The impact of learning Latin on school pupils: a review of existing data

References

• 1975. Latin for fifth and sixth graders in Easthampton, Massachusetts. Classical World 68: 444.
   Google Scholar
• Ashe, A. 1998. Latin for special needs students: meeting the challenge of students with learning disabilities. In Latin for the 21st Century: From Concept to Classroom, ed. R. LaFleur, 237–50. Glenview, IL: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, G. 1985–1986. Latin as a practical study. Classical Journal 81, no. 2: 158–60.
   Google Scholar
• Bassman, M. and M. Ironsmith. 1984. An experimental FLES program in Latin. ADFL Bulletin 16: 41.
   Google Scholar
• Bolchazy-Garducci Publishers. 2012. Study of Latin bolsters achievement tests scores. http://www.bolchazy.com (accessed 21 October, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, R. 1975. English vocabulary comparison of Latin and non-Latin students. Technical Report 831. Boston, MA: Human Engineering Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Bracke, E. 2016. The role of university students in increasing widening participation to classics. Journal of Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning 18, no. 2: 111–29.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, G. 2016. What Works for Children and Young People with Literacy Difficulties? The Effectiveness of Intervention Schemes. Fifth edition. Farnham: Dyslexia-SpLD Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Burstall, C. 1974. Primary French in the Balance. Windsor: NFER.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, L. 2016. Aequora: teaching literacy with Latin. Eidolon, 5 December. https://eidolon.pub/aequora-8accc39de16c#.75mjg8vnf (accessed 21 October, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J. 1993. The influence of study of a second language on improvement in spelling. Reading and Writing 5: 339–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J.F. and I.Y. Liberman. 1989. Does the study of Latin affect Latin proficiency? Reading and Writing 1: 179–91.
   Google Scholar
• Cederstrom, E. 1974. Quid agunt discipuli? Latin in Philadelphia. Independent School Bulletin 33: 56–57.
   Google Scholar
• Chanock, K. 2006. Help for a dyslexic learner from an unlikely source: the study of ancient Greek. Literacy 40: 164–70.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. 1932. Amount of high school Latin as an indicator of success in college work. School and Society 35: 189–90.
   Google Scholar
• Comments on Some Current Vocabulary Research. 1974. Bulletin 115. no date. Boston, MA: Human Engineering Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, V. 1991. Second Language Learning and Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Colligan, I. 1944. Pragmatists and high school Latin. Manuscripts 12: 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Coulmas, F. 1989. Writing Systems of the World. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coxe, W. 1924. The influence of Latin on the spelling of English words. The Journal of Educational Research 9: 223–33.
   Google Scholar
• Dallam, M. 1917. Is the study of Latin advantageous to the study of English? Educational Review 54: 500–3.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2013. Consultation report: foreign languages at key stage 2. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239042/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_Languages.pdf (accessed 20 October, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• DeVane, A. 1997. Efficacy of Latin studies in the information age. http://teach.valdosta.edu/whuitt/files/latin.html (accessed 20 October, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Douglass, H.R. and C. Kittelson. 1935. The transfer of training in high school Latin to English grammar, spelling and vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Education 4: 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, E. 1917. The results of a recent spelling test at the University of Iowa. School and Society 5: 506–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fromchuck, A. 1984. The measurable benefits of teaching English through Latin in elementary school. Classical World 78: 25–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliland, A. 1922. Effect of the study of Latin on ability to define words. Journal of Educational Psychology 13: 501–6.
   Google Scholar
• Gottmann, J. 1961. Megalopolis: The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Haag, L. and E. Stern. 2003. In search of the benefits of learning Latin. Journal of Educational Psychology 95, no. 1: 174–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamblen, A. 1925. An Investigation to Determine the Extent to Which the Effect of the Study of Latin upon a Knowledge of English Derivatives can be Increased by Conscious Adaptation of Content and Method to the Attainment of This Objective. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington-Lueker, D. 1992. Latin redux. Executive Educator 14, no. 8: 21–5.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. 1915. A study in the relation of Latin to English composition. School and Society 2: 251–2.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, B. 2006. Latin for students with severe foreign language learning difficulties. In When Dead Tongues Speak: Teaching Beginning Greek and Latin, ed. J. Gruber-Miller, 50–67. Oxford and New York: American Philological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, C. and R.L. Keffer. 1995. A computerized method to teach Latin and Greek root words: effect on verbal SAT scores. Journal of Educational Research 89: 47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes-Henderson, A., S. Hunt and M. Musié. Forthcoming. Forward with Classics! Classical Languages in Schools and Communities. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, T. 2003. Special needs in classics. In The Teaching of Classics, ed. J. Morwood, 51–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, M., A. Barnes, B. Powell, G. Lindsay and D. Muijs. 2005. Primary modern foreign languages: an overview of recent research, key issues and challenges for educational policy and practice. Research Papers in Education 20, no. 4: 371–90.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, R. 2003. Progression. Paper presented at CILT ITT conference Enabling Change, 6 September in Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Josephina, S. 1963. Latin: an effective word builder. Classical Journal 58: 354–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, T. 1923. Latin as a preparation for French. School and Society 18: 563–9.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, C. 1922. Tests and measurements in Latin. Classical World 15, no. 20: 153–7.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. and T. Terrell. 1983. The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Hayward, CA: Prentice Hall Europe.
   Google Scholar
• LaFleur, R. 1981. Latin students score high on SAT and achievement tests. Classical Journal 76: 254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFleur, R. 1985. 1981 SAT and Latin achievement test results and enrolment data. Classical Journal 77: 343.
   Google Scholar
• LeBovit, J. 1967. Qui timide rogat, docet negare. Classical World 61, no. 2: 37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, J. 2013. Why you should learn a dead language. The Guardian, 16 September, 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/sep/16/why-learn-a-dead-language (accessed 20 October, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Masciantonio, R. 1970. How the Romans Lived and Spoke (Teachers’ Guide). Philadelphia: Instructional Services. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED044066.pdf (accessed 20 October, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Masciantonio, R. 1977. Tangible benefits of the study of Latin: a review of research. Foreign Language Annals 10: 375–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrogenes, N. 1977. The effect of elementary Latin instruction on language arts performance. Elementary School Journal 77: 268–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. R. and T.H. Briggs. 1923. The effect of Latin translation on English. School Review 31: 756–62.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. 1989. An examination of the relationship of academic course work with admissions test performance. College Board Report 89-6: 13.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. and C. Pelling. 2010. Latin for language learners: opening opportunities for primary pupils. http://www.politeia.co.uk/p116.pdf (accessed 20 October, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, V.A., E. Macaro, S. Alba and C. Cipolla. 2015. The influence of learning a second language in primary school on developing first language literacy skills. Applied Psycholinguistics 36: 1133–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offenberg, R. 1982. Language Arts Through Latin. Philadelphia: Office of Research and Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Omrani, B. 2010. Teaching Latin at primary school level (Durand Primary School). http://www.bijanomrani.com/?p=teachingLatin (accessed 20 October, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Orleans, J. 1922. Possible transfer value of the study of Latin to English vocabulary. School and Society 16: 559–60.
   Google Scholar
• Otis, A. 1922. The relation of Latin study to ability in English vocabulary and composition. School Review 30, no. 1: 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Polsky, M. 1986. The NEH/Brooklyn College Latin cornerstone project, 1982-84: genesis, implementation, evaluation. Classical Outlook 63: 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Pond, F. 1938. Influence of the study of Latin on word knowledge. School Review 46, no. 8: 611–18.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, B., D. Wray, S. Rixon, J. Medwell, A. Barnes and M. Hunt. 2001. Analysis and evaluation of the current situation relating to the teaching of modern foreign languages at key stage 2 in England (QCA). http://www.qca.org.uk/ca/subjects/mfl/warwick.pdf (accessed 20 October, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Prager, R. 2000. Introductory language: opening new doors. Middle School Journal 31, no. 4: 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt, E. 1983. They don’t call this class ‘bor-ing’. English Journal 72: 37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, C. 2009. The Golden Age of the Classics in America: Greece, Rome, and the Antebellum United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riess, W. and C. Riess. 2005. The state of Latin instruction in Germany today. Classical Journal 101, no. 2: 191–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebesta, J. 1998. Aliquid semper novi: new challenges, new approaches. In Latin for the 21st Century: From Concept to Classroom, ed. R. LaFleur, 15–24. Glenview, IL: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, R. 1975. Evaluation Report of Title III Project, Indianapolis. Indiana.
   Google Scholar
• Sienkewicz, T., A. Mulberry, P. Reaves, E. Kann and B. Bell 2004. Lingua latina liberis: four models of Latin in the elementary school. Classical Journal 99, no. 3: 301–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. 2014. What’s the state of the evidence on … Latin? https://secondarysource.wordpress.com/2014/10/03/whats-the-state-of-the-evidence-on-teaching-latin/ (accessed 20 October, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. 2007. The correlation of Latin, Greek and the classical education model with learning other subjects. PhD diss. Capella University.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, R., L. Ganschow, K. Fluharty and S. Little. 1996. An exploratory study on the effects of Latin on native language skills and foreign language aptitude of students with and without learning disabilities. Classical Journal 91: 165–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, H. and E. Hall. 2015. Greek and Roman Classics in the British Struggle for Social Reform. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, L. 1978. The decline of basic skills: a suggestion so old that it’s new. Classical Journal 73: 351.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J. 1987. A case for the teaching of Latin to the verbally talented. Roeper Review 9: 159–61.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. 1924. Mental discipline in high school studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 15: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. and G. Ruger. 1923. The effect of first-year Latin upon knowledge of English words of Latin derivation. School and Society 18: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Townsley, L. 1985. Latin as a vocabulary builder for hearing-impaired and second-language students of English. Teaching English to Deaf and Second-Language Students 3: 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, P. 1984–1985. High school foreign language study and college academic performance. Classical Outlook 62, no. 2: 33–6.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, M. and R. Wilhelm. 1991. Bringing the classics to life. Humanities 12, no. 1: 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wolverton, R. 1975. Classics for the future. Paper presented at the Classical Association of the Atlantic States Conference, in his presidential address of the Classical Association of the Atlantic States, 15 November 1975 in Atlantic City, NJ. http://0-files.eric.ed.gov.opac.msmc.edu/fulltext/ED113976.pdf (accessed 20 October, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Young, T. 2011. Forget Mandarin: Latin is the key to success. The Spectator, 3 February. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2011/02/forget-mandarin-latin-is-the-key-to-success/ (accessed 20 October, 2017).
   Google Scholar