Task-based learning and content and language integrated learning materials design: process and product

References

• Ainley, M., S. Hidi and D. Berndorff. 2002. Interest, learning and the psychological processes that mediate their relationships. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, no. 3: 545–561. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D.L. and D.K. Cohen. 1996. Reform by the book: what is, or might be, the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher 25, no. 9: 6–8, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Banegas, D. 2012. CLIL teacher development: challenges and experiences. LACLIL Journal 5, no. 1: 46–56. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2012.5.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Barwell, R. 2005. Language in the mathematics classroom. Language & Education 19, no. 2: 97–102.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C., J. Little, L. Bethel, T. Chavkin, D. Fouquette and J. Garufis. 2005. Reference Guide to Writing across the Curriculum. Santa Barbara, CA: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beacco, J.-C. and M. Byram. 2007. Guide for the Development of Language Policies in Europe. Strasbourg, France: Language Policy Division, Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Peretz, M. 1990. The Teacher-Curriculum Encounter: Freeing Teachers from the Tyranny of Texts. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E. 2007. Cognitive effects of bilingualism: how linguistic experience leads to cognitive change. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10, no. 3: 210–223. doi: 10.2167/beb441.0
   Google Scholar
• Braundet, M. and J. Lee, J. 2013. Frequency and efficacy of talk-related tasks in primary science. Research in Science Education 43, no. 2: 457–478. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9270-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cendoya, A.M. and V. Adibin. 2012. A CLIL experience based on the use of tasks and different genre types. LACLIL 3, no. 1: 11–17. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2010.3.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, J. 2007. Assessing the language demands of lessons taught in a second language. In Models and Practice in CLIL, eds. F. Lorenzo, S. Casal, V. Alba-Quiñones and P. Moore, 113–128. La Rioja, Spain: Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada.
   Google Scholar
• Coffin, C. 2004. Learning to write history: the role of causality. Written Communication 21, no. 3: 261–289. doi: 10.1177/0741088304265476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone, S.L. and T.P. Cone. 2001. Language arts and physical education: a natural connection. Teaching Elementary Physical Education 12, no. 4: 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 1999. Supporting students in content and language integrated contexts: planning for effective classrooms. In Learning through a Foreign Language: Models, Methods and Outcomes, ed. J. Masih, 46–62. London: CILT.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2005. CLIL: planning tools for teachers. Internet document. http://clilrb.ucoz.ru/_ld/0/29_CLILPlanningToo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 1984. Wanted: a theoretical framework for relating language proficiency to academic achievement among bilingual students. In Language Proficiency and Academic Achievement, ed. C. Rivera, 2–19. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2013. A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 1, no. 2: 216–253.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2003. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2009. Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19, no. 3: 221–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
   Google Scholar
• Escobar Urmeneta, C. and A. Sánchez Sola. 2009. Language learning through tasks in a CLIL science classroom. Porta Linguarum, no. 11: 65–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, M.A. and C. Day. 2006. Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: a multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education 22, no. 2: 219–232. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goullier, F. 2007. Council of Europe Tools for Language Teaching: Common European Framework and Portfolios. Paris: Language Policy Division/Didier.
   Google Scholar
• Grandinetti, M., M. Langellotti and T. Ting. 2013. How CLIL can provide a pragmatic means to renovate science education: even in a sub-optimally linguistic context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16, no. 3: 354–374. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2013.777390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellerman, J. and S.P. Doehler. 2010. On the contingent nature of language learning tasks. Classroom Discourse 1, no. 1: 25–45. doi: 10.1080/19463011003750657
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, T. and E. Torres. 1994. The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal 48, no. 4: 315–328. doi: 10.1093/elt/48.4.315
   Google Scholar
• Jang, H., J. Reeve and G.L. Deci. 2010. Engaging students in learning activities: it is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology 102, no. 3: 588–600. doi: 10.1037/a0019682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junta de Andalucía. 2006. Guia Informativa para Centros con modalidad de Enseñanza Bilingüe. Sevilla, Spain: Consejería de Educación.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, L., P.A. Kirschner and J.J.G. Van Merriënboer. 2006. Just-in-time information presentation: improving learning a troubleshooting skill. Contemporary Educational Psychology 31, no. 2: 167–185. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. and J.M. Sierra. 2009. Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional FL classes. International CLIL Research Journal 1, no. 2: 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F. 2007. An analytical framework of language integration in L2 content-based courses: the European dimension. Language and Education 21, no. 6: 502–514. doi: 10.2167/le708.0
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F. 2008. Instructional discourse in bilingual settings: an empirical study of linguistic adjustments in content and language integrated learning. The Language Learning Journal 36, no. 1: 21–33. doi: 10.1080/09571730801988470
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F. 2013. Genre-based curricula: multilingual academic literacy in content and language integrated learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16, no. 3: 375–388. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2013.777391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F., S. Casal and P. Moore. 2009. The effects of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in European education: key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics 31, no. 3: 418–442. doi: 10.1093/applin/amp041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F., S. Casal, P. Moore and Y. Afonso. 2009. Bilingüismo y Educación: Datos de Incidencia de la Red de Centros Bilingües de Andalucía. Andalucía: CENTRA.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F. and P. Moore. 2010. On the natural emergence of language structures in CLIL: towards a language theory of European educational Bilingualism. In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, eds. C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula and U. Smit, 23–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., M. Gavon and A. Boldin. 2008. On warm conceptual change: the interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology 100, no. 2: 291–309. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. and P. Warren. 2005. Scaffolds or straitjackets? Critical moments in classroom discourse. Educational Review 57, no. 1: 55–69. doi: 10.1080/0013191042000274187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendéz García, M. 2013. The intercultural turn brought about by the implementation of CLIL programmes in Spanish monolingual areas: a case study of Andalusian primary and secondary schools. The Language Learning Journal 41, no. 3: 268–283. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2013.836345
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, O. 2010. Introducing the CLIL-pyramid: key strategies and principles for quality CLIL planning and teaching. In Basic Issues in EFL-Teaching and Learning, eds. M. Eisenmann and T. Summer, 295–313. Heidelberg, Germany: Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, B. 1986. Language and Content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, B. 2007. Knowledge structures in social practice. In International Handbook of English Language Teaching, eds. J. Cummins and C. Davison, 303–316. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E.B., T. Collazo, R. Carillo and R. Marx. 2001. ‘Maestro, what is quality?’: language, literacy and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38, no. 4: 469–498. doi: 10.1002/tea.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, P. 2011. Collaborative interaction in turn-taking: a comparative study of European bilingual (CLIL) and mainstream (MS) foreign language learners in early secondary education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 14, no. 5: 531–549. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2010.537741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, P. and F. Lorenzo. 2007. Adapting authentic materials for CLIL classrooms. ViewZ (Vienna English Working Papers) 16, no. 3: 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. 2012. Teachers’ knowledge about language and classroom interaction in CLIL. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Departamento de Filología Inglesa. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. 2013. Critically evaluating materials for CLIL. In Critical Perspectives on Language Teaching Materials, ed. J. Gray, 111–136. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P. and U. Smit. Forthcoming. Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. 2005. Task as research concept. Language Learning 55, no. 3: 533–570. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00314.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 1998. Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 18: 268–286. doi: 10.1017/S0267190500003585
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 2000. The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, ed. J. Lantolf, 97–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tardieu, C. and M. Doltisky. 2012. Integrating the task-based approach to CLIL teaching. In Teaching and Learning English through Bilingual Education, ed. J. de Dios, 3–35. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, V. 2010. Student Engagement – Literature Review. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L. 2001. Teaching Multiliteracies across the Curriculum. Philadelphia, PA: The Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Merrienboer, J.J.G. and J. Sweller. 2005. Cognitive load theory and complex learning: recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review 17, no. 2: 147–177. doi: 10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer, H.J. 2006. Language across the Curriculum. Strasbourg, France: Language Policy Division, Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmer, H.J. 2009. Language in Other Subjects. Strasbourg, France: Language Policy Division, Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar