. “Reflexivity.” In Theorizing Rituals, Volume 1: Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts, edited by Jens Kreinath, Michael Stausberg and J. A. M. Snoek, 627–646. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, Brent J. 2019. “Welcome Home! Routines, Ontological Insecurity and the Politics of US Military Reunion Videos.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1564899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, Brent J. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: self-Identity and the IR State. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Subotić, Jelena. 2016. “Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change.” Foreign Policy Analysis 12 (4): 610–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sushentsov, Andrey A. 2022a. “Strategy of Sentimentality in EU Foreign Policy.” Russia in Global Affairs 20 (3): 157–160. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2022-20-3-157-160
   Google Scholar
• Sushentsov, Andrey A. 2022b. Глобальный контекст украинского кризиса: предпосылки и последствия’ [Global’nyy kontekst ukrainskogo krizisa: predposylki i posledstviya.], Global Context of the Ukrainian Crisis: Background and Consequences. Accessed 3 June 2023.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uG2Oldh20b0&t=5s.
   Google Scholar
• Sushentsov, Andrey A. 2023a. Children’s Crusade: Europe’s Strategy in the Ukrainian Crisis. Valdai Club. Accessed 3 June 2023. https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/children-s-crusade-europe-s-strategy/.
   Google Scholar
• Sushentsov, Andrey A. 2023b. ‘Когда закончится СВО?’ [Kogda zakonchitsya SVO?] When will the SMO end? Interview for Голосовое Сообщение [Golosovoye Soobshcheniye]. Accessed 3 June 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIH2PRpccKI.
   Google Scholar
• Sushentsov, Andrey A., and William C. Wohlforth. 2020. “The Tragedy of US–Russian Relations: NATO Centrality and the Revisionists’ Spiral.” International Politics 57 (3): 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00229-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsygankov, Andrei P., and Pavel A. Tsygankov. 2021. “Constructing National Values: The Nationally Distinctive Turn in Russian IR Theory and Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy Analysis 17 (4), orab022. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orab022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira, Marco A. 2018. “(Re-)Imagining the ‘Self’ of Ontological Security: The Case of Brazil’s Ambivalent Postcolonial Subjectivity.” Millennium 46 (2): 142–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817741255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkan, Vamik. 1997. Bloodlines: From Ethnic Pride to Ethnic Terrorism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Andrew. 2005. Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the post-Soviet World. 1st ed. New Haven, Conn. and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, Steve. 1989. “Foreword.” In The Reflexive Thesis. Writing Sociology of Scientific Knowledge, edited by Malcolm Ashmore, xvii–xvxx. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zamora, Lois Parkinson, and Wendy B. Faris. 1995. Magical Realism: Theory, History, Community. Durham, N.C. and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar