Captioning and grammar learning in the L2 Spanish classroom

References

• Bates, D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker and S. Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, no. 1: 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1992. The use of adverbials and natural order in the development of temporal expression. IRAL—International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 30, no. 4: 299–320. doi: 10.1515/iral.1992.30.4.299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1998. Narrative structure and lexical aspect: conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, no. 4: 471–508. doi: 10.1017/S0272263198004021
   Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. 2000. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D.J., R. Levy, C. Scheepers and H.J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68, no. 3: 255–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, R.J. 2013. Brave New Digital Classroom: Technology and Foreign Language Learning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, I. and R.C. Lafayette. 1994. Effects of multimedia courseware subtitling on the speaking performance of college students of French. The Modern Language Journal 78, no. 1: 61–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M. 2013. Lextale_FR a fast, free, and efficient test to measure language proficiency in French. Psychologica Belgica 53, no. 1: 23–37. doi: 10.5334/pb-53-1-23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canteli Dominicis, M. and J.J. Reynolds. 2014. Repase y Escriba: Curso Avanzado de Gramática y Composición. 7th ed. New York: St. John’s University.
   Google Scholar
• Cerezo, L., A. Caras and R.P. Leow. 2016. Effectiveness of guided induction versus deductive instruction on the development of complex Spanish ‘gustar’ structures: an analysis of learning outcomes and processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38, no. 2: 265–91. doi: 10.1017/S0272263116000139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cintrón-Valentín, M.C. and N.C. Ellis. 2016. Salience in second language acquisition: physical form, learner attention, and instructional focus. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H. and C. Felser. 2006. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, no. 1: 3–42. doi: 10.1017/S0142716406060024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collentine, J. 2013. Subjunctive in second language Spanish. In The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition, ed. K.L. Geeslin, 270–88. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Comajoan, L. 2013. Defining and coding data: narrative discourse grounding in L2 studies. In Research Design and Methodology in Studies on L2 Tense and Aspect, ed. R. Salaberry and L. Comajoan, 309–56. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R.M. 2005. What makes learning second language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning 55, no. 1: 1–25. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekeyser, R. and G. Prieto Botana. 2013. Acquisition of grammar by instructed learners. In The Handbook of Spanish Second Language Acquisition, ed. K.L. Geeslin, 449–65. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, C. and J. Williams, eds. 1998. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N.C. 2006. Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics 27, no. 2: 164–94. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, N.C. 2017. Salience in usage-based SLA. In Salience in Second Language Acquisition, ed. S. Gass, P. Spinner and J. Behney, 21–39. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farley, A.P. and K. McCollam. 2004. Learner readiness and L2 production in Spanish: processability theory on trial. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada 22, no. 40: 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• García-Amaya, L. 2012. Second language fluency and cognition: the study of Spanish second language development in an overseas immersion program and an at-home foreign language classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Garza, T.J. 1991. Evaluating the use of captioned video materials in advanced foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals 24, no. 3: 239–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00469.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S.M., P. Spinner and J. Behney, eds. 2017. Salience in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geeslin, K. 2003. A comparison of copula choice: native Spanish speakers and advanced learners. Language Learning 53, no. 4: 703–64. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-9922.2003.00240.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschneider, J.M. and R. DeKeyser. 2001. Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: a meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 51, no. 1: 1–50. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guasch, M., R. Boada, P. Ferré and R. Sánchez-Casas. 2013. NIM: a web-based Swiss army knife to select stimuli for psycholinguistic studies. Behavior Research Methods 45, no. 3: 765–71. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0296-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudmestad, A. 2012. Acquiring a variable structure: an interlanguage analysis of second-language mood use in Spanish. Language Learning 62, no. 2: 373–402. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Z., E.S. Park and C. Combs. 2008. Textual enhancement of input: issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics 29, no. 4: 597–618. doi: 10.1093/applin/amn010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H.C. and D.E. Eskey. 1999. The effects of closed-captioned television on the listening comprehension of intermediate English as a second language (ESL) students. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 28, no. 1: 75–96. doi: 10.2190/RG06-LYWB-216Y-R27G
   Google Scholar
• Izura, C., F. Cuetos and M. Brysbaert. 2014. Lextale-Esp: a test to rapidly and efficiently assess the Spanish vocabulary size. Psicológica 35, no. 1: 49–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourdenais, R., M. Ota, S. Stauffer, B. Boyson and C. Doughty. 1995. Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think-aloud protocol analysis. In Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning, ed. R. Schmidt, 182–209. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, U.O. 1990. The challenge of broadcast videotex to applied linguistics. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 28, no. 3: 201–20. doi: 10.1515/iral.1990.28.3.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, J.F. and E. Stewart. 1994. Category interference in translation and picture naming: evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language 33, no. 2: 149–74. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.K. and H.T. Huang. 2008. Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: a meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30, no. 3: 307–31. doi: 10.1017/S0272263108080479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.F. and P.A. Malovrh. 2009. Linguistic and non-linguistic factors affecting OVS processing of accusative and dative case pronouns by advanced L2 learners of Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. J. Collentine, M. García, B. Lafford and F. Marcos Marín, 105–16. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. and A. Révész. 2018. Promoting grammatical development through textually enhanced captions: an eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal 102, no. 3: 557–77. doi: 10.1111/modl.12503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeman, J., I. Arteagoitia, B. Fridman and C. Doughty. 1995. Integrating attention to form with meaning: focus on form in Spanish content-based instruction. In Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning, ed. R. Schmidt, Tech. Rep. No. 9, 217–58. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
   Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K. and M. Broersma. 2012. Introducing LexTALE: a quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods 44, no. 2: 325–43. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow, R.P. and A. Martin. 2017. Enhancing the input to promote salience of the L2: A critical overview. In Salience in Second Language Acquisition, ed. S. Gass, P. Spinner and J. Behney, 167–86. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Li, P., F. Zhang, E. Tsai and B. Puls. 2014. Language history questionnaire (LHQ 2.0): A new dynamic web-based research tool. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17, no. 3: 673–80. doi: 10.1017/S1366728913000606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, P.L. 1989. The effects of captioned television videotapes on the listening comprehension of beginning, intermediate, and advanced ESL students. Educational Technology 29, no. 10: 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, P.L. 1993. Captioned television videotapes: effects of visual support on second language comprehension. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 21, no. 3: 183–91. doi: 10.2190/59JJ-0RBN-KKVL-C2YG
   Google Scholar
• Markham, P.L. 1999. Captioned videotapes and second-language listening word recognition. Foreign Language Annals 32, no. 3: 321–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1999.tb01344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero Perez, M., W. Van Den Noortgate and P. Desmet. 2013. Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: a meta-analysis. System 41, no. 3: 720–39. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero Perez, M., E. Peters, G. Clarebout and P. Desmet. 2014. Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology 18, no. 1: 118–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero Perez, M., E. Peters and P. Desmet. 2015. Enhancing vocabulary learning through captioned video: an eye-tracking study. Modern Language Journal 99, no. 2: 308–28. doi: 10.1111/modl.12215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, C. 2017. The role of age and proficiency in subtitle reading. An eye-tracking study. System 67: 77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2017.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, P. 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, S.B. and P. Koskinen. 1992. Captioned television as comprehensible input: effects of incidental word learning from context for language minority students. Reading Research Quarterly 27, no. 1: 94–106. doi: 10.2307/747835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overstreet, M. 1998. Text enhancement and content familiarity: the focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics 2: 229–58.
   Google Scholar
• Plass, J.L. and L.C. Jones. 2005. Multimedia learning in second language acquisition. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, ed. R.E. Mayer, 467–488. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, K. 1983. Closed-captioned TV: an untapped resource. MATESOL Newsletter 12, no. 2: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. 2015. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, Inc. URL: http://www.rstudio.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 2001. Attention. In Cognition and Second Language Instruction, ed. P. Robinson, 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharwood Smith, M. 1993. Input enhancement in instructed SLA: theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, no. 2: 165–79. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100011943
   Google Scholar
• Sydorenko, T. 2010. Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology 14, no. 2: 50–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlin, R.S. and V. Villa. 1994. Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, no. 2: 183–203. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100012870
   Google Scholar
• Vanderplank, R. 2010. Déjà vu? A decade of research on language laboratories, television and video in language learning. Language Teaching 43, no. 1: 1–37. doi: 10.1017/S0261444809990267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderplank, R. 2016. ‘Effects of’ and ‘effects with’ captions. How exactly does watching a TV programme with same-language subtitles make a difference to language learners? Language Teaching 49, no. 2: 235–250. doi: 10.1017/S0261444813000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanPatten, B. 1987. Classroom learners’ acquisition of ser and estar: accounting for developmental patterns. In Foreign Language Learning: A Research Perspective, ed. B. VanPatten, T. Dvorak and J. Lee, 61–75. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez Rozas, V. 2006. Gustar-type verbs. In Functional Approaches to Spanish Syntax. Lexical Semantics, Discourse and Transitivity, ed. J. Clancy Clements and J. Yoon, 80–114. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, S. 2008. Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30, no. 1: 79–95. doi: 10.1017/S0272263108080042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winke, P.M., S. Gass and T. Sydorenko. 2010. The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology 14, no. 1: 65–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winke, P.M., T. Sydorenko and S. Gass. 2013. Factors influencing the use of captions by foreign language learners: an eye-tracking study. Modern Language Journal 97, no. 1: 254–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulff, S. and N.C. Ellis. 2018. Usage-based approaches to SLA. In Bilingual Cognition and Language: The State of the Science Across its Subfields, ed. D. Miller, F. Bayram, J. Rothman and L. Serratrice, 37–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar