Preschool children’s understanding of the musical concept of tempo by engaging in strategies from mathematical generalisation

References

• Anderson, L., D. Krathwohl, P. Airasian, D. Cruikshank, R. Mayer, P. Pintrich, J. Raths, and M. Wittrock. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York City: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. S. 2011. “Musical Narratives: A Study of A Young Child’s Identity Work in and through music-making.” Psychology of Music 39 (4): 403–423. doi:10.1177/0305735610373054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. S., R. E. Schachter, D. Gilbert, and M. Fuerst. 2022. “Best Practices for Preschool Music Education: Supporting music-making Throughout the Day.” Early Childhood Education Journal 50 (3): 385–397. doi:10.1007/s10643-021-01155-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birbili, M. 2007. “Making the Case for a Conceptually Based Curriculum in Early Childhood Education.” Early Childhood Education Journal 35 (2): 141–147. doi:10.1007/s10643-006-0112-0.
   Google Scholar
• Birbili, M. 2015. “The Shift from Factual Teaching to Conceptual Understanding in Early Childhood Education: Challenges in Lesson Planning.” In Early Childhood Education: Teachers’ Perspectives, Effective Programs and Impacts on Cognitive Development, edited by K. Vann, 67–92. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Birbili, M., and H. Hedges. 2021. “Studying Curriculum as Culture: Early Childhood Policy Documents in Greece and New Zealand.” International Journal of Early Years Education 1–16. doi:10.1080/09669760.2020.1866502.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2021. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, United States: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bresler, L. 2008. “The Music Lesson.” In Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues, edited by J. G. Knowles and A. L. Cole, 225–238. Thousand Oaks, United States: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carraher, D. W., M. V. Martinez, and A. D. Schliemann. 2008. “Early Algebra and Mathematical Generalization.” ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education 40: 3–22. doi:10.1007/s11858-007-0067-7.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2018. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cuskelly, M. M. 2005. “Ethical Inclusion of Children with Disabilities in Research.” In Ethical Research with Children, edited by A. Farrell, 97–111. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davydof, V. V. 1990. Types of Generalization in Instruction: Logical and Psychological Problems in the Structuring of School Curricula. Volume 2 of Soviet Studies in Mathematics Education. Reston Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. 2014. The Good Research Guide: For Small Scale Research Projects. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DEPPS – Greek Early Childhood Curriculum. 2002. Διαθεματικό Ενιαίο Πρόγραμμα Σπουδών και Προγράμματα Σχεδιασμού και ανάπτυξης Δραστηριοτήτων για το Νηπιαγωγείο [Interdisciplinary Program of Studies for Kindergarten and Programs for planning and developing activities]. Athens: OAED. http://www.pi-schools.gr/content/index.php?lesson_id=300.
   Google Scholar
• Dogani, K. 2008. “Using Reflection as a Tool for Training Generalist Teachers to Teach Music.” Music Education Research 10 (1): 125–139. doi:10.1080/14613800701871595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogani, K. 2012. Μουσική στην προσχολική αγωγή: Αλληλεπίδραση παιδιού-παιδαγωγού [Music in preschool age: Interaction between child and teacher]. Athens: Gutenberg.
   Google Scholar
• Dogani, K. 2016. “Discovering Young Children’s Free Musical Play.” In 21st Century Music Education: Informal Learning and non-formal Teaching Approaches in School and Community Contexts, edited by R. Wright, B. A. Younker, and C. Beynon, 433–450. Canada: CMEA/ACME National Office.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, L. H. 2002. Concept-based Curriculum and Instruction. Teaching beyond the Facts. California: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, L. H., and L. A. Lanning. 2014. Transitioning to concept-based Curriculum and Instruction. Thousand Oaks, United States: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, L. H., L. A. Lanning, and R. French. 2017. Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction for the Thinking Classroom. Thousand Oaks, United States: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fenyvesi, K., S. Lehto, C. Brownell, L. Nasiakou, Z. Lavicza, and R. Kosola. 2019. “Learning Mathematical Concepts as a whole-body Experience: Connecting Multiple Intelligences, Creativities and Embodiments within the STEAM Framework.” In Why Science and Art Creativities Matter, edited by P. Burnard and L. Colucci-Gray, 300–336. The Netherlands: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004421585_018.
   Google Scholar
• Flewitt, R. 2006. “Using Video to Investigate Preschool Classroom Interaction: Education Research Assumptions and Methodological Practices.” Visual Communication 5 (1): 25–50. doi:10.1177/1470357206060917.
   Google Scholar
• Gembris, H. 2006. “The Development of Musical Abilities.” In MENC Handbook of Musical Cognition and Development, edited by R. Colwell, 124–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. J., and M. P. Zimmerman. 1992. “Developmental Theories of Music Learning.” In Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning: A Project of the Music Educators National Conference, edited by R. Colwell, 377–391. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, D. 2016. “Child Participatory Research Methods: Attempts to Go ‘Deeper’.” Childhood 24 (2): 245–259. doi:10.1177/0907568216647787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesson, P., and E. Perjons. 2014. An Introduction to Design Science. New York City: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kamberelis, G., and G. Dimitriadis. 2005. “Focus Groups: Strategic Articulations of Pedagogy, Politics, and Inquiry.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 887–907. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. 1999. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaput, J. J. 1999. “Teaching and Learning a New Algebra.” In Mathematics Classroom that Promotes Understanding, edited by E. Fennema and T. Romberg, 133–155. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., and M. A. Casey. 2014. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, United States: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., M. Α. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2019. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, United States: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nardo, R. L., L. A. Custodero, D. C. Persellin, and D. B. Fox. 2006. “Looking Back, Looking Forward: A Report on Early Childhood Music Education in Accredited American Preschools.” Journal of Research in Music Education 54 (4): 278–292. doi:10.1177/002242940605400402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou, E. 2017. “Διδακτικές παρεμβάσεις για μαθηματική γενίκευση σε παιδιά ηλικίας 5-7 χρόνων [Teaching interventions for mathematical generalization in children aged 5-7 years old].” PhD diss., Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. https://www.didaktorika.gr/eadd/handle/10442/40454
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou, E. 2020. “Recognizing Pattern Rules in an Early Childhood Classroom: The Role of Manipulatives.” Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair 7 (2): 58–69. doi:10.26220/une.3377.
   Google Scholar
• Papandreou, M. 2019. “Young Children’s Representational Practices in the Context of self-initiated Data Investigations.” Early Years 1–17. doi:10.1080/09575146.2019.1703101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philpott, C. 2001. “Musical Learning.” In Learning to Teach Music in the Secondary School, edited by C. Philpott, 19–37. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Presmeg, N. 2016. “Semiotics as a Tool for Learning Mathematics: How to Describe the Construction, Visualisation, and Communication of Mathematical Concepts.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 18 (3): 233–238. doi:10.1080/10986065.2016.1184953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, L. 2006. “Algebraic Thinking and the Generalization of Patterns: A Semiotic Perspective.” In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, edited by S. Alatorre, J. L. Cortina, M. Sáiz, and A. Méndez, 95–101. Mérida México: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. 2010. “Layers of Generality and Types of Generalization in Pattern Activities.” PNA 4 (2): 37–62. http://www.luisradford.ca/pub/23_PNA2010Layersgenerality.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, E. 2010. “Analyzing Focus Group Data: Content and Interaction.” Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing 15 (2): 176–180. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6155.2010.00237.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shatri, K., and K. Buza. 2017. “The Use of Visualization in Teaching and Learning Process for Developing Critical Thinking of Students.” European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research 4 (1): 71–74. doi:10.26417/ejser.v9i1.p71-74.
   Google Scholar
• Tzekaki, M. 2010. Μαθηματική εκπαίδευση για την προσχολική και πρώτη σχολική ηλικία [Mathematical education for preschool and early school age]. Thessaloniki: Zygos.
   Google Scholar
• Vergnaud, G. 1997. “The Nature of Mathematical Concepts.” In Learning and Teaching Mathematics: An International Perspective, edited by T. Nunes and P. Bryant, 5–28. Sassex, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, J. 2015. Teaching for Musical Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. Κ. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications. Thousand Oaks, United State: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, W., and S. Cunningham. 1991. “Editors’ Introduction: What Is Mathematical Visualization?” In Visualization in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, edited by W. Zimmermann and S. Cunningham, 1–8. Washington, DC, United States: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar