Collegiality vs role models: gendered discourses and the ‘glass escalator’ in English primary schools

References

• Angus, L. 1995. “Cultural Theory in Educational Administration.” In Educational Administration: An Australian Perspective, edited by C. W. Evers and J. D. Chapman, 60–80. St Leonards, New South Wales: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L., and D. K. Mumby. 2004. Reworking Gender: A Feminist Communicology of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. S. 2007. Doing Focus Groups. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bassey, M. 1981. “Pedagogic Research: On the Relative Merits of the Search for Generalisation and Study of Single Events.” Oxford Review of Education 7 (1): 73–93. doi:10.1080/0305498810070108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., and S. Jack. 2008. “Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers.” The Qualitative Report 13 (4): 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, C. 2005. Gender and Sexuality: Critical Theories, Critical Thinkers. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, R. K. 1999. “Mentoring and Collegiality.” In Faculty in New Jobs, edited by Associates R. J. Menges, 88–117. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brownhill, S. (2010). “The ‘Brave’ Men in the Early Years (0–8): The Ambiguities of the Role Model.” Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, University of Warwick, Coventry, September 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Brownhill, S. 2014. “Build Me a Role Model! Critical Exploration of the Perceived Qualities/Characteristics of Men in Early Years (0–8) in England.” Gender and Education 26 (3): 246–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, B., and C. Skelton. 2003. “Re-Thinking Role Models: Equal Opportunities in Teacher Recruitment in England and Wales.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (3): 253–265. doi:10.1080/02680930305573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2001. “Grounded Theory.” In Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations, edited by R. M. Emerson, 335–352. 2nd ed. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cognard-Black, A. J. 2012. “Riding the Glass Escalator to the Principal’s Office: Gender-Atypical Work among Token Men in the United States.” Teorija in Praska 49 (6): 878–900.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. 7th ed. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. 1996. “Teaching the Boys: New Research on Masculinity and Gender Strategies for Schools.” Teacher College Record 98 (2): 206–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, P. 2009. “So What Exactly Do You Want? What Principals Mean When They Say ‘Male Role Model’.” Gender and Education 20 (2): 123–136. doi:10.1080/09540250701805847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education. 2017. School Workforce in England: November 2016. England: Department of Education Press Office.
   Google Scholar
• Dvorsky, G., and J. Hughes. 2008. “Post-Genderism: Beyond the Gender Binary.” IEET-03 Monograph Series 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., J. Elwood, V. Hey, and J. Maw. 1998. “Schoolboy Frictions: Feminism and ‘Failing Boys’.” In Failing Boys? edited by D. Epstein, J. Elwood, V. Hey, and J. Maw, 1–18. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., S. O’Flynn, and D. Telford. 2001. “Othering Education: Sexualities, Silences and Schooling.” In Review of Research 25: 2000–2001, edited by W. G. Secada, 127–129. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2014. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B. 2008. “Teaching Manfully? Exploring Gendered Subjectivities and Power via Analysis of Men Teacher’s Gender Performance.” Gender and Education Journal 20 (2): 109–122. doi:10.1080/09540250701797226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 1999. Change Forces: The Sequel. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, G. (2017). A dictionary of gender studies (Online). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed from 14 April 2018 http://www.oxfordreference.com.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/view/10.1093/acref/9780191834837.001.0001/acref-9780191834837
   Google Scholar
• Guittar, S. G., and N. A. Guittar. 2015. International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, R. 2006. “Collegiality in Higher Education: Toward an Understanding of the Factors Involved in Collegiality. Journal of Organizational Culture.” Communications and Conflict 10 (1): 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, T., and L. Rantalaiho. 1997. “Persistence and Change of Gendered Practices, In; Kelan, E. K. (2009). Gender Fatigue: The Ideological Dilemma of Gender Neutrality and Discrimination in Organizations.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Science 26 (3): 197–210.
   Google Scholar
• Hill-Collins, P., and S. Bilge. 2016. Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hultin, M. 2003. “Some Take the Glass Escalator, Some Hit the Glass Ceiling? Career Consequences of Occupational Sex Segregation.” Work and Occupations 30 (1): 30–61. doi:10.1177/0730888402239326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings, M., B. Carrington, C. Skelton, B. Read, and I. Hall. 2007. “Nice and Kind, Smart and Funny: What Children like and Want to Emulate in Their Teachers.” Oxford Review of Education 34 (2): 135–157. doi:10.1080/03054980701663959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kelan, E. K. 2009. “Gender Fatigue: The Ideological Dilemma of Gender Neutrality and Discrimination in Organizations.” Canadian Journal of Administrative Science 26 (3): 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenway, J. 1995. “Masculinities in Schools: Under Seize, on the Defensive and under Reconstruction?” Discourse 16 (1): 59–79.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C. 2005. “Heteronormativity in Action: Reproducing the Heterosexual Nuclear Family in After-hours Medical Calls.” Social Problems 52 (4): 477–498. doi:10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L., and P. Leonard. 2003. “The Continuing Trouble with Collaboration.” Current Issues in Education 6 (15): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. 2003. “Where to in Gender Policy Education after Recuperative Masculinity Politics?” International Journal of Inclusive Education 7 (1): 33–56. doi:10.1080/13603110210143626.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., M. Mills, and M. B. Weaver-Hightower. 2011. “Interrogating Recuperative Masculinity Politics in Schooling.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 16 (4): 407–421. doi:10.1080/13603116.2011.555095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., W. Martino, and M. Mills. 2009. Boys and Schooling: Beyond Structural Reform. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lӧfgren, H., and M. Karlsson. 2016. “Emotional Aspects of Teacher Collegiality: A Narrative Approach.” Teaching and Teacher Education 60: 270–280. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., and K. S. Louis. 1997. “Does Teacher Empowerment Affect the Classroom? the Implications of Teacher Empowerment for Instructional Practice and Student Achievement.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 19 (3): 245–275. doi:10.3102/01623737019003245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino, W., and B. Meyenn. 2001. What about the Boys? Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massy, W. F., A. K. Wilger, and C. Colbeck. 1994. “Departmental Cultures and Teaching Quality: Overcoming “Hollowed” Collegiality.” Change 26 (4): 10–20. doi:10.1080/00091383.1994.9938496.
   Google Scholar
• May, V. M. 2015. Pursuing Intersectionality, Unsettling Dominant Imaginaries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. 2007. Understanding Social Work Research. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, J., and J. Watt. 1984. “Case Study.” In Conducting Small-Scale Investigations in Educational Management, edited by J. Bell, T. Bush, A. Fox, J. Goodey, and S. Goulding, 191–192. London: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenhinkel, A. J. 2017. “Let’s Talk about Sex – The Gender Binary Revisited.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 58 (8): 863–864. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesky, E. H. 2011. “Intersectionality at the Cross-Roads.” Women’s Studies International 34 (4): 263–270. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2011.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompper, D., and T. Jung. 2013. “‘Outnumbered yet Still on Top, but for How Long?’ Theorising about Men Working in the Feminized Field of Public Relations.” Public Relations Review 39: 497–506. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb, M. 2010. “Men Wanted? Gender and the Children’s Workforce.” In Critical Practice with Children and Young People, edited by M. Robb and R. Thomson, 185–199. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, M. 2012. “The Importance and Benefits of Teacher Collegiality in Schools – A Literature Review.” Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences 46: 1242–1246. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.282.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, K. A., and A. I. Green. 2009. “Revisiting the Glass Escalator: The Case of Gender Segregation in a Female Dominated Occupation.” Social Problems 55 (2): 271–299. doi:10.1525/sp.2008.55.2.271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 2010. Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sumsion, J. 2000. “Rewards, Risks and Tensions: Perceptions of Males Enrolled in an Early Childhood Teacher Education Programme.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 28 (1): 87–100. doi:10.1080/135986600109462.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Y., S. Hines, and M. E. Casey. 2011. Theorizing Intersectionality and Sexuality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. 2016. How to Do Your Case Study: A Guide for Students and Researchers. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Titus, J. 2004. “Boy Trouble: Rhetorical Framing of Boys’ Underachievement.” Discourse 25 (2): 145–169.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. L. 1992. “The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the ‘Female’ Professions.” Social Problems 39: 253–267. doi:10.2307/3096961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. L. 1995. Still a Man’s World: Men Who Do ‘Women’s Work’. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. L. 2013. “The Glass Escalator Revisited.” Gender and Society 27 (5): 609–629. doi:10.1177/0891243213490232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ysabet, K. N. 2005. “Gender Theory.” In Gender Politics: Citizenship, Activism and Sexual Diversity, edited by S. Monro, 10–42. London: Pluto Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, L. 1988. “Tokenism and Women in the Work Place: The Limits of Gender-Neutral Theory.” Social Problems 35: 64–77. doi:10.2307/800667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar