Bilingual education in monolingual contexts: a comparative perspective

References

• Becker-Mrotzek, M., K. Schramm, E. Thürmann, and H. J. Vollmer, eds. 2013. Sprache im Fach: Sprachlichkeit und Fachliches Lernen. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D.C. 2002. Educational research: the hardest science of all. Educational Researcher 31, no. 8: 18–20. DOI:10.3102/0013189X031008018.
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E. 2018. Bilingual education for young children: review of the effects and consequences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21, no. 6: 666–679. DOI:10.1080/13670050.2016.1203859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse, S., and W. Helsper. 2008. Schule und Familie. In Handbuch der Schulforschung, ed. Werner Helsper, and Jeanette Böhme, 2nd ed., 469–494. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Cinganotto, L. 2016. CLIL in Italy: a general overview. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning 9, no. 2: 374–400. DOI:10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.6.
   Google Scholar
• Dallinger, S., K. Jonkmann, J. Hollm, and C. Fiege. 2016. The effect of content and language integrated learning on students’ English and history competences – killing two birds with one stone? Learning and Instruction 41: 23–31. DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denman, J., E. van Schooten, and R. de Graaff. 2018. Attitudinal factors and the intention to learn English in pre-vocational secondary bilingual and mainstream education. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7, no. 2: 203–226. DOI:10.1075/dujal.18005.den.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deventer, J., N. Machts, S.K. Gebauer, and J. Möller. 2016. Immersion Education and School Achievement: a Three-Level Meta-Analysis. Kiel: Kiel University: Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. First European Survey on Language Competences: Final Report. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 1993. Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Genesee, F. 2004. What do we know about bilingual education for majority language students? In The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multiculturalism, ed. T.K. Bhatia, and W.C. Ritchie, 547–576. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Goris, J. 2019. Content and Language Integrated Learning in English as a Foreign Language: a European Perspective. Radboud University Nijmegen: Behavioural Science Institute. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/207520/207520.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, K.M., Y. Choi, A. Davoodi, S. Razmeh, and L.Q. Dixon. 2018. Language and content outcomes of CLIL and EMI: a systematic review. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning 11, no. 1: 19–38. DOI:10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J.P. 1998. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Bilingual Education. Claremont, CA: Tomas Rivera Policy Institute. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/pepg/PDF/Papers/biling.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten, K., and A. Rohde. 2015. Immersion teaching in English with young learners. In Teaching English to Young Learners: Critical Issues in Language Teaching with 3-12 Year Olds, ed. J. Bland, 71–89. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Leisen, J. 2015. Fachliches und sprachliches Lernen im sprachsensiblen Fachunterricht. In Beiträge der XV. Internationalen Tagung der Deutschlehrerinnen und Deutschlehrer: Band 1 (Hauptvorträge). IDT 2013, ed. H. Drumbl, and A. Hornung, 249–274. Bozen: Bozen-Bolzano University Press. http://pro.unibz.it/library/bupress/publications/fulltext/9788860461155.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y.Y., and E.S.C. Lo. 2014. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of English-medium education in Hong Kong. Review of Educational Research 84, no. 1: 47–73. DOI:10.3102/0034654313499615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougald, J.S. 2015. Teachers’ attitudes, perceptions and experiences in CLIL: a look at content and language. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal 17, no. 1: 25–41. DOI:10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2015.1.a02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, O., and D. Coyle. 2017. Pluriliteracies teaching for learning: conceptualizing progression for deeper learning in literacies development. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 5, no. 2: 199–222. DOI:10.1515/eujal-2017-0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, O., D. Coyle, and K. Schuck. 2018. Learnscaping: creating next-gen learning environments for pluriliteracies growth. In Multilingual Computer Assisted Language Learning, ed. J. Bündgens-Kosten, and D. Elsner, 18–38. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, J., J. Fleckenstein, F. Hohenstein, S. Preusler, I. Paulick, and J. Baumert. 2018. Varianten und Effekte bilingualen Lernens in der Schule. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 21, no. 1: 4–28. DOI:10.1007/s11618-017-0791-x.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T., and A. Llinares. 2017. Content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Type of programme or pedagogical model? In Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL, ed. A. Llinares, and T. Morton, 1–16. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Nold, G., J. Hartig, S. Hinz, and H. Rossa. 2008. Klassen mit bilingualem Sachfachunterricht: Englisch als Arbeitssprache. In Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch: Ergebnisse der DESI-Studie, ed. E. Klieme, 451–457. Weinheim: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M.L. 2012. CLIL research in Europe: past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15, no. 3: 315–341. DOI:10.1080/13670050.2011.630064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez Cañado, M.L, D. Coyle, T. Ting, T. Nikula, C. Dalton-Puffer, F. Matz, and T. Jerez Montoya. 2019. ADiBE Project. CLIL for All: Attention to Diversity in Bilingual Education. https://adibeproject.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Rolstad, K., K. Mahoney, and G.V. Glass. 2005. The big picture: a meta-analysis of program effectiveness research on English language learners. Educational Policy 19, no. 4: 572–594. DOI:10.1177/0895904805278067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumlich, D. 2016. Evaluating Bilingual Education in Germany: CLIL Students’ General English Proficiency, EFL Self-Concept and Interest. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Rumlich, D. 2018. Current research on CLIL in the Netherlands: a discussion. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics (DuJAL 7, no. 2: 264–273. doi: 10.1075/dujal.00003.rum
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasajima, S. 2013. How CLIL can impact on EFL teachers’ mindsets about teaching and learning: an exploratory study on teacher cognition. International CLIL Research Journal 2, no. 1: 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., and S. Lapkin. 1982. Evaluating Bilingual Education: a Canadian Case Study. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Tabari, F., E.G. Heinze, and A. Sampaio. 2018. How far from the premise; a meta-analysis and critical appraisal of literature on content and language integrated learning. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 3, no. 4: 60–102. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.1450984.
   Google Scholar
• van Kampen, E., W. Admiraaland, and A. Berry. 2016. Content and language integrated learning in the Netherlands: teachers’ self-reported pedagogical practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21, no. 2: 222–236. DOI:10.1080/13670050.2016.1154004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kampen, E., T. Mearns, J. Meirink, W. Admiraal, and A. Berry. 2018. CLIL and bilingual education in the Netherlands. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7, no. 2: 129–155. DOI:10.1075/dujal.18004.kam.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, S. 2013. Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: a meta-synthesis. Educational Review 66, no. 3: 1–21. DOI:10.1080/00131911.2013.780009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig, A.C. 1985. A meta-analysis of selected studies on the effectiveness of bilingual education. Review of Educational Research 55, no. 3: 269–317. DOI:10.3102/00346543055003269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar