The contribution of CLIL to learners’ international orientation and EFL confidence

References

• Admiraal, W., G. Westhoff and K. de Bot. 2006. Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in The Netherlands: students’ language proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation 12, no. 1: 75–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500392160
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. 2011. Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System 39: 523–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, L. and R. Tanner. 2012. CLIL Activities. A Resource for Subject and Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2008. Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): current research from Europe. In Future Perspectives for English Language Teaching, ed. W. Delanoy and L. Volkmann, 139–58. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2011. Content-and-Language integrated learning: from practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 182–04. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doiz, A., D. Lasagabaster and J.M. Sierra. 2014. CLIL and motivation: the effect of individual and contextual variables. The Language Learning Journal 42, no. 2: 209–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889508
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., K. Csizér and N. Németh. 2006. Motivation, Language Attitudes and Globalisation. A Hungarian Perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. and J. Hadfield. 2013. Motivating Learning. Research and Resources in Language Teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. and P. Skehan. 2003. Individual differences in second language learning. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 589–630. Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Eurydice Report. 2006. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R.C. 1985. Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R.C. 2010. Motivation and Second Language Acquisition: The Socio-Educational Model. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R.C. and W.E. Lambert. 1972. Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning. Massachusetts: Rowley, Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Goris, J., E. Denessen and L. Verhoeven. 2013. Effects of the content and language integrated learning approach to EFL teaching. Written Language & Literacy 16, no. 2: 186–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.16.2.03gor
   Google Scholar
• Graz Group, Coyle, D., A. Halbach, O. Meyer, K. Schuck and T. Ting. 2013. Developing Literacy Through CLIL. The CLIL Magazine. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
   Google Scholar
• Huibregtse, I. 2001. Effecten en didaktiek van tweetalig voortgezet onderwijs in Nederland. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, K.M. 2013. Target-language community involvement: second-language linguistic self-confidence and other perceived benefits. The Canadian Modern Language Review 69, no 1: 65–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langé, G. 2014. CLIL/Emile in Italy: a real driver for lifelong learning. Paper Presented at the ALTE 5th International Conference: Language Assessment for Multilingualism, 10–11 April 2014 in Paris.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P.D., S.C. Baker, R. Clément and S. Conrod. 2001. Willingness to communicate, social support and language orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 369–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101003035
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P.D., R. Clément, Z. Dörnyei and K.A. Noels. 1998. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2. A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal 82: 545–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannion, G., G. Biesta, M. Priestley and H. Ross. 2011. The global dimension in education and education for global citizenship: genealogy and critique. Globalisation, Societies and Education 9, no. 3–4: 443–56. DOI:10.1080/14767724.2011.605327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2011.605327
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2002. CLIL/EMILE – The European Dimension. Jyväskyla: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2013. The CLIL Trajectory: Educational Innovation for the 21st Century iGeneration. Córdoba: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehisto, P. 2007. What a school needs to consider before launching a CLIL programme: the Estonian experience. In Diverse Contexts – Converging Goals: CLIL in Europe, ed. D. Marsh and D. Wolff, 61–77. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Noels, K.A. and R. Clément. 1996. Communicating across cultures: social determinants and acculturative consequences. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement 28, no. 3: 214–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400X.28.3.214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otwinowska, A. and M. Foryś. 2015. They learn the CLIL way, but do they like it? Affectivity and cognition in upper-primary CLIL classes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. DOI:10.1080/13670050.2015.1051944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M. L. 2012. CLIL research in Europe: past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15, no. 3: 315–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumlich, D. 2013. Students’ general English proficiency prior to CLIL: empirical evidence for substantial differences between prospective CLIL and Non-CLIL students in Germany. In Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in Europe. Research Perspectives on Policy and Practice, ed. S. Breidbach and B. Viebrock, 181–201. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Verspoor, M., K. de Bot and X. Xu. 2015. The effects of English bilingual education in the Netherlands. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 3, no. 1: 4–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.1.01ver
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. 2000. The changing global economy and the future of English teaching. TESOL Quarterly 34: 511–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weenink, D. 2005. Upper Middle-Class Resources of Power in the Education Arena. Dutch Elite Schools in an Age of Globalization. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, D. 2002. CLIL/EMILE – The European Dimension, 47–8. Jyväskyla: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar