Development of EFL writing over three years in secondary education: CLIL and non-CLIL settings

References

• Abbuhl, R., S. Gass and A. Mackey. 2014. Experimental research design. In Research Methods in Linguistics, ed. R.J. Podesva and D. Sharma, 116–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2011. Are the differences between CLIL and non-CLIL groups in Andalusia due to CLIL? A reply to Lorenzo, Casal and Moore (2010). Applied Linguistics 32, no. 2: 236–41. doi: 10.1093/applin/amr007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2013. CLIL: some of the reasons why … and why not. System 41, no. 3: 587–97. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulté, B. and A. Housen. 2012. Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency. Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA, ed. A. Housen, F. Kuiken and I. Vedder, 21–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudron, C., A.M. Martín Úriz and R. Whittaker. 2005. Innovación pedagógica: los centros, los alumnos y los profesores. In La Composición como Comunicación: una Experiencia en las Aulas de Lengua Inglesa en Bachillerato, ed. A. Martín Úriz and R. Whittaker, 41–60. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2008. Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): current research from Europe. In Future Perspectives for English Language Teaching, ed. W. Delanoy and L. Wolkmann, 139–57. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. 1989. Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. 1996. Literacy and linguistics: a functional perspective. In Literacy in Society, ed. R. Hasan and G. Williams, 339–76. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, K.W. 1964. Grammatical Structures Written at Three Grade Levels. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Klampfl, A. 2010. A comparative study of writing proficiency between an Austrian CLIL and mainstream EFL class with regard to vocabulary. Unpublished master's diss., Universität Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Kormos, J. 2011. Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing 20, no. 2: 148–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. 2008. Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal 1: 30–41. doi:10.2174/1874913500801010030
   Google Scholar
• Llinares, A. and R. Whittaker. 2006. Linguistic analysis of secondary school students’ oral and written production in CLIL contexts: studying social science in English. Vienna English Working Papers (Special Issue: Current Research on CLIL) 15, no. 3: 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Llinares, A., T. Morton and R. Whittaker. 2012. The Roles of Language in CLIL. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F., P. Moore and S. Casal. 2011. On complexity in bilingual research: the causes, effects, and breadth of content and language integrated learning –a reply to Bruton (2011). Applied Linguistics 32, no. 4: 450–55. doi: 10.1093/applin/amr025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvern, D.D. and B.J. Richards. 1997. A new measure of lexical diversity. In Evolving Models of Language, ed. A. Ryan and A. Wray, 58–71. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2000. Using Languages to Learn and Learning to Use Languages. The Future Doesn't Just Happen, It Is Shaped and Modelled by Our Actions. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., A. Maljers and A.-K. Hartiala. 2001. Profiling European CLIL Classrooms. Languages Open Doors. Jyväskylä, Finland: European Platform for Dutch Education, The Netherlands & University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Martín Úriz, A. 2005. La composición escrita en las aulas de bachillerato: función pedagógica y modelos teóricos de escritura. In La Composición como Comunicación: una Experiencia en las Aulas de Lengua Inglesa en Bachillerato, ed. A. Martín Úriz and R. Whittaker, 17–39. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, A. 2011. Essay length, lexical diversity and automatic essay scoring. Memoirs of the Osaka Institute of Technology, Series B 55, no. 2: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Navés, T. 2011. How promising are the results of integrating content and language for EFL writing and overall EFL proficiency? In Content and Foreign Language Learning. Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, ed. Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J.M. Sierra and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 155–85. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Palotti, G. 2009. CAF: defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics 30, no. 4: 590–601. doi: 10.1093/applin/amp045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roquet, H. 2011. A study of the acquisition of English as a Foreign Language: integrating content and language in mainstream education in Barcelona. Unpublished PhD diss., Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. 2010. Written production and CLIL: an empirical study. In Language Use in CLIL, ed. C. Dalton Puffer, T. Nikula and U. Smit, 191–210. Berlin: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. 2011. Which language competencies benefit from CLIL? An insight into applied linguistics research. In Content and Foreign Language Learning. Contributions to Multilingualism in European Contexts, ed. Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J.M. Sierra and F. Gallardo del Puerto, 129–53. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, L. 2014. The role of age on the development of written competence in L4 English: evidence from a Spanish/German CLIL context. In Teaching and Learning in Multilingual Contexts: Sociolinguistic and Educational Perspectives, ed. A. Otwinowska and G. De Angelis, 125–44. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmer, H.J., H. Lena, R. Troschke, D. Coetzee and K. Verena. 2006. Subject-specific competence and language use of CLIL learners: the case of geography in grade 10 of secondary schools in Germany. Paper presented at the ESSE8 Conference in London.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, R., A. Llinares and A. McCabe. 2011. Written discourse development in CLIL at secondary school. Language Teaching Research 15, no. 3: 343–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe-Quintero, K., S. Inagaki and H.-Y. Kim. 1998. Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy & Complexity. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i.
   Google Scholar