Cooperative learning tasks in a Grade 6 intensive English as a second language class: turn-taking and degree of participation

References

• Abdullah, M. and G. Jacobs 2004. Promoting cooperative learning at primary school. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 7, no. 4. http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume7/.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, E. 1992. Jigsaw: integrating language and content. In Cooperative Language Learning, ed. C. Kessler, 129–152. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 1997. Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: group dynamics and motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 81: 482–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty, C. and T. Pica. 1986. Information gap tasks: an aid to second language acquisition?. TESOL Quarterly, 20: 305–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, T. and Y. A. Tanaka Yamazaki 1994. Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44: 449–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, N. 2009. Cooperative learning and oral interaction activities in an intensive Grade 6 ESL program in Quebec. Masters thesis, Université Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, N. and S. Parks. in press. Cooperative learning tasks in a Grade 6 intensive ESL class: the role of scaffolding. Language Teaching Research, 17, no. 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaith, G.M., K.A. Shaaban and S.A. Harkous 2007. An investigation of the relationship between forms of positive interdependence, social support and selected aspects of classroom climate. System, 35: 229–240.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.T. and D.W. Johnson 1994. An overview of cooperative learning. In Creativity and Collaborative Learning: A Practical Guide to Empowering Students and Teachers, ed. J. Thousand, R. Villa and A. Nevin, 31–44. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson and E.J. Holubec 1994. The Nuts and Bolts of Cooperative Learning. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson and M.B. Stanne 2000. Cooperative learning methods: a meta-analysis. http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHIBIT-B.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. 1993. The structural approach to cooperative learning. In Cooperative Learning, ed. D.H. Holt, 9–17. McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics/Delta Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. 1994. Cooperative Learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. and M. Kagan 2009. Kagan Cooperative Learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan.
   Google Scholar
• Kowal, M. and M. Swain 1994. Using collaborative language tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness, 3: 73–93.
   Google Scholar
• Kowal, M. and M. Swain 1997. From semantic to syntactic processing: how can we promote it in the immersion classroom?. In Immersion Education: International Perspectives, ed. K. Johnson and M. Swain , 284–309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lightbown, P.M. and N. Spada 1994. An innovative program for primary ESL in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly, 28: 563–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M.H. and P.A. Porter 1985. Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19: 207–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattar, C. and C. Blondin 2006. Apprentissage coopératif et prises de parole en langue cible dans deux classes d'immersion. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63: 225–253.
   Google Scholar
• Naughton, D. 2006. Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 90: 169–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford, R.L. 1997. Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81: 443–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. 2001. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pica, T 2002. Subject-matter content: how does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners?. The Modern Language Journal, 86: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pica, T. and C. Doughty 1985. The role of group work in classroom second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7: 233–248.
   Google Scholar
• Pica, T., F. Lincoln-Porter, D. Paninos and J. Linnell 1996. Language learners' interaction: how does it address the input, output and feedback needs of L2 learners?. TESOL Quarterly, 30: 59–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storch, N. 2001. How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5, no. 1. 29–53.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. 2002. Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52: 119–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, M. and K. Arnett 2002. Teachers' uses of the target and first languages in second and foreign language classrooms. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22: 204–218.
   Google Scholar
• Varonis, E. and S. Gass 1985. Non-native/non-native conversations: a model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6: 71–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, J.L. and C.E. Turner 2005. Comparing children's oral ability in two ESL programs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61: 491–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar