References
- Hüttner, J., C. Dalton-Puffer and U. Smit. 2013. The power of beliefs: lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingualism and Bilingual Education 16, no. 3: 267–84. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2013.777385
- Jexenflicker, S. and C. Dalton-Puffer. 2010. The CLIL differential: written production of CLIL and non-CLIL students in higher technical schools. In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL, ed. C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula and U. Smit, 169–90. Amsterdam and New York: Benjamins.
- Lasagabaster, D. 2013. The use of the L1 in CLIL classes: the teachers’ perspective. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 6, no. 2: 1–21. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2013.6.2.1
- Moore, P. and T. Nikula. (in preparation). Translanguaging in CLIL. In Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education, ed. T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, U. Smit and P. Moore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
- Nikula, T., E. Dafouz, U. Smit and P. Moore, eds. (in preparation). Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
- Schleppegrell, M. 2004. The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. New York: Routledge.