Meaningful interaction and affordances for language learning at a Zapotec revitalisation programme

References

• Anzures Tapia, A. 2015. Evaluations in Mexico: institutionalizing the silence of indigenous populations. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 30, no. 2: 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Aronin, L. and D. Singleton. 2010. Affordances and the diversity of multilingualism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 205, no. 205: 105–129. doi:10.1515/IJSL.2010.041.
   Google Scholar
• Aronin, L. and D. Singleton. 2012. Affordances theory in multilingualism studies. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 2, no. 3: 311–331. http://www.ssllt.amu.edu.pl. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.3.3
   Google Scholar
• Asher, J.J. 1977. Learning Another Language Through Actions: The Complete Teacher’s Guidebook. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Beam de Azcona, R.G. 2016. Zapotecan languages. In Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Linguistics. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.73.
   Google Scholar
• Benedicto, E. 2018. When participatory action research (PAR) and (Western) academic institutional policies do not align. In Insights from Practices in Community-based Research, eds. S. T. Bischoff and C. Jany, 38–65. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, R.A. 1986. Schools as agents for language revival in Ireland and New Zealand. In Language and Education in Multilingual Settings, ed. B. Spolsky, 53–76. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, R.A. 2015. Perfecting the partnership: revitalising the Māori language in New Zealand education and society 1987–2014. Language, Culture and Curriculum 28, no. 2: 99–112. doi:10.1080/07908318.2015.1025001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxer, D. and W. Zhu. 2016. Discourse and second language learning. In Discourse and Education, ed. S. Wortham, D. Kim and S. May, 1–13. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02322-9_30-1.
   Google Scholar
• Branden, K.V.d., ed. 2006. Task-based Language Education: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandl, K. 2008. Communicative Language Teaching in Action: Putting Principles to Work. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cámara de Diputados. 2003. Ley general de derechos lingüísticos de los pueblos [General law for the linguistic rights of the indigenous people]. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/257_200618.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, E. 2017. Otomanguean historical linguistics: exploring the subgroups. Linguistics and Language Compass 11, no. 4: 1–23. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, L. and S.D. Penfield. 2011. ‘Applied linguist needed’: cross-disciplinary networking for revitalization and education in endangered language contexts. Introduction to special issue. Language and Education 25, no. 4: 267–271. doi:10.1080/09500782.2011.577217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, A. 2012. The Hawaiian model of language revitalization: problems of extension to mainland native America. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 218: 167–193. doi:10.1515/ijsl-2012-0063.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2009. Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19, no. 3: 221–246. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, J. 1991. Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S.M. and A. Mackey. 2015. Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, eds. B. Vanpatten and J. Williams, 180–206. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S.M., A. Mackey and T. Pica. 1998. The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition: introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal 82, no. 3: 299–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J.J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Grupo Cultural Tagayu’. 2017. Ta’ gukua, la’nabani, ta’ yuuriu ke’ yesi Tagayu’, Lola’a (Historia, vivencia, y saberes de Macuiltianguis, Oaxaca). Mexico City: Talleres de Impresos & Publicidad.
   Google Scholar
• Grupo Cultural Tagayu’. 2018. Gudiariu, gulhariu, ineriu xtisa’ Tagayu’, Lola’a (Escribir, leer, hablar el zapoteco de Macuiltianguis, Oaxaca). Ciudad de México: Talleres de Impresos & Publicidad.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, R.E. 2008a. Bilingual education for indigenous communities in Mexico. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 5, eds. J. Cummins, and N.H. Hornberger, 311–322. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, R.E. 2008b. Indigenous language policy and education in Mexico, Vol. 1. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, eds. S. May and N.H. Hornberger, 301–312. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarström, H., R. Forkel, M. Haspelmath and S. Bank, eds. 2017. Glottolog. glottolog.org (10 May, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S.B. 1972. Telling Tongues. Language Policy in Mexico: Colony to Nation. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hermes, M. 2007. Moving toward the language: reflections on teaching in an indigenous-immersion school. Journal of American Indian Education 46, no. 3: 54–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, L. 2011. Language revitalization and language pedagogy: new teaching and learning strategies. Language and Education 25, no. 4: 307–318. doi:10.1080/09500782.2011.577220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornberger, N.H., ed. 2008. Can Schools Save indigenous Languages? Policy and Practice on Four Continents. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• INALI. 2008. Catálogo de las lenguas indígenas nacionales: Variantes lingüísticas de México con sus autodenominaciones y referencias geoestadísticas. http://www.inali.gob.mx/pdf/CLIN_completo.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• INEGI. 2010. Census de población y vivienda. Retrieved from www.inegi.org.mx.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, C., G. Iberri-Shea, N. Tracy-Ventura, and S. Wa-Mbaleka. 2006. Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition. In Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching, eds. J.M. Norris and L. Ortega, 91–131. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Korne, H.D. 2016. Imagining convivial multilingualism: Practices, ideologies and strategies in Diidxazá/Isthmus Zapotec indigenous language education. PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J.P. 2000. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J.P. and S.L. Thorne. 2015. Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, eds. B. VanPatten and J. Williams, 201–224. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen–Freeman, D. 2015. Complexity theory. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, eds. B. VanPatten and J. Williams, 227–244. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M.H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, eds. W.C. Ritchie and T.K. Bhatia. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M.H. 2015. Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Somerset, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M.H. 2016. In defense of tasks and TBLT: nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36: 5–33. doi:10.1017/S0267190515000057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., ed. 2007. Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, K. and A. Mackey, eds. 2013. Second Language Interaction in Diverse Educational Contexts. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Montemayor, C. 2003. Lenguas y pueblos indígenas de México. Guaraguao 17: 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, L. 2015. Second language learning explained? SLA across 10 contemporary theories. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, eds. B. Vanpatten and J. Williams, 245–272. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paulston, C.B. 1971. The sequencing of structural pattern drills. TESOL Quarterly 5, no. 3: 197–208. doi:10.2307/3585692.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Báez, G., R. Vogel and E.O. Koller. 2018. Comparative analysis in language revitalization practices: addressing the challenge. In The Oxford Handbook of Endangered Languages, eds. K.L. Rehg and L. Campbell, 466–489. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks Online. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190610029.013.1.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Báez, G., R. Vogel and U. Patolo. 2019. Global survey of revitalization efforts: a mixed methods approach to understanding language revitalization practices. Language Documentation & Conservation 13, no. May: 446–513.
   Google Scholar
• Pica, T., H.-s. Kang, and S. Sauro. 2006. Information gap tasks: their multiple roles and contributions to interaction research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 301–338. doi: 10.1017/S027226310606013X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhu, N. 1987. Second Language Pedagogy: A Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reyhner, J., ed. 1997. Teaching indigenous Languages: Selected Papers From the Symposium on Stabilizing indigenous Languages. Flagstaff, AZ: Northern Arizona University.
   Google Scholar
• Riestenberg, K.J. and Grupo Cultural Tagayu’. 2019. Teaching Macuiltianguis Zapotec Collection of Kate Riestenberg and Grupo Cultural Tagayu’. The Archive of the indigenous Languages of Latin America, ailla.utexas.org. Access: restricted. PID ailla:260404.
   Google Scholar
• Riestenberg, K.J. and A. Sherris. 2018. Task-based teaching of indigenous languages: investment and methodological principles in Macuiltianguis Zapotec and Salish Qlipse revitalization. Canadian Modern Language Review 74, no. 3: 434–459. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.4051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. 1999. Task-based interaction. ELT Journal 53, no. 3: 149–156. doi: 10.1093/elt/53.3.149
   Google Scholar
• Segalowitz, N. 2001. On the evolving connections between psychology and linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 21, no. 2001. Bryn Mawr College. 3–22. doi:10.1017/s0267190501000010.
   Google Scholar
• Tarone, E. 2007. Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research 1997–2007. Modern Language Journal 91: 837–848. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00672.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejada, L. 2012. Tone gestures and constraint interaction in Sierra Juarez Zapotec. PhD diss., University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lier, L. 2007. Action-based teaching, autonomy and identity. Innovation in Language Teaching and Learning 1: 46–65. doi:10.2167/illt42.0.
   Google Scholar
• Vanpatten, B. and J. Williams. 2015. Introduction: the nature of theories. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, eds. B. VanPatten and J. Williams, 1–16. New York: Taylor & Francis. https://read.amazon.com/ref=kcr_app_surl_cloudreader (22 March, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• White, F. 2006. Rethinking native American language revitalization. The American Indian Quarterly 30, no. 1: 91–109. doi:10.1353/aiq.2006.0013.
   Google Scholar