The role of spoken vocabulary knowledge in second language speaking proficiency

References

• Alhazmi, K. and J. Milton. 2016. Phonological vocabulary size, orthographic vocabulary size, and EFL reading ability among native Arabic speakers. Journal of Applied Linguistics 30: 26–43.
   Google Scholar
• Baba, K. 2009. Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing 18, no. 3: 191–208. DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2009.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beglar, D. 2010. A Rasch-based validation of the vocabulary size test. Language Testing 27: 101–8. DOI:10.1177/0265532209340194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. and J. Matthews. 2018. The relationship between three measures of L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading. Language Testing 35, no. 1: 3–25. DOI:10.1177/0265532216676851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clenton, J. 2010. Investigating the construct of productive vocabulary knowledge with Lex30. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Swansea: University of Swansea.
   Google Scholar
• Clenton, J., N.H. de Jong, D. Clingwall and S. Fraser. 2021. Investigating the extent to which vocabulary knowledge and skills can predict aspects of fluency for a small group of pre-intermediate Japanese L1 users of English (L2). In Vocabulary and the Four Skills: Pedagogy, Practice, and Implications for Teaching Vocabulary, eds. J. Clenton and P. Booth, 126–45. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, N.H. and J.C. Mora. 2019. Does having good articulatory skills lead to more fluent speech in first and second languages? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41, no. 1: 227–39. DOI:10.1017/S0272263117000389.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, N.H., M.P. Steinel, A.F. Florijn, R. Schoonen and J.H. Hulstijn. 2012. Facets of speaking proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34: 5–34. DOI:10.1017/S0272263111000489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T. 2007. Productive vocabulary tests and the search for concurrent validity. In Modelling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge, eds. H. Daller, J. Milton and J. Treffers-Daller, 116–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T. and J. Clenton. 2010. The challenge of validation: assessing the performance of a test of productive vocabulary. Language Testing 27, no. 4: 537–54. DOI:10.1177/0265532209354771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T. and J. Clenton. 2017. Making sense of learner performance on tests of productive vocabulary knowledge. TESOL Quarterly 51, no. 4: 844–67. DOI:10.1002/tesq.356.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T. and P. Meara. 2004. Exploring the validity of a test of productive vocabulary. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Granena, G. and M.H. Long. 2013. Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research 29, no. 3: 311–43. DOI:10.1177/0267658312461497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, M. and M. Carey. 2009. The on-line yes/no test as a placement tool. System 37, no. 4: 614–26. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2009.09.006.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, E. and A. Lazaraton. 1991. The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. New York: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, H. 2008. The link between vocabulary knowledge and spoken L2 fluency. The Language Learning Journal 36, no. 2: 153–66. DOI:10.1080/09571730802389983.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, B. and A. Godfroid. 2020. Testing the role of processing speed and automaticity in second language listening. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1–27. DOI:10.1017/S0142716420000193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isaacs, T. and R.I. Thomson. 2013. Rater experience, rating scale length, and judgments of L2 pronunciation: revisiting research conventions. Language Assessment Quarterly 10, no. 2: 135–59. DOI:10.1080/15434303.2013.769545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs, T., P. Trofimovich, G. Yu and M. Chereau. 2015. Examining the linguistic aspects of speech that most efficiently discriminate between upper levels of the revised IELTS Pronunciation scale. IELTS Research Reports Online Series No.4.
   Google Scholar
• Iwashita, N., A. Brown, T. McNamara and S. O’Hagan. 2008. Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: how distinct? Applied Linguistics 29, no. 1: 24–49. DOI:10.1093/applin/amm017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwashita, N. and C. Vasquez. 2015. An examination of discourse competence at different proficiency levels in IELTS speaking part 2. IELTS Research Reports Online 5: 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Japan Association of College English Teachers (JACET) Basic Word Revision Committee, ed. 2003. JACET List of 8000 Basic Words. Tokyo: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jelani, N.A.M. and F. Boers. 2018. Examining incidental vocabulary acquisition from captioned video: does test modality matter? ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics 169, no. 1: 169–90. DOI:10.1075/itl.00011.jel.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, E.H. and J. Yamashita. 2014. L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: a meta-analysis. Language Learning 64, no. 1: 160–212. DOI:10.1111/lang.12034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koizumi, R. and Y. In’nami. 2013. Vocabulary knowledge and speaking proficiency among second language learners from novice to intermediate levels. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 4: 900–13. DOI:10.4304/jltr.4.5.900-913.
   Google Scholar
• Kormos, J. 2006. Speech Production and Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kyle, K. 2020. Measuring lexical richness. In The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies, ed. S. Webb, 454–76. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI:10.4324/9780429291586-24.
   Google Scholar
• Larson-Hall, J. 2010. A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research Using SPSS. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. and T.A.M.I. Aviad-Levitzky. 2017. What type of vocabulary knowledge predicts reading comprehension: word meaning recall or word meaning recognition? The Modern Language Journal 101, no. 4: 729–41. DOI:10.1111/modl.12431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. and I.S.P. Nation. 1995. Vocabulary size and use: lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics 16, no. 3: 307–22. DOI:10.1093/applin/16.3.307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. and I.S.P. Nation. 1999. A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing 16, no. 1: 33–51. DOI:10.1177/026553229901600103.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W.J.M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mairano, P. and F. Santiago. 2020. What vocabulary size tells US about pronunciation skills: issues in assessing L2 learners. Journal of French Language Studies 30, no. 2: 141–60. DOI:10.1017/S0959269520000010.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. and J. Cheng. 2015. Recognition of high frequency words from speech as a predictor of L2 listening comprehension. System 52: 1–13. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2015.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, S., B. Kramer and D. Beglar. 2015. The creation and validation of a listening vocabulary levels test. Language Teaching Research 19, no. 6: 741–60. DOI:10.1177/1362168814567889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, S., J. Stewart and A.O. Batty. 2020. Predicting L2 reading proficiency with modalities of vocabulary knowledge: a bootstrapping approach. Language Testing 37, no. 3: 389–411. DOI:10.1177/0265532219898380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meara, P. 1996. The dimensions of lexical competence. In Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition, eds. G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer and J. Williams, 35–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meara, P. and T. Fitzpatrick. 2000. Lex30: an improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in an L2. System 28: 19–30. DOI:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00058-5.
   Google Scholar
• Meara, P. and I. Miralpeix. 2016. Tools for Researching Vocabulary. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, J. 2010. The development of vocabulary breadth across the CEFR levels. In Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections Between SLA and Language Testing Research, eds. I. Vedder, I. Bartning and M. Martin, 211–32. Second Language Acquisition and Testing in Europe Monograph Series 1.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, J. and N. Hopkins. 2006. Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size: do vocabulary tests underestimate the knowledge of some learners? Canadian Modern Language Review 63, no. 1: 127–47. DOI:10.1353/cml.2006.0048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, J., J. Wade and N. Hopkins. 2010. Aural word recognition and oral competence in a foreign language. In Further Insights Into non-Native Vocabulary Teaching and Learning, eds. R. Chacón-Beltrán, C. Abello-Contesse and M. Torreblanca-López, 83–98. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Miralpeix, I. and C. Muñoz. 2018. Receptive vocabulary size and its relationship to EFL language skills. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 56, no. 1: 1–24. DOI:10.1515/iral-2017-0016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer, A. 2014. Exceptional outcomes in L2 phonology: the critical factors of learner engagement and self-regulation. Applied Linguistics 35, no. 4: 418–40. DOI:10.1093/applin/amu012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, M.J. and T.M. Derwing. 2001. Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech the role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23, no. 4: 451–68. DOI:10.1017/S0272263101004016.
   Google Scholar
• Nagle, C.L. 2017. Examining the temporal structure of the perception-production link in second language acquisition: a longitudinal study. Language Learning 68, no. 1: 234–70. DOI:10.1111/lang.12275.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I.S.P. 1984. Vocabulary Lists. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington, English Language Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I.S.P. 2012. The BNC/COCA Word Family Lists. https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I.S.P. 2013. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noreillie, A.S., P. Desmet and E. Peters. 2020. Factors predicting low-intermediate French learners’ vocabulary use in speaking tasks. Canadian Modern Language Review 76, no. 3: 194–217. DOI:10.3138/cmlr-2019-0018.
   Google Scholar
• Noreillie, A.S., B. Kestemont, K. Heylen, P. Desmet and E. Peters. 2018. Vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension at an intermediate level in English and French as foreign languages: an approximate replication study of Stæhr (2009). ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics 169, no. 1: 212–31. DOI:10.1075/itl.00013.nor.
   Google Scholar
• Pallotti, G. 2009. CAF: defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics 30, no. 4: 590–601. DOI:10.1093/applin/amp045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L. and F.L. Oswald. 2014. How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning 64, no. 4: 878–912. DOI:10.1111/lang.12079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, D.D. 1999. Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review 56, no. 2: 282–307. DOI:10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, D.D. 2002. Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: an assessment perspective. Language Learning 52, no. 3: 513–36. DOI:10.1111/1467-9922.00193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, D.D. and L.H.F. Lin. 2020. The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and language proficiency. In The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies, ed. S. Webb, 66–80. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, K. and L. Plonsky. 2019. Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: a proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning 69, no. 3: 652–708. DOI:10.1111/lang.12345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, K., P. Trofimovich and T. Isaacs. 2016. Second language speech production: investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics 37, no. 2: 217–40. DOI:10.1017/S0142716414000502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai, M. and C. Moorman. 2018. Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics 39, no. 1: 187–225. DOI:10.1017/S0142716417000418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. 2009. Modelling second language performance: integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics 30, no. 4: 510–32. DOI:10.1093/applin/amp047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society for Testing English Proficiency (STEP). 2015. Eiken jyunikkyu kako 6kai zen mondaisyu [A Collection of Past 6 Administration of the Exam for STEP Test Grade pre-1]. Obunsha.
   Google Scholar
• Stæhr, L.S. 2009. Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31, no. 4: 577–607. DOI:10.1017/S0272263109990039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, S., J. Kormos and T. Uchihara. 2021. The relationship between utterance and perceived fluency: a meta-analysis of correlational studies. The Modern Language Journal. DOI:10.1111/modl.12706.
   Google Scholar
• Uchihara, T. 2021. Vocabulary and speaking: current research, tools, and practices. In Vocabulary and the Four Skills: Pedagogy, Practice, and Implications for Teaching Vocabulary, eds. J. Clenton and P. Booth, 121–5. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uchihara T. 2022. Is it possible to measure word-level comprehensibility and accentedness as independent constructs of pronunciation knowledge?. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, DOI: 10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100011.
   Google Scholar
• Uchihara, T. and J. Clenton. 2020. Investigating the role of vocabulary size in second language speaking ability. Language Teaching Research 24, no. 4: 540–56. DOI:10.1177/1362168818799371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchihara, T. and T. Harada. 2018. Roles of vocabulary knowledge for success in English-medium instruction: self-perceptions and academic outcomes of Japanese undergraduates. TESOL Quarterly 52, no. 3: 564–87. DOI:10.1002/tesq.453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchihara, T. and K. Saito. 2019. Exploring the relationship between productive vocabulary knowledge and second language oral ability. The Language Learning Journal 47, no. 1: 64–75. DOI:10.1080/09571736.2016.1191527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchihara, T., K. Saito and J. Clenton. 2021. Reexamining the relationship between productive vocabulary knowledge and second language oral ability. In Vocabulary and the Four Skills: Pedagogy, Practice, and Implications for Teaching Vocabulary, eds. J. Clenton and P. Booth, 146–65. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vafaee, P. and Y. Suzuki. 2020. The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in second language listening ability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42, no. 2: 383–410. DOI:10.1017/S0272263119000676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. and S. Baker. 2015. Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: an exploratory path analysis. Language Learning 65, no. 2: 390–416. DOI:10.1111/lang.12105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, M.P. 2020. Individual differences in second language listening: examining the role of knowledge, metacognitive awareness, memory, and attention. Language Learning. DOI:10.1111/lang.12424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walters, J. 2012. Aspects of validity of a test of productive vocabulary: Lex30. Language Assessment Quarterly 9, no. 2: 172–85. DOI:10.1080/15434303.2011.625579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, S., Y. Sasao and B. Oliver. 2017. The updated vocabulary levels test: developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics 168, no. 1: 33–69. DOI:10.1075/itl.168.1.02web.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, D. and J. Willis. 2007. Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa, A. and S. Webb. 2020. Measuring depth of vocabulary knowledge. In The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies, ed. S. Webb, 371–86. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zareva, A., P. Schwanenflugel and Y. Nikolova. 2005. Relationship between lexical competence and language proficiency: variable sensitivity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 567–95. DOI:10.1017/S02722631050254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaytseva, V., I. Miralpeix and C. Pérez-Vidal. 2021. Because words matter: investigating vocabulary development across contexts and modalities. Language Teaching Research 25, no. 2: 162–84. DOI:10.1177/1362168819852976.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S. and X. Zhang. 2020. The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening comprehension: a meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research. DOI:10.1177/1362168820913998.
   Google Scholar