References
- Bernales, C. 2016. Towards a comprehensive concept of willingness to communicate: learners’ predicted and self-reported participation in the foreign language classroom. System 56: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2015.11.002
- Borg, S. 2013. Teacher Research in Language Teaching a Critical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Cao, Y. 2011. Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System 39: 468–79. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2011.10.016
- Cao, Y. 2013. Exploring dynamism in willingness to communicate: a longitudinal case study. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 36: 160–76. doi: 10.1075/aral.36.2.03cao
- Cao, Y. and J. Philp. 2006. Interactional context and willingness to communicate: a comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System 34, no. 4: 480–93. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002
- Cohen, A.D., R.L. Oxford and J.C. Chi. 2002. Language Strategy Use Survey. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.
- de Saint Léger, D. and N. Storch. 2009. Learners’ perceptions and attitudes: implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System 37, no. 2: 269–85. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2009.01.001
- Griffiths, C. ed. 2008. Lessons from Good Language Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
- Hulstijn, J. 1997. Second language acquisition research in the laboratory: possibilities and limitations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 131–43. doi: 10.1017/S0272263197002015
- Khajavy, G., P. MacIntyre and E. Barabadi. 2017. Role of the emotions and classroom environment in willingness to communicate: applying doubly latent multilevel analysis in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–20. doi:10.1017/S0272263117000304.
- Kang, S. 2005. Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System 33: 277–92. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004
- Lantolf, J.P. 2006. Sociocultural theory and L2: state of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 67–109. doi: 10.1017/S0272263106060037
- Lightbown, P. 2000. Anniversary article: classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics 21: 431–62. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.4.431
- Long, M.H. 1985. Input and second language acquisition theory. In Input in Second Language Acquisition, ed. S.M. Gass and C.G. Madden, 377–93. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
- Long, M.H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Handbook of Research on Second Language Acquisition, ed. W.C. Ritchie and T.K. Bhatia, 413–68. New York: Academic Press.
- MacIntyre, P.D. and J.J. Legatto. 2011. A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics 32: 149–71. doi: 10.1093/applin/amq037
- MacIntyre, P.D., S.C. Baker, R. Clément and S. Conrod. 2001. Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, no. 3: 369–88. doi: 10.1017/S0272263101003035
- MacIntyre, P.D., R. Clément, Z. Dörnyei and K.A. Noels. 1998. Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in L2: a situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal 82: 545–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
- Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. 2016. Dynamics of classroom WTC: results of a semester study. Studies In Second Language Learning and Teaching 6, no. 4: 651–76. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.4.5
- Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. and M Pawlak. 2014. Fluctuations in learners’ willingness to communicate during communicative task performance: conditions and tendencies. Research in Language 12: 245–60. doi: 10.2478/rela-2014-0019
- Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. and M. Pawlak. 2016. Designing a tool for measuring the interrelationships between L2 WTC and confidence, beliefs, motivation, and context. In Classroom-Oriented Research, ed. M. Pawlak, 19–37. Heidelberg: Springer.
- Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. and M. Pawlak. 2017. Willingness to Communicate in Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Combining a Macro- and Micro-Perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Pawlak, M. and A Mystkowska-Wiertelak. 2015. Investigating the dynamic nature of L2 willingness to communicate. System 50: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2015.02.001
- Pawlak, M., A. Mystkowska-Wiertelak and J. Bielak. 2016. Investigating the nature of classroom WTC: a micro-perspective. Language Teaching Research 20, no. 5: 654–71. doi: 10.1177/1362168815609615
- Peng, J.-E., L. Zhang and Y. Chen. 2016. The mediation of multimodal affordances on willingness to communicate in the English as a foreign language classroom. TESOL Quarterly. doi:10.1002/tesq.298.
- Peng, J.E. 2014. Willingness to Communicate Inside the EFL Classroom and Beyond: An Ecological Perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Rubin, J. 1975. What the good language learner can teach us. TESOL Quarterly 9: 41–51. doi: 10.2307/3586011
- Swain, M. 1985. Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in Second Language Acquisition, ed. S. Gass and C. Madden, 235–56. New York: Newbury House.
- Swain, M. 1998. Focus on form through conscious reflection. In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, ed. C. Doughty and J. Williams, 64–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Taylor, E. 2005. Research in your own classroom. In Methodology in Language Teaching, ed. J.C. Richards and W.A. Renandya, 397–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.