Variations on the IRE pattern in a French beginner task-based classroom

References

• Bygate, M. 2001. Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing, ed. M. Bygate, P. Skehan and M. Swain, 23–48. Harlow, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bygate, M. 2015. Sources, developments and directions of task-based language teaching. The Language Learning Journal 43, no. 1: 1–20. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2014.997459
   Google Scholar
• Candlin, C.N. 1987. Towards task-based language learning. In Language Learning Tasks, ed. C. Candlin and D. Murphy, 5–22. London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. 1988. Classroom Discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, P. 2000. Repetition in foreign language classroom interaction. In Second and Foreign Language Learning Through Classroom Interaction, ed. J.K. Hall and L.S. Vertplaetse, 109–38. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2003. Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. and F. Yuan. 2005. The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language, ed. R. Ellis, 167–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by Expanding: An Activity Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Garton, S. 2012. Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacher-fronted classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse 3, no. 1: 29–45. doi: 10.1080/19463014.2012.666022
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J.K. 1997. Differential teacher attention to learner utterances: the construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF. Linguistics and Education 9, no. 3: 227–311. doi: 10.1016/S0898-5898(97)90003-6
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J.K. 2007. Redressing the roles of correction and repair in research on second and foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal 91, no. 4: 511–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00619.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J.K. and M. Walsh. 2002. Teacher-student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 186–203. doi: 10.1017/S0267190502000107
   Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J. 2003. The interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange: teacher repetition in feedback moves. Language in Society 32, no. 1: 79–104. doi: 10.1017/S0047404503321049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D., M. Tessmer and W. Hannum. 1999. Task Analysis Methods for Instructional Design. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G. 1985. Repair in foreign language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7, no. 2: 200–15. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100005374
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G. 2004. Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. The Modern Language Journal 88, no. 4: 551–67. doi: 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-18-.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labascoule, J., C. Lause and C. Royer. 2004. Rond Point. Méthode de français basée sur l'apprentissage par les tâches. Grenoble, France: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. and S. Thorne. 2006. Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, ed. W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia, 413–68. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markee, N. and G. Kasper. 2004. Classroom talks: an introduction. The Modern Language Journal 88, no. 4: 491–500. doi: 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-14-.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHoul, A.W. 1978. The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society 7, no. 2: 183–213. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500005522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979. Learning Lessons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mori, J. 2002. Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language Classroom. Applied Linguistics 23, no. 3: 323–47. doi: 10.1093/applin/23.3.323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. and G. Wells. 2000. What's use of ‘triadic dialogue’? An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics 21, no. 3: 376–406. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.3.376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff and G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, no. 4: 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E.A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E.A., I. Koshik, S. Jacoby and D. Olsher. 2002. Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 3–31. doi: 10.1017/S0267190502000016
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. 2004. The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. 2005. Conversation analysis and language learning. Language Teaching 38, no. 4: 165–87. doi: 10.1017/S0261444805003010
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. and M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, C. 2010. La dimension sociale dans le CECR: pistes pour scénariser, évaluer et valoriser l'apprentissage collaborative. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue canadienne des langues vivantes 66, no. 4: 511–523. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.66.4.511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, H.Z. 2008. Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. The Modern Language Journal 92, no. 4: 577–594. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00788.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, H.Z. 2009. Moving out of IRF (Initiation–Response–Feedback): a single case analysis. Language Learning 59, no. 4: 796–824. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00526.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, H.Z. 2011. Learner initiatives and learning opportunities in the language classroom. Classroom Discourse 2, no. 2: 201–218. doi: 10.1080/19463014.2011.614053
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1993. Reevaluating the IRF sequence: a proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education 5, no. 1: 1–37. doi: 10.1016/S0898-5898(05)80001-4
   Google Scholar
• Willis, D. and J. Willis. 2007. Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar