666
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Emergent multilinguals learning languages with the iPad app iTEO: a study in primary schools in Luxembourg

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Alexander, R.J. 2004. Still no pedagogy? Principle, pragmatism and compliance in primary education. Cambridge Journal of Education 34, no. 1: 7–33.
  • Alexander, R.J. 2008. Culture, dialogue and learning: notes on an emerging pedagogy. In Exploring Talk in School, ed. N. Mercer and S. Hodgkinson, 93–114. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Angelova, M., D. Gunawardena and D. Volk. 2006. Peer teaching and learning: co-construction language in a dual language first grade. Language and Education 20, no. 3: 173–90.
  • Bachmair, B. and N. Pachler. 2015. Sustainability for innovative education—the case of mobile learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 1, no 17: 1–12.
  • Burston, J. 2014. The reality of MALL: still on the fringes. CALICO Journal 31, no. 103. http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA365981259&v=2.1&u=mlin_b_suffuniv&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w&asid=ad5fdc5122062833bd1fd0be265c68a1 (accessed 1 April, 2016).
  • Chen, Y. and E. Gregory. 2004. How do I read these words? Bilingual exchange teaching between Cantonese-speaking peers. In Many Pathways to Literacy: Young Children Learning with Siblings, Grandparents, Peers, and Communities, ed. E. Gregory, S. Long and D. Volk, 117–28. London: Routledge Falmer.
  • Culén, A. and A. Gasparini. 2011. iPad: a new classroom technology? A report from two pilot studies. Paper presented at the INFuture2011: Information Sciences and e-Society, 9–11 November in Zagreb.
  • Day, D. and M. Lloyd. 2007. Affordances of online technologies: more than the properties of the technology. Australian Educational Computing 22, no. 2: 17–21.
  • De Korne, H. 2012. Towards new ideologies and pedagogies of multilingualism: innovations in interdisciplinary language education in Luxembourg. Language and Education 26, no. 6: 479–500.
  • Di Blas, N. and P. Paolini. 2013. Beyond the school’s boundaries: policultura, a large-scale digital storytelling initiative. Educational Technology & Society 16, no. 1: 15–27.
  • Ebadi, S. and K. Bahramlou. 2014. Dynamic assessment of learning potential or cognitive modifiability. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World 6, no. 4: 228–39.
  • Ellis, R. 2003. Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Esquinca, A., B. Araujo and M.T. de la Piedra. 2014. Meaning making and translanguaging in a two-way dual-language program on the U.S.-Mexico border. Bilingual Research Journal 37, no. 2: 164–81.
  • Flewitt, R., D. Messer and N. Kucirkova. 2014. New directions for early literacy in a digital age: the iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 15, no. 3: 289–310.
  • Foster, P. and A.S. Ohta. 2005. Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics 26, no. 3: 402–30.
  • García, O. and L. Wei. 2014. Language, Bilingualism, and Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gibson, J.J. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, Acting and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, ed. R. Shaw and J. Bransford, 67–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Godwin-Jones, R. 2011. Emerging technologies: mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning and Technology 15, no. 2: 2–11.
  • Gretsch, G. 2014. iTEO as a tool-and-result in dialogical multilingual language learning. In Lernen und Lehren in multilingualen Kontexten: Zum Umgang mit sprachlich-kultureller Vielfalt im Klassenraum, ed. N. Morys, C. Kirsch, I. de Saint Georges and G. Gretsch, 183–217. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  • Hutchison, A. and B. Beschorner. 2015. Using the iPad as a tool to support literacy instruction. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 24, no. 4: 407–22.
  • Jenkins, H., K. Clinton, R. Purushotma, A.J. Robison and M. Weigel. 2006. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education of the 21st Century. Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation.
  • Johnson, R.T. and D.W. Johnson. 1986. Action research: cooperative learning in the science classroom. Journal of Science and Children 23, no. 2: 31–32.
  • Karsenti, T. and A. Fievez. 2013. The iPad in education: uses, benefits, and challenges. Preliminary Report of Key Findings. www.karsenti.ca/ipad/pdf/iPad_report_Karsenti-Fievez_EN.pdf (accessed 10 August, 2016).
  • Kervin, L. 2016. Powerful and playful literacy learning with digital technologies. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 39, no. 1: 64–73.
  • Kirsch, C. forthcoming 2016. Developing language skills through collaborative storytelling on iTEO. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal 7, no. 4.
  • Kirsch, C. forthcoming 2017. Translanguaging practices during storytelling with iTEO in preschools. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 3, no. 2.
  • Kirsch, C. and G. Gretsch. 2015. L’apprentissage langagier avec l’App iTEO-Multilinguisme: enseignement, littératures et cultures au Luxembourg. Synergies pays germanophones 8: 37–48.
  • Kucirkova, N., D. Messer, K. Sheehy and C. Fernández Panadero. 2014. Children’s engagement with educational iPad apps: insights from a Spanish classroom. Computers & Education 71: 175–84.
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. 2013. Re-skilling Language Learners for a Mobile World. Monterey, CA: The International Research Foundation for English Language Education. http://www.tirfonline.org/english-in-the-workforce/mobile-assisted-language-learning (accessed 20 August, 2015).
  • Kumpulainen, K. 1996. The nature of peer interaction in the social context created by the use of word processors. Learning and Instruction 6, no. 3: 243–61.
  • Lantolf, J.P. 2000. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lantolf, J.P. and M.E. Poehner. 2008. Introduction to sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. In Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages, ed. J.P. Lantolf and M.E. Poehner, 1–33. London: Equinox.
  • Martin-Beltrán, M. 2010. The two-way language bridge: co-constructing bilingual language learning opportunities. The Modern Journal 94 (ii): 254–70.
  • Martin, R., S. Ugen and A. Fischbach. 2015. Épreuves Standardisées: Bildungsmonitoring für Luxemburg. Nationaler Bericht 2011 bis 2013. Esch/ Alzette: University of Luxembourg (LUCET).
  • McEwen, R. and K. Dubé. 2015. Engaging or distracting: children’s tablet computer use in education. Educational Technology & Society 18, no. 4: 9–23.
  • MENJE (Ministry of National Education, Childhood and Youth). 2016. Les chiffres clés de l'Éducation nationale: statistiques et indicateurs-Année scolaire 2014–2015. Luxembourg. http://www.men.public.lu/catalogue-publications/themes-transversaux/statistiques-analyses/chiffres-cles/2014-2015/CC_201415.pdf (accessed 20 August, 2016).
  • Mercer, N. 2004. Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1, no. 2: 137–68.
  • Mercer, N. 2008. The seeds of time: why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences 17: 33–59.
  • Mercer, N. and K. Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking. London: Routledge.
  • Milman, N.B., A. Carlson-Bancroft and A. Vanden Boogart. 2014. Examining differentiation and utilization of iPads across content areas in an independent, PreK-4th grade elementary school. Computers in the Schools 31, no. 3: 119–33.
  • Moll, L. 2000. Inspired by Vygotsky: ethnographic experiments in education. In Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research: Constructing Meaning through Collaborative Inquiry, ed. C. Lee and P. Smagorinsky, 256–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ohta, A.S. 2001. Second Language Acquisition Processes in the Classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Palalas, A. 2011. Mobile-assisted language learning: designing for your students. In Second Language Teaching and Learning with Technology: Views of Emergent Researchers, ed. S. Thouësny and L. Bradley, 71–94. Dublin: Research-publishing.net.
  • Pellerin, M. 2014. Language tasks using touch screen and mobile technologies: reconceptualising task-based CALL for young language learners. Canadian Journal for Learning and Technology 40, no. 1. http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/803 (accessed 5 June, 2015).
  • Seipold, J. 2014. Mobile learning structures, concepts and practices of the British and German mobile learning discussion form a media education perspective. MedienPädagogik 24: 30–52.
  • Storch, N. 2002. Patterns of interaction in ESL Pair work. Language Learning 52, no. 1: 119–58.
  • Swain, M. 2000. The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, ed. J. Lantolf, 97–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Swain, M. 2006. Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, ed. H. Byrnes, 95–108. London: Continuum.
  • Van Lier, L. 1988. The organization of repair in second language classroom. In The Classroom and the Language Learner, ed. L. Van Lier, 180–212. London: Longman.
  • Viberg, O. and A. Grönlund. 2012. Mobile assisted language learning: a literature review. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning, ed. M. Specht, M. Sharples and J. Multisilta, 16–18 October in Helsinki, Finland.
  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wertsch, J.V. 2002. Computer mediation, PBL and dialogicality. Distance Education 23, no. 1: 105–08.
  • Wood, D.J., J.S. Bruner and G. Ross. 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17, no. 2: 89–100.
  • Xu, Y., H. Park and Y. Baek. 2011. A new approach toward digital storytelling: an activity focused on writing self efficacy in a virtual learning environment. Educational Technology & Society 14, no. 4: 181–91.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.