Using eye-tracking to measure cognitive engagement with feedback in a digital literacy game

References

• Abt, C. C. 1987. Serious Games. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Andringa, Sible, and Maja Curcic. 2015. How explicit knowledge affects online L2 processing: evidence from differential object marking acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37, no. 2: 237–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andringa, Sible, and Patrick Rebuschat. 2015. New directions in the study of implicit and explicit learning: an introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37, no. 2: 185–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anjum, J., and B. Hallowell. 2019. Validity of an eyetracking method for capturing auditory–visual cross-format semantic priming. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 41, no. 4: 411–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astwood, R. S., W.L. Van Buskirk, J. M. Cornejo, and J. Dalton. 2008. The impact of different feedback types on decision-making in simulation based training environments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 52, no. 26: 2062–2066.
   Google Scholar
• Billings, D. R. 2012. Efficacy of adaptive feedback strategies in simulation-based training. Military Psychology 24, no. 2: 114–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, B. Y., H.Y. Wang, C.Y. Hsu, G.L. Chiou, M.J. Tsai 2019. Probing digital game-based science learning experience through eye-tracking. In 27th International Conference on Computers in Education, eds. M. Chang, H. J. So, L.H. Wong, J.L. Shih, F.Y. Yu, M. P. Banawan, and B. Chang, et al., 147–151. Kenting:: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cornillie, F. 2014. Adventures in red ink. Effectiveness of corrective feedback in digital game-based language learning. PhD diss., KU Leuven. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/566455.
   Google Scholar
• Cornillie, F. 2017. Educationally designed game environments and feedback. In Language, Education and Technology, eds. S.L. Thorne, and S. May, 361–374. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cornillie, F., S.L. Thorne, and P. Desmet. 2012. Digital games for language learning: challenges and opportunities. Editorial: digital games for language learning - from hype to insight? ReCALL 24, no. 3: 243–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornillie, F., K. Van den Branden, and P. Desmet. 2015. From language play to linguistic form and back again. Lessons from an experimental study for the design of task-based language practice supported by games. In Proceedings of XVIIth International CALL Conference. Task Design and CALL, eds. J. Colpaert, A. Aerts, M. Oberhofer, and M. Gutiérez-Colón Plana, 214–222. Antwerp: Universiteit Antwerpen.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, D. H., T. Dixon, and E. Jordan. 2022. Second language (L2) gains through digital game-based language learning (DGBLL): a meta-analysis. Language Learning & Technology 26, no. 1: 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, K. 2014. Vysor. ClockworkMod. Android.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 2009. A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal 63, no. 2: 97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorella, L., J.J. Vogel-Walcutt, and S. Schatz. 2012. Applying the modality principle to real-time feedback and the acquisition of higher-order cognitive skills. Educational Technology Research and Development 60: 223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, A., L. Benton, L. Bunting, E. Herbert, E. Sumner, M. Mavrikis, A. Revesz, et al. 2022. I don’t usually listen, I read: how different learner groups process game feedback. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, eds. S. Barbosa, C. Lampe, C. Appert, D. A. Shamma, S. Drucker, J. Williamson, and K. Yatani, 1–15. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
   Google Scholar
• Godfroid, A. 2019. Eye Tracking in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism: A Research Synthesis and Methodological Guide. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gombert, J. E. 1997. Metalinguistic development in first-language acquisition. In Vol. 6 of Encyclopedia of Language and Education, eds. L. Lier, and D. Corson, 43–51. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77, no. 1: 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heift, T., P. Nguyen, and V. Hegelheimer. 2021. Technology-mediated corrective feedback. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and- Teaching, eds. H. Nassaji, and E. Kartchava, 226–250. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heift, T., and A. Rimrott. 2008. Learner responses to corrective feedback for spelling errors in CALL. System 36, no. 2: 196–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzknecht, F., K. Eberharter, B. Kremmel, M. Zehentner, G. McCray, E. Konrad, and C. Spöttl. 2017. Looking into listening. ARAGS Research Reports Online 3: 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ishaq, K., F. Rosdi, N.A. M. Zin, and A. Abid. 2022. Serious game design model for language learning in the cultural context. Education and Information Technologies, 1-39.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. I., S.K. Bailey, and W.L. Van Buskirk. 2017. Designing effective feedback messages in serious games and simulations: a research review. In Instructional Techniques to Facilitate Learning and Motivation of Serious Games, eds. P. Wouters, and H. Van Oostendorp, 119–140. Cham.: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., and P.A. Carpenter. 1980. A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 87, no. 4: 329–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., E. Hillemann, and D. Albert. 2011. Tracking the UFO’s paths: using eye-tracking for the evaluation of serious games. In International Conference on Virtual and Mixed Reality, ed. R. Shumaker, 315–324. Berlin, Heidelberg.: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kieseier, Teresa, Dieter Thoma, Markus Vogelbacher, and Hopp Holger. 2022. Differential effects of metalinguistic awareness components in early foreign language acquisition of English vocabulary and grammar. Language Awareness 31, no. 4: 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiili, K., H. Ketamo, and M.D. Kickmeier-Rust. 2014. Evaluating the usefulness of eye tracking in game-based learning. International Journal of Serious Games 1, no. 2: 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Kregar, S. 2011. Relative effectiveness of corrective feedback types in computer-assisted language learning. PhD diss., The Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kulhavy, R. W., and W.A. Stock. 1989. Feedback in written instruction: the place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review 1, no. 4: 279–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lado, B., H.W. Bowden, C.A. Stafford, and C. Sanz. 2014. A fine-grained analysis of the effects of negative evidence with and without metalinguistic information in language development. Language Teaching Research 18, no. 3: 320–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Language and Reading Research Consortium. 2015. Learning to read: should we keep things simple? Reading Research Quarterly 50, no. 2: 151–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., R. Bull, and R. MH Ho. 2013. Developmental changes in executive functioning. Child Development 84, no. 6: 1933–1953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., S. Woltering, C. Prickett, Q. Shi, H. Sun, and J. L. Thompson. 2022. Exploring the associations between reading skills and eye movements in elementary children’s silent sentence reading. Reading Psychology 43, no. 1: 85–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow, R. P., and M. Driver. 2021. Cognitive theoretical perspectives of corrective feedback. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching, eds. H. Nassaji, and E. Kartchava, 65–84. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. 2010. The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: a meta-analysis. Language Learning 60, no. 2: 309–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., K. Saito, and M. Sato. 2013. Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching 46, no. 1: 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, B. J., and R. Bruning. 2001. Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: what the research tells us. Center for Instructional Innovation, University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20061127204447/http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2009. Multimedia Learning, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and C.I. Johnson. 2010. Adding instructional features that promote learning in a game-like environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research 42, no. 3: 241–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and C. Pilegard. 2014. Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: segmenting, pre-training, and modality principles. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, eds. R. E. Mayer, 2nd ed., 316–344. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, S. 2012. Gamification and serious games for personalized health. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 177: 85–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moreno, R. 2004. Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science 32, no. 1: 99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, N. 2007. The effects of type of task and type of feedback on L2 development in call. PhD diss., Georgetown University.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., R.E. Mayer, H.A. Spires, and J.C. Lester. 2001. The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction 19: 177–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, M., and C. Conati. 2012. An analysis of attention to student–adaptive hints in an educational game. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, eds. S.A. Cerri, W.J. Clancey, G. Papadourakis, and K. Panourgia, 112–122. Berlin, Heidelberg.: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. 2007. Reading comprehension exercises online: the effects of feedback, proficiency and interaction. Language Learning & Technology 11, no. 3: 107–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagata, N. 1993. Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. The Modern Language Journal  77, no. 3: 330–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattemore, M., R. Gilabert, and J. Serra. 2019. Elaborative feedback in L2 reading games. GamiLearn 2497: 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, Jean. 2003. The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plass, J. L., R.E. Mayer, and B.D. Homer. 2020. Handbook of Game-Based Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2001a. Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 1. On the Horizon 9, no. 5: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2001b. Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part 2: do they really think differently? On the Horizon 9, no. 6: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Pujolà, J. T. 2001. Did CALL feedback feed back? Researching learners’ use of feedback. ReCALL 13, no. 1: 79–98.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhardt, J. 2019. Gameful Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Cham: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Révész, A. 2014. Towards a fuller assessment of cognitive models of task-based learning: investigating task-generated cognitive demands and processes. Applied Linguistics 35: 87–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz, C., and K. Morgan-Short. 2004. Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: a computer-assisted study. Language Learning 54, no. 1: 35–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. W. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11, no. 2: 129–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serge, S. R., H.A. Priest, P.J. Durlach, and C.I. Johnson. 2013. The effects of static and adaptive performance feedback in game-based training. Computers in Human Behavior 29, no. 3: 1150–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, Philip H. K., Mikko Aro, Jane M. Erskine, and Collaboration with COST Action A8 Network. 2003. Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology 94, no. 2: 143–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, A. M., K.A. Pollard, B.T. Files, A.H. Oiknine, M. Ericson, and P. Khooshabeh. 2021. Social fidelity in virtual agents: Impacts on presence and learning. Computers in Human Behavior 114: 106562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. 2010. Employing eye-tracking technology in researching the effectiveness of recasts in CMC. In Directions and Prospects for Educational Linguistics, ed. F. M. Hult, 79–98. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. 2012. Eye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC. Language Learning & Technology 16, no. 3: 53–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., and C. Renaud. 2013. Eye-tracking as a measure of noticing corrective feedback in computer- mediated instructor-student foreign language conferences. In Interaction in Diverse Educational Settings, eds. K. McDonough, and A. Mackey, 147–165. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Smither, J. A. A. 1993. Short term memory demands in processing synthetic speech by old and young adults. Behaviour & Information Technology 12: 330–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes, J. E., and J. Reinhardt. 2012. Language at Play: Digital Games in Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Learning. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Higher Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi, Naoko, Daniel H. Dixon, Yuqing Qin, and Ying Chen. 2022. Pedagogic tasks in digital games: effects of feedback conditions and individual characteristics on learning request-making. Language Teaching Research, doi:10.1177/13621688221110871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobii Pro AB. 2020. Tobii Pro Lab (Version 1.142.27188) [Computer Software]. Danderyd, Sweden: Tobii Pro AB.
   Google Scholar
• Tobii Pro AB. 2022. Tobii Pro Lab User's Manual (Version 1.194).
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., R. K. Wagner, and C. A. Rashotte. 2012. Test of Word Reading Efficiency, 2nd ed. Austin, TX: ProEd.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, M. J., L.J. Huang, H.T. Hou, C.Y. Hsu, and G.L. Chiou. 2016. Visual behavior, flow and achievement in game-based learning. Computers & Education 98: 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UCLES. 2015. Preliminary English Test for Schools: Reading and Writing. Sample Paper 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kleij, Fabienne M., Remco CW Feskens, and Theo JHM Eggen. 2015. Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research 85, no. 4: 475–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasylets, L., and R. Gilabert. 2015. Exploring the visual-dynamic and linguistic conceptualisation traces in task-based performance. Paper Presented at the 6th Biennial International Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching, Leuven, September 16-18.
   Google Scholar