The effect of synchronous computer-mediated communication on beginner L2 learners’ foreign language anxiety and participation

References

• Arnold, N. 2007. Reducing foreign language communication apprehension with computer-mediated communication: a preliminary study. System 35, no. 4: 469–486. doi:10.1016/j.system.2007.07.002.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, P., A.J. Onwuegbuzie and C. E Daley. 2000. Using learning style to predict foreign language achievement at the college level. System 28, no. 1: 115–133. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00064-0.
   Google Scholar
• Baralt, M. and L. Gurzynski-Weiss. 2011. Comparing learners’ state anxiety during task-based interaction in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Language Teaching Research 15, no. 2: 201–229. doi:10.1177/0265532210388717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauvois, M.H. 1992. Computer-Assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals 25, no. 5: 455–464. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1992.tb01128.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, T. and L. Lomicka. 2000. A case study of learner interaction in technology-enhanced language learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research 22, no. 3: 347–368. doi:10.2190/TCUA-3YUV-B1P5-26P3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.H. 2005. Computer mediated communication: the use of CMC to develop EFL learners’ communicative competence. Asian EFL Journal 7, no. 1: 167–182. http://asian-efl-journal.com/1246/quarterly-journal/2005/03/computer-mediated-communication-the-use-of-cmc-to-develop-efl-learners-communicative-competence/#squelch-taas-tab-content-0-3.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y-s, E.K. Horwitz and D.L. Schallert. 1999. Language writing anxiety: differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning 49: 417–446. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P.T. and R.R. McCrae. 1997. Longitudinal stability of adult personality. In Handbook of Personality Psychology, ed. R. Hogan, J.A. Johnson and S. Briggs, 269–290. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, J. 1991. Understanding communication apprehension: an introduction for language educators. In Language Anxiety: From Theory and Research to Classroom Implications, ed. E.K. Horwitz and D.J. Young, 3–13. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• De Bot, K. 1992. A bilingual processing model: Levelt’s ‘speaking’ model adapted. Applied Linguistics 13: 1–24. doi:10.1093/applin/13.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, T. 2009. Individual differences, participation, and language acquisition in communicative EFL classes in a Japanese university. PhD diss., Auckland University, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Dewaele, J.-M. 2002. Psychological and sociodemographic correlates of communicative anxiety in L2 and L3 production. The International Journal of Bilingualism 6: 23–38. doi:10.1177/13670069020060010201.
   Google Scholar
• Dewaele, J.-M. 2007a. Predicting language learners’ grades in the L1, L2, L3, and L4: the effect of some psychological and sociocognitive variables. International Journal of Multilingualism 4: 169–197. doi:10.2167/ijm080.0.
   Google Scholar
• Dewaele, J.-M. 2007b. The effect of multilingualism and socio-situational factors on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety of mature language learners. The International Journal of Bilingualism 11, no. 4: 391–409. doi:10.1177/13670069070110040301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewaele, J.-M. 2010a. Multilingualism and affordances: variation in self-perceived communicative competence and communicative anxiety in French L1, L2, L3, and L4. International Review of Applied Linguistics 48: 105–129. doi:10.1515/iral.2010.006.
   Google Scholar
• Dewaele, J.-M. 2010b. Emotions in Multiple Languages. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2009. The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2009. Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19, no. 3: 221–246. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x.
   Google Scholar
• Frantzen, D. and S. Sieloff Magnan. 2005. Anxiety and the true beginner: false beginner dynamic in beginning French and Spanish classes. Foreign Language Annals 38, no. 2: 171–186. doi:101111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregersen, T.S. 2003. To err is human: a reminder to teachers of language-anxious students. Foreign Language Annals 36: 25–32. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb01929.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregersen, T. and E.K. Horwitz. 2002. Language learning and perfectionism: anxious and non-anxious language learners’ reactions to their own oral performance. The Modern Language Journal 86, no. 4: 562–570. doi:10.1111/1540-4781.00161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregersen, T.S. and P.D. MacIntyre. 2014. Capitalizing on Language Learners’ Individuality: From Premise to Practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, E.K. 2001. Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 21: 112–126. doi:10.1017.S0267190501000071 doi: 10.1017/S0267190501000071
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, E., B. Horwitz and J. Cope. 1986. Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal 70: 125–132. doi:10.2307/327317 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, R. 1995. Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal 79: 457–476. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, A. and T. Terrell. 1991. Affective reaction and foreign language students to natural approach activities and teaching techniques. In Language Anxiety: From Theory and Research to Classroom Implications, ed. E.K. Horwitz and D.J. Young, 109–126. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lamy, M.N. and R Hampel. 2007. Online Communication in Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-Y. 2009. The effect of computer-mediated communication (CMC) interaction on L2 vocabulary acquisition: a comparison study of CMC interaction and face-to-face interaction. Master’s diss., Iowa State University, Ames.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P.D. 1999. Language anxiety: a review of the literature for language teachers. In Affect in Foreign Language and Second Language Learning: A Practical Guide to Creating a Low-Anxiety Classroom Atmosphere, ed. D.J. Young, 24–45. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. 2002. Motivation, anxiety, and emotion in second language acquisition. In Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning, ed. R. Robinson, 45–68. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. and C. Charos. 1996. Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15, no. 1: 3–26. doi:10.1177/0261927X960151001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. and R. Gardner. 1991a. Methods and results in the study of anxiety in language learning: a review of the literature. Language Learning 41: 85–117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00677.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. and R. Gardner. 1991b. Language anxiety: its relationship to other anxieties and to processing in native and second languages. Language Learning 41: 513–534. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00691.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P. and R. Gardner. 1994. The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning 44: 283–305. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01103.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, L.E. 1998. Personality and motivational factors in computer-mediated foreign language communication. In New Ways of Learning and Teaching: Focus on Technology and FL Education, ed. J.A. Muyskens, 145–197. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A., P. Bailey and C. Daley. 2000. The validation of three scales measuring anxiety at different stages of the foreign language planning process: the input anxiety scale, the processing anxiety scale, and the output anxiety scale. Language Learning 50: 87–117. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, J.S. and P.J. Whitney. 2002. Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal 20, no. 1: 7–32. http://www.jstor.org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/stable/24149607. doi: 10.1558/cj.v20i1.7-32
   Google Scholar
• Pellettieri, J. 2000. Negotiation in cyberspace: the role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practices, ed. M. Warschauer and R. Kern, 59–86. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. 1997. Language teaching and networking. System 25: 29–37. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00058-9.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. 1991. The subjective experience of foreign language anxiety: interviews with highly anxious students. In Language Anxiety: From Theory and Research to Classroom Implications, ed. E.K. Horwitz and D.J. Young, 101–108. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, G. 1994. Relationships between personality, anxiety, proficiency and participation. PhD diss., Temple University, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Roed, J. 2003. Language learning behaviour in a virtual environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning 16, no. 2–3: 155–172. doi:10.1076/call.16.2.155.15880.
   Google Scholar
• Scovel, T. 1978. The effect of affect on foreign language learning: a review of the anxiety research. Language Learning 28: 129–142. doi:10.1111-j.1467-1770.1978.tb00309.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shield, L. 2000. The nature and purpose of online conversations: a brief synthesis of current research. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 6: 19–52. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/8018.
   Google Scholar
• Spielmann, G. and M. Radnofsky. 2001. Learning language under tension: new directions from a qualitative study. The Modern Language Journal 85: 259–278. doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, N. and E. Pratt. 1996. A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: a computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System 24: 491–501. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00044-9.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. 1985. Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensive Input and Comprehensive Output in Its Development. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Woodrow, L. 2006. Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC Journal 37: 308–328. doi:10.1177/0033688206071315.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D.J. 1990. An investigation of students’ perspectives on anxiety and speaking. Foreign Language Annals 23: 539–553. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1990.tb00424.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D.J. 1991. Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: what does language anxiety research suggest? The Modern Language Journal 75, no. 4: 426–437. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05378.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar