References
- Basturkmen, H. 2012. Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System 40, no. 2: 282–295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.05.001
- Basturkmen, H., S. Loewen and R. Ellis. 2004. Teachers’ stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics 25, no. 2: 243–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.243
- Cathcart, R. and J. Olsen. 1976. Teachers’ and students’ preferences for correction of classroom conversation errors. In On TESOL ’76, ed. J. Fanselow and R. Crymes, 41–53. Washington, DC: TESOL.
- Corder, S.P. 1967. The significance of learners’ errors. IRAL 4: 161–170. ERIC. Document Reproduction Service, ED 019903.
- Creswell, J.W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Ellis, R. 2009. Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal 1, no. 1: 3–18.
- Gass, S. 1997. Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Hedge, T. 2000. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hendrickson, J. 1978. Error correction in foreign language teaching: recent theory, research, and practice. The Modern Language Journal 62, no. 8: 387–398.
- Jensen, M.T. 2001. Corrective feedback to spoken errors in adult ESL classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Monash University.
- Kamiya, N. 2014. The relationship between stated beliefs and classroom practices of oral corrective feedback. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.939656.
- Krashen, S. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
- Lee, E.J. 2013. Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students. System 41: 217–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.022
- Lightbown, P. 2000. Anniversary article: Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics 21: 431–462. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.431
- Lyster, R. 2004. Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26: 399–432. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263021
- Lyster, R., K. Saito and M. Sato. 2013. Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching 46: 1–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365
- Lyster, R. and L. Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 37–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
- Oliver, R. and A. Mackey. 2003. Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. The Modern Language Journal 87, no. 4: 519–533. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00205
- Roothooft, H. 2014. The relationship between adult EFL teachers’ oral feedback practices and their beliefs. System 46: 65–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.012
- Sepehrinia, S. and M. Mehdizadeh. 2016. Oral corrective feedback: teachers’ concerns and researchers’ orientation. The Language Learning Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1172328.
- Sheen, Y. 2004. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research 8, no. 3: 263–300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr146oa
- Varnosfadrani, A.D. 2006. A comparison of the effect of implicit/explicit and immediate/delayed corrective feedback on learners’ performance in tailor-made test. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Auckland.