Analysis of accuracy in the writing of EFL students enrolled on CLIL and non-CLIL programmes: the impact of grade and gender

References

• Cabrera Solano, P., P. Gonzalez Torres, C. Ochoa Cueva, A. Quinonez Beltran, L. Castillo Cuesta, L. Solano Jaramillo, F. Espinosa Jaramillo and M.O. Arias Cordova. 2014. Spanish interference in EFL writing skills: a case of Ecuadorian senior high schools. English Language Teaching 7, no. 7: 40–8.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dallinger, S., K. Jonkmann, J. Hollm and C. Fiege. 2016. The effect of content and language integrated learning on students’ English and history competences. Learning and Instruction 41: 23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, P. and P. Skehan. 1996. The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies on Second Language Acquisition 18: 299–323. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100015047
   Google Scholar
• Gené-Gil, M., M. Juan-Garau and J. Salazar-Noguera. 2015. Development of EFL writing over three years in secondary education: CLIL and non-CLIL settings. The Language Learning Journal 43, no. 3: 286–303. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2015.1053278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heras, A. and D. Lasagabaster. 2015. The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research 19, no. 1: 70–88. doi: 10.1177/1362168814541736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jexenflicker, S. and C. Dalton-Puffer. 2010. The CLIL differential: comparing the writing of CLIL and non-CLIL students in higher colleges of technology. In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, ed. C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula and U. Smit, 169–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lahuerta Martínez, A.C. 2015. The written competence of Spanish secondary education students in bilingual and non-bilingual programs. Porta Linguarum 24: 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. 2008. Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal 1: 30–41. doi: 10.2174/1874913500801010030
   Google Scholar
• Llinares, A. and R. Whittaker. 2006. Linguistic analysis of secondary school students’ oral and written production in CLIL contexts: studying social science in English. Vienna English Working Papers (Special Issue: Current Research on CLIL) 15, no. 3: 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F. and L. Rodríguez. 2014. Onset and expansion of L2 cognitive academic language proficiency in bilingual settings: CALP in CLIL. System 47: 64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merisuo-Storm, T. and M. Soininen. 2014. Students’ first language skills after six years in bilingual education. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5, no. 22: 72–81.
   Google Scholar
• Navés, T. and M. Victori. 2010. CLIL in Catalonia: an overview of research studies. In CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training, ed. D. Lasagabaster and Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, 30–54. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Vidal, C. and H. Roquet. 2015. The linguistic impact of a CLIL Science programme: an analysis measuring relative gains. System 54: 80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2015.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pladevall-Ballester, E. and A. Vallbona. 2016. CLIL in minimal input contexts: a longitudinal study of primary school learners’ receptive skills. System 58: 37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2016.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roquet, H. 2011. A study of the acquisition of English as a Foreign Language: integrating content and language in mainstream education in Barcelona. Unpublished PhD diss., Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
   Google Scholar
• Roquet, H., J. Llopis and C. Pérez-Vidal. 2015. Does gender have an impact on the potential benefits learners may achieve in two contexts compared? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19, no. 4: 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. 2010. Written production and CLIL: an empirical study. In Language Use in CLIL, ed. C. Dalton Puffer, T. Nikula and U. Smit, 191–210. Berlin, Germany: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland, J. 2000. Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching 33, no. 4: 203–23. doi: 10.1017/S0261444800015688
   Google Scholar
• Thewissen, J. 2013. Capturing L2 accuracy developmental patterns. The Modern Language Journal 97: 77–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01422.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verspoor, M., M.S. Schmid and X. Xu. 2012. A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 21, no. 3: 239–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer, H.J., H. Lena, R. Troschke, D. Coetzee and K. Verena. 2006. Subject-specific competence and language use of CLIL learners. Paper presented at the ESSE8 Conference, London.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe-Quintero, K., S. Inagaki and H.-Y. Kim. 1998. Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
   Google Scholar