400
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Bypassing the sperm bank: documenting the experiences of online informal sperm donors

ORCID Icon &
Pages 584-595 | Received 19 May 2017, Accepted 02 Jun 2018, Published online: 03 Jul 2018

References

  • Appleton, S. (2015). Between the binaries: Exploring the legal boundaries of non anonymous sperm donation. Family Law Quarterly, 49(1), 93–115.
  • Bossema, E. R., Janssens, P. M., Treucker, R. G., Landwehr, F., Van, D. K., Nap, A. W., & Geenen, R. (2014). An inventory of reasons for sperm donation in formal versus informal settings. Human Fertility (Cambridge), 17, 21–27.
  • Corley, S. O., & Mehlman, M. (2014). Sperm donation: Legal aspects. In J. M. Goldfarb (Ed.), Third-party reproduction (pp. 143–158). New York: Springer.
  • Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3 ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications Inc.
  • deBoer, A., Oosterwijk, J. C., & Ritgers-Aris, C. A. (1995). Determination of a maximum number of artificial inseminations by donor children per sperm donor. Fertility and Sterility, 63(2), 419–421.
  • Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Tranfield, E., & Golombok, S. (2016). Online sperm donation: A survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website. Human Reproduction, 31, 2082–2089.
  • Hallich, O. (2017). Sperm donation and the right to privacy. The New Bioethics, 23(2), 107–120.
  • Harper, J., Jackson, E., Spoelstra-Witjens, L., & Reisel, D. (2017). Using an introduction website to start a family: Implications for users and health practitioners. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 4, 13–17.
  • Janssens, P. M., Simons, A. H., Van Kooij, R. J., Blokzijl, E., & Dunselman, G. A. (2006). A new Dutch law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: Background, content and impact. Human Reproduction, 21, 852–856.
  • Janssens, P. M., Thorn, P., Castilla, J. A., Frith, L., Crawshaw, M., Mochtar, M., ... & Kirkman-Brown, J. C. (2015). Evolving minimum standards in responsible international sperm donor offspring quota. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 30(6), 568–580.
  • Lavoie, K., Côté, I., & De Montigny, F. (2017). Assisted reproduction in the digital age: Stories of Canadian sperm donors offering their gametes online via introduction websites. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 1060826517737047.
  • Mamo, L., & Alston-Stepnitz, E. (2015). Queer intimacies and structural inequalities: New directions in stratified reproduction. Journal of Family Issues, 36(4), 519–540.
  • Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3).
  • Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Mohr, S. (2014). Beyond motivation: On what it means to be a sperm donor in Denmark. Anthropology & Medicine, 21, 162–173.
  • Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 3–5.
  • Motluk, A. (2011). Canadian court bans anonymous sperm and egg donation. Nature News. doi:10.1038/news.2011.329
  • Nordqvist, P. (2011). ‘Dealing with sperm’: Comparing lesbians’ clinical and non-clinical donor conception processes. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33, 114–129.
  • Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Pi, V. L. (2009). Regulating sperm donation: Why requiring exposed donation is not the answer. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy. 16, 379–402. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djglp/vol16/iss2/7/
  • Pralat, R. (2015). Repro-sexual intersections: Sperm donation, HIV prevention and the public interest in semen. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 30(3), 211–219.
  • Ravelingien, A., Provoost, V., & Pennings, G. (2016). Creating a family through connection websites and events: Ethical and social issues. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 33, 522–528.
  • Riggs, D. W., & Russell, L. (2010). Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation. Human Reproduction, 26, 266–272.
  • Riggs, D. W., & Scholz, B. (2011). The value and meaning attached to genetic relatedness among Australian sperm donors. New Genetics and Society, 30(1), 41–58.
  • Starks, H., & Brown Trinidad, S. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372–1380.
  • Steinberg, D. (2010). Altruism in medicine: Its definition, nature, and dilemmas. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19, 249–257.
  • van den Broeck, U., Vandermeeren, M., Vanderschueren, D., Enzlin, P., Demyttenaere, K., & D’Hooghe, T. (2012). A systematic review of sperm donors: Demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 37–51.
  • Weinberg, R. (2008). The moral complexity of sperm donation. Bioethics, 22(3), 166–178.
  • Whyte, S., Savage, D. A., & Torgler, B. (2017). Online sperm donors: The impact of family, friends, personality and risk perception on behaviour. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 35(6), 723–732.
  • Woestenburg, N. O., Winter, H. B., & Janssens, P. M. (2015). What motivates men to offer sperm donation via the internet? Psychology, Health & Medicine, 21, 424–430.
  • Yee, S. (2009). Gift without a price tag: Altruism in anonymous semen donation. Human Reproduction, 24, 3–13.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.