Incidental L2 lexical acquisition in reading: the role of L2-gloss frequency and learner proficiency

References

• Balota, D.A. and J.I. Chumbley. 1984. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10, no. 3: 340–57. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, C., C.M. Morrison and A.W. Ellis, 1997. Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 50, no. 3: 560–85. DOI: 10.1080/783663595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, T. 2000. The Compleat Lexical Tutor. http://www.lextutor.ca (accessed 13 June, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Craik, F.I. and R.S. Lockhart. 1972. Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11, no. 6: 671–84. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X.
   Google Scholar
• Day, R.R., C. Omura and M. Hiramatsu. 1992. Incidental EFL vocabulary learning and reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 7, no. 2: 541–51.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2013. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, K.I. and S.M. Chambers. 1973. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12, no. 6: 627–35. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80042-8.
   Google Scholar
• Glanzer, M. and J.K. Adams. 1990. The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16: 5–16. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldinger, S.D. 1998. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105, no. 2: 251–79. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D.L. 1986. ‘Schema abstraction’ in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 93, no. 4: 411–28. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.4.411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, F.M. and J.K. King. 1971. Vocabulary glosses in foreign language reading materials. Language Learning 21, no. 2: 213–19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1971.tb00060.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst, M., T. Cobb, T. Cobb and P. Meara. 1998. Beyond a Clockwork Orange: acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 11, no. 2: 207–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, H.-c.M. and H. Nassaji. 2012. Ease of inferencing, learner inferential strategies, and their relationship with the retention of word meanings inferred from context. Canadian Modern Language Review 68, no. 1: 54–77. DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.68.1.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckin, T. and J. Bloch. 1993. Strategies for inferring word meanings: a cognitive model. In Second Language Reading and Vocabulary Learning, ed. T. Huckin, M. Haynes and J. Coady, 153–78. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J.H. 1992. Retention of inferred and given word meanings: experiments in incidental learning. In Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics, ed. P.J.L. Arnaud and H. Béjoint, 113–25. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J.H., M. Hollander and T. Greidanus. 1996. Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: the influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal 80, no. 3: 327–39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb01614.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G.M., P. Dufon and F.C. Hong. 1994. L1 and L2 vocabulary glosses in L2 reading passages: their effectiveness for increasing comprehension and vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Research in Reading 17, no. 1: 19–28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.1994.tb00049.x.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, N. 2000. Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics 21, no. 1: 47–77. DOI: 10.1093/applin/21.1.47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, N. 2004. Semantic transfer and its implications for vocabulary teaching in a second language. The Modern Language Journal 88, no. 3: 416–32. DOI: 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00238.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, M.H. 2012. Glossing and second language vocabulary learning. TESOL Quarterly 46, no. 1: 56–79. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, J.F. and A.M.B. De Groot. 1997. Lexical and conceptual memory in the bilingual: mapping form to meaning in two languages. In Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives, ed. A.M.B.de. Groot and J.F. Kroll, 169–99. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, J.F. and E. Stewart. 1994. Category interference in translation and picture naming: evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language 33, no. 2: 149–74. DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. 1989. What percentage of text lexis is essential for comprehension? In Special Language: From Humans Thinking to Thinking Machines, ed. C. Lauren and M. Nordman, 316–23. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. 1997. The lexical plight in second language reading: words you don’t know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy, ed. J. Coady and T. Huckin, 20–34. New York: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Lv, H., M. Yao and Y. Du. 2005. Effects of word annotation on vocabulary learning in English reading. Psychological Science 28, no. 6: 1415–17.
   Google Scholar
• Miyasako, N. 2002. Does text-glossing have any effects on incidental vocabulary learning through reading for Japanese senior high school students? Language Education & Technology 39: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. 2003. L2 vocabulary learning from context: strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL Quarterly 37, no. 4: 645–70. DOI: 10.2307/3588216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I.S.P. 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I.S.P. and D. Belgar. 2007. The vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher 31, no. 7: 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Nöth, W. 2014. The semiotics of learning new words. Journal of Philosophy of Education 48, no. 3: 446–56. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9752.12076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R.C. and A. Wingfield. 1965. Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 17, no. 4: 273–81. DOI: 10.1080/17470216508416445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, M., H. White and S. Krashen. 1989. Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading: a replication of the Clockwork Orange study using second language acquirers. Reading in a Foreign Language 5, no. 2: 271–75.
   Google Scholar
• Plass, J.L., D.M. Chun, R.E. Mayer and D. Leutner. 2003. Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior 19, no. 2: 221–43. DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00015-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulido, D. 2009. How involved are American L2 learners of Spanish in lexical input processing tasks during reading? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31, no. 1: 31–58. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263109090020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rott, S. 1999. The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21, no. 4: 589–619. DOI: 10.1017/S0272263199004039.
   Google Scholar
• Rott, S., J. Williams and R. Cameron. 2002. The effect of multiple-choice L1 glosses and input-output cycles on lexical acquisition and retention. Language Teaching Research 6, no. 3: 183–222. DOI: 10.1191/1362168802lr108oa.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhi, A. and H. Mohebbi. 2012. The effect of computer assisted L1 and L2 glosses on L2 vocabulary learning. The Journal of Asia TEFL 9, no. 2: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, H.E., K. Rayner and J.I. Chumbley. 1998. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition 26, no. 6: 1270–81. DOI: 10.3758/BF03201199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R.W. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11, no. 2: 129–58. DOI: 10.1093/applin/11.2.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 1993. Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13, 206–26. DOI: 10.1017/S0267190500002476.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 1994. Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. Consciousness in Second Language Learning. AILA Review ( Special Issue) 11, 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 2001. Attention. In Cognition and Second Language Instruction, ed. P. Robinson, 3–33. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. 2008. Review article: instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research 12, no. 3: 329–63. DOI: 10.1177/1362168808089921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N. and D. Schmitt. 2014. A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching 47, no. 4: 484–503. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444812000018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoynoff, S. 2009. Recent developments in language assessment and the case of four large-scale tests of ESOL ability. Language Teaching 42, no. 1: 1–40. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444808005399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, E. and H. Nesi. 2003. Teaching vocabulary in two Chinese classrooms: schoolchildren's exposure to English words in Hong Kong and Guangzhou. Language Teaching Research 7, no. 1: 65–97. DOI: 10.1191/1362168803lr113oa.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E.L. 1914. The Measurement of Ability in Reading, Preliminary Scales and Tests. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M.T. 2001. A neurocognitive perspective on language: the declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, no. 10: 717–26. DOI: 10.1038/35094573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M.T. 2005. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: the declarative/procedural model. In Mind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition, ed. C. Sanz, 141–78. Washington, DC: Gergetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, Y. 1997. Input, intake, and retention: effects of increased processing on incidental learning of foreign language vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 287–307. DOI: 10.1017/S027226319700301X.
   Google Scholar
• Yanguas, I. 2009. Multimedia glosses and their effect on L2 text comprehension and vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology 13, no. 2: 48–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshii, M. 2006. L1 and L2 glosses: their effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology 10, no. 3: 85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar